PDA

View Full Version : Interracial relationships



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Jon Snow
03-09-2012, 04:29 PM
And the way to solve that is not through miscegenation laws (which doesn't address the immigrant birthrates) but through forceful repatriation.

Having a homogenous society is the highest ideal, I agree. Why not both?


Much of this would mitigate itself if whites marrying other whites had more children, however. Thus, even as the mixed population were growing, the native European-derived white population wouldn't necessarily be shrinking if this were the case.

Yes, they are treated poorly....this is true, and not a good thing at all. :(

Whites also have certainly spent time dishing out their own share of maltreatment to other disenfranchised minorities in the past....also not a good thing.:(

There must come a point when people stop playing the revenge game. This is the cycle of violence that continually spirals out of control and the game of intergenerational violence and revenge continues:(

I understand. Like you, I have no wish to see us as a people obliterated.

Agreed on all counts.

The irony of multiculturalism is that most racism, oppression, interracial violence, et cetera, would be completely non-existent if people simply lived separately. Peace, prosperity, and preservation of diversity. That's what I want.

The Lawspeaker
03-09-2012, 04:33 PM
Having a homogenous society is the highest ideal, I agree. Why not both?

Having a homogeneous society where the government knows it's place will do for me. A government that even invades the bedroom, lectures with who one should have children and does not respect the parents when it comes to the upbringing of their children should be violently deposed as it is a gateway drug to tyranny.

Having a multi-ethnic tyrannical state or a homogeneous tyrannical state is exactly the same in my book: death to both. That is my sincere belief.

Aramis
03-09-2012, 05:38 PM
No.

I wouldn't mind this particular law per se, as I have no physical attraction for members of other races, thus it wouldn't affect my life much.
It would open a window for similar legislation though, and I'm not prone to the idea of a state interfering in my private sphere. Today it's marriage, tomorrow household and private property. Last time eastern Europeans found themselfs living under these conditions, we called it communism. No thanks.

Rather use laws to hinder the influx of new immigrants or change citizenship requirements. :)

mihaitzateo
03-09-2012, 05:42 PM
:rofl: Mazel tov, idiotic gypsy Romanian! Your people came from India! :thumbs up

Well according to these 2 Y DNA tests not really:
http://www.carswell.com.au/wp-content/documents/homogenous-balkan-analysis.pdf
http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=981561349&dok_var=d1&dok_ext=pdf&filename=981561349.pdf
(think most M170 from first doccument is mostly some I2 branches).
Associated with rroma/gypsies is haplogrup H on paternal line.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_H_%28Y-DNA%29


Sorry for generalizations I made earlyer,not all anglo-saxons are with these things with forbiding the marriage between races,not all people from England are suporting fanatic zionists,same not all people from USA are not supporting fanatic zionists.

You do not think there was holocaust of native americans from North America,because of the racist mode of the thinking?
Maybe some monuments should be built there and native american jews should be sent to visit them,to not forget and not do that again?Because maybe their ancestors were part at that also.
I do not know,I was wondering.

You can see here the states from US where laws banning interracial marriage were existing and when those laws were abrogated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interracial_marriage_in_the_United_States

Odoacer
03-09-2012, 06:14 PM
Well according to these 2 Y DNA tests not really

Of course not, I wasn't being serious.


Sorry for generalizations I made earlyer,not all anglo-saxons are with these things with forbiding the marriage between races,not all people from England are suporting fanatic zionists,same not all people from USA are not supporting fanatic zionists.

I don't see what's so terribly "Jewish" about prohibiting interracial marriage. Do you think race-mixing is a positive thing? Personally I'd rather that anti-miscegenation laws had remained in place in the U.S., but I'm not sure that it's worth expending any effort today to bring them back.


You do not think there was holocaust of native americans from North America,because of the racist mode of the thinking?
Maybe some monuments should be built there and native american jews should be sent to visit them,to not forget and not do that again?Because maybe their ancestors were part at that also.
I do not know,I was wondering.

No, there wasn't a "Holocaust" of the Indians in North America. There was no truly systematic effort to exterminate them all. Most of them - up to 90% - died from the spread of Old World diseases. Here's a balanced article that gives a good overview of what happened: Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide? (http://hnn.us/articles/7302.html) It concludes:


In the end, the sad fate of America's Indians represents not a crime but a tragedy, involving an irreconcilable collision of cultures and values. Despite the efforts of well-meaning people in both camps, there existed no good solution to this clash. The Indians were not prepared to give up the nomadic life of the hunter for the sedentary life of the farmer. The new Americans, convinced of their cultural and racial superiority, were unwilling to grant the original inhabitants of the continent the vast preserve of land required by the Indians’ way of life. The consequence was a conflict in which there were few heroes, but which was far from a simple tale of hapless victims and merciless aggressors. To fling the charge of genocide at an entire society serves neither the interests of the Indians nor those of history.

Mosov
03-09-2012, 07:18 PM
Is it considered inter-racial, if the person who is mixed of the two races would fit in among both races?

Padre Organtino
03-09-2012, 07:19 PM
Huh? That's possible only if we're talking about Caucasoid subraces.

Prince Carlo
03-09-2012, 07:32 PM
I am in favor of intra-ethnic marriage. I would never marry a non Campanian woman.

Racial Observer 1814
03-09-2012, 08:22 PM
[QUOTE=bosnian;761530]its not just Michelle Obama,here is south african Charlize Theron during an emotional meeting with Mandela

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040312/w2.jpg

http://im.rediff.com/movies/2004/mar/15poster.jpg


She feels White Guilt, even though the Bantu shouldn't be in South Africa.
She is getting rich because of the Hollywood Jews and they are telling her what to do or she will get called a "racist".
Meanwhile they want her to do casting couches.


Please, she is no victim.



[QUOTE]And here she is with Will Smith.
http://binside.typepad.com/binside_tv/images/2008/06/17/charlize_will_smith.jpg

she is campaigning for Obama.


She sure likes being around them n'est pas?


[QUOTE=Jon Snow;761942]:mmmm:


What is your confusion?

Loddfafner
03-09-2012, 08:34 PM
No. I believe that it is mostly a cultural issue. People are naturally attracted to those most similar to them physically and culturally when it comes to marriage.

I don't think it's too outrageous to imagine a world where people can marry whomever they wish legally but feel it important to marry their own people.

Exactly. Also, the more energy goes into forbidding interracial marriage or even sex, the more it will become desirable. Forbid it, and it will take on the appeal of forbidden fruit.

Jon Snow
03-09-2012, 10:32 PM
What is your confusion?

Claiming that black women are "cuter and more interesting" than their white counterparts is a) beyond strange to me; in fact, I find it slightly disturbing that someone can even think this way, and b) textbook trolling in a forum like this one.

The Lawspeaker
03-09-2012, 10:33 PM
Claiming that black women are "cuter and more interesting" than their white counterparts is a) beyond strange to me; in fact, I find it slightly disturbing that someone can even think this way, and b) textbook trolling in a forum like this one.
Or just a different point of view. "Shrugs".

Jon Snow
03-09-2012, 10:37 PM
Or just a different point of view. "Shrugs".

Women of European descent are bashed daily in the mainstream Western media. Do we really need to replicate that here?

The Lawspeaker
03-09-2012, 10:39 PM
Women of European descent are bashed daily in the mainstream Western media. Do we really need to replicate that here?
Maybe sometimes with some justification and the sense of entitlement under most young ladies (I am using the term ironically) is pretty disturbing. Feminism hasn't done us or them a huge favour. Let's say that a lot of women have forgotten what it is like to be a woman. Thankfully not all of them but the effects of feminism are clearly visible in the latest generations.

AussieScott
03-09-2012, 10:39 PM
Or just a different point of view. "Shrugs".

So trusting...:rolleyes:

The Lawspeaker
03-09-2012, 10:42 PM
So trusting...:rolleyes:
It's better then to go Nazi on someone. I am sorry: I tend to have more respect for the viewpoints of the left then I have for the right because the left at least believes in something. However wrong and misguided - at least they believe in something.

I haven't found the same fire when it comes to the right.. apart from their insane believe in the free market and in institutionalised selfishness.

CelticViking
03-09-2012, 10:55 PM
Claiming that black women are "cuter and more interesting" than their white counterparts is a) beyond strange to me; in fact, I find it slightly disturbing that someone can even think this way, and b) textbook trolling in a forum like this one.

Black Woman don't know the truth about what he says about their people.



LOL! That drawing is HILARIOUS! And if crybaby Black men are so upset about German/European "Racism" against them, here is an idea: STAY THE F--CK out of Germany/Europe! Problem solved.

Stupid, idiot crybabies.



I'm not sure Black woman would agree with him.
But he does like Obama.

Racial Observer 1814
03-09-2012, 11:22 PM
Claiming that black women are "cuter and more interesting" than their white counterparts is a) beyond strange to me;

I don't give a damn how beyond strange it is too you. I prefer Black women over White women. Get over it.



[QUOTE]in fact, I find it slightly disturbing that someone can even think this way, and b) textbook trolling in a forum like this one.


I don't give a damn how slightly disturburbing it is to you. I prefer Black women over White women. Get over it. Also, it is no more disturbing than the fact on on this very same forum, you have a thread where White women are openly gushing over the NON-WHITE ESPECIALLY BLACK men who they find attractive. Why don't you complain about THAT?


[QUOTE=Civis Batavi;762890]Or just a different point of view. "Shrugs".


Thank you.


[QUOTE=Jon Snow;762895]Women of European descent are bashed daily in the mainstream Western media.


Really? Really? I don't know what mainstream Western media you are watching, but in the one I am watching all I see is Women of European descent having their rear ends kissed and their likes/needs/wants, etc catered to.


[QUOTE]Do we really need to replicate that here?


I didn't bash anyone. I simply stated my preference, that is all. That is not bashing.


[QUOTE=Civis Batavi;762896]Maybe sometimes with some justification and the sense of entitlement under most young ladies (I am using the term ironically) is pretty disturbing. Feminism hasn't done us or them a huge favour. Let's say that a lot of women have forgotten what it is like to be a woman. Thankfully not all of them but the effects of feminism are clearly visible in the latest generations.


Once again, thank you.


[QUOTE=AussieScott;762898]So trusting...:rolleyes:


He is correct about me, so there is nothing for you to roll your eyes about.


[QUOTE=CelticViking;762918]Black Woman don't know the truth about what he says about their people.



First of all, I said NOTHING insulting about Black FEMALES, so if you are going to qoute me, get it right. Second of all, the thing I said that about in the first qoute is a RAPIST, what was I supposed to call that scum? A fine, upstanding citizen? Or in your pc "Racialist" views is it taboo to call Black males out on the vile, sick misogynistic garbage they do? Second of all, I am under NO obligation to like or coddle Black males like too many other damn people in the West do just because I prefer Black females. White women who love Black men and Black men who love White women both trash Black women and White men everyday on and off the internet without giving it a second thought nor with anyone taking them to task for it, so why the double standard for me? This on a supposedly "Un PC" forum? Finally, the second qoute of mine was me doing what my name is, making a racial observation about something that I found funny. They laugh at and make fun of European males all the time, so if they dish it out, they need to learn how to take it.




[QUOTE]I'm not sure Black woman would agree with him.


Would White women who love Black men agree with negative things Black men say about us? Would Black men who love White women agree with negative things those women say about Black women? I think we all know the answer.

CelticViking
03-09-2012, 11:31 PM
First of all, I said NOTHING insulting about Black FEMALES, so if you are going to qoute me, get it right. Second of all, the thing I said that about in the first qoute is a RAPIST, what was I supposed to call that scum? A fine, upstanding citizen? Or in your pc "Racialist" views is it taboo to call Black males out on the vile, sick misogynistic garbage they do? Second of all, I am under NO obligation to like or coddle Black males like too many other damn people in the West do just because I prefer Black females. White women who love Black men and Black men who love White women both trash Black women and White men everyday on and off the internet without giving it a second thought, so why the double standard for me? This on a supposedly "Un PC" forum? Would White women who love Black men agree with what Black men say about us? Would Black men who love White women agree with what those women say about Black women?

Black woman wouldn't want their brothers and fathers to be deported.
I don't think you would say White animal or European animal so why say African animal? Black woman wouldn't like that no matter what the crime is.


Would White women who love Black men agree with what Black men say about us?

They would agree or they would get the beat.


Would Black men who love White women agree with what those women say about Black women?[/

No, because that is their mother or sister. The White woman will get a beating.

European Loyalist
03-09-2012, 11:31 PM
It's better then to go Nazi on someone. I am sorry: I tend to have more respect for the viewpoints of the left then I have for the right because the left at least believes in something. However wrong and misguided - at least they believe in something.

That's just idiotic, and not even a valid argument, because conservatism believes in something, and that is the conservation of tradition and gradual positive change. We want to conserve what we have (or had, since it's been desecrated by liberalism) and build on it in a positive and sensible manner.

AussieScott
03-09-2012, 11:32 PM
It's better then to go Nazi on someone. I am sorry: I tend to have more respect for the viewpoints of the left then I have for the right because the left at least believes in something. However wrong and misguided - at least they believe in something.

I haven't found the same fire when it comes to the right.. apart from their insane believe in the free market and in institutionalised selfishness.

So trusting of the political elite and the trolls...The left agrees with neo liberalism just like the neo conservatives of the right do...I judge the political elite by their actions not what they say, they all belong to the same ideological coin at the moment.

Racial Observer 1814
03-09-2012, 11:34 PM
Someone who has different views=troll. That is such a lame, tired philosophy seriously.

The Lawspeaker
03-09-2012, 11:35 PM
So trusting of the political elite and the trolls...The left agrees with neo liberalism just like the neo conservatives of the right do...I judge the political elite by their actions not what they say, they all belong to the same ideological coin at the moment.
Not the real left. The Dutch Socialist Party (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_%28Netherlands%29) here doesn't and neither does the Dutch Communist Party (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Communist_Party_of_the_Netherlands). Remember: we are not American or Australian.

European Loyalist
03-09-2012, 11:41 PM
So trusting of the political elite and the trolls...The left agrees with neo liberalism just like the neo conservatives of the right do...I judge the political elite by their actions not what they say, they all belong to the same ideological coin at the moment.

Exactly. Neoliberalism is not conservatism. I would say that true economic conservatism is actually much more closely related to statism/economic nationalism. The state should do what's in the best interest of it's economy in relation to the rest of the world, period. There is no blind explicit ideology to follow with regards to the international economic sphere.

Inside of the it's domestic economy economic conservatism is simply fiscal responsibility, minimal social justice/redistribution of wealth, and prudent regulation and no more government than is needed.

Racial Observer 1814
03-09-2012, 11:42 PM
[QUOTE=CelticViking;762976]Black woman wouldn't want their brothers and fathers to be deported.


I think dangerous rapists should be dealt with, no matter what their color. I will not back down from that position just because you seem to want me to if the scum doing that is a Black man.


[QUOTE]I don't think you would say White animal or European animal so why say African animal?

Any White man who does the same needs to be beaten, castrated, then strung up. I called him an animal because he is a damn RAPIST. Also, since you are so concerned about supposed racial slurs, are you upset about the not so nice comments made about Black women in the attractive non-European women thread? And in this very thread too?



[QUOTE]Black woman wouldn't like that no matter what the crime is.


That has nothing to do with the issue at hand.




[QUOTE]They would agree or they would get the beat.


No doubt about it.



[QUOTE]No, because that is their mother or sister.


You must not know Black men very well then.



[QUOTE]They White woman get a beating.


You got that right.

CelticViking
03-09-2012, 11:49 PM
[QUOTE]
I think dangerous rapists should be dealt with, no matter what their color. I will not back down from that position just because you want me to if the scum doing that is a Black man. Any White man who does the same needs to be beaten, castrated, then strung up. I called him an animal because he is a damn RAPIST. Also, since you are so concerned about supposed racial slurs, are you upset about the not so nice comments made about Black women in the attractive non-European women thread? And in this very thread too?


Yeah they are all monsters.

But what about this:


Originally Posted by Racial Observer 1814

LOL! That drawing is HILARIOUS! And if crybaby Black men are so upset about German/European "Racism" against them, here is an idea: STAY THE F--CK out of Germany/Europe! Problem solved.

Stupid, idiot crybabies.

That wasn't about rape.
It was about a "Racist Calender"
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,818621,00.html http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43104
Black woman wouldn't like that you find it funny.

CelticViking
03-09-2012, 11:54 PM
[QUOTE]

No doubt about it.
You must not know Black men very well then.
You got that right.

Maori men are the same, they are close enough.
http://www.degringolou.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/close_enough.png
African American have mixed heritage just like Maori.
Multiracial people do more crimes.
And you want more of them.

AussieScott
03-09-2012, 11:55 PM
Not the real left. The Dutch Socialist Party (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_%28Netherlands%29) here doesn't and neither does the Dutch Communist Party (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Communist_Party_of_the_Netherlands). Remember: we are not American or Australian.

Do you have a preferential voting system?

The socialist party and the communist party, where do they sit in the polls or among the elected?

Australia for your information has a communist and socialist party to.

The Lawspeaker
03-09-2012, 11:57 PM
Do you have a preferential voting system?
No.



The socialist party and the communist party, where do they sit in the polls or among the elected?
The communists only in municipalities at a couple of seats and the socialists are at 32,33 seats out of 150 in parliament. The biggest single party in parliament if the elections would be held today. So when this cabinet falls (and it can't be soon enough) I will be throwing tomatoes (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/SP_nl_logo_2006.svg).


Australia for your information has a communist and socialist party to.
Vote for them. Maybe it works.

AussieScott
03-10-2012, 12:03 AM
Black woman wouldn't want their brothers and fathers to be deported.
I don't think you would say White animal or European animal so why say African animal? Black woman wouldn't like that no matter what the crime is.



They would agree or they would get the beat.



No, because that is their mother or sister. The White woman will get a beating.


http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web05/2012/2/12/21/enhanced-buzz-9509-1329100883-23.jpg

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal05/2012/2/12/22/enhanced-buzz-11684-1329102546-74.jpg

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/horrible-reactions-to-chris-brown-at-the-grammys

Some women like to be hit and some men like to hit women...

AussieScott
03-10-2012, 12:07 AM
Someone who has different views=troll. That is such a lame, tired philosophy seriously.

Troll, who worships black women on a pedestal...

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 12:13 AM
[QUOTE=CelticViking;763009]Yeah they are all monsters.



Yes they are.



[QUOTE]But what about this:


I already explained about that. You need to go back and see my response.



[QUOTE]That wasn't about rape.
It was about a "Racist Calender" http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43104


I explained this once, but I will do it again. First of all, there is no law against me finding that drawing funny. In my day, I have heard plenty of Black men laugh at jokes about French/French-descended men, so if they can laugh at that, then I can laugh at jokes about them. Second, they come to the West and get special treatment, and them having the nerve to cry about "Racism" against them inspite of that, and ignoring that MANY of them commit crimes in the West makes me angry, and I have every right to complain about that. If our countries are so "Racist" they can stay home. C'est tres simple. :)



[QUOTE=CelticViking;763018]Maori men are the same, they are close enough.


And what makes you think I like Maori men? :confused:



[QUOTE]http://www.degringolou.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/close_enough.png
African American have mixed heritage just like Maori.
Multiracial people do more crimes.
And you want more of them.


What does the mixed heritage of African-Americans have to do with any of this? Are you racist against multiracial people? I want more of them? What does that mean? Multiracial people already exist, what can I do about it? And for your info, I do not want children. This world is too crazy to bring innocent children into IMHO!

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 12:15 AM
Troll, who worships black women on a pedestal...



Wow, a man so butthurt over my preference. That is very odd.

AussieScott
03-10-2012, 12:18 AM
No.

Not a preferential system? I bet they'll bring one in...



The communists only in municipalities at a couple of seats and the socialists are at 32,33 seats out of 150 in parliament. The biggest single party in parliament if the elections would be held today. So when this cabinet falls (and it can't be soon enough) I will be throwing tomatoes (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/SP_nl_logo_2006.svg).


Interesting. At least they are open.


Vote for them. Maybe it works.

Our Labour party has a left and a right faction, just like the Liberal/National(Conservative coalition) has a left and right. Confusing I know, the left of Labour are the socialists, the left of the Greens party are the watermelons, green on the out side but red in the middle, they are the communists.

People don't vote socialist or communist in Australia so the puritanical parties of this nature never get elected, so they infiltrate the major parties instead.

Mordid
03-10-2012, 12:19 AM
Racial Observer 1814 is nigger in denial

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 12:20 AM
Not a preferential system? I bet they'll bring one in...
It was abandoned in 1917 - and support for bringing it back is so low that it would never happen.



Our Labour party has a left and a right faction, just like the Liberal/National(Conservative coalition) has a left and right. Confusing I know, the left of Labour are the socialists, the left of the Greens party are the watermelons, green on the out side but red in the middle, they are the communists.
That's like Labour and D66 so I know exactly what you mean. And the melon thing goes for GroenLinks - our Greens.


People don't vote socialist or communist in Australia so the puritanical parties of this nature never get elected, so they infiltrate the major parties instead.
Maybe the electorate should just give it a try and see how it pays off.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 12:23 AM
Racial Observer- And what makes you think I like Maori men?

No, I said they are like African men.


Racial Observer- I have heard plenty of Black men laugh at jokes about French/French-descended men, so if they can laugh at that, then I can laugh at jokes about them. Second, they come to the West and get special treatment, and them having the nerve to cry about "Racism" against them inspite of that, and ignoring that MANY of them commit crimes in the West makes me angry, and I have every right to complain about that. If our countries are so "Racist" they can stay home. C'est tres simple

Ofcourse, it is okay they think it is okay to mock the French.
Black woman would still call you racist if you mocked Blacks.



Racial Observer- What does the mixed heritage of African-Americans have to do with any of this? Are you racist against multiracial people? I want more of them? What does that mean? Multiracial people already exist, what can I do about it? And for your info, I do not want children. This world is too crazy to bring innocent children into IMHO!

Racially Incorrect Couples create Mixed children.
"Multiracial youths were 63 percent more violent"
"bone marrow problems"
" Higher bladder cancer in African American"


Racial Observer- Are you racist against multiracial people?

Ofcourse because I am not multiracial.


According to the Oxford English Dictionary the term “racist” was coined by Leon Trotsky in 1930 in an article attacking the Slavophiles.[1]. Leon Trotsky used the term "racism" as early as 1933.[2] Deracination ideology is a major focus of Cultural Marxism. Merriam Webster dates the term 'racism' to 1933 and defines it as such; a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.[3] The term "racialism" from the early Twentieth Century "The two principal planks in the party platform are opposition to all racialism and cooperation with the government." 1907


Anti racist argue often, that racially awakened people "hate" a specific group of people because they are a certain race, and anti-racism means, obviously, not hating any group at all, and instead respecting their ancestry and native culture. This argumentation is hypocritical. Racially awakened people do not hate any other person because he/she is of a certain race, but they want to keep the geographical separation of races, as God created it. Agressivity and tendency to criminality is different between races. Geographic separation of races is necessary for the less aggressive races simply to survive. So called anti-racists hate less agressive races, especially whites, and they wish race mixture everywhere in order, so that less aggressive races die out.
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anti-racism


Troll, who worships black women on a pedestal...

He loves Obama


Racial Observer- Obama? Mr President, I think your wife is beautiful, you must be so proud. Also, I think Condi deserves a place in your administration, finally, I miss Desiree Rogers, she was cool man! Good luck in November.

AussieScott
03-10-2012, 12:46 AM
It was abandoned in 1917 - and support for bringing it back is so low that it would never happen.


That's good thing indeed.


That's like Labour and D66 so I know exactly what you mean. And the melon thing goes for GroenLinks - our Greens.

Yes, it's rather insidious.


Maybe the electorate should just give it a try and see how it pays off.

When "One Nation" was on the up, both the main parties combine to eliminate them via legal and illegal means. It's rigged by the elite at the moment. It's not really a democracy any more. Preferential voting will keep it that way in Australia now...:( Till something else happens.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 01:09 AM
[QUOTE=iMordid;763058]Racial Observer 1814 is nigger in denial


What part of Africa am I from? :)



[QUOTE=CelticViking;763069]No, I said they are like African men.

Well in that case then my views about them will be equal to my views about the African men. I do not like nor respect misogynists.




[QUOTE]Ofcourse, it is okay they think it is okay to mock the French.


Then it is okay for me to mock them.



[QUOTE]Black woman would still call you racist if you mocked Blacks.


Viking, having my preference is not an easy one like for European men who like East Asian women. I have had my whole life to deal with this, so I can handle it. :)



[QUOTE]Racially Incorrect Couples create Mixed children.


Okay, and I can do what exactly about this? :confused:



[QUOTE]"Multiracial youths were 63 percent more violent"


That does not change the considerable crime stats of unmixed Blacks.



[QUOTE]"bone marrow problems"


Hopefully something can be done about this with modern medicine.


[QUOTE]"Higher bladder cancer in African American"


What does this have to do with anything? :confused: Every race has illnesses that are more common for them.



[QUOTE]Ofcourse because I am not multiracial.


So it is wrong for me to not like Black men, but it is okay for you to not like multiracial people? That is an unfair double-standard.



[QUOTE]http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anti-racism


Anti-racism is mostly a phony fraud IMHO.




[QUOTE]He loves Obama


I think he is a cool guy yes, so that proves I am no racist. :)

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 01:15 AM
"Multiracial youths were 63 percent more violent"
"bone marrow problems"
" Higher bladder cancer in African American"

All true, good points, but i think the most genuine reason why mixed marriages or relationships are bad (which lead to multiracial kids) is because there is no love involved. If you look up mixed marriage statistics, 70% of them end in divorce. Secondly they usually always involve domestic violence. Who the hell would want to raise a half-breed kid in that environment? And then ontop of that he/she will be suffering a racial identity crisis.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 01:20 AM
I don't give a damn how beyond strange it is too you. I prefer Black women over White women. Get over it.

I don't give a damn how slightly disturburbing it is to you. I prefer Black women over White women. Get over it.

Can you explain what attracts you to black woman? Beauty polls put their features at the bottom. I mean are you really into afro's and wide noses?

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 01:22 AM
Can you explain what attracts you to black woman? Beauty polls put their features at the bottom. I mean are you really into afro's and wide noses?
He probably means mixed. Some of those can be very beautiful.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 01:29 AM
Okay, and I can do what exactly about this? :confused:
That does not change the considerable crime stats of unmixed Blacks.
Hopefully something can be done about this with modern medicine.
What does this have to do with anything? :confused: Every race has illnesses that are more common for them.
So it is wrong for me to not like Black men, but it is okay for you to not like multiracial people? That is an unfair double-standard.


I don't likes Blacks or multiracial people.
What can you you do?
Stop posting "African woman are hot" on a European preservation sites would be a good start :coffee:. Medicine can't cure the mixed race children.


Consistently multiracial youth show, in almost all behavior problems—alcohol, smoking, marijuana, fighting—more problems than other children.”



Multiracial youths were 63 percent more likely than white respondents to have been in a fight and 65 percent more likely to have threatened to stab someone. African American students, who held even with multiracial respondents for some violent behaviors, were 39 percent less likely to have hurt someone badly and 46 percent less likely to have carried a gun.



Higher rates of mental illness in migrant groups have been proposed as evidence of racism within psychiatry, they write. Yet rates of psychiatric disorder are high for all migrants, irrespective of ethnicity. This suggests an explanation that is not ethnic specific and is environmental rather than genetic.



A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains.


Shannon died Monday afternoon at Cohen Children's Medical Center in New Hyde Park, on Long Island, of acute myelogenous leukemia, a common type of leukemia among adults, but rare among children.


Shannon, who played the young lion Nala, had received an umbilical-cord blood transplant in August. The procedure was performed as an alternative to a bone marrow transplant. Her doctor, Dr. Larry Wolfe, said that a perfect bone marrow match for Shannon could not be found.

The search for a match was especially daunting because Shannon's mother is African-American and her father is Hispanic, from the Dominican Republic. For bone marrow transplants, minorities and those of mixed ancestry have a more difficult time finding good matches because there aren't as many people from those groups signed up as potential donors.


USA Today: Multiracial patients have tough battle to find marrow matches

The hopes of his parents, both doctors in San Jose, Calif., immediately turned to a bone marrow transplant, but they soon learned some distressing news — Luke's ethnic heritage made him a tough match.

[...]

Sarah Gaskins, Luke's mother, has Japanese and European ancestors and his father, Lam Do, is Vietnamese-American. Because bone marrow matches usually are made with a relative or someone with the same racial or ethnic background as the patient, multiracial people rarely have success.

"It's tragic," said Lam Do, who specializes in internal medicine. "Your chance of finding a donor is so low, it's like winning the lottery. And most people are unaware of this."



When she was diagnosed with leukemia, her doctor said she would probably not survive without a transplant from a donor with matching bone marrow. The marrow of her two sisters and her parents was incompatible, and of the 1.9 million people registered with the National Blood Donor Program, not one had marrow to match hers. When a marrow donor could not be found, doctors performed an umbilical-cord blood transplant March 22.

One obstacle to finding a matching donor was her mixed ethnic background. Her father is black, with West Indian and Panamanian roots. Her mother is white, with Russian-Jewish roots. In addition, only 5 percent of registered donors are black.

Her illness is called acute myeloid leukemia or acute myelogenous leukemia and is relatively rare in children. Its annual toll in the United States is 600 cases and 300 deaths. Dr. Stephen Feig, the head of pediatric oncology at the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, said that type accounted for 10 to 15 percent of all childhood leukemia.


Mr Winddancer believes that Mr Serbin's vendetta against him is 'racist'.
He said: 'It's racism. What else would you call it? I'm not Indian enough for Sal? Then it's an issue of race.'


Obama has also written and talked about using alcohol, marijuana and cocaine during his teenage years to "push questions of who I was out of my mind."


Rihanna
On being bullied at school for being too 'white': “I was a little confused as a kid because I grew up with my mum, and my mum is black. So I was cultured in a very ‘black’ way. But when I go to school, I’m getting called ‘white’. They would look at me and would curse me out.








I think he is a cool guy yes, so that proves I am no racist. :)

Cool for a Marxist that loves Dog Killing NFL players.


You are encouraging Racially Incorrect couples, other people will read what you say and copy you. You might not want children but they might. And their children will have problems. You are really great for European preservation :rolleyes:

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 01:33 AM
He probably means mixed. Some of those can be very beautiful.

Well, we should ask him to post a picture of what he finds attractive to clarrify. And yea, he will probably come back posting pictures of mixed-race women with a large dose of white genes.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 01:35 AM
[QUOTE=Pyramidologist;763140]Can you explain what attracts you to black woman?


See we are dudes, lets start with the physical:

Faces: They have a really interesting look. I know it is different, but I like it.

Hair: It is unique and sexy, and they can do so many cool things with it.

Bodies: Curves that just don't stop! Most of them have very feminine bodies that are truly a treat for the eyes.

Now onto the non-physical:

Personalities: In the face of so much discriminationin general and disdain from their own men, Black women have had to be very resourceful to survive. I like and admire that.

Sass: One word, SEXY! :):)

Quick tongues: Watching/listening to Black women unleash those nuclear-powered cutting down to size skills that ONLY they have on some deserving subject is truly a thing of beauty to behold!



[QUOTE]Beauty polls put their features at the bottom.


Those polls mean nothing to me.



[QUOTE]I mean are you really into afro's and wide noses?

I think you can guess the answer after reading the above, lol. Afros are an especially hot look for them. That's why I really love looking at Black shows/films from the 1970s when the Afro was really popular.


[QUOTE=Civis Batavi;763141]He probably means mixed. Some of those can be very beautiful.


No my friend, I do not just mean the mixed ones. While The Alicia Keys, Mariah Carey's and the Beyonce's are indeed very lovely, I also mean pure, umixed oned straight from Africa or the West Indies. :):)

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 01:36 AM
No my friend, I do not just mean the mixed ones. While The Alicia Keys, Mariah Carey's and the Beyonce's are indeed very lovely, I also mean pure, umixed oned straight from Africa or the West Indies. :):)
My friend. I can perfectly understand if you'd like the mixed ones but... :D

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 01:45 AM
No my friend, I do not just mean the mixed ones. While The Alicia Keys, Mariah Carey's and the Beyonce's are indeed very lovely, I also mean pure, umixed oned straight from Africa or the West Indies. :):)

Most of the famous woman are mixed or have plastic surgery like Tyra Banks.
I typed in Zulu woman but most of the pictures were nude because they
are still primitive. Here is a Zulu for you:


http://img2.photographersdirect.com/img/12366/wm/pd2496216.jpg

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 01:48 AM
[QUOTE=CelticViking;763147]I don't likes Blacks


You mean just Black FEMALES right? :rolleyes:


[QUOTE]or multiracial people.

You are free to not like whatever racial group you choose, and so am I.


[QUOTE]Stop posting "African woman are hot" on a European preservation sites would be a good start


Celtic, with all due respect, I did not see that posting that on here is against the rules. There are men on here who openly talk about their attraction to East Asian women and other non-White women, so how come you are not telling them to stop that? There is also a thread on here for women to talk about what non-White men they are attracted to. Do you have a problem with that?




[QUOTE]:coffee:. Medicine can't cure the mixed race children.


IMHO, mixed-race children are not a disease that needs to be "Cured".



[QUOTE]Cool for a Marxist that loves Dog Killing NFL players.


Nobody's perfect. I hate Vick if that is any consolation.



[QUOTE]You are encouraging Racially Incorrect couples,


No I am not. I just talked about my preference is all.



[QUOTE]other people will read what you say and copy you.



Now stop it. Most Black women are not attracted to European men, and most European men are not attracted to Black women. And I am just one guy on the internet. Nobody is going to copy little old me. :)




[QUOTE]You might not want children but they might. And their children will have problems. You are really great for European preservation


People who want kids are going to want to have kids no matter what I say or do. And some of those people will be in relationships with someone of a different race. C'est la vie, and such couples are not the majority. Monoracial children have potential for problems too, and I do not support wholsale, state-sponsored interracial mixing programs like what the Spanish did in the Americas when they were a colonial power silly. :rolleyes:

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 01:53 AM
See we are dudes, lets start with the physical:

Faces: They have a really interesting look. I know it is different, but I like it.

Hair: It is unique and sexy, and they can do so many cool things with it.

Bodies: Curves that just don't stop! Most of them have very feminine bodies that are truly a treat for the eyes.

Negroids lack sexual dimorphism, its why black males look like black females, especially in the face. Negroid faces are robust, rugged, and the least symmetrical, which is why universally they are considered the least attractive.

Black females do not look feminine. Curves? They don't have it. They have larger buttocks, but this is not an attractive feature, its a primitive feature of apes. Most female apes ''booty shake'' to attract their mate, exactly the same activity black woman do. Its a lowly feature of the primates.

Several studies have found wider hips, narrower waists in women of European descent than in other women (Hrdlicka, 1898; Meredith & Spurgeon, 1980; Nelson & Nelson, 1986). This accentuation is noticeable even before birth: Euro-American fetuses are sexually more dimorphic than African-American fetuses (Choi & Trotter, 1970).

Please compare black woman (top) with white woman (bottom)-

http://www.femininebeauty.info/images/jaw.projection.1.jpg

Anyone claiming black woman are more attractive than white are lieing. I'm not interested in what people personally believe, i look at the scientific data which is conclusive. Blacks are the least sexually dimorphic, and least attractive.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 01:57 AM
Well, we should ask him to post a picture of what he finds attractive to clarrify. And yea, he will probably come back posting pictures of mixed-race women with a large dose of white genes.



http://ayannanahmias.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/nigerian-gele-4.jpg


http://cache.jezebel.com/assets/images/39/2010/05/haiti351710.jpg


Straight off the boat unmixed! :):)

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 01:59 AM
My friend. I can perfectly understand if you'd like the mixed ones but... :D



Hey no problem. I do not try to force my preference on anyone else. Different strokes right? :thumb001:

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 02:05 AM
Most of the famous woman are mixed or have plastic surgery like Tyra Banks.
I typed in Zulu woman but most of the pictures were nude because they
are still primitive. Here is a Zulu for you:


http://img2.photographersdirect.com/img/12366/wm/pd2496216.jpg



She is cute, thanks Viking! :):)

And the reason most of the famous ones are mixed is because Black men want it that way. There are many Haitien and African women in my city, and many of them are beautiful, and they are NOT mixed. I see them EVERY day. I also travel often to the states, to the big cities like NYC, Detroit, Philly, DC, etc. All of those cities have large Black populations, and I have seen the same thing. Same when I went to big cities (Paris, Rome, Marseille, London) in Europe.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 02:14 AM
FEMALES[/B] right? :rolleyes:


All of them: Africans, Abo and Dravadians.
They can all get their own land and leave us alone.
We have helped most of them evolve, now they can use the skills we taught them.But people like you still want them around so you can breed with them. You've got this idea that primitive people right out of the jungle are hot.


There are men on here who openly talk about their attraction to East Asian women and other non-White women, so how come you are not telling them to stop that? There is also a thread on here for women to talk about what non-White men they are attracted to. Do you have a problem with that?


It isn't about gender and those men like infantile woman. They are not helping with European preservation too. This thread is about European preservation and posting pictures of Racially Incorrect Couples so that we don't wastle our money on them. It is not about who you think is hot. The beautiful Non European woman is for that kind of talk about primitive and infantile woman.You say are aren't against European preservation or racism, but you are Pro Interracial relationships. You love Obama and so does Rhiannon. Obama has not helped with preservation. These types of relationships destroy Human Diversity.

FyHYbsXt05k

rdJ5vAWVIFQ

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 02:17 AM
[QUOTE=Pyramidologist;763177]Negroids lack sexual dimorphism,


Comment? :confused:




[QUOTE]its why black males look like black females, especially in the face.


You cannot be serious. :rolleyes:



[QUOTE]Negroid faces are robust, rugged, and the least symmetrical,


Not to me.



[QUOTE]which is why universally they are considered the least attractive.[Q


I do not give a damn about universally. I know what I consider attractive, and that is good enough for me. :)



[QUOTE]Black females do not look feminine.


I think you need your eyes checked.



[QUOTE]Curves? They don't have it.


Once again, you cannot be serious.



[QUOTE]They have larger buttocks,


Mmmmmm, they sure do! :):)



[QUOTE]but this is not an attractive feature,


To me it is.



[QUOTE]its a primitive feature of apes. Most female apes ''booty shake'' to attract their mate, exactly the same activity black woman do. Its a lowly feature of the primates.


This is not even worth a reply. :rolleyes:


[QUOTE]Several studies have found wider hips, narrower waists in women of European descent than in other women (Hrdlicka, 1898; Meredith & Spurgeon, 1980; Nelson & Nelson, 1986). This accentuation is noticeable even before birth: Euro-American fetuses are sexually more dimorphic than African-American fetuses (Choi & Trotter, 1970).


Whatever dude. You like what you like, and I like what I like.


[QUOTE]Please compare black woman (top) with white woman (bottom)-

http://www.femininebeauty.info/images/jaw.projection.1.jpg


Finding photos of not so attractive non-White women and comparing them to photos of the White female models. How original. :rolleyes::rolleyes:



[QUOTE]Anyone claiming black woman are more attractive than white are lieing.


I am not a liar, and I do not care if you think I am. I think Black women are more attractive than White, period. Deal with it. You will NOT change my preference.



[QUOTE]I'm not interested in what people personally believe, i look at the scientific data which is conclusive.


And I'm not interested in fake, biased studies with agendas. Nor do I need "Scientific data" to tell me what women I should be attracted to.




[QUOTE]Blacks are the least sexually dimorphic, and least attractive.


I still prefer Black women. :)

Joe McCarthy
03-10-2012, 02:27 AM
Exactly. Also, the more energy goes into forbidding interracial marriage or even sex, the more it will become desirable. Forbid it, and it will take on the appeal of forbidden fruit.

Then why did we have far fewer interracial couples with anti-miscegenation laws?

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 02:28 AM
As I am the Biggest Racist on Apricity™, my vote is naturally YES.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 02:29 AM
Not to me.





Do you like these?

http://www.etonline.com/media/photo/2011/04/23877687/prince_albert_ii_nicole_valerie_coste_640_f.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xHdqWGaSPFs/R5D5g9tqWUI/AAAAAAAAAag/GF0u09eLnnk/s400/ferdinandandmaryvonhabsburg.jpg

http://static1.purepeople.com/articles/9/96/51/9/@/800854-carl-alexander-prince-de-hohenzollern-637x0-2.jpg

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 02:30 AM
And the way to solve that is not through miscegenation laws (which doesn't address the immigrant birthrates) but through forceful repatriation.

And taboos.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 02:32 AM
Finding photos of not so attractive non-White women and comparing them to photos of the White female models. How original. :rolleyes::rolleyes:


I'm glad you think me and my friends look like models than :thumbs up

Joe McCarthy
03-10-2012, 02:33 AM
No.

I wouldn't mind this particular law per se, as I have no physical attraction for members of other races, thus it wouldn't affect my life much.
It would open a window for similar legislation though, and I'm not prone to the idea of a state interfering in my private sphere. Today it's marriage, tomorrow household and private property. Last time eastern Europeans found themselfs living under these conditions, we called it communism. No thanks.

Rather use laws to hinder the influx of new immigrants or change citizenship requirements. :)

Americans actually had more property rights in the era of anti-miscegenation laws than we do today.

And what are 'these conditions'? Eastern Europeans have never had anti-miscegenation laws, certainly under Communism. Quite the contrary as the Soviet Union tried to stamp out and criminalize racial prejudice.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 02:36 AM
Do you like these?

http://www.etonline.com/media/photo/2011/04/23877687/prince_albert_ii_nicole_valerie_coste_640_f.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xHdqWGaSPFs/R5D5g9tqWUI/AAAAAAAAAag/GF0u09eLnnk/s400/ferdinandandmaryvonhabsburg.jpg

http://static1.purepeople.com/articles/9/96/51/9/@/800854-carl-alexander-prince-de-hohenzollern-637x0-2.jpg


The first and third ones yes, the second one is not my type.



[QUOTE=CelticViking;763240]I'm glad you think me and my friends look like models than :thumbs up


You guys let folks post your photos online? :eek: That's a no-no!

Thunor
03-10-2012, 02:37 AM
This article (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/why-black-women-are-less-physically-attractive-tha) is proof enough that there is a scientific consensus that negroid females are less attractive than white women. People have known for ages that negroes are closer to apes than any other race, and are less attractive than non-negroes on average. Negrophilia, like that of Racial Observer, is a fetish and not the sexual norm.

Poor countries tend to export women as mail-order brides, but how many white men want to buy mail-order negresses from Africa? That's right, almost none.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 02:39 AM
All of them: Africans, Abo and Dravadians.
They can all get their own land and leave us alone.
We have helped most of them evolve, now they can use the skills we taught them.But people like you still want them around so you can breed with them. You've got this idea that primitive people right out of the jungle are hot.

Australian Aborigines are not ''Black'', nor are Dravidians. You are lumping completely distinct, seperate races into this silly ''Black'' tag.

Dravidians are not primitive, they have an IQ of 85. Lower than European, but nonetheless far higher than the Negroid (70). Australian aborigines are primitive with low IQ, yes, but they remarkably friendly, unlike Negroes.

Jeeze, there are too many pseudo-anthropologists on this forum who think if someone has dark skin they are suddenly ''Black''?:coffee:

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 02:45 AM
No.

Thunor
03-10-2012, 02:46 AM
Australian aborigines are primitive with low IQ, yes, but they remarkably friendly, unlike Negroes.
I've never heard of these "remarkably friendly" Australoids. Everything I heard from my Aussie friends about these people was very negative, and reminiscent of the black ghetto-dwellers over here. This is a race that only invented the boomerang in 40, 000 years.


Jeeze, there are too many pseudo-anthropologists on this forum who think if someone has dark skin they are suddenly ''Black''?:coffee:
"Black" is a pretty good description of darker-skinned races as a whole. "Negroid", on the other word, means Sub-Saharan Africans in specific.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 02:49 AM
Australian Aborigines are not ''Black'', nor are Dravidians. You are lumping completely distinct, seperate races into this silly ''Black'' tag.Dravidians are not primitive, they have an IQ of 85. Lower than European, but nonetheless far higher than the Negroid (70). Australian aborigines are primitive with low IQ, yes, but they remarkably friendly, unlike Negroes.Jeeze, there are too many pseudo-anthropologists on this forum who think if someone has dark skin they are suddenly ''Black''?:coffee:

Australian Abo are not friendly WTF.
By primitive, I mean the way they look.
I still included them as being connected to Africans.



17 Oct 2003 – But critics have attacked the gesture for overlooking racist statements attributed to Gandhi, which suggest he viewed black people as lazy
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/oct/17/southafrica.india

Australia-India Comparison
http://ferrarini.tripod.com/AUSTRALIA-INDIA/



Veddas or Veddahs (Sinhala වැද්දා [ˈvædːaː], Tamil "வெட்ட"), are an indigenous people of Sri Lanka, an island in the Indian Ocean. They amongst other self identified native communities such as Coast Veddas and Anuradhapura Veddas are accorded indigenous status. From as early as 18,000 BCE a genetic continuum is shown with present-day Veddas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedda_people


According to this model of classification, Australoid peoples ranged throughout Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, New Guinea, Melanesia, and India. In the mid-twentieth century an argument emerged that Australoids were linked to proto-Caucasoids.

In the out of Africa theory, the ancestors of the Australoids, the Proto-Australoids are thought to have been the first branch off from the Proto-Capoids to migrate from Africa about 60,000 BCE, migrating along the now submerged continental shelf of the northern shore of the Indian Ocean and reaching Australia about 50,000 BCE.

Huxley's original model included populations in India. Some scholars still use the term Australoid to denote the small populations, mainly of some of the Adivasi and the Andamanese people in India and the Veddas in Sri Lanka. The American Journal of Physical Anthropology (1996, p. 382) by American Association of Physical Anthropologists. L. L. (Luigi Luca) Cavalli-Sforza, Paolo Menozzi and Alberto Piazza in their text, The History and Geography of Human Genes (1994, P. 241) both use the term.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australoid_race


MALID

Veddid subvariety of the southern Indian inlands, showing Negritid admixture
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/gloss2.htm



VEDDID (Dravidian (Deniker and others); Indo-Aboriginal; Weddid (German sp.))

Southeastern Asian racial type, considered a member of the greater "Australoid" group, however the relation to Australids is uncertain and provisional, and may be nothing but a shared retention of the generalized Pleistocene human morphology. Veddids are small-statured, gracile and stocky (pyknomorphic). The head is moderately low, and the face is roundish and euryprosopic and often characterized by strongly developed browridges. The nose is moderately broad, short and snub, with extended alae, and the mouth is "childlike", bending down at the corners. The skin tone varies between medium and very dark brown, the hair is wavy and black, and the eyes are brown. Veddids are most common in the forest mountains of India and the park jungles of Sri Lanka (the Gondid and Malid, incl. transitional Indo-Melanid and Melanid varieties); they constitute an important element in the population of the Indian Subcontinent. Their eastward distribution from India is characterized by a sliding transition to Paleo-Mongolids.
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/gloss2.htm


ABORIGINAL Australians are descended from the first people to leave Africa up to 75,000 years ago, a genetic study has found.
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/aborigines-linked-to-first-african-nomads/story-e6frg13u-1226144453373

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 02:52 AM
My father and grand father encouraged my heritage to me, though that was not all. They did show a healthy dislike to other races in general to. At the time being young(Teenager) and my liberal egalitarian education I use to think they were racist and in fact use to tell them so to their faces. They would just ignore my opinion nor reprimand me for it and told me I was free to think what ever I wanted.

There racist attitude I have to concede were correct, it was built upon life experience which I also lived and found to be truth and my teachers were wrong, with their political opinions and beliefs.

Unfortunately one of the horrible things that happened to the West in the 1960s was that kids were told to ignore their elders and listen to the left-wing radicals instead for moral values.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 02:52 AM
And taboos.
You do such stuff in your country then where white guys behave like black guys and run off after having made a girl pregnant and still call her a whore. :)

The government's powers end in the street.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 02:54 AM
Dravidians are not primitive, they have an IQ of 85. Lower than European, but nonetheless far higher than the Negroid (70). Australian aborigines are primitive with low IQ, yes, but they remarkably friendly, unlike Negroes.

Average black African IQ I've seen is in the 85 category as well, which is also not uncommon across South Asia. There are more components than just IQ of course, though it's a big indicator of national success in general.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 03:06 AM
This article (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/why-black-women-are-less-physically-attractive-tha) is proof enough that there is a scientific consensus that negroid females are less attractive than white women. People have known for ages that negroes are closer to apes than any other race, and are less attractive than non-negroes on average. Negrophilia, like that of Racial Observer, is a fetish and not the sexual norm.

Poor countries tend to export women as mail-order brides, but how many white men want to buy mail-order negresses from Africa? That's right, almost none.



Someone could turn that around and point out how White women go after Black men much more than Black women come after us. :)


Oh, and Celtic, I don't "Love" Obama, I just think he is a good guy. The only Obama I love is Michelle!

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 03:08 AM
i say no.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 03:09 AM
First they to determine who you should marry, then they take your children, then your property. I say no to all sorts of totalitarianism.. and to all those Americans that are so in favour of it: you don't even what the fuck totalitarianism is. Many Europeans know what it is - because they themselves, or their parents or their grandparents faced it in one way or the other and the legacy of it all can still be seen all over the place.

Laws that give government sweeping powers to even enter the household and the bedroom are an absolute no no.

I don't need a GESTAPO, KGB or STASI with paid informants, microphones in my bloody clock and camera's hidden in bloody trees in my country. Not now.. not ever.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:15 AM
First they to determine who you should marry, then they take your children, then your property.

Thank you, pastor Niemoeller.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 03:16 AM
Thank you, pastor Niemoeller.
He was more then right in that one. Unlike you: he was a Christian.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 03:22 AM
First they to determine who you should marry, then they take your children, then your property. I say no to all sorts of totalitarianism.. and to all those Americans that are so in favour of it: you don't even what the fuck totalitarianism is. Many Europeans know what it is - because they themselves, or their parents or their grandparents faced it in one way or the other and the legacy of it all can still be seen all over the place.

Laws that give government sweeping powers to even enter the household and the bedroom are an absolute no no.


I understand Totalitarianism has had negative reactions throughout Europe, but liberalism has not done us much better. In actuality is might seem to work better, but there are some flaws and gaps in this socio-political/socio-cultural approach to matters. I think that they should be allowed to say who is allowed to marry, because they are preserving a greater common, which transcends the individual and state in a purely ethnic bond.


I think people need to sacrifice themselves to the commands of the state, so that they use their freedom individuals in an appropriate manner. If the state does not intervene on some essential and basic problems, then how do you expect people to take any responsibility for themselves. The tone needs to be set by the laws and the socio-political construct in place.


The great problem with democracy in part is that this socio-political construct reflects of the majorities of the public's opinions. A lot of the public's opinions are ill informed, ignorant, and uncertain as to what they want. I think people would desire to preserve their biological homogeneity, but the political correctness infringes upon their fundamental desires.



We need a state run in a meritocratic where the people have as little say in what is enacted. All that is enacted will be on the basis of people who are qualified and informed as to how use their intellect to mediate on moral concerns in the context of society.


I don't necessarily think that enacting a law against race-mixing would necessitate constructing a totalitarian/absolutist state, but could be a collective effort between the Volk(Commoner) and the Public elite in office. It might come about that the feelings of race-consciousness, which lie deep in the subconscious of the Volk, will be invoked if the politicians enacted laws protecting people from mixing with each other.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 03:24 AM
I understand Totalitarianism has had negative reactions throughout Europe, but liberalism has not done us much better. In actuality is might seem to work better, but there are some flaws and gaps in this socio-political/socio-cultural approach to matters. I think that they should be allowed to say who is allowed to marry, because they are preserving a greater common, which transcends the individual and state in a purely ethnic bond.


I think people need to sacrifice themselves to the commands of the state, so that they use their freedom individuals in an appropriate manner. If the state does not intervene on some essential and basic problems, then how do you expect people to take any responsibility for themselves. The tone needs to be set by the laws and the socio-political construct in place.


The great problem with democracy in part is that this socio-political construct reflects of the majorities of the public's opinions. A lot of the public's opinions are ill informed, ignorant, and uncertain as to what they want. I think people would desire to preserve their biological homogeneity, but the political correctness infringes upon their fundamental desires.



We need a state run in a meritocratic where the people have as little say in what is enacted. All that is enacted will be on the basis of people who are qualified and informed as to how use their intellect to mediate on moral concerns in the context of society.


I don't necessarily think that enacting a law against race-mixing would necessitate constructing a totalitarian/absolutist state, but could be a collective effort between the Volk(Commoner) and the Public elite in office. It might come about that the feelings of race-consciousness, which lie deep in the subconscious of the Volk, will be invoked if the politicians enacted laws protecting people from mixing with each other.
That's because you're not European. You wouldn't even know it is, Geistfaust. And romantic notions of a Great Fuehrer don't work here.

zack
03-10-2012, 03:25 AM
It depends on how far you are going to take this law. I'm not a believer in the 1 drop rule,so i would not like the government telling me i can't marry this nice looking white girl because she is say 10% amerindian,or marry this hot redhead that is 2-5% negroid from over two centuries ago.

I can't be assured that such a law would not come back to bite me in the ass either.... :(

AussieScott
03-10-2012, 03:28 AM
Australian Aborigines are not ''Black'', nor are Dravidians. You are lumping completely distinct, seperate races into this silly ''Black'' tag.

Dravidians are not primitive, they have an IQ of 85. Lower than European, but nonetheless far higher than the Negroid (70). Australian aborigines are primitive with low IQ, yes, but they remarkably friendly, unlike Negroes.

Jeeze, there are too many pseudo-anthropologists on this forum who think if someone has dark skin they are suddenly ''Black''?:coffee:

I see you have had very little experience with Aboriginal culture then.

Mary
03-10-2012, 03:29 AM
That's because you're not European. You wouldn't even know it is, Geistfaust. And romantic notions of a Great Fuehrer don't work here.

Europeans are naturally inclined towards totalitarian societies. This is because White people are authoritarian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality

http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 03:31 AM
Europeans are naturally inclined towards totalitarian societies. This is because White people are authoritarian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality

http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm
You're not even from here, troll.

Mercury
03-10-2012, 03:32 AM
WFY2kJ96jNY

Mercury
03-10-2012, 03:35 AM
Europeans are naturally inclined towards totalitarian societies. This is because White people are authoritarian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality

http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm


Europeans have been the least authoritarian people in history. We're the ones that invented concepts like Democracy, Republicanism, Democratic-Republics (like we have here in the US), magna carta, etc.. Compare European civilizations to the God-King cults that ruled Egypt or Han China's long line of nutty dictators.

Mary
03-10-2012, 03:35 AM
You're not even from here, troll.

I'm still right. Look at a) the research and b) European history. Any White European who opposes totalitarianism must be considered racially suspicious or spiritually degenerate.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:38 AM
He was more then right in that one. Unlike you: he was a Christian.

I'm not a fan of totalitarianism myself, but let's be honest: Christianity did not outlaw ANY form of government. It didn't even outlaw slavery. I don't think you can get more totalitarian than the Old Testament.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 03:38 AM
That's because you're not European. You wouldn't even know it is, Geistfaust. And romantic notions of a Great Fuehrer don't work here.



Yes, I know, but I never said that it can be that way or that it accords with reality in the context of European's socio-political framework. I just merely stated that this is the way it ought to be, and it is my idealized approach to things, even though it most likely can't and won't be able to be enacted. You don't need to constantly enforce this imagery that I am not of a European mentality or culture, because I understand this.


A subtle and silent Totalitarian regime will set itself up regardless if whether the socio-political structure avoids this type of government. All things incline towards regression and decline in terms of culture and politics, and this invokes feelings and instincts to control this regression and decline with Totalitarian approaches.


If people don't want to accept a Totalitarian/Absolutist ruler to protect themselves from themselves then they will only have new Totalitarian/Absolutist forces arise to subsidize their well being. Liberalism and a greater degree of freedom is sometimes a facade and illusion, which the public elites use to make it seem like a Totalitarian rule is not in effect when theoretically its always inclining towards it.


Civilization is synonomous with decline as Otto Spengler said, and the only way to deal with this constant decline is to repress and suppress the forces and freedoms of mankind. The Public elites can only do this by constructing new freedoms and forces, which are nothing but petty, cheap, and superficial replacements and substitutes. Stirner speaks of this from a perspective coming with the Totalitarian state of Prussia.


He said that governments and socio-political governments will constantly be trying to find ways to socialize and subdize peoples by giving them a false of sense of freedom through government initiations. It seems the only the way to construct a system where laws can be enacted against race-mixing would be in Calvinist like and de-centralized communities.


In these communities people would make contracts and pacts with each other to submit themselves to a collective good, but if the collective good does not align with their individual conscience then they not agree to it. I think it sounds like a libertarian tribalism where everyone agrees to disagree, and all that is collective good is what the individual consciously determines as agreeable.


That said I think a tribalistic and Calvinistic like socio-political structure would be the only possible way for a race-conscious society could exist where race laws would could be constructed. That is people would enter into a community on the conditions that they agreed to outlaw certain things like race-mixing, and to create an environment which supported a strong race-consciousness. This sounds Utopian to me as well, but probably a more viable and safer route to take then to enact race-laws in a totalitarian government structure.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:39 AM
It depends on how far you are going to take this law. I'm not a believer in the 1 drop rule,so i would not like the government telling me i can't marry this nice looking white girl because she is say 10% amerindian,or marry this hot redhead that is 2-5% negroid from over two centuries ago.

I can't be assured that such a law would not come back to bite me in the ass either.... :(

Very few people are.

Mary
03-10-2012, 03:41 AM
Europeans have been the least authoritarian people in history. We're the ones that invented concepts like Democracy, Republicanism, Democratic-Republics (like we have here in the US), magna carta, etc.. Compare European civilizations to the God-King cults that ruled Egypt or Han China's long line of nutty dictators.

Anglos invented Republicanism. They are a separate case.

If you study the main European groups:

* Germanics have the Fuhrer concept.

* Latins have the Caesar.

* East Europeans have the Despot.

I can't talk about Egypt or China since I'm not familiar with them. But if you look at Europe, most countries were functional monarchies, with absolutist rulers, less than 100 years ago. That makes the current trend of democracy a historical exception.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:46 AM
I see you have had very little experience with Aboriginal culture then.

I think I told you this story, but I used to know a guy from Australia who said that Abos take houses given them by the government and cut them up for firewood. They also like to sleep on pavement due to the heat absorption, then they get hit by cars.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 03:49 AM
Europeans are naturally inclined towards totalitarian societies. This is because White people are authoritarian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality

http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm



That said some of the greatest accomplishments and the worst horrors were achieved when the white man learned to find more of a two-sided balanced in terms of socio-political structures. British Constitutionalism worked extremely well, but a lot of this had to do with their position and geography, which isolated them from other countries. To employ a democratic/constitutionalist structure in places like Germany and Russia would have been political suicide.


In France a short shift to a more constitutionalist/democratic socio-political system was put in place, but only worked for a short term and the methods that were used to implement were extremely violent and destructive. The ironic thing is that France would return to more Totalitarian/Authoritarian rulers under Napolean I, Charles X, and Napolean III.


A good example of what negativity occurs when Europeans decided to enact a democratic/constitutionalist socio-political structure was in Poland. Its just hard to keep up with competition and power forces and their ambitions when you orient yourself on too constitutionalist/democratic of a socio-political basis.


That said the thematic structure, format, and dynamics of the socio-political and socio-cultural structures in the West have changed, but the underlying structures still incline towards a Totalitarianism, and this will never be changed. They will be merely repressed and suppressed by the more balanced and constitutionalist socio-political culture we live in these days, where liberalism and freedom exist to a great extent.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 03:50 AM
* Latins have the Caesar.



but before they had republic with senators and athenites had form of democracy.

zack
03-10-2012, 03:51 AM
Average black African IQ I've seen is in the 85 category as well, which is also not uncommon across South Asia. There are more components than just IQ of course, though it's a big indicator of national success in general.

Afircan american IQ is 85,but blacks in Africa still score 70.

Mary
03-10-2012, 03:56 AM
but before they had republic with senators and athenites had form of democracy.

Senator status was obviously very restricted. And so was Athenian citizenship. That's very far from what you call democracy today.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 04:03 AM
Senator status was obviously very restricted. And so was Athenian citizenship. That's very far from what you call democracy today.



Democracy today is a sham, which is inspired by the Universal Male Suffrage ideals of the Republican Jacobins. It largely betrays the true meaning of democracy, and replaces it with some cheap and superficial form of democracy. If anything today's democracy is going to open the door to a new form of totalitarianism, and this can be seen with the Jews implementation of global hegemony and monarchy through a Plutocracy.


Its unfortunate that people don't see this, and are blinded by their false sensibilities that democracy equates freedom, and monarchy/totalitarism necessarily equates slavery. Democracy just sets itself up for a silent and subtle totalitarian rule, through which many powerful forces are attempting to take absolute control over things.


All it will take is an economic crisis, socio-cultural crisis, or massive war to have our political systems to return to a more directly Totalitarian structure. Its amazing to see how terribly the poision of some French revolutionaries have infected the socio-political structures of the Anglo-West, and I think the Jews have something to do with this.

Joe McCarthy
03-10-2012, 04:04 AM
First they to determine who you should marry, then they take your children, then your property. I say no to all sorts of totalitarianism.. and to all those Americans that are so in favour of it: you don't even what the fuck totalitarianism is. Many Europeans know what it is - because they themselves, or their parents or their grandparents faced it in one way or the other and the legacy of it all can still be seen all over the place.

Laws that give government sweeping powers to even enter the household and the bedroom are an absolute no no.

I don't need a GESTAPO, KGB or STASI with paid informants, microphones in my bloody clock and camera's hidden in bloody trees in my country. Not now.. not ever.

This is a ridiculous post. America has never been even a remotely totalitarian state, and the ban on interracial marriage was no more 'totalitarian' than the ban on gay marriage. Please don't confuse European brownshirts with Americans.

Thank you.

ethnopluralist
03-10-2012, 04:06 AM
I'm straddling the fence on this one, while I support the practice of endogamy, I know many kids who are the product of mixed marriages. I personally think that wringing your hands over interracial relationships is futile, because most of the world don't have laws restricting interracial relationships. Also, many people are inculcated with the belief that interracial marriages are just like any other relationship, even though they wouldn't partake in one themselves. Instead of agonizing over interracial marriages, I think nationalists should focus their time on stopping the undertow of immigration in their countries, as well as co-opting the institutions of academia and media. It is only by these means that we can directly influence the political process.

Mercury
03-10-2012, 04:09 AM
Senator status was obviously very restricted. And so was Athenian citizenship. That's very far from what you call democracy today.

Just because the Democracies and Republic of thousands of years ago weren't identical to the ones today, doesn't mean they weren't Democracies or Republics. There was plenty of progression from Greece to Rome to the Medieval Ages to the Renaissance. Significant changes in peoples' rights, personal liberty, civil liberties, common law, etc... We kept evolving and enhancing our forms of governance. To clarify, I'm not arguing for the status quo, I would like a more traditional Republic along the lines of what the Founding Fathers established.



Anglos invented Republicanism. They are a separate case.

If you study the main European groups:

* Germanics have the Fuhrer concept.

* Latins have the Caesar.

* East Europeans have the Despot.

I can't talk about Egypt or China since I'm not familiar with them. But if you look at Europe, most countries were functional monarchies, with absolutist rulers, less than 100 years ago. That makes the current trend of democracy a historical exception.

I'm a fan of Monarchs myself, for nations with a Royal Family at least. As long as there are proper checks and balances in place. But you have to admit they did work best in an age where if the Monarchy was fucking you over, some bloke and a few farmers could pick up a musket and start a revolution. We're obviously not on a level playing field as the State anymore and have no physical ways of keeping them in check once they get out of line. The only option we have is to have a government with checks and balances and representation from the people.

Mary
03-10-2012, 04:18 AM
Just because the Democracies and Republic of thousands of years ago weren't identical to the ones today, doesn't mean they weren't Democracies or Republics. There was plenty of progression from Greece to Rome to the Medieval Ages to the Renaissance. Significant changes in peoples' rights, personal liberty, civil liberties, common law, etc... We kept evolving and enhancing our forms of governance. To clarify, I'm not arguing for the status quo, I would like a more traditional Republic along the lines of what the Founding Fathers established.

1) What is the fundamental principle of modern democracy? Equality.

What was the fundamental principle of ancient democracy/republics? Inequality.

As you can see, they are fundamentally different, even though they can appear similar.

2) Anglo Republicanism is a separate case. It has no relevance for the forms of government on the European continent. This also applies to concepts such as individual rights, property rights, limited government, etc. They are all Anglo concepts.


I'm a fan of Monarchs myself, as long as there are proper checks and balances in place. But you have to admit they did work best in an age where if the Monarchy was fucking you over, some bloke and a few farmers could pick up a musket and start a revolution. We're obviously not on the same playing field as the State anymore and have no physical ways of keeping them in check once they get out of line. The only option we have is to have a government with checks and balances and representation from the people.

Then you assume that the government and the people are opposite parties. Why not see the government and the state as the embodiment of the people's will? That is the European way.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 04:23 AM
1) What is the fundamental principle of modern democracy? Equality.

What was the fundamental principle of ancient democracy/republics? Inequality.

.

There was inequality in ancient democracy/republic just like was 100 years ago or now for somebody who is only "permanent resident" (not criticing just giving example) but the principle was always the same: and the modern democracy could be established because of these ancient principles.

Mary
03-10-2012, 04:28 AM
There was inequality in ancient democracy/republic just like was 100 years ago or now for somebody who is only "permanent resident" (not criticing just giving example) but the principle was always the same: and the modern democracy could be established because of these ancient principles.

They are different things.

In Bourgeois democracy anyone can become a peer by a) acquiring property or b) acquiring citizenship. This is egalitarian - "by merit".

In ancient democracy, only those who are born into a certain class of people can be part of the decision making process. This is elitist - "by birth".

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 04:30 AM
They are different things.

In Bourgeois democracy anyone can become a peer by a) acquiring property or b) acquiring citizenship. This is egalitarian - "by merit".

In ancient democracy, only those who are born into a certain class of people can be part of the decision making process. This is elitist - "by birth".

yet the roman citizenship was open to foreigners and freed slaves.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 04:31 AM
This is a ridiculous post. America has never been even a remotely totalitarian state, and the ban on interracial marriage was no more 'totalitarian' than the ban on gay marriage. Please don't confuse European brownshirts with Americans.

Thank you.
Americans do not have a democratic history with women and most men only getting the vote relatively late. And let's not even talk about the blacks and the minorities.

Mary
03-10-2012, 04:33 AM
yet the roman citizenship was open to foreigners and freed slaves.

In its final, decadent stage, yes.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 04:34 AM
There was inequality in ancient democracy/republic just like was 100 years ago or now for somebody who is only "permanent resident" (not criticing just giving example) but the principle was always the same: and the modern democracy could be established because of these ancient principles.


Democracy of the earlier and more ancient peoples was more authentic and true. It was based on the schemework that some men are born into nature as masters and others as slaves. Inequality is the nature of nature, and its only right that this natural hierarchy of being reflects and resonates on the socio-political and socio-cultural structures.

Modern democracy has negated all necessity for a meritocratic system in order to achieve certain posts, and thus you have a lot of unqualified and unprofessional folks filling in the bureaucratic posts. We live on a shanty system, which is constituted up of individuals with a poor concept or organization and communication.


The current type of democracy depends on the ignorance and blindness of the masses through material goods and consumerism. This is all how they self-alienate the individual from the actual nature of the socio-political processes in the government.


The people should not be seen as the sum whole of politics and government, but the state should be seen as the sum whole of the people's will. It should be seen as the source of the people's freedom and possibilities in society, and all individuals should be willing to serve it in order to progress their own individual self-interest in accord with the common good.


The current system is theoretically and in structure a democracy, but in actuality its a cold and totalitarian system, which has done a good job at alienating the masses through materialism, consumerism, and media propaganda.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 04:44 AM
Democracy of the earlier and more ancient peoples was more authentic and true. It was based on the schemework that some men are born into nature as masters and others as slaves. Inequality is the nature of nature, and its only right that this natural hierarchy of being reflects and resonates on the socio-political and socio-cultural structures.


You wouldnt say that if you were considered to be the slave. There was a hypothesis that someone would think about the best system first only if he were to reborn into his system but didnt know what he will be born as.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 04:46 AM
In its final, decadent stage, yes.

no from the beginning.

Once free, they faced few barriers, beyond normal social snobbery, to participating in Roman society. The principle that a person could become a citizen by law rather than birth was enshrined in Roman mythology; when Romulus defeated the Sabines in battle, he promised the war captives that in Rome they could become citizens


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_citizenship

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 04:47 AM
You wouldnt say that if you were considered to be the slave. There was a hypothesis that someone would think about the best system first only if he were to reborn into his system but didnt know what he will be born as.



The slave has no right, and must be subjugated to the system at place. This is the cruel and unforgiving nature of nature, and we can not excuse its nastiness.

We can only formulate a process to deal what it has to spew out to us. Some people can only be used merely as a petty and trifle tools for lower class jobs.

Others seem bred to rule, but of course all this should be proven on the basis on the meritocratic system where theoretical and practical application are necessary to prove oneself.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 04:51 AM
no from the beginning.

Once free, they faced few barriers, beyond normal social snobbery, to participating in Roman society. The principle that a person could become a citizen by law rather than birth was enshrined in Roman mythology; when Romulus defeated the Sabines in battle, he promised the war captives that in Rome they could become citizens


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_citizenship



This is referring to the local cities that centered around Rome, and which shared a similar biological and cultural heritage with it. Rome started to collapse when it started to invite other foreign peoples into it. Then Christianity would come along and put more of an emphasis on the peasants, immigrants, and foreigners as having a higher place over Rome.


This kind of propaganda led to the downfall of the great and majestical Rome, but a lot of this was brought about by Rome itself. That said the situation with Rome in its later years in terms of the immigration which brought about its defeat sounds similar to what is going on in the West.


It also seems to be a historical process, which has occured in other cultures, and it has generally led to the expulsion and extinction of those people or a hybridization of them with other peoples.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 04:53 AM
This is referring to the local cities that centered around Rome, and which shared a similar biological and cultural heritage with it. Rome started to collapse when it started to invite other foreign peoples into it. Then Christianity would come along and put more of an emphasis on the peasants, immigrants, and foreigners as having a higher place over Rome.

Thats the racial theory why rome collapsed because of racial foreigners etc.
there are other explanations as well, for me the most reasonable is the peoples migration within europe pushed by asiatic invaders which caused the downfall of rome.

Zephyr
03-10-2012, 04:58 AM
Just looking for a show of hands here. basically. If there is a thread on this subject already that I've overlooked please forgive me.

A society that needs racial laws, does not trust its own members regarding marriage and sex. Invading the intimate life of an individual at that point will result in social unrest.

How could such laws be enforced?

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 04:58 AM
Thats the racial theory why rome collapsed because of racial foreigners etc.
there are other explanations as well, for me the most reasonable is the peoples migration within europe pushed by asiatic invaders which caused the downfall of rome.



The Asiatic invaders came in much later when Rome was in great decline. A lot of the Roman downfall was because it over expanded its boundaries, and thus invited other peoples by default into their Empire.


This is the problem with civilizing barbarians, because they will eventually take you over and overcome your socio-political structures and infilitrate them. Also a series of internal conflict, and extreme forms of corruption from the years of Tacticus the historian caused a great deal of problems.


I would say Rome's fall was a combination of Rome's corruption coupled with the results and consequences of being corrupt, which was the immigration of foreign peoples into their boundaries.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 05:11 AM
Oh, and Celtic, I don't "Love" Obama, I just think he is a good guy. The only Obama I love is Michelle!

You like Marxist Black woman, cool story bro..............


http://www.thedailygouge.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/angry-michelle-obama-jpg.jpeg

Joe McCarthy
03-10-2012, 05:11 AM
Americans do not have a democratic history with women and most men only getting the vote relatively late. And let's not even talk about the blacks and the minorities.

Don't make me laugh. The American Revolution, as Thomas Carlyle said, launched the age of democratic revolution including the French Revolution. It is due to our influence that Europe is no longer dominated by autocrats. If we don't epitomize democracy, who does?

European Loyalist
03-10-2012, 05:14 AM
Don't make me laugh. The American Revolution, as Thomas Carlyle said, launched the age of democratic revolution including the French Revolution. It is due to our influence that Europe is no longer dominated by autocrats. If we don't epitomize democracy, who does?

The "American" revolution was highly foreign (European) influenced however.

European Loyalist
03-10-2012, 05:15 AM
Americans do not have a democratic history with women and most men only getting the vote relatively late. And let's not even talk about the blacks and the minorities.

When did Swiss women get the vote? 1974 or something?

Joe McCarthy
03-10-2012, 05:16 AM
A society that needs racial laws, does not trust its own members regarding marriage and sex. Invading the intimate life of an individual at that point will result in social unrest.

How could such laws be enforced?

We had anti-miscegenation laws for over 300 years with no social unrest. Enforcement was as simple as denying interracial couples a marriage license.

I suppose by enacting such laws we'd be distrusting people just as we'd be distrusting them by making any criminal act illegal.

GeistFaust
03-10-2012, 05:20 AM
A society that needs racial laws, does not trust its own members regarding marriage and sex. Invading the intimate life of an individual at that point will result in social unrest.

How could such laws be enforced?



As I said their are two options in this case, and one is de-centralization, which would be constituted of communities where people enter into it on the basis of agreeing to these racial laws. That said it would be a good question how long these societies would last until the inner tensions led to conflict between different members.


All things incline towards a Totalitarian/Despotic rule, and this would be no different in a more tribal/communal oriented system where people entered into it on a certain basis. A totalitarian enactment of such rules might be possible for a short time if a crisis broke out, but it would be short term, especially given how programmed people are towards liberalism.


I think we would have to slowly and gradually re-educated and indoctrinate the populations in order to enforce and enact these laws. This means that we should have clubs,conventions, and inner movements constructed to deal with this problem, and to employ different people into different aspects of the culture to deal with the issues slowly.


This silent revolution will creep up on people until it becomes actualized, and then people will have this illusion that they live in a similar system as before.


This similarity will be cast by the fact that we used the current framework and system in place now to slowly prepare a future system where enforcing such a law would be made possible and compatible with the will of the people. Afterall enacting such a law would be done in the name of this will, and for its own good.

Zephyr
03-10-2012, 05:35 AM
The Asiatic invaders came in much later when Rome was in great decline. A lot of the Roman downfall was because it over expanded its boundaries, and thus invited other peoples by default into their Empire.


This is the problem with civilizing barbarians, because they will eventually take you over and overcome your socio-political structures and infilitrate them. Also a series of internal conflict, and extreme forms of corruption from the years of Tacticus the historian caused a great deal of problems.


I would say Rome's fall was a combination of Rome's corruption coupled with the results and consequences of being corrupt, which was the immigration of foreign peoples into their boundaries.

But Russia has withstood so far, even being an ethnic cauldron.

I also disagree that Rome was only civilizing barbarians, Rome was mostly destroying opponents to its imperialism. Carthage was a thriving society. The Celtic west was not backwards as Romans claimed. When they arrived here, local cultures were usurped, replaced with the Romanitas which was not necessarily superior. Their priority was always to castrate invaded peoples, to tame and make them sheep.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 05:37 AM
You like Marxist Black woman, cool story bro..............


http://www.thedailygouge.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/angry-michelle-obama-jpg.jpeg



Marxist? Who cares about marxist? I just like Black women. :)

Zephyr
03-10-2012, 06:01 AM
We had anti-miscegenation laws for over 300 years with no social unrest. Enforcement was as simple as denying interracial couples a marriage license.

I suppose by enacting such laws we'd be distrusting people just as we'd be distrusting them by making any criminal act illegal.

I know and am not saying I wouldn't welcome laws like those, but I fail to see how they would be implemented nowadays in this cultural dumpster we live in, flooded with africanism. See super productions like X Factor or American Idol, if you don't sing some shit from Ray Charles or Whitney Houston or at least sing in the afro soul style, you have little chances. Millions are spent to promote complete miscegenation of humankind, I can see thousands of activists of all races taking the streets and destroying everything if all of a sudden marrying a negro was no longer possible. Can you see what I'm saying? We live in a world dominated by inverted nazism.

Defiance
03-10-2012, 06:01 AM
While I find Racial Observer to be rather peculiar indeed, I really don't see the point in aggressively scrutinizing him like this. There's no arguing with taste, after all.:ohwell:

Electronic God-Man
03-10-2012, 06:17 AM
The social aversion to interracial marriage was much stronger in places like 17th century colonial Virginia and Maryland than it is today yet it was still felt laws were needed to ban marriages between whites and blacks. Why do you suppose that was?

This argument verges on the multiculturalist argument that without such laws banning interracial marriage it would take place on a huge scale. The argument runs that if racism was "natural" there wouldn't be any reason to make laws banning interracial sex and marriage.

Now, the answer to your question is that it was needed because any time you have two groups of people living side by side there will inevitably be intermarriage.

I support the idea that countries should maintain homogenous populations, but that this homogenous nature can't be achieved when we have a very heterogenous population to begin with. You don't need interracial bans in homogenous countries. Interracial bans in multiracial countries always result in one or more groups being treated unfairly and unequally in the eyes of the law.

It also breeds tremendous strife. One of the reasons I am interested in multiculturalism and the way our society views race is that we have a long history of political, social and cultural strife attached to our "race problem." Interracial marriage bans only exacerbate our problem. I feel that it would be a very artificial, not to mention half-assed, way of dealing with the problem.


Exactly. Also, the more energy goes into forbidding interracial marriage or even sex, the more it will become desirable. Forbid it, and it will take on the appeal of forbidden fruit.

We're a nation obsessed with race and it's clear that not a few people have had our society's obsession express itself in their sexual fantasies. Just look at our interracial pornography business. It's a huge market. I think that anything that strikes a nerve can often manifest as a sexual fantasy. America's racial obsession definitely strikes a sensitive nerve.

Arsen_
03-10-2012, 06:36 AM
Can you explain what attracts you to black woman? Beauty polls put their features at the bottom. I mean are you really into afro's and wide noses?

Well as they say in Russia: Не бывает некрасивых женщин! Бывает мало водки! :D
(There is no such thing as unattractive women! There is such thing as not enough vodka! :D )

But if seriously then generally I noticed a clear regularity: the more distant peoples from your own type the less attractive for you they actually are.

For example personally for me there are 4 types of women which I can't imagine not only to be loved but even to be considered.

1. Black women type. I don't know why but I am somewhat even afraid to touch black woman. It would demand from me effort to do that. And I am surprised if someone considered them very attractive.

2. Asian women type. When I see an Asian woman I think: well, enough! put your mask off! I'd like to see your real face. And I am also surprised if someone considered them very attractive.

3. Ginger-red type women with continuous freckles. Also I am somewhat afraid to touch.

4. Masculine type Nordic women. Can't imagine them to be loved by anybody.

Nabatea1
03-10-2012, 06:40 AM
3. Ginger-red type women with continuous freckles. Also I am some what afraid to touch.

My paternal grandmother was redhead with freckles and green eyes, and she did well, in fact she did so well that she married a blond dude and had 9 kids altogether 7 were all boys and 3 were girls.:p

Man you killed me with your post I swear you are becoming my favorite poster :cool:

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 06:58 AM
While I find Racial Observer to be rather peculiar indeed, I really don't see the point in aggressively scrutinizing him like this. There's no arguing with taste, after all.:ohwell:



Lol thanks. :thumbs up

zack
03-10-2012, 07:05 AM
Lol thanks. :thumbs up

French negrophilia?

Robertt52
03-10-2012, 07:06 AM
Klum was your typical European high society little spoiled brat child. Don't mean to stereotype you Europeans, we have plenty here as well. What can you expect? She admitted she chose the guy for his skin color. Shallow liberalized brat child. She isn't indicative of most women. Look how their marriage ended, drugs and parties. Now she gets to be the poster child for failed interracial marriages from every racist the world over. Justice served I say.

zack
03-10-2012, 07:46 AM
Depends on what non-white your talking about. I'm fine with castizos and white women getting together.

zack
03-10-2012, 07:57 AM
We're a nation obsessed with race and it's clear that not a few people have had our society's obsession express itself in their sexual fantasies. Just look at our interracial pornography business. It's a huge market. I think that anything that strikes a nerve can often manifest as a sexual fantasy. America's racial obsession definitely strikes a sensitive nerve.

10% of the porn users buying up and watching 90% of the interracial porn. The cuckold phenomenon comes to my mind at the moment.

Although all of this amuses me because interracial porn along with all professional porn is fake,fake moaning,fake cocks,fake jizz,fake tits,bleached anuses,etc.

Outside of Bang Bros and other Hollywood style porn i would bet interracial porn is a small market.

Libertas
03-10-2012, 08:05 AM
Whiggers are cultural traitors.

rhiannon
03-10-2012, 08:27 AM
All of them: Africans, Abo and Dravadians.
They can all get their own land and leave us alone.
We have helped most of them evolve, now they can use the skills we taught them.But people like you still want them around so you can breed with them. You've got this idea that primitive people right out of the jungle are hot.

It isn't about gender and those men like infantile woman. They are not helping with European preservation too. This thread is about European preservation and posting pictures of Racially Incorrect Couples so that we don't wastle our money on them. It is not about who you think is hot. The beautiful Non European woman is for that kind of talk about primitive and infantile woman.You say are aren't against European preservation or racism, but you are Pro Interracial relationships. You love Obama and so does Rhiannon. Obama has not helped with preservation. These types of relationships destroy Human Diversity.


Obama isn't married to a white woman...he's married to a black woman:) Seems that ought send a positive message about the ability of a black man and woman to marry and remain in a loving marriage, while also raising two children in a positive environment. I'm not going to fault the Obamas on the family end of things at all. Compare Obama's behavior in his marriage to Michelle with Gingrich's behavior in his marriage to his last two spouses and you will see who the dirtbag is.....it's not Obama.

I like Obama for reasons that have nothing to do with his status as a biracial man, but that is not relevant to the question of Interracial couples, because he is not married to a white woman.

I suppose, because Obama is biracial himself, one might say he can't ever truly be involved in anything BUT an interracial marriage....because it would be the same whether Obama was married to Michelle, or if he were married to a white woman.

European Loyalist
03-10-2012, 08:39 AM
French negrophilia?

not really. urban quebecois are generally very racially un-aware, especially montreallais. It's a very common site to see racially mixed couples in that city. On a related note the whitest acting black people in the world probably are black montrealers.

rhiannon
03-10-2012, 09:11 AM
Then why did we have far fewer interracial couples with anti-miscegenation laws?

Didn't people who broke these laws often find themselves strung up in some tree somewhere? Or beaten to a bloody pulp?

Breaking miscegenation laws back then often resulted in violence against the lawbreaking couple...which likely would have scared people into submission.

Just my guess.

Joe McCarthy
03-10-2012, 09:33 AM
Didn't people who broke these laws often find themselves strung up in some tree somewhere? Or beaten to a bloody pulp?

Breaking miscegenation laws back then often resulted in violence against the lawbreaking couple...which likely would have scared people into submission.

Just my guess.

As a practical matter it was hard to break the law against interracial marriage as getting a marriage license was simply impossible. But yes, back in those days women who consorted with niggers were presumed to be prostitutes, as they often were, got harassed by the cops, and niggers who dared to go openly with white women in public were in need of track shoes. :D

My point though is that banning interracial marriage isn't going to give us more interracialism, if history is any guide. Prohibition in general works to decrease the frequency of the banned behavior historically, from abortion to alcohol use.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 12:03 PM
You like Marxist Black woman, cool story bro..............


http://www.thedailygouge.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/angry-michelle-obama-jpg.jpeg

Very bestial face. I don't know why people are attracted to such unpleasant features.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 12:13 PM
Obama isn't married to a white woman...he's married to a black woman:)

His father was a Marxist Communist and his mother liked Communism.


" Friends describe her as a "fellow traveler", that is, a communist sympathizer, from her youth, according to a March 27, 2007, Chicago Tribune report" Source: Spengler, Asia Times "The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics - Barack Obama" Source: Tim Jones, Chicago Tribune
His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (her father always wanted a son), was white and just 18 when they met in a Russian class" Source: Sharon Cohen, St Louis Times
http://obamaism.blogspot.co.nz/

http://commieblaster.com/images/site-photos/communist-jerk.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BcgVAryH9dY/Te5YoylTukI/AAAAAAAAAYs/7-F7INPvsgc/s400/barack-obama-communist.jpg

http://commieblaster.com/obama/index.html

Obama and Black Pantha
http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/files/2011/10/nbpp-obama.jpg

http://www.therightscoop.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/obama.jpg

Obama's church was a Black Liberation Theology Church.


14. Obama's Church is Rooted in Liberation Theology which is Rooted in Marxism - " The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology" Source: TUCC Website "Simply put, Liberation Theology is an attempt to interpret Scripture through the plight of the poor. It is largely a humanistic doctrine. It started in South America in the turbulent 1950's when Marxism was making great gains among the poor because of its emphasis on the redistribution of wealth, allowing poor peasants to share in the wealth of the colonial elite and thus upgrade their economic status in life." Source: gotquestions.org
http://obamaism.blogspot.co.nz/

Ron Paul is not Mitt, Gingrich or Obama. Racial Observer wants Obama to win again and I bet you do too. Obama goes to sports games, has lots of parties and supports dog killers.

http://www.politifake.org/image/political/small/1012/obama-praises-michael-vick-put-america-back-to-work-political-poster-1293593918.jpg

http://www.bouviers.net/dogblog/images/michaelvick.jpg

Ron Paul tells the truth and doesn't get support for the Jewish media.
http://edrosenthal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ron-paul-military-373x330.jpg
Doctor Ron did military service but he doesn't want war or the TSA abusing people. Obama lied about war and if he wins there will be more war.
You say you are Liberal well so is Ron Paul.

Racial Observer is posting about how black woman almost everywhere he goes on this site. This site is about European preservation. You have personal connection to race mixers so ofcourse you are agree with him.
Race mixing destroys all preservation not just European. I bet if he meet a Zulu, he would marry one and that destroys African preservation.
We do not need to meet Zulu or go into the Amazon and change native people. The native people that we have already changed can get their own land, the African American could go to live in African like Malcolm X and Marcus Garvey wanted but they won't be able to because people want to lust over them and breed with them. Racial Observer worships Black people And just because someone doesn't want children doesn't mean they should betray their ancestors that have done so much for their own preservation.

rhiannon
03-10-2012, 12:31 PM
His father was a Marxist Communist, his mother liked Communism.

http://obamaism.blogspot.co.nz/


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BcgVAryH9dY/Te5YoylTukI/AAAAAAAAAYs/7-F7INPvsgc/s400/barack-obama-communist.jpg

http://commieblaster.com/obama/index.html

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BcgVAryH9dY/Te5YoylTukI/AAAAAAAAAYs/7-F7INPvsgc/s400/barack-obama-communist.jpg

Ron Paul is not Mitt, Gingrich or Obama. Racial Observer wants Obama to win again and I bet you do too. Obama goes to sports games, has lots of parties and supports dog killers. Ron Paul tells the truth and doesn't get support for the Jewish media.
http://edrosenthal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ron-paul-military-373x330.jpg
Doctor Ron did military service but he doesn't want war or the TSA abusing people. Obama lied about war and if he wins there will be more war.

Racial Observer is posting about how black woman almost everywhere he goes on this site. This site is about European preservation. You have personal connection to race mixers so ofcourse you are agree with him.
Race mixing destroys all preservation not just European. I bet if he meet a Zulu, he would marry one and that destroys African preservation.
We do not need to meet Zulu or go into the Amazon and change native people. The native people that we have already changed can get their own land, the African American could go to live in African like Malcolm X and Marcus Garvey wanted but they won't be able to because people want to lust over them and breed with them. Racial Observer worships Black people And just because someone doesn't want children doesn't mean they should betray their ancestors that have done so much for their own preservation.

CelticViking, let's face one fact: The USA has not ever had any one perfectly moral president that has not turned out to be some kind of puppet for some lobbyist group or other. Obama is no exception, but he is no worse than Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, Reagan, etc.. I tend to vote democratic (seeing as no independent candidate has ever won any election yet) because democratic ideology tends to look out more for the little guy rather than some big fat cat corporation. Democrats tend to favor UHC for all citizens, also....which is another thing that resonates with me.

As for white dudes that like black or other nonwhite women...all the disapproval in the world is not going to change a person's visceral attraction. Honestly, most people don't *set out* to like any one racial or ethnic group over another. Love and attraction cannot be planned like that.

I know most people in here think black women are ugly, for example. I will disagree and say that there are many beautiful black women out there....just as there are many beautiful asian women....and of course, many beautiful white women:) One thing that makes this true is that beauty showcases itself very differently in all these women, and that is kind of a cool thing.

By far and large, most white men and white women stick within their own race. Many black men even stick within their own race as well, as do most black women. Asians probably stick to their own race more than just about everyone, quite frankly.

There is room in our collective future as the human species for every race and culture:) This is what I hope for.....

Lastly, I don't think RacialObserver1814 goes around *promoting* anything. He just happens to feel more attraction for black women, which is somewhat unusual for a white male, but obviously, not unheard of:) You only have to examine the DNA of most of this country's AA population to find out most will have token white ancestry....and usually going back to the days of slavery....when the white male masters kept black female slave concubines

Mind you, I realize you're in New Zealand....so I have no idea what the situation in your country is. I can only speak for my own observations as an American who has spent her 44 years of life living on the West Coast:)

As for my personal connection to race mixers....none of my brothers *set out* to race mix per se. It so happened that the women they fell in love with were either of partially non-European ancestry, or as in the case of my younger brother, Asian ancestry. Both of my older brothers have, however, also had white girlfriends in their past.

I cannot fault my brothers for making their own decisions, and one big reason for why I won't do this is because all three of the women they married (I have three brothers) are truly upstanding, decent, caring, and of high moral character. I like all of them as people, which is the most important thing:)

But yes, and this is something I've said before, it is a little of an odd feeling to realize that none of my brothers were able to find love with a woman of similar ancestral background. It's odd because I am the opposite of them in that I have no physical or emotional attraction to nonwhite males, and would almost go as far to say this goes for men of non CeltoGermanic ancestry as well.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 12:37 PM
not really. urban quebecois are generally very racially un-aware, especially montreallais. It's a very common site to see racially mixed couples in that city. On a related note the whitest acting black people in the world probably are black montrealers.

I can't work it out... shouldn't the Canadian cold keep the Negroes out? Don't they have to take vitamin d pills? I remember reading a goverment statement on this, saying how dark skinned blacks had to take pills if they moved there. Its really not a climate for black people.

In UK, blacks only cluster in England. They complain that Scotland is too cold and wet, which is why the black population of Scotland is not even 1%. If England was the same way as Scotland i would have no problem, but the blacks here in England, especially in the main cities are becoming the majority.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 12:54 PM
CelticViking, let's face one fact: The USA has not ever had any one perfectly moral president that has not turned out to be some kind of puppet for some lobbyist group or other. Obama is no exception, but he is no worse than Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, Reagan, etc.. I tend to vote democratic (seeing as no independent candidate has ever won any election yet) because democratic ideology tends to look out more for the little guy rather than some big fat cat corporatation. Democrats tend to favor UHC for all citizens, also....which is another thing that resonates with me. :)

I do not like any of the modern leaders of your country.
But when a Doctor comes that looks like Gandalf and gets respected by the military and many other people, maybe you should vote for him :coffee:.
All the other people are Israel firsters and get Jew money.
The more jew money they get, the more they have a chance of winning.



As for white dudes that like black or other nonwhite women...all the disapproval in the world is not going to change a person's visceral attraction. Honestly, most people don't *set out* to like any one racial or ethnic group over another. Love and attraction cannot be planned like that.

Abo and Blacks look primitive and have lower IQ and many have depression = easy targets.
East Asians look infantile and be submissive, many of them live in poorer countries. That is not our fault. Men can buy them and they will cook and have sex with the men. = easy targets.


Lastly, I don't think RacialObserver1814 goes around *promoting* anything.

This thread was about posting pictures and he is defending them for being racially Incorrect couples and having children and so are you.
Mixed children have many problems.




You only have to examine the DNA of most of this country's AA population to find out most will have token white ancestry....and usually going back to the days of slavery....when the white males masters kept black female slave concubines


Those men took advantage of the lower Iq in Black people.





Mind you, I realize you're in New Zealand....so I have no idea what the situation in your country is. I can only speak for my own observations as an American who has spent her 44 years of life living on the West Coast:)

The Maori want their own land but other people of other races still want to breed with them. It is this fetish for Natives that has destroyed them.

rhiannon
03-10-2012, 01:02 PM
I do not like any of the modern leaders of your country.
But when a Doctor comes that looks like Gandalf and gets respected by the military and many other people, maybe you should vote for him :coffee:.
All the other people are Israel firsters and get Jew money.
The more jew money they get, the more they have a chance of winning.

Just a quick note for you: While I am not anti-Jew, I am definitely anti-Zionist....thereby making me a Palestinian sympathizer and a person who does not support Israel in its current state whatsoever.

I wish my fucking country would follow suit:mad:

rhiannon
03-10-2012, 01:08 PM
This thread was about posting pictures and he is defending them for being racially Incorrect couples and having children and so are you.
Mixed children have many problems.


True.

*Devils' advocate mode on*

So do many children of monocultural heritage....look up Tay Sachs disease (Ashkenazi Jews), Cystic Fibrosis (Northern Europeans), and Sickle Cell Disease (Blacks and some Mediterraneans).

All of these diseases have higher propensity in showing up when a child is born to two parents of the same culture given by the parentheses.

*Devils' advocate mode off*

I do not apologize for my refusal to categorically condemn a person's most personal decision in life....that is, who a person chooses to love and procreate with. Assuming, of course, the person has made their decision out of love.

But, you are wrong to think that only biracial children are going to be more predisposed to health problems. This is not always the case.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 01:21 PM
I know most people in here think black women are ugly, for example. I will disagree and say that there are many beautiful black women out there....just as there are many beautiful asian women....and of course, many beautiful white women:) One thing that makes this true is that beauty showcases itself very differently in all these women, and that is kind of a cool thing.


Oy8FY7tQ7W4

It is Human Diversity but just because people find something cool, new or beautiful doesn't mean they should want to sleep with them. It not only destroys our preservation but also theres. You keep saying that oh it is only a small group of people. Well guess what, Mexicans were a small number now they are very large number in your country. Queen Elizabeth 1 couldn't deport the small number of blacks in London, now look at England. Look at London with all the Blacks and Muslims. Small numbers can turn into large numbers. The future race is said to be mixed and it will have many problems and there will be lots more crime. The Preservation of their people and our people don't mean hate. It means love and you say you love them but you don't care if they destroy their own preservation by mixing with White people. This site is about European preservation World wide.
These types of relationships destroy Human Diversity and preservation.


Dr. David Duke offers a New Paradigm for Humanity. Read and listen to this amazing statement that will create a revolution in the concept of Human Rights. A recognition of the absolute right of every people to preserve its Human diversity, independence and freedom. The right of every people to preserve its culture, traditions, art forms and characteristics of society. A path to peace and harmonious nations and societies. Why we must resist Globalist destruction of freedom, Globalist forms of economic and financial slavery, and Globalist, Zionist wars. In the power of its reason, love and understanding, this declaration of Human Diversity and Freedom can be the moral engine to saving our European people and the rights of all people on Earth! ( Text Below ) Listen to some of the most powerful words you will every hear!


The Foundation of Human Freedom
By David Duke

I believe that each of us must be committed to the preservation of Human diversity. I cherish not only the value of every form of life in what we call biodiversity, but also in the diversity of Mankind. I believe that every people has the right to preserve their expression of Humanity, its heritage and culture. That every people on earth has the right rule themselves and the right to be free and independent.

Human freedom is the principle that all peoples must be free to be different. Humanity is not one, it is many. Destroying the variety, diversity and freedom of a diverse Humanity is a destruction of Humanity itself. And not recognizing the inborn urge of every people to express their essence in their own forms of art, music, culture, religion, societal structure and government, leads to Human conflict and often to violence and Human suffering on a horrific scale. Much of the world’s conflict is not because peoples and cultures are different, it is that they are not allowed to be different, because Globalists and imperialists seek to expand their empires. They want to control the resources and economy of other nations and real Human diversity, freedom and independence stand in the way of that.


Human Diversity is natural


Human life is expressed in a multitude of diverse peoples created by geographic and social adaption over the course of thousands of years. Whether we celebrate Human diversity as the handiwork of Nature or in a religious sense as the creation of God, we celebrate the rich tapestry of different peoples and cultures across the Earth. We believe that every people and culture has the right to preserve its unique expression of Humanity, that every people has the right to maintain and enrich its unique culture, to nurture its particular expressions of art, music, literature, philosophies, architecture, religion, diet, traditions and values that make every people unique and add beauty and possibility for Mankind. We believe that every people has the right to be politically free and independent, and not be ruled over or exploited by any other people or nation. And we reject the Globalist power that seeks to destroy the independence and freedom of every people and destroy Human diversity.


Every people must have the right to self preservation and freedom


We believe that every free people has the right to live in a harmonious society created in its own image, its own nature and spirit. For example, the people of Tibet have the Human right to live in a society oriented to the heritage, culture and tradition of that nation, as should all peoples. Today the Tibetan people are threatened by massive non-Tibetan immigration forced by an imperial power meant to marginalize the heritage and culture of Tibetan people in their own homeland. The loss of the unique people and culture of Tibet is a horrific loss for them and truly a loss for all of Humanity. What is true for Tibet and the Tibetan people is true for every people on Earth. We believe that the people of Tibet and every nation have the right to defend their borders, and an inherent Human right to preserve its unique ethnic and cultural character, and its freedom and independence.

Nations more similar in their cultural, ethnic, religious and social traditions are obviously far more harmonious that those wracked with internal cultural, ethnic or religious divisions. We also affirm that states with significant ethnic and cultural minorities tend to be more happy, peaceful and cooperative when each group has the freedom to an autonomy that makes each group feel more at home in society. If one looks honestly at the world, he quickly recognizes that the greatest source of civil conflict, hatreds, wars, genocide and other horrific Human rights violations comes from ethnic conflict, often accompanied by religious conflict. And when that happens it is like putting a fuse into dynamite. It is a truism that if you want to reduce ethnic conflict, you must endeavor to give every people the Human right to live and to create society and community in its own values and, that every group respect the right of every other group to do this.

We believe that these endemic conflicts are rooted in supra-national states and globalist denial of the reality of Human diversity and denial of the natural Human desire of people to live in a society reflecting their own heritage, traditions, culture and values. One size does not fit all.

Instead of recognizing this reality, the globalists and empire builders seek to destroy the distinctions of Humanity so they will become more compliant to their control and exploitation. Instead of accepting the reality of Human nature and truly the diversity of all life, including Human life, the globalists continue to promote destructive policies that destroy the harmony of traditional societies and historical character of nations.


Massive immigration of diverse peoples into another people’s living space produces conflict not harmony

We believe that massive forced immigration of non-indigenous people into other people’s lands is almost always against the will of the indigenous people. And this leads to civil repression, conflict, hatreds, violence. One does not have to look much further than the Palestinian Nakba, or the massive immigration into Tibet as examples of this universal truth, but this reality is just as true in Europe and other areas of the world that have undergone massive immigration into it regions and nation states. Look at the riots and mayhem that have befallen traditional harmonious societies that have experienced massive, unwanted immigration. A world of independent cultures is true diversity and freedom. A multicultural state does not contribute to Human diversity. It does not contribute to Human happiness, peace and harmony. It more often than not lessens Human love and Human rights.

Just as in the natural world every life form needs its own living space, and needs the preservation of its own ecosystem to survive and flourish, so it is true for every people of Humanity. Every people needs a living space and eco-cultural system in which it can thrive. Ignoring this reality leads to conflict. Diverse Human peoples and cultures and religions in a limited living space is the greatest single cause of civil war and crimes against Humanity.

United Nations studies show ethnic, cultural and religious conflicts within nations are the primary engines of civil conflict and war which takes an enormous toll in Human suffering, numbering hundreds of millions of dead, injured, and dispossessed Human beings. This urge to diversity has always been in Mankind, and always will be. In fact with the rise of the idea that people have the right to be free, ethnic conflict is increasing as the imperial states created by conquest can no longer repress the desire of diverse people locked within them to be free. And nations whose rulers have established immigration policies ignoring Human differences are increasingly divided and conflicted.


Trying to change the natural urge toward freedom is like screaming against the tide


The global elite in government and media which has a huge stake in trying to regiment the world’s populations, tell us we are all the same and they endeavor to destroy every unique culture and Human expression . They attempt to change Human nature, but history and an increasingly conflicted world show that this is like screaming against the tide. Better to recognize Human nature, and within that context support national and regional freedom that lessons conflict and supports mutual respect.

It is time to teach the new ethic that recognizes the Human right of every people to exist and thrive. However, those who seek their own people’s freedom must understand that these rights must be afforded to every people. And any effort toward this worthy goal must be in the spirit of not destroying the rights of others and to peaceful resolution of the conflicts.

It is far better to recognize these realities and inherent desires of Humanity and avoid future Human conflict, than to try to destroy Human distinctions in pursuit of imperialist empire or globalist regimentation and conformity.


Attempts to control, exploit or harm any people is a crime


We must condemn violence and the harming or destruction of any people. We must adopt a clear Human ethic that attempts to control or exploit any other nation or people is a crime against Humanity. We support Human freedom and we support Human diversity and we support the right of every people to have their own nation or society, but we do not support supremacism, control or repression of any other people. Efforts to control or exploit is a crime against Humanity. As a person of European descent I see that much of the repressive globalism damaging the world originates in mostly European peopled nations that are today called the West. I see that this globalism not only damages and harms the world’s diversity of peoples but that it harms my own people. And I have learned that we must not allow this exploitation of our own heritage and that of the rest of the world.

This is a life-changing lesson that I have learned in my own life. As a very young man I joined a non-violent Klan organization in my community. Like so many young people across the world, I longed to identify with my own people, to defend the heritage that I love and that I believed was threatened. But still as a young man I left the organization because I came to realize I have no moral right to speak about Human rights for my own people unless I embrace the idea of the same Human rights for every people, and further, that we must be committed to securing Human rights, not with war, not with violence, not with Human suppression but the power that we are. Because the vast majority of the earth’s people believe in the way I am speaking right now. I further realized that other peoples have the same the desires for their own people’s heritage and rights that I had for mine. I realized that only in a context of genuine commitment to respect the rights and freedoms of all Humanity, can one morally campaign for your own people’s fundamental rights.


Defending the Diversity of Humanity is a defense of Humanity itself


There is nothing wrong with a people defending their own rights and heritage. In fact defending and preserving the diversity of Humanity is defense of Humanity itself. But, it must come with a genuine concern for the rights and heritage of all. In that context we can move toward peaceful resolutions of social, religious and ethnic conflicts and at the same time preserve our own heritage and the diversity and freedom of Humanity.

Nations that have an overwhelmingly unifying heritage, culture, religious and social tradition have the right to preserve their expression of Humanity and their societal harmony. It is a crime to destroy those values in pursuit of so-called multiculturalism. And if one wants to see where massive immigration of alien peoples, cultures and religions lead, just look to what happened in the war-ravaged now dismembered nation once called Yugoslavia, look to the cultural and ethnic genocide in Tibet, look to the tribal and religious conflicts in many nations of the Mideast. Group differences run deep. Even though the Muslim Qur’an repeatedly teaches Muslim unity, still some extremist elements of Shiites and Sunnis blow up the children of each other in the other’s holy places of worship. Nor did the admonitions of Jesus Christ against violence and for love and reconciliation stop Irish Catholics and Scottish-derived Protestants from a cascade of violence that has lead to the death of countless innocents. Although we understand the historical motives of mass immigration of one people into another people’s lands, we must not continue to repeat those mistakes in the modern world and create more divided and strife-torn communities, regions and nations.


Models of self rule and societal harmony


And just as a majority has the Human right to live in a social fabric in harmony with its history and values, so minorities must be accorded their Human right to have their own communities or regions that reflect their own essence, or helped to migrate to a sovereign region of compatriots. This is Human freedom and this is Human rights on the most fundamental level. Those nations with significant minorities of diverse people should strive toward recognizing their desire for freedom and self expression. Autonomy within nations, such as the German language speaking South Tyrol region of North Italy and the Cantons of Switzerland offer models of how recognition of differences in language, heritage, ethnicity and a liberal degree of autonomy can lead to a more peaceful national fabric. Nation states that seek imperial power through the conquering and subjection of other peoples are now coming apart at the seams because of the inherent will to freedom and identity that grow in suppressed people.

Even European nations divided by slight differences in history, identity, genetics and culture, seek this freedom. The artificially created nation of Czechoslovakia was composed of Czechs and Slovaks held together by 50 years of intense totalitarian physical suppression, propaganda and conditioning. When the communist tyranny collapsed they used their new freedom to create the independent states of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. They did this with mutual respect and not war, and without horrific crimes against Humanity. Contrast that to the artificially created state of Yugoslavia created in name of empire, and then held together under a ruthless authoritarian regime. When Communism fell, people wedded to old ideas of empire tried desperately to hold on to control over vast areas of diverse peoples. As a result, a long war and brutality and massive crimes against Humanity occurred on both sides of the conflict. How much better if all parties in the conflict had embraced the ethic that all people have a right to self rule and self expression in their own regions. Take for example two of the many peoples trapped in the old Yugoslavia, the Serbians and the Croatians. Even though Serbians may have dominated the government of Yugoslavia, to effectively control other peoples such a totalitarian state must suppress the natural differences in people and force a regimentation and conformity. So even the Serbian people lost some of their unique identity as well as the other peoples over whom they ruled. People now warmly embrace the right of Serbians and Croatians to be themselves and rule themselves.


Globalism is a continuation of Yugoslavian totalitarianism on a global scale


Ironically, the Serbians and the Croatians and indeed all of us, face globalist tyrants demanding to control the economy of Serbia and Croatia, their currencies, controlled by New York and London rather than by their own people, and increasingly they are subject to a media controlled by Hollywood and New York rather than the spirit of their own traditional heritage and values. And in the height of insanity, the Globalists are eyeing mass immigration into both Serbia and Croatia of massive numbers of non-European immigrants who are far more fundamentally different than Serbs and Croats. A prescription for future Human conflict.


Respect for the rights of both majorities and minorities


There are many harmonious nations on earth that are overwhelmingly of one primary heritage, with only minor differences among their inhabitants. But, nations corrupted by the globalist power and media elite, and propagandized that Humanity is one and not many go against the people’s will and usher in massive immigration of an alien population. This process is almost always against the democratic will of the nation’s inhabitants as history repeatedly shows. And then as the numbers increase and societal differences and conflicts and discord increase, the globalists resort to the old totalitarian tactics of suppressing free speech, free association, and all kinds of Human liberty, even to the point of forbidding the public displays of the traditional culture of the vast majority. A powerful example is how the American government has now made it illegal to display a Christian Christmas motif on public ground, even in an overwhelmingly Christian cultural nation. America supposedly created by e pluribus unum (out of the many, one) is now dominated by identity and ethnic politics. The most powerful lobby in American politics by far is, for instance, the Jewish Lobby, comprised of an ethnic group of two percent of the American people but driven by ethnic and religious supremacism. Jewish organizations lead the fight in the destruction of Christian Christmas traditions. The political landscape of America is dominated by special interest groups to which every politician must now bow, except of course the European American majority which must silently watch as its cultural traditions, such as Christmas are exterminated. And of course it goes far beyond Christmas. Americans are experiencing increasing identity politics and division such as generated by massive illegal immigration.


The rights of small nations cannot be sacrificed


On the international level it must be recognized as a crime against Humanity for any imperial state to occupy another people’s lands for exploitation of its labor or resources. Where autonomy or independent regions are not possible, a degree of autonomy is certainly possible where significant groups in an area can have community institutions, schools and other structures oriented toward both their needs and their spirit.

It is time to stand for freedom for all peoples. It is time to stand up to Globalist destruction of biodiversity, destruction of Human diversity, destruction of the earth’s indigenous cultures, artistic expressions, lifestyles, traditions and independence.


Zionist Globalism is actually supremacism


The globalists seek the destruction of every unique expression of Humanity. They want to destroy the unique character of your people and every people on the earth. They seek to destroy the Human diversity of the earth so they can more easily rule over all of us, and market the same brands of junk movies, media and music. They want you and all of us to consume the same junk food from a world agribusiness and media that advertises it, that not only destroys the planet’s ecosystems, but destroys your health and the health of hundreds of millions of people spawning epidemics of obesity, heart disease, diabetes and other ills. They want to control the value of the currency in your pocket, and force you and your nation under a corrupt Zionist-controlled global banking system that exploits you and all of us and put whole nations and peoples as slaves in a perpetual debt. They want to put you and all of us under a soulless, Globalist government that takes away your freedom and that of every people and every nation. And these globalists want war, perpetual wars and conflicts in their attempts to expand their power over the earth and over all people. They grow stronger by divide and conquer tactics, and they seek to stamp out Human diversity and seek to regiment all of Humanity to their New World Order all while the New York centered Globalist media supports Israel as a quote “Jewish State”, and supports Zionist control of the International Banks and the Globalist media. So in reality, Zionist-Driven Globalism is actually form of supremacism.


Yes to Freedom, yes to Diversity and Independence


But, my dear friends all over the world, in my homeland of America and that of my brethren in Europe, but among all freedom loving people across the globe, millions of us say no to globalism. We say yes to freedom, yes to Human diversity and independence. We say no to globalist wars such as the Iraq War, the Afghanistan War, the planned war on Iran, horrific wars that are part of the Zionist, Globalist agenda. We say no to the Zionist dominated Globalist media that spout the lies that fuel these wars. We say yes to a free Internet and the freedom of people create their own media, literature, music and art forms. No longer will we drink the toxic poisons of the Globalist elite.

We say no to Globalism, yes to Human freedom, yes to Human diversity, yes to world of peace and prosperity. We say yes to every people’s striving to preserve their way of life, their particular heritage, their particular expression of Humanity. Whether we are Kurds, or Pakistanis, or Iranians or Palestinians. Whether we are Chinese, or Japanese, or Africans or Indians or of European heritage, we say no to globalism. We say yes to Human Freedom and Global Diversity. We say yes to the peoples of our own nations and societies determining our destiny. We say no to the Global corporations and huge imperial powers wiping out Human diversity in pursuit of their ungodly power. We say yes to preserving our heritage and our way of life, yes to our independence and freedom no matter who we are or where we live upon the earth.

We are Humanity. We are many. Because we honor our own heritage and traditions, we honor every heritage and tradition. Because we value our own freedom and independence we value the freedom and independence of every people on Earth. Because we refuse to be economically exploited we pledge not to exploit others. Just as most Europeans now want to preserve their own heritage and cultures, we refuse to support the Globalists who seek to use us to control and exploit other nations around the world. Because we love peace, we refuse to support their Zionist-driven globalist wars.


A New Paradigm of Human Rights


This is a new affirmation of Human rights, a new paradigm. It is the Human freedom movement and it is found wherever there are free people who desire to preserve their heritage and freedom. It is found where people yearn for Human societies allowed to be as naturally diverse as the biodiversity in Nature. The Globalists have global economic, media political and military power. But we represent the true desires of Humanity for freedom. We represent the natural desires of every majority population to want to preserve the character of their nation and people, and every minority population who seeks more freedom and autonomy in their own communities or regions.


Human Diversity, Freedom and Independence


We must resist rule of the Globalists over us with a Global coalition of mutually free peoples. We are rising in every nation. Our Paradigm for Human Freedom and Diversity is growing among people all over the world. The Globalists cannot rule over us without our consent. They cannot defeat us if we rise in defense of Human freedom and diversity, not just for ourselves but as a new principle for all Mankind. Good for all people on this planet. The principles we stand for we hold, for our own people and for every people on the face the Earth. This is the world I am committed to, the Humanity I am committed to, the nation in my own land that I am committed to. I hope you join me in this quest for a new paradigm for Humanity, a new commitment to Human freedom and diversity.

http://www.davidduke.com/

rdJ5vAWVIFQ




True.

*Devils' advocate mode on*

So do many children of monocultural heritage....look up Tay Sachs disease (Ashkenazi Jews), Cystic Fibrosis (Northern Europeans), and Sickle Cell Disease (Blacks and some Mediterraneans).

All of these diseases have higher propensity in showing up when a child is born to two parents of the same culture given by the parentheses.

*Devils' advocate mode off*

I do not apologize for my refusal to categorically condemn a person's most personal decision in life....that is, who a person chooses to love and procreate with. Assuming, of course, the person has made their decision out of love.

But, you are wrong to think that only biracial children are going to be more predisposed to health problems. This is not always the case.



You only need to read about the Maori, they had low iq and have low population = easy targets,and they are mixed with lots of health problems, most drink ,most smoke and they do more crime. This can be about other races too. London is full of mixed race people and so is New York. It might be love, but what about the children they have. That is selfish because the children have problems.


Originally Posted by Excerpt

Black patients with bladder cancer are 35 percent more likely to die of the disease than white patients, according to a new study from the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center. http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/09/21/20290.aspx


USA Today: Multiracial patients have tough battle to find marrow matches

The hopes of his parents, both doctors in San Jose, Calif., immediately turned to a bone marrow transplant, but they soon learned some distressing news — Luke's ethnic heritage made him a tough match.

[...]

Sarah Gaskins, Luke's mother, has Japanese and European ancestors and his father, Lam Do, is Vietnamese-American. Because bone marrow matches usually are made with a relative or someone with the same racial or ethnic background as the patient, multiracial people rarely have success.

"It's tragic," said Lam Do, who specializes in internal medicine. "Your chance of finding a donor is so low, it's like winning the lottery. And most people are unaware of this."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-01-30-mix-marrow_x.htm


For American children, says Yoonsun Choi, assistant professor at the School of Social Service Administration, early adolescence isn’t getting any simpler. Besides the awkwardness and looming angst, there’s this: more and more youth now find themselves navigating the uncertain territory of multiracial heritage. (Even the term is ambiguous; it can refer to having parents of different races or to generations-old diversity.) The multiracial experience frequently corresponds, Choi says, with higher rates of violence and substance use. “Consistently multiracial youth show, in almost all behavior problems—alcohol, smoking, marijuana, fighting—more problems than other children.”

[...]

The differences in violent behavior were even more striking. Multiracial youths were 63 percent more likely than white respondents to have been in a fight and 65 percent more likely to have threatened to stab someone. African American students, who held even with multiracial respondents for some violent behaviors, were 39 percent less likely to have hurt someone badly and 46 percent less likely to have carried a gun.

Choi has yet to decipher all the factors that exacerbate multiracial youths’ “bad outcomes,” but racial discrimination is part of the equation. Kids act out in response to ridicule or ostracism. In junior high and high school, “some [racial] groups are very exclusive. Other children will push you out if you’re a racial combination.” In similar surveys in Hawaii, she notes, multiracial youths did not show more problems than their monoracial classmates. “It’s not even an issue there—so many people come from multiple backgrounds.” In the U.S. at large, interracial marriages account for 4 percent of the total; in Hawaii they account for nearly half.

“However, there is some indication that a strong ethnic identity” with at least one race—a sense of racial or cultural pride, belonging, and confidence—“helps protect kids from these behaviors,” Choi says. But youths must strike a sometimes difficult balance. “This research is just emerging, but it is saying that ethnic identity for multiracial children is unique. They need to endorse every part of who they are, and for children of combinations from conflicting groups”—for instance, black and white or, Choi says, Asian and black—“that will be hard.”
http://magazine.uchicago.edu/0610/investigations/problem.shtml


Students of mixed races report suffering more health problems

CHAPEL HILL -- A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.

"It did not matter what races the students identified with, the risks were higher for all of them if they did not identify with a single race," said Dr. J. Richard Udry, principal author of a paper on the work appearing in the November issue of the American Journal of Public Health.

"Most of the risk items we assessed may be related to stress, and so we believe being of mixed race is a source of stress," Udry said. "From this work, we cannot identify further the sources of that stress. More research is needed to identify those sources and possibly suggest programs that might help biracial adolescents."

Udry is professor of maternal and child health at the UNC School of Public Health, professor of sociology in UNC's College of Arts and Sciences and a fellow at the Carolina Population Center. His co-authors are Dr. Rose Marie Li, formerly of NIH, and Janet Hendrickson-Smith, research associate at the UNC center.

The new findings derive from data compiled as part of the UNC-based National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, the largest and most comprehensive survey of teen-agers ever conducted in the United States.

In the detailed surveys they completed, students could give more than one answer when asked about their race. Those who called themselves biracial tended to be more likely to smoke and drink, Udry said. Overall, older biracial children were more likely to have sex at younger ages, to have access to guns and to have poorer experiences at school such as through suspensions, skipping class and repeating grades.

In characteristics not related to traditional risks, such as grades, vocabulary, family structure and family education, mixed-race adolescents often fell between single-race adolescents, he said. For example, Asians had higher grade-point averages than whites and were more likely to have a college-educated parent, but children with both Asian and white parents had averages between those two peer groups and were more likely to have a parent who attended college than white-only adolescents.

"Quite a few studies attest in some way to the emotional, health and behavioral risk problems of multiracial adolescents," he said. "The most common explanation for the high-risk status is the struggle with identity formation, leading to lack of self-esteem, social isolation and problems of family dynamics in biracial households."

Since some previous studies found no differences between biracial and single-race children, Udry and his colleagues wanted to explore the relative risk of mixed race adolescents with teens of a single race using a large nationally representative sample.

When first reported in 1997, Add Health showed that strong and supportive ties between parents and children helped protect adolescents against risky behaviors, including substance abuse, early sexual activity, pregnancy, emotional distress, suicide and violence.

Feeling connected with one's school and, in some cases, one's religion also helped adolescents avoid some of the pitfalls of youth, the study showed.

"These findings offered the parents of America a blueprint for what worked in protecting their kids from harm," Udry said. "Contrary to common assumptions, Add Health found that parents -- not just peers -- were extremely relevant to their children throughout adolescence," he said.

Parents trying to prevent risky behaviors in children should spend time with teen-agers, talk with them, be available to them, set high standards and send clear messages about what they want their children to do and not do, Udry and his colleagues concluded.
http://www.unc.edu/index.htm

They don't get accepted by their Non European side.

American Indian.

Mr Winddancer believes that Mr Serbin's vendetta against him is 'racist'.
He said: 'It's racism. What else would you call it? I'm not Indian enough for Sal? Then it's an issue of race.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2093432/Youre-cultural-thief-Ten-year-feud-Native-American-fraud-performs-heritage-festivals-sells-traditional-chants-MySpace.html

African American

Rihanna
On being bullied at school for being too 'white': “I was a little confused as a kid because I grew up with my mum, and my mum is black. So I was cultured in a very ‘black’ way. But when I go to school, I’m getting called ‘white’. They would look at me and would curse me out.
http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/18536420.html

Indian

A blonde haired blue-eyed Wellingtonian Indian has caused turmoil in the beauty contest world by winning Miss IndiaNZ - and being accused of not being Indian enough.

The New Zealand Herald said Jacinta Lal, 21, was booed and has been the subject of complaints to organisers from Indian spectators
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/4226833/Indian-girl-not-Indian-enough

Abo

A young Aborigine was ''shocked'' and ''humiliated'' to hear she might not look ''indigenous'' enough for a job promoting the Aboriginal employment initiative GenerationOne, founded by the mining entrepreneur Andrew Forrest.
Tarran Betterridge, 24, a Canberra university student, applied for the post through an ACT company, Epic Promotions, which had been asked to find five people of ''indigenous heritage'' to staff a stall at Westfield in Canberra handing out flyers for GenerationOne.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/news/world-news/4307339/Aboriginal-woman-not-black-enough-for-job

Maori

Selliman says she is Maori and Te Ati Awa.
"Because I'm blonde and I'm fair skinned, I'm not Maori enough, and working for a Maori organisation they felt I should, I suppose, look more Maori," she said.
http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/employee-bullied-not-looking-maori-enough-3856845

This can cause depression and sleeping problems.
Not all of them have a european skin tone but they still don't get accepted by their Non european side. Making them easier targets because of depression. Many Maori woman get drunk and use text language.
There is a lower population but many teenage Maori get pregnaunt.
This happens in America and England too with Black people too.



rhiannon- Just a quick note for you: While I am not anti-Jew, I am definitely anti-Zionist....thereby making me a Palestinian sympathizer and a person who does not support Israel in its current state whatsoever.


There is no point picking sides. Both Arabs and Jews are Semitic.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 01:36 PM
http://www.davidduke.com/

David Duke is an idiot. He claims to be standing up for ''white Christian family values'', but is a sex pest. This is why he has plastic surgery despite being 61, and why his wife divorced him:

''in 1977 David Duke, then married with two children, pursued female sex partners so avidly and so openly that it embarrassed many of his closest colleagues.[15] Metzger, then Duke's state leader in southern California, became livid when Duke showed up for a Ku Klux Klan anti-immigrant "border watch" stunt and immediately started pursuing women''

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke

He also discredits white nationalism with cranky Holocaust denial, and jewish focused conspiracy theories.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 01:40 PM
Afircan american IQ is 85,but blacks in Africa still score 70.

I don't know where that 70 score comes from. Blacks in the US enjoy, last I saw, about a 3-point advantage over Africans. Environmental change isn't going to account for such a large increase in IQ, and I don't think racial admixture would, either, especially on such a large scale.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 01:41 PM
''in 1977 David Duke, then married with two children, pursued female sex partners so avidly and so openly that it embarrassed many of his closest colleagues.[15] Metzger, then Duke's state leader in southern California, became livid when Duke showed up for a Ku Klux Klan anti-immigrant "border watch" stunt and immediately started pursuing women''

And he's rewarded by being alone the rest of his life. If he was/is really that bad, he's got issues between the ears.

Jon Snow
03-10-2012, 01:42 PM
I don't give a damn how beyond strange it is too you. I prefer Black women over White women. Get over it.

I find your inclinations toward bestiality repulsive, as well as running counter to the ethos of this forum and the purpose of this specific thread. Get over it. :)


I don't give a damn how slightly disturburbing it is to you. I prefer Black women over White women. Get over it. Also, it is no more disturbing than the fact on on this very same forum, you have a thread where White women are openly gushing over the NON-WHITE ESPECIALLY BLACK men who they find attractive. Why don't you complain about THAT?

Actually, the Non-European Men to Die For thread started off as a joke; a parody of the Beautiful Non-European Women thread. It's obvious that the majority of the posts there, especially at the start of the thread, are firmly tongue-in-cheek.

The Beautiful Non-European Women thread, on the other hand, is a lot larger and the posts there are more genuine, thanks to idiots like you.

And yes, I have complained in both threads. :)


Really? Really? I don't know what mainstream Western media you are watching, but in the one I am watching all I see is Women of European descent having their rear ends kissed and their likes/needs/wants, etc catered to.

People will see what they want to see, I guess.


I didn't bash anyone. I simply stated my preference, that is all. That is not bashing.

Well, when a sizable percentage of your posts made on a European Preservation Forum contain references to your strange fetish for black women, then forgive me for finding something amiss in the whole process.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 01:43 PM
Just a quick note for you: While I am not anti-Jew, I am definitely anti-Zionist....thereby making me a Palestinian sympathizer and a person who does not support Israel in its current state whatsoever.

I wish my fucking country would follow suit:mad:

Besides being overly aggressive at times, Israel is generally doing nothing wrong. There is nothing wrong with asking people to relocate a few dozen miles so that others can have a sovereign, stable homeland. We should be doing it ourselves.

Padre Organtino
03-10-2012, 01:47 PM
If anything Blacks have more to be proud of than Aussie Abos. At least they have a cool musical culture of sorts and some sports achievements.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 01:48 PM
East Asians look infantile and be submissive, many of them live in poorer countries. That is not our fault. Men can buy them and they will cook and have sex with the men. = easy targets.

I'd wager that white male/Oriental female couples have higher than normal rates of domestic violence. I've come across a few Orientals after bad breakups insisting that their white ex chose them because of perceptions of racial and cultural submissiveness they wanted to take advantage of. One in particular had to get her family to help her keep the guy from following her around and beating the living shit out of her. I'm currently working with one from Thailand that complains her white trash boyfriend does nothing but "walk all over" her.

Criminals in general look for smaller, easier, weaker targets. I don't think it's going to be much different when the same types look for dates.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 01:51 PM
If anything Blacks have more to be proud of than Aussie Abos. At least they have a cool musical culture of sorts and some sports achievements.

I'd actually rather have the blacks purged out of the music industry rather than publishing this kind of degenerate filth -

ruef7aYCEbc

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 01:52 PM
I don't know where that 70 score comes from. Blacks in the US enjoy, last I saw, about a 3-point advantage over Africans. Environmental change isn't going to account for such a large increase in IQ, and I don't think racial admixture would, either, especially on such a large scale.

The 70 statistic comes from most Sub-Saharan African countries. Lynn (1995; 2000, 2006) has full statistics by country.

Black Africans are 70 IQ (borderline mental retard). Most Sub-Saharan Africans cannot even count their fingers, they don't know basic arithmetic. African-Americans score higher, around 85.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_enRW2gU1hjg/TCzGPvfbswI/AAAAAAAABFY/wrG3rhJ1Mlc/s400/race_IQscore.jpg

Why do African-Americans score higher than Black Sub-Saharan Africans?

The answer is because African-Americans on average are 15% White, most Blacks in America have white ancestry though mixing with the slave trade.

Padre Organtino
03-10-2012, 01:54 PM
I'd actually rather have the blacks purged out of the music industry rather than publishing this kind of degenerate filth -

ruef7aYCEbc

Well, I didn't say I'm a fan of modern Black music:D What I meant was that Australian Aborigenes are the most underdeveloped race in the world that hardly qualifies as a human one in my eyes.

mihaitzateo
03-10-2012, 02:00 PM
The fact that inter-racial marriages are not a problem but how you educate people is a problem (in US,the education that afro-americans are given is the problem the fact that too much violence is put in the education there and so on) is shown by Holland which works great as a state,compared with USA and they have plenty of inter-racial marriages.
(if you take what some people are saying they have every 1 in 5 marriages inter-racial).

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 02:06 PM
The Beautiful Non-European Women thread, on the other hand, is a lot larger and the posts there are more genuine, thanks to idiots like you.

That thread is just for single guys to have a quick wank.
I do not think they would all ask non Europeans out.


Actually, the Non-European Men to Die For thread started off as a joke; a parody of the Beautiful Non-European Women thread. It's obvious that the majority of the posts there, especially at the start of the thread, are firmly tongue-in-cheek.


That thread doesn't really get any post anymore lol.



What I meant was that Australian Aborigenes are the most underdeveloped race in the world that hardly qualifies as a human one in my eyes.

They had a low population too and many are now mixed because horny men took advantage of their low iq. They look like this now:

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/01/26/1226254/488173-gillard-shoe-tent-embassy.jpg

http://images.smh.com.au/2012/01/27/2919286/shoe729-420x0.jpg


I'd wager that white male/Oriental female couples have higher than normal rates of domestic violence. I've come across a few Orientals after bad breakups insisting that their white ex chose them because of perceptions of racial and cultural submissiveness they wanted to take advantage of. One in particular had to get her family to help her keep the guy from following her around and beating the living shit out of her. I'm currently working with one from Thailand that complains her white trash boyfriend does nothing but "walk all over" her.

Criminals in general look for smaller, easier, weaker targets. I don't think it's going to be much different when the same types look for dates.


The 70 statistic comes from most Sub-Saharan African countries. Lynn (1995; 2000, 2006) has full statistics by country.

Black Africans are 70 IQ (borderline mental retard). [/B]Most Sub-Saharan Africans cannot even count their fingers, they don't know basic arithmetic. African-Americans score higher, around 85.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_enRW2gU1hjg/TCzGPvfbswI/AAAAAAAABFY/wrG3rhJ1Mlc/s400/race_IQscore.jpg

Why do African-Americans score higher than Black Sub-Saharan Africans?

The answer is because African-Americans on average are 15% White, most Blacks in America have white ancestry though mixing with the slave trade.

Yes both things make them easy targets.

Contra Mundum
03-10-2012, 02:08 PM
I'm personally not that racist, but I do believe for the good of society, that interracial marriages should be outlawed, and since most interracial couples aren't married, we should also ban interracial dating. Deportation and/or segregation would be needed as well.

Mordid
03-10-2012, 02:10 PM
Oh, amerika..

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 02:31 PM
A society that needs racial laws, does not trust its own members regarding marriage and sex. Invading the intimate life of an individual at that point will result in social unrest.

How could such laws be enforced?

But the US didn't have social unrest in the years interracial marriage laws were in force.

Laws are put in place to maintain a cohesive civil society, because without such laws, we'd be drowning in filth and would frankly lose our way. If nothing else, people have a habit of thinking something is okay to and harmless do merely because it is legal without considering the possible consequences.

Laws in and of themselves do not cause social unrest. The only possible way of saying that anti-miscegenation laws cause social unrest is to try to draw a comparison between it and the Iron Curtain. Keep it in mind in the case of the Iron Curtain, it wasn't one law but an entire repressive system encroaching in every facet of everyone's lives.

It's not an accurate comparison and the lack of domestic unrest due to such laws in longterm existence in the US prove in and of itself that such laws do not cause unrest. Actually such laws are beneficial. It means fewer divorces and fewer children with identity-related emotional and behavioral problems.

Also keep in mind that at least here in the US we also had required pre-marriage blood testing. That didn't cause social unrest, either.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 02:34 PM
I'm personally not that racist, but I do believe for the good of society, that interracial marriages should be outlawed, and since most interracial couples aren't married, we should also ban interracial dating. Deportation and/or segregation would be needed as well.

We are still a heavily self-segregated society. The prevailing liberal narrative is that the only reason there is any segregation in the Western world is due to evil white people not inviting the dreck into their communities. Actually, even the new immigrants voluntarily self-segregate into their own enclaves. You can see it in maps of New York City and similar places. Black sections, white sections, Paki sections, and so forth.

Endogamy and self-segregation are the natural order of things. If they weren't, after all, different races and cultures wouldn't even exist.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 02:51 PM
I found something interesting. According to mendelian inheritance its impossible that white race dies out completely even if all whites would mix, in next generations still 100% whites would be born. Fascinating is also that two Mullatos can have a 100% white baby.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Dihybrid_cross.png

Edit: I dont support interracial, just find it interesting.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 03:02 PM
I found something interesting. According to mendelian inheritance its impossible that white race dies out completely even if all whites would mix, in next generations still 100% whites would be born. Fascinating is also that two Mullatos can have a 100% white baby.

Its called atavism. Ever heard of Sandra Laing? Both her parents were White, but she was born with Negroid features. The reason is because her parents, 300 or so years back had a black ancestor - so those Negroid genes resurfaced.

They made a documentary about Sandra Laing. Basically her parents looked like this, but she came out with Negroid features:

http://www.filmeducation.org/skin/imgs/stills/picnic.jpg

And of course this happens vice-versa. Its very rare though.

Electronic God-Man
03-10-2012, 03:07 PM
But the US didn't have social unrest in the years interracial marriage laws were in force.

Laws are put in place to maintain a cohesive civil society, because without such laws, we'd be drowning in filth and would frankly lose our way. If nothing else, people have a habit of thinking something is okay to and harmless do merely because it is legal without considering the possible consequences.

Laws in and of themselves do not cause social unrest. The only possible way of saying that anti-miscegenation laws cause social unrest is to try to draw a comparison between it and the Iron Curtain. Keep it in mind in the case of the Iron Curtain, it wasn't one law but an entire repressive system encroaching in every facet of everyone's lives.

It's not an accurate comparison and the lack of domestic unrest due to such laws in longterm existence in the US prove in and of itself that such laws do not cause unrest. Actually such laws are beneficial. It means fewer divorces and fewer children with identity-related emotional and behavioral problems.

Also keep in mind that at least here in the US we also had required pre-marriage blood testing. That didn't cause social unrest, either.

Personally, I think our multiracial situation has always been a source of conflict. You're going to tell me that the US and the American colonies did not have social unrest at any time before 1968? That's a joke.

Interracial marriage laws of the sort being suggested here would clearly be directed against Blacks and it would let them know loud and clear that they are not wanted and are, in fact, second class citizens, or worse.

Advocating some sort of separatism would probably be easier. Interracial marriage laws at this point in time seem to be historically out of place. We instituted our interracial marriage laws at a time when Blacks were not citizens and then it was held over as a remaining vestige of that time into the 1960's. Interracial marriage laws would be seen as essentially stripping Blacks, and other groups, of their citizenship.

I don't know how or even why someone would advocate a society that is as fundamentally divided as that. I would oppose interracial marriage laws for the same reason I oppose slavery, or state multiculturalism. All breed disunity and division within the society.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 03:07 PM
As for the poll, i would have to say yes. I think it should be banned.

As much as i believe in freedom of association, freedom of choice, speech etcetc somewhere you have to draw the line, as with homosexuality.

Interracialism is not natural, and has negative effects on society.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 03:11 PM
As for the poll, i would have to say yes. I think it should be banned.

As much as i believe in freedom of association, freedom of choice, speech etcetc somewhere you have to draw the line, as with homosexuality.

Interracialism is not natural, and has negative effects on society.

Why is it unnatural? i dont feel unnatural somehow being of partially mixed race.

Edit: im quiete neutral about it, i dont think it should be seen whether as positive nor outlawed. its everyones self determination to choose about his preferences for life partner.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:19 PM
I found something interesting. According to mendelian inheritance its impossible that white race dies out completely even if all whites would mix, in next generations still 100% whites would be born. Fascinating is also that two Mullatos can have a 100% white baby.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Dihybrid_cross.png

Edit: I dont support interracial, just find it interesting.

I don't know where you're getting this from, but it's not accurate. Not all species or types of life reproduce the same. I've never seen two mulattoes produce anything but two mulattoes. Halle Berry's kid is 3/4 white and looks half black. Your dihybrid cross represents only the fur color of two solid colors of cats mixing, which is not comparable to races of humans.

This is from my old college biology textbook:

http://i44.tinypic.com/17crya.png

With 2 mulattoes you get only 1/64 chance of a light skinned child with the hypothetical heterozygote parental example here assuming equal amounts of dark and light skinned alleles in both parents. That doesn't account for other racial features such as hair texture, eye color, skull shape, skeletal structure, and facial features. Superficial traits in animals is not a comparison. Notice also in your picture it includes short vs long tails.

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 03:22 PM
I don't know where you're getting this from, but it's not accurate. Not all species or types of life reproduce the same. I've never seen two mulattoes produce anything but two mulattoes. Halle Berry's kid is 3/4 white and looks half black. Your dihybrid cross represents only the color of mice, which is not comparable to races of humans.

This is from my old college biology textbook:

http://i44.tinypic.com/17crya.png

With 2 mulattoes you get only 1/64 chance of a light skinned child with the hypothetical heterozygote parental example here. That doesn't account for other racial features such as hair texture, eye color, skull shape, skeletal structure, and facial features. Superficial traits in animals is not a comparison.

thanks for clarification. i got it from wikipedia, article: mendelian inheritance.

Malva
03-10-2012, 03:27 PM
Its called atavism. Ever heard of Sandra Laing? Both her parents were White, but she was born with Negroid features. The reason is because her parents, 300 or so years back had a black ancestor - so those Negroid genes resurfaced.

They made a documentary about Sandra Laing. Basically her parents looked like this, but she came out with Negroid features:

http://www.filmeducation.org/skin/imgs/stills/picnic.jpg

And of course this happens vice-versa. Its very rare though.

WHAT-THE-HELL!!!

(PRaying now)! :biggrin:

Although it's quite unlikely for us to have a black ancestor in the last 300 years.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 03:31 PM
Why is it unnatural? i dont feel unnatural somehow being of partially mixed race.

Races evolved seperate and developed in isolation, therefore mixing the races from a biodiversity or anthropological perspective is completely unnatural. Scientific studies show this, most babies naturally identify with their parents on racial grounds but mixed-race babies don't, instead they can't identify with their own parents.

Although you are mixed, you are predominantly Caucasoid. Most craniometric studies cluster Indians with Caucasoids, and genetic studies put Indians just on the outside of Caucasoids. I don't think at all you are a good example of someone who is a true hybrid or mixed race, take this as a compliment? I mean no offense. :confused:

Scrapple
03-10-2012, 03:31 PM
Its called atavism. Ever heard of Sandra Laing? Both her parents were White, but she was born with Negroid features. The reason is because her parents, 300 or so years back had a black ancestor - so those Negroid genes resurfaced.

They made a documentary about Sandra Laing. Basically her parents looked like this, but she came out with Negroid features:

http://www.filmeducation.org/skin/imgs/stills/picnic.jpg

And of course this happens vice-versa. Its very rare though.

Not disputing your post just that the picture is of the actors in the docudrama, that is Sam Neill on the right. Here is an actual picture http://www.africansuccess.org/docs/image/PH2007052501036.jpg

:eek:

Lumi
03-10-2012, 03:36 PM
I think any non-white man who get's a white female pregnant should be forced to marry her as punishment. Teach them some morals and that they can't get away with the hump and dump bullcrap.

Teyrn
03-10-2012, 03:41 PM
It won't stop people of different races doing the ugly and having mixed race offspring.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:45 PM
Personally, I think our multiracial situation has always been a source of conflict. You're going to tell me that the US and the American colonies did not have social unrest at any time before 1968? That's a joke.

Except this isn't the issue. Any multiracial/multicultural society is full of conflict.


Interracial marriage laws of the sort being suggested here would clearly be directed against Blacks and it would let them know loud and clear that they are not wanted and are, in fact, second class citizens, or worse.

Actually it wouldn't. It's for everyone. It also means whites can't marry out. Is that oppressive of whites, disenfranchising us? What exaggerations!


Advocating some sort of separatism would probably be easier. Interracial marriage laws at this point in time seem to be historically out of place. We instituted our interracial marriage laws at a time when Blacks were not citizens and then it was held over as a remaining vestige of that time into the 1960's. Interracial marriage laws would be seen as essentially stripping Blacks, and other groups, of their citizenship.

Their citizenship status is irrelevant. The laws were enacted to preserve our race and culture, and thus they were just laws. The question is why do non-whites not value their own races and cultures enough to not equally support such laws rather than take them as an affront as if being dis-invited from the white man's dinner table will mean the death of them. Ultimately, the only opposition they have to such laws is that they simply don't like whites telling them no. At the end of the day, it's about sticking it to whitey and saying no to us while they get angry and say we can't say no to them.

Keep in mind many of the same blacks who bitch and moan that whites are against interracial marriage and blacks moving into their communities bitch when whites move into THEIR communities and live with blacks. Theirs is not and never will be a morally consistent position.


I don't know how or even why someone would advocate a society that is as fundamentally divided as that. I would oppose interracial marriage laws for the same reason I oppose slavery, or state multiculturalism. All breed disunity and division within the society.

Nonsense. The physical presence of wildly different groups is what breeds disunity. Marriage laws or no, there's always bickering and such societies will never be united. Only monogamous societies have any semblance of a unified population.

Hess
03-10-2012, 03:47 PM
I believe that the government has no role in the private sector. We can encourage people to make right choices, but at the end of they day what they do is up to them and them alone.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:48 PM
It won't stop people of different races doing the ugly and having mixed race offspring.

Making things taboo and illegal always cuts down on it. Anti-robbery laws don't eradicate robbery but they keep the incidences of it down. Because anti-robbery laws don't eradicate ALL of it, does that mean we should toss such laws?

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:49 PM
As for the poll, i would have to say yes. I think it should be banned.

As much as i believe in freedom of association, freedom of choice, speech etcetc somewhere you have to draw the line, as with homosexuality.

Interracialism is not natural, and has negative effects on society.

Our forefathers believed in freedom. What we have now is free dumb. There IS a difference.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 03:52 PM
WHAT-THE-HELL!!!

(PRaying now)! :biggrin:

Although it's quite unlikely for us to have a black ancestor in the last 300 years.

These two are Boers. I know I don't have any black ancestors. It's not in my DNA, not counting the paperwork I've accumulated on my family line. It's just not there.

Leadchucker
03-10-2012, 04:04 PM
I believe that the government has no role in the private sector. We can encourage people to make right choices, but at the end of they day what they do is up to them and them alone.

Couldn't have said it better!!! :thumb001:

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 04:10 PM
The fact that inter-racial marriages are not a problem but how you educate people is a problem (in US,the education that afro-americans are given is the problem the fact that too much violence is put in the education there and so on) is shown by Holland which works great as a state,compared with USA and they have plenty of inter-racial marriages.
(if you take what some people are saying they have every 1 in 5 marriages inter-racial).
I think that the number of inter-racial marriages in the Netherlands, even in Holland, is insignificant compared to the U.S. I personally know only one such couple.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 04:14 PM
I think any non-white man who get's a white female pregnant should be forced to marry her as punishment. Teach them some morals and that they can't get away with the hump and dump bullcrap.
And the same should go for any white man that gets a white woman pregnant or for a white man that gets a non-white woman pregnant. Morality is the key. It should not be enforced by the law but damn well by the respective families.

If I would get a woman pregnant without marrying her I'd be disowned and my friends would remodel my face while the rest would just cut me out of their lifes. It's frowned upon in this country. :thumb001:

Nabatea1
03-10-2012, 04:19 PM
I believe that the government has no role in the private sector. We can encourage people to make right choices, but at the end of they day what they do is up to them and them alone.

Indeed, but for some the so called wrong decision is not at all wrong but rather was the right one. The marriage between my father and mother has worked great despite cultural differences. So all it depends on the persons prespective. If some of the people had their way, I would not exist and certainly can not support a movement that does not want me to exist. The ultimate choice is for the people, and no one can do anything about it indeed.

Lumi
03-10-2012, 04:20 PM
Well, except in the cases of rape. If a woman gets pregnant through rape, the rapist should have his genitals sawed off without anasthetic and the woman should be allowed to abort.
If you force a rapist to marry the woman he raped and impregnated, then that would be a punishment for the woman, not the man.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 04:23 PM
Well, except in the cases of rape. If a woman gets pregnant through rape, the rapist should have his genitals sawed off without anaesthetic and the woman should be allowed to abort.
If you force a rapist to marry the woman he raped and impregnated, then that would be a punishment for the woman, not the man.
You're right. I meant that as in while the man got the woman pregnant while in a relationship or just during a night of after-pub fun. When it comes to rapists: I'd go mediaeval on those people. The woman can opt for the abortion and the rapist should be dragged through the streets, have his genitals removed (without anaesthetics) and then be drawn and quartered on the market square.

Electronic God-Man
03-10-2012, 04:25 PM
Except this isn't the issue. Any multiracial/multicultural society is full of conflict.

I won't argue with that. That was partly my point.




Actually it wouldn't. It's for everyone. It also means whites can't marry out. Is that oppressive of whites, disenfranchising us? What exaggerations!

The hypothetical law is to protect the "purity" of White Americans. What would we do with the mixed race children that would inevitably be born? I'll tell you what we used to do, we considered them Black. It wasn't for everyone.




Their citizenship status is irrelevant. The laws were enacted to preserve our race and culture, and thus they were just laws. The question is why do non-whites not value their own races and cultures enough to not equally support such laws rather than take them as an affront as if being dis-invited from the white man's dinner table will mean the death of them. Ultimately, the only opposition they have to such laws is that they simply don't like whites telling them no. At the end of the day, it's about sticking it to whitey and saying no to us while they get angry and say we can't say no to them.

Citizenship status is very relevant. The laws were made at a time when non-Whites were NOT citizens, correct? Again, the law was made to protect Whites, not Blacks. Blacks were not citizens and were not considered equal before the law. Interracial marriage laws only stuck for as long as they did because in truth no one really wanted Blacks to be full citizens.


Keep in mind many of the same blacks who bitch and moan that whites are against interracial marriage and blacks moving into their communities bitch when whites move into THEIR communities and live with blacks. Theirs is not and never will be a morally consistent position.

Most Blacks don't "bitch and moan" that many Whites are against interracial marriage, because most of them don't want to marry White people anyway. What they would "bitch and moan" about is being made de facto second class citizens by laws that were made to place them in an inferior position within society. I can understand that.




Nonsense. The physical presence of wildly different groups is what breeds disunity. Marriage laws or no, there's always bickering and such societies will never be united. Only monogamous societies have any semblance of a unified population.

Wonderful. Now remind me just how exactly interracial marriage laws are going to facilitate the creation of a united and fairly homogenous society?

Interracial marriage laws assume and maintain a multiracial, multicultural society.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 04:27 PM
I think any non-white man who get's a white female pregnant should be forced to marry her as punishment. Teach them some morals and that they can't get away with the hump and dump bullcrap.

How about an abortion followed by a stint in jail?

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 04:30 PM
The hypothetical law is to protect the "purity" of White Americans. What would we do with the mixed race children that would inevitably be born? I'll tell you what we used to do, we considered them Black. It wasn't for everyone.

They are black. They're still considered black, they're still acculturated as black, and they still fit in with blacks. Is there a reason this should cease?




Citizenship status is very relevant. The laws were made at a time when non-Whites were NOT citizens, correct? Again, the law was made to protect Whites, not Blacks. Blacks were not citizens and were not considered equal before the law. Interracial marriage laws only stuck for as long as they did because in truth no one really wanted Blacks to be full citizens.

Again, this has nothing to do with it. These laws refer to whites also, who had full citizenship status. This is not a one-way street. Why treat it as such?



Most Blacks don't "bitch and moan" that many Whites are against interracial marriage, because most of them don't want to marry White people anyway. What they would "bitch and moan" about is being made de facto second class citizens by laws that were made to place them in an inferior position within society. I can understand that.

Actually they do. As I stated, they complain that whites object to them moving into our communities, yet the few whites who move into theirs often face cold shoulders and worse. There is a huge double-standard in the black attitude.



Wonderful. Now remind me just how exactly interracial marriage laws are going to facilitate the creation of a united and fairly homogenous society?

Interracial marriage laws assume and maintain a multiracial, multicultural society.

I didn't say they were going to create it, nor did I assert those laws were for that reason. That part has been explained here by myself and others.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 04:31 PM
How about an abortion followed by a stint in jail?
That's something that belongs in your weird, backward, primitive Jewnited States and not in civilised European countries. :) Here drawn and quartering for rapists, some societal pressure on men that make women pregnant to get married and suitable legislation to remove the bulk of all immigrants might be a good idea.

Duke
03-10-2012, 04:36 PM
No, firstly because I am a realist, and secondly, it could potentially make consequences that are worst.

Electronic God-Man
03-10-2012, 04:39 PM
They are black. They're still considered black, they're still acculturated as black, and they still fit in with blacks. Is there a reason this should cease?

Mixed race White-Black children should be put with Blacks.


Again, this has nothing to do with it. These laws refer to whites also, who had full citizenship status. This is not a one-way street. Why treat it as such?

But wait, it's not just about protecting Whites. We also don't want the Blacks to be any more mixed race.


Does not compute.





I didn't say they were going to create it, nor did I assert those laws were for that reason. That part has been explained here by myself and others.


It hasn't been explained. What good are interracial marriage laws then? All they would seem to serve is to further the division in our society and give the government another excuse to dictate my private life to boot. Well done. :confused:

mihaitzateo
03-10-2012, 06:18 PM
I think that the number of inter-racial marriages in the Netherlands, even in Holland, is insignificant compared to the U.S. I personally know only one such couple.

Sorry I used Holland meaning Netherlands and not only that county from Netherlands.But it seems in Holland county you have most inter-racial marriages (and this was only by coincidence) since there is Amsterdam and that city have a lot of afro-americans.But they are afro-americans from Netherlands owned colonies so they are very civilised I think.
I talked with some people from Netherlands and no one complained about afro-americans they have there,born and raised in Netherlands,but they complained about turks.
Turks are considered caucasians in US,so I think in US there is a problem of education of the afro-american people.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 06:28 PM
Sorry I used Holland meaning Netherlands and not only that county from Netherlands.But it seems in Holland county you have most inter-racial marriages (and this was only by coincidence) since there is Amsterdam and that city have a lot of afro-americans.But they are afro-americans from Netherlands owned colonies so they are very civilised I think.
I talked with some people from Netherlands and no one complained about afro-americans they have there,born and raised in Netherlands,but they complained about turks.
Turks are considered caucasians in US,so I think in US there is a problem of education of the afro-american people.
I don't think you understand it at all. I wonder to what Dutch people you spoke as people from the Antilles are not popular here at all (a lot of them being involved in crime etc). And Holland is not a county btw but two provinces: North and South Holland. Amsterdam is a very international city but Amsterdam is not representative of the Netherlands at all (a Dutchman from the province is often unpleasantly surprised when he visits Amsterdam) as any Dutchman could tell you.

Interracial marriages in Holland ? I haven't seen many there... let alone here in Utrecht province. Some happen in the bigger cities but frankly don't see much of them here. In my own circle I know only one such union.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 06:44 PM
Mixed race White-Black children should be put with Blacks.

And it's done very well for a very long time.



But wait, it's not just about protecting Whites. We also don't want the Blacks to be any more mixed race.

They accept the mixed kids and don't have the same standards for what they define as black. Why assume they do?



It hasn't been explained. What good are interracial marriage laws then? All they would seem to serve is to further the division in our society and give the government another excuse to dictate my private life to boot. Well done. :confused:

Ones we've had taken off the books were perfectly good laws. They were also accompanied by strong social taboos against it and thus were very rarely an issue anyway.

I don't know why you worry about national unity in a mixed nation. There's no such thing under such circumstances and it has nothing to do with preservation of our people. Kowtowing to minorities be they racial or in terms of lifestyle should never be a guiding principle, and certainly neither should be the fear of upsetting the feelings of the swarthy. Doing such means that national policy is basically dictated by those with the biggest mouths, as it basically currently is, and the rest of us have to walk on eggshells. If they bitch, it's not the end of the world, but unfortunately whites have been programmed to listen to and take seriously on face value every one of their whining complaints.

Ultimately, these are our countries, not theirs.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 06:53 PM
[QUOTE=zack;763454]French negrophilia?


Nope, French appreciation of African female beauty. :)


[QUOTE=rhiannon;763477]Obama isn't married to a white woman...he's married to a black woman:) Seems that ought send a positive message about the ability of a black man and woman to marry and remain in a loving marriage, while also raising two children in a positive environment. I'm not going to fault the Obamas on the family end of things at all. Compare Obama's behavior in his marriage to Michelle with Gingrich's behavior in his marriage to his last two spouses and you will see who the dirtbag is.....it's not Obama.


Exactly and thank you. It is real funny this hatred Obama is getting from certain people on here. I bet if he was married to a White woman, they would not hate him so much. Hmmmmmmmm..............


[QUOTE]I like Obama for reasons that have nothing to do with his status as a biracial man, but that is not relevant to the question of Interracial couples, because he is not married to a white woman.


Great points.


[QUOTE=European Loyalist;763481]not really. urban quebecois are generally very racially un-aware, especially montreallais.


This is very true basically, but I would not exactly include myself in that group.



[QUOTE]It's a very common site to see racially mixed couples in that city.


Yes it is.



[QUOTE]On a related note the whitest acting black people in the world probably are black montrealers.


Lol, that is a result of the French colonial mindset towards Blacks: "You Blacks are just French with Black skin! Let us help you bring that French out!" :D:D


[QUOTE=Pyramidologist;763634]Very bestial face. I don't know why people are attracted to such unpleasant features.

Why do you care? It would be better to mind your own business. I like her face, and that's good enough for me. :)

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 06:57 PM
The 70 statistic comes from most Sub-Saharan African countries. Lynn (1995; 2000, 2006) has full statistics by country.

Black Africans are 70 IQ (borderline mental retard). Most Sub-Saharan Africans cannot even count their fingers, they don't know basic arithmetic. African-Americans score higher, around 85.

Interesting. The official definition of mental retardation is IQ of 70 with a severe learning disability.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_enRW2gU1hjg/TCzGPvfbswI/AAAAAAAABFY/wrG3rhJ1Mlc/s400/race_IQscore.jpg

I have to disagree with this graph. Orientals is a wide term and the only Oriental countries I know of with higher potential IQs are Japan, China, and S. Korea. Anything south of there is below us, as low as 86 (Thailand, Phillippines, and the Hmong). Most of those countries hover somewhere in the 90s.

mihaitzateo
03-10-2012, 06:57 PM
@Civis Batavi
Well I talked a lot via inet with some ppl ,some from Amsterdam ,who are native from Netherlands and are dutch people.
I never heared any of them complaining about the afro-american people.
But two of them complained about turks.

One of them,native from Netherlands and also dutch told me that he likes more women with dark hair and a little darker skin because that is something exotic for him,than he likes dutch women.He was not telling about afro-american women but he was telling me about some romanian women.
Did not asked him if he likes afro-american women also.
(this one is not marryed).


These people were pretty young,so only two of them were marryed and both were marryed with dutch women.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 07:00 PM
@Civis Batavi
Well I talked a lot via inet with some ppl ,some from Amsterdam ,who are native from Netherlands and are dutch people.
I never heared any of them complaining about the afro-american people.
But two of them complained about turks.
Amsterdam - the Netherlands are two different things entirely as there are more foreigners in Amsterdam then in the whole of the Netherlands combined. And Antelleans are hated and reviled all over the country (including Amsterdam) which makes me doubt you even more. I know very few people that have anything positive to say about them.


One of them,native from Netherlands and also dutch told me that he likes more women with dark hair and a little darker skin because that is something exotic for him,than he likes dutch women.He was not telling about afro-american women but he was telling me about some romanian women.
Romanians are (until now) quite rare here. Which makes me doubt that you have spoken to a Dutchman from Amsterdam.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 07:01 PM
Well, I didn't say I'm a fan of modern Black music:D What I meant was that Australian Aborigenes are the most underdeveloped race in the world that hardly qualifies as a human one in my eyes.

Yes, but they're basically quiet and don't own large amounts of weapons.

:thumbs up

TheBrownBear
03-10-2012, 07:01 PM
about interracial laws would you push it on other countries except your own as well? i mean an white and a black person marrying somewhere in singapore? you know not all cultures share your values.

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 07:05 PM
[QUOTE=Jon Snow;763737]I find your inclinations toward bestiality repulsive,



I am not into bestiality idiot. I think you have me confused with another group that shall remain nameless.



[QUOTE]as well as running counter to the ethos of this forum and the purpose of this specific thread.


There are threads on here for talking about attractive non-Whites, so you are wrong. Also, I made one statement about my preference in this thread, which is also talking about interracial couples, and people cannot stop harping on it. If they would shut up,leave me alone and let me have my preference, I would stop talking about it, so blame them not me.



[QUOTE]Get over it. :)


As soon as you get over being butthurt over the preferences of another male, as if it were any of your damn business in the first place. :)



[QUOTE]Actually, the Non-European Men to Die For thread started off as a joke; a parody of the Beautiful Non-European Women thread. It's obvious that the majority of the posts there, especially at the start of the thread, are firmly tongue-in-cheek.


Whatever.



[QUOTE]The Beautiful Non-European Women thread, on the other hand, is a lot larger and the posts there are more genuine,


So? Take it up with the board administrators and get off my back.


[QUOTE]thanks to idiots like you.


Well I suppose we could pine over White women who prefer Blacks over us like idiots like you do.



[QUOTE]And yes, I have complained in both threads. :)

Good for you.



[QUOTE]People will see what they want to see, I guess.


They sure will.



[QUOTE]Well, when a sizable percentage of your posts made on a European Preservation Forum contain references to your strange fetish for black women, then forgive me for finding something amiss in the whole process.


First of all, it's not some strange fetish, it is my preference. Second of all, I do not give a damn what you find amiss. Next, if you add up my posts that talk about that vs the ones that don't the latter would dwarf the former, and I repeat, if people would shut up about it I wouldn't have to talk about it so much. Finally, put me on ignore if you do not like what I say.:)

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 07:13 PM
[QUOTE]Racial Observer is posting about how black woman almost everywhere he goes on this site.


That is not true Viking.



[QUOTE]This site is about European preservation.


That also allows talk of what non-Whites are considered attractive.


[QUOTE]You have personal connection to race mixers so ofcourse you are agree with him.


So she is supposed to hate her own family because you do not like racemixing?



[QUOTE]I bet if he meet a Zulu, he would marry one

And that is MY business.


[QUOTE]Racial Observer worships Black people

No I do not. Stop being silly. I do not worship any people.

mihaitzateo
03-10-2012, 07:25 PM
Amsterdam - the Netherlands are two different things entirely as there are more foreigners in Amsterdam then in the whole of the Netherlands combined. And Antelleans are hated and reviled all over the country (including Amsterdam) which makes me doubt you even more. I know very few people that have anything positive to say about them.


Romanians are (until now) quite rare here. Which makes me doubt that you have spoken to a Dutchman from Amsterdam.

He saw that romanian women on TV.
Haha.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 07:26 PM
And that is MY business.



http://www.wildland.com/trips/details/imagegallery/wildlnewsandreviews/southaf-zulu-feature-big-traditional_zulu.JPG


http://woondu.com/images/tribes/mursi-tribe-ethiopia/mursi-tribe-ethiopia-9.jpg

http://www.imagesofanthropology.com/images/e.traditional_hairstyle_Central_African_Republic.j pg

http://www.worldofstock.com/slides/PCU7083.jpg

These people don't need you to destroy them.
When you see them naked it isn't porn.
They can have their own preservation.
They can have their own culture and tribes.
You don't need to go marry one.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 07:33 PM
He saw that romanian women on TV.
Haha.
Right then.

Jon Snow
03-10-2012, 07:37 PM
Well I suppose we could pine over White women who prefer Blacks over us like idiots like you do.

This is the crux of the issue, I guess.

If you're losing out to niggers, then you're doing something wrong. 95%+ of white women want an intelligent, handsome male who can make a good father and/or provider. Black males fulfill none of those criteria.

You should work on yourself instead of pretending like you're into black women so you don't have to compete for white ones.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 07:41 PM
That is not true Viking.





It is true. Most of your post are about Black people.
With out even including your posting in the Non European woman or all the stuff you say about interracial relationships or black men.

Most attractive ethnicity in Europe?

Do mixes with non-Euros count?

Can she pass as Dominican

Yes. She is one HOT LADY! She can pass as Dominican yes, but I prefer to think of her as Black/African-American.

"Take me home tonight!"......................

Who is White?

[QUOTE=Racial Observer 1814;753773
People who look like this woman are in Halle's heritage, and women who look like this African lady are the MOTHER of your Dominican culture. Your attempt to humiliate her is pathetic and you should be ashamed of yourself.

Dominicans - From the Island


[QUOTE=Racial Observer 1814;753579]Zoe Saldana is seriously beautiful. She looks Afro-American!


What is your Black/Negro comfort level?

Obama? Mr President, I think your wife is beautiful, you must be so proud. Also, I think Condi deserves a place in your administration, finally, I miss Desiree Rogers, she was cool man! Good luck in November.

And not much about your own people except this:

Can you cook?

I am French, of course I can! La cuisine, c'est chez moi! :thumb001::thumb001:

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 07:48 PM
95%+ of white women want an intelligent, handsome male who can make a good father and/or provider. Black males fulfill none of those criteria.

White women who mix are deluded. Be they black or Mexican or whatever, few of them actually qualify as good providers. Their incomes are lower, marriage rates are lower, IQs are lower, STD rates higher, broken homes higher, crime rates higher, dropout rates higher/school grades lower. Only egalitarianism as fooled some whites into thinking they're getting a Ward Cleaver when they date Eldridge Cleaver.

Btw, this Racial Observer is a sockpuppet troll. Believe not a word.

Electronic God-Man
03-10-2012, 07:59 PM
And it's done very well for a very long time.




They accept the mixed kids and don't have the same standards for what they define as black. Why assume they do?




Ones we've had taken off the books were perfectly good laws. They were also accompanied by strong social taboos against it and thus were very rarely an issue anyway.

I don't know why you worry about national unity in a mixed nation. There's no such thing under such circumstances and it has nothing to do with preservation of our people. Kowtowing to minorities be they racial or in terms of lifestyle should never be a guiding principle, and certainly neither should be the fear of upsetting the feelings of the swarthy. Doing such means that national policy is basically dictated by those with the biggest mouths, as it basically currently is, and the rest of us have to walk on eggshells. If they bitch, it's not the end of the world, but unfortunately whites have been programmed to listen to and take seriously on face value every one of their whining complaints.

Ultimately, these are our countries, not theirs.

So, you're admitting that

1) Interracial marriage laws do not solve our root problem, which is the fact that we have a divided multiracial, multicultural nation.

2) Interracial marriage laws would be effected to protect the "purity" of White Americans, and mixed race people would be relegated to a "Black" category.

3) In the long era in which interracial marriage laws were in place, a much more effective deterrent of interracial marriage and sex was social and cultural norms. The laws were mostly for show, and to punish those that went against the normal convention.


Why worry about national unity? Indeed, why worry about national unity when we can do the same stupid shit we've already tried. You agree that it was social norms that led to the vast majority of people not marrying outside their race and that the laws were "very rarely an issue anyway", but then expect people to believe that there is any way that we can somehow bring about a law without popular opinion supporting it? Just what exactly are you suggesting?

So, what's more important? The idea or the law? The common idea that people shouldn't marry outside their race, or a law dictating that they must not marry outside their race?

Rereg
03-10-2012, 08:09 PM
Helen Flanagan:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/09/29/article-2043173-0E234FC500000578-360_468x595.jpg
http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/le/may_fair_hotel_celebs_2_140211/helen_flanagan_3206997.jpg
http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/04/article-1330874939686-12049D75000005DC-18640_466x468.jpg

:p

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 08:29 PM
Helen Flanagan:

Interesting in these pictures he's always walking ahead of her and almost dragging her.

Two things about this girl.

1) She's mental:

"The winger whisked his girlfriend away on a romantic weekend in Paris earlier this month after she suffered a bout of panic attacks." (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2050351/Helen-Flanagan-moving-Swansea-close-footballer-boyfriend-Scott-Sinclair.html)


2) She's an exhibitionist whore.

http://i40.tinypic.com/wl8851.jpg

I just sent her a warm greeting via Twitter, btw. :)

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 08:31 PM
Today I found funny photo:

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-AY5n7dL16XY/SNAzIpjjOsI/AAAAAAAAAlc/lpKoTUSNYL4/s637/IMG_6358i.jpg
British woman with very "handsome" partner :rotfl:

Some unattractive overweight broad with a bad haircut and Tiger Woods in his 50s without hair.

Padre Organtino
03-10-2012, 08:34 PM
That Sinclair guy looks almost North African is some pics.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 08:35 PM
And out of curiosity.A Muslim couple Swimming.
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS5qukqRfH4qJ-uE7i_3bCCWjQEbGhlQM7ldbxbLZ3KYAVlwWJF3w:p

How exciting! I think I'll order one of those to take with me to swim in the Gulf of Mexico this summer!

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 08:36 PM
That Sinclair guy looks almost North African is some pics.

Clearly a mutt.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 08:50 PM
How exciting! I think I'll order one of those to take with me to swim in the Gulf of Mexico this summer!
That's one way for you to keep white American men at a distance and not having to produce any white offspring.

Rereg
03-10-2012, 08:56 PM
1) She's mental:

"The winger whisked his girlfriend away on a romantic weekend in Paris earlier this month after she suffered a bout of panic attacks." (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2050351/Helen-Flanagan-moving-Swansea-close-footballer-boyfriend-Scott-Sinclair.html)


2) She's an exhibitionist whore.

http://i40.tinypic.com/wl8851.jpg

I just sent her a warm greeting via Twitter, btw. :)

I think she is very empty "party-girl" without ability of thinking. She have nice boobs, it's all about her. :)


IVoDmO7582o

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 08:57 PM
I think she is very plate "party-girl" without ability of thinking. She have nice boobs, it's all about her. :)


IVoDmO7582o
Ach.. still good enough for a night of fun.. wouldn't you reckon ? ;)
And maybe she can still be brought back to sanity.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 09:02 PM
I think she is very empty "party-girl" without ability of thinking. She have nice boobs, it's all about her. :)

Clearly lacks a value system and has dubious self-respect. She dates apes and hangs herself out on a meat rack like that. Where the hell were her parents? Living at the pub, maybe?

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 09:08 PM
When you see them naked it isn't porn.


I don't like porn.



[QUOTE]You don't need to go marry one.


Who I marry is MY choice, and MY business, NOT yours. :)


[QUOTE][QUOTE=Jon Snow;764511]This is the crux of the issue, I guess.

No it isn't.


[QUOTE]If you're losing out to niggers,


I'm not losing out to niggers because I'm not into White women. YOU are who is losing out to niggers because YOU are into White women. Get it right. :)



[QUOTE]95%+ of white women want an intelligent, handsome male who can make a good father and/or provider.


Lol, whatever.



[QUOTE]Black males fulfill none of those criteria.


Tell that to the non-Black women who date them.


[QUOTE]You should work on yourself instead of pretending like you're into black women so you don't have to compete for white ones.


I'm not pretending anything. I prefer Black women. If you choose not to believe me that's your problem, not mine.


[QUOTE=Lagergeld;764548]Btw, this Racial Observer is a sockpuppet troll. Believe not a word.


I'm not a sockpuppet or troll oh angry, bitter one. :)

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 09:18 PM
[QUOTE=CelticViking;764526]
It is true.

No it's not.


[QUOTE]Most of your post are about Black people.
With out even including your posting in the Non European woman or all the stuff you say about interracial relationships or black men.


This is not true.



[QUOTE]Most attractive ethnicity in Europe?


Because I wanted to know if half was included.



[QUOTE]Can she pass as Dominican


Dominican is an ethnicity that is mainly Mulato, so it fit there too.



[QUOTE]Who is White?
Dominicans - From the Island What is your Black/Negro comfort level?


:confused:




[QUOTE]And not much about your own people except this:

Can you cook?


If you look hard enough for something, you can find it. I have over 130 posts. Look at ALL of them. :)

Jon Snow
03-10-2012, 09:23 PM
I'm not losing out to niggers because I'm not into White women. YOU are who is losing out to niggers because YOU are into White women. Get it right. :)

I don't lose out to niggers or anyone else, because I'm not a beta male like you.

I happen to be in a very healthy and loving relationship with a beautiful woman who shares my racial and cultural background. This must seem very bizarre to you, but trust me when I say that things are just fine on my end.

It is my recommendation that you re-evaluate your position insofar as dating preferences are concerned. The path you are walking is not a healthy one.

Mercury
03-10-2012, 09:25 PM
I am attracted to the mind first and foremost. Blacks have an IQ close to mental retardation. I view the indigenous African tribes as something that is decent, and preferable to Africa's lame attempt to be civilized, but being attracted to them may be close to bestiality. It's almost like a wild animal that you are viewing in their natural habitat. It shouldn't be killed for not being like you (Human) but it shouldn't be mixed with either.

Now I'm not so dogmatic on race-mixing myself, I've advocated Whites in North America mixing with Amerindians in the past. And I use to be more sympathetic to East Asian/Euro couples. But mixing with black ruins everything. Our phenotype, which is most important. I don't want to live in a world where everyone has dark eyes, dark hair, and dark skin.

I can honestly say I would prefer activities such as these brought back to keep blacks in check:

http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/images/life/lynching.jpg

http://www.nathanielturner.com/images/New_Folder/citadelyearbook.jpg

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 09:27 PM
[QUOTE]
If you look hard enough for something, you can find it. I have over 130 posts. Look at ALL of them. :)

Most of them are about Interracial relationships so I didn't include them.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 09:40 PM
Racial Observer 1814
Who I marry is MY choice, and MY business, NOT yours. :)I'm not losing out to niggers because I'm not into White women. YOU are who is losing out to niggers because YOU are into White women. Get it right. :)






So you want them to worship you?

FyHYbsXt05k

c7RA4UnEuQ0


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult

http://www.beauty-and-the-bath.com/image-files/jack-sparrow-tribal-scene.jpg

You can be a manwhore and have your low IQ African American but leave the even lower IQ African tribes woman alone.
http://wanderlustandlipstick.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/africa_datogawoman.jpg

I'm not posting many pictures of them because they are naked.
Let them have their own preservation.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 09:43 PM
I have to disagree with this graph. Orientals is a wide term and the only Oriental countries I know of with higher potential IQs are Japan, China, and S. Korea. Anything south of there is below us, as low as 86 (Thailand, Phillippines, and the Hmong). Most of those countries hover somewhere in the 90s.

Lynn's ''Orientals'' are specifically East Asians. Yes, other Mongoloid populations (South-East, Central Asia etc) have lower IQ's.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 09:54 PM
Btw, this Racial Observer is a sockpuppet troll. Believe not a word.

Yea, he's not white. Its only black males who repeat the lie that most white woman love black men, and he says this in most of his posts.

Nabatea1
03-10-2012, 10:32 PM
Could care less about it and what others say. Simpy it's none of my business. Hating on it and not liking it well will not change the fact. That said most people go toward their group rather than outsiders it's all exaggerated and those are the facts.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 10:36 PM
Yea, he's not white. Its only black males who repeat the lie that most white woman love black men, and he says this in most of his posts.

No he's white. His profile says age 37 I'm thinking more like 17. White liberals repeat certain ideas and certain talking points, and he's using many of them.

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 10:37 PM
Central Asians have low IQ's?

Well it could be the Caucasoid blood

They have lower IQ's than East Asians. Overall they are around 85 - 90, which is pretty average, not low. But they are lower than East Asians.

By the way, Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ's, more so that East Asians and they are Caucasoid.

Nabatea1
03-10-2012, 10:43 PM
They have lower IQ's than East Asians. Overall they are around 85 - 90, which is pretty average, not low. But they are lower than East Asians.

By the way, Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQ's, more so that East Asians and they are Caucasoid.

I don't believe in IQ, I was laughing at the racialist rehortic of it. Ashkenazim Jews are unique in that case, but Sephardim and Mizharim are not much different from their Middle Eastern neighbours. I believe IQ is B.S truth be told:thumb001:

Pyramidologist
03-10-2012, 10:43 PM
That said most people go toward their group rather than outsiders it's all exaggerated and those are the facts.

40% of black males are married outside of their race. And that's only a marriage statistic from US and Britain, that doesn't even include dating.

The main problem is with black males who hate black woman out of self-hatred, so they lust after white females. The vast majority of white females however turn them down as they are attracted to white men. This is why in my view black on white crime is so high, black males have so much aggression.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 10:47 PM
I don't believe in IQ, I was laughing at the racialist rehortic of it. Ashkenazim Jews are unique in that case, but Sephardim and Mizharim are not much different from their Middle Eastern neighbours. I believe IQ is B.S truth be told:thumb001:

Well, since many longterm psychological studies have shown it exists and that it is largely inherited, I can't imagine how you can say it's not real.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 10:48 PM
40% of black males are married outside of their race. And that's only a marriage statistic from US and Britain, that doesn't even include dating.

The main problem is with black males who hate black woman out of self-hatred, so they lust after white females. The vast majority of white females however turn them down as they are attracted to white men. This is why in my view black on white crime is so high, black males have so much aggression.

The black marriage statistic is skewed because most blacks never marry, I think to the tune of 50%, at least here in the US.

Mosov
03-10-2012, 10:54 PM
Why is it that it's usually the low class, desperate white women that have relationship with black skinned men?

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 11:02 PM
Why is it that it's usually the low class, desperate white women that have relationship with black skinned men?

.Black porn mythology
. Left wing political views
. Drunk or on drugs
. Gold diggers
.Don't want to be called racist.
. Watch lots of NFL or NBA or other sport.
. Love rap music eg Wigger
. Weight problems and lack of self confidence.
. Think they are being cool.
. Religious views eg turning to Islam.
. Watching too much Jewish Hollywood films and tv shows.

List goes on .............

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 11:04 PM
.Black porn mythology
. Left wing political views
. Drunk or on drugs
. Gold diggers
.Don't want to be called racist.
. Watch lots of NFL or NBA
. Love rap music eg Wigger
. Weight problems and lack of self confidence.
. Think they are being cool.

List goes on .............
The average American.

Mosov
03-10-2012, 11:08 PM
.Black porn mythology
. Left wing political views
. Drunk or on drugs
. Gold diggers
.Don't want to be called racist.
. Watch lots of NFL or NBA
. Love rap music eg Wigger
. Weight problems and lack of self confidence.
. Think they are being cool.

List goes on .............

Well maybe its good to weed out such low class people....

Racial Observer 1814
03-10-2012, 11:09 PM
[QUOTE=Jon Snow;764781]I don't lose out to niggers



Lie. Yes you do.


[QUOTE]because I'm not a beta male like you.


Yeah, because White Nationalist males have such a great reputation being super Alpha male chick magnets who can get ANY White woman they want,:rolleyes: LOL!


[QUOTE]I happen to be in a very healthy and loving relationship with a beautiful woman who shares my racial and cultural background. This must seem very bizarre to you, but trust me when I say that things are just fine on my end.


If that were true you would not be so disturbed over the romantic tastes of some guy you don't even know on the internet. :)


[QUOTE]It is my recommendation that you re-evaluate your position insofar as dating preferences are concerned. The path you are walking is not a healthy one.

Nah, I'm okay. Trust me when I say that. :thumb001:


[QUOTE=CelticViking;764836]So you want them to worship you?


No.


[QUOTE]You can be a manwhore.


I am not that.


[QUOTE=Pyramidologist;764906]Yea, he's not white. Its only black males who repeat the lie that most white woman love black men, and he says this in most of his posts.


Lol, whatever helps you sleep better at night pal. :rolleyes:



[QUOTE=CircassianWine;765055]Could care less about it and what others say. Simpy it's none of my business. Hating on it and not liking it well will not change the fact. That said most people go toward their group rather than outsiders it's all exaggerated and those are the facts.


Thank you.

CelticViking
03-10-2012, 11:12 PM
Thank you.

Ofcourse he would say that.


Subrace: Alpine-Arabid/Turanid
Ancestry: Paternal: Circassian tribes of the NorthWest Caucasus Maternal: Syrian Desert Arabian tribes.

Nabatea1
03-10-2012, 11:14 PM
Well, since many longterm psychological studies have shown it exists and that it is largely inherited, I can't imagine how you can say it's not real.

There are many factors which is effected, the enviornment and the educational levels have a great deal in it. As well you really can not measure abstract matter like intelligence and say it's set in stone. Psychological studies and statistics can be be messaged and altered and even used to spread a specific agenda. In fact this what was shown in some of those studies. I just don't believe that some puzzles and questions will measure intellignece especially when you had lack of education or poor environment. It's the abstract element that makes it to be nothing but b.s. Educated people no matter who behave in the same way most often.

Contra Mundum
03-10-2012, 11:21 PM
I found something interesting. According to mendelian inheritance its impossible that white race dies out completely even if all whites would mix, in next generations still 100% whites would be born. Fascinating is also that two Mullatos can have a 100% white baby.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Dihybrid_cross.png

Edit: I dont support interracial, just find it interesting.

I think you're wrong there. If all whites mix, the white race is finished. Just because on extremely rare occasions a mixed race couple will produce a child that appears nearly all white, genetically that child is still mixed.

I hope you don't think that is preserving the white race.

Contra Mundum
03-10-2012, 11:25 PM
I think any non-white man who get's a white female pregnant should be forced to marry her as punishment. Teach them some morals and that they can't get away with the hump and dump bullcrap.

You support laws to force blacks to go against their nature and act civilized but don't support laws banning interracial marriages?

I would prefer she get an abortion and the man deported, or executed, if he refuses to leave.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 11:26 PM
You support laws to force blacks to go against their nature and act civilized but don't support laws banning interracial marriages?
Yap. It's the European way: that is true conservatism.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 11:29 PM
I just stepped out a short while and encountered what I would call extremely dysgenic.

2 white guys, possibly brothers, both of them with unwashed, overgrown, diseveled hair and old ragged clothing. They had a dented automobile full of junk and a dark-skinned negress was with them as if she was dating one of them.

Truth be known, she was the most groomed of all three. Those guys were utter trash, so low, apparently, that even white trailer females wouldn't have them.

I so wanted to go over and tell them to clean up their filthy act.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 11:30 PM
Truth be known, she was the most groomed of all three. Those guys were utter trash, so low, apparently, that even white trailer females wouldn't have them.

Irony.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 11:31 PM
There are many factors which is effected, the enviornment and the educational levels have a great deal in it. As well you really can not measure abstract matter like intelligence and say it's set in stone. Psychological studies and statistics can be be messaged and altered and even used to spread a specific agenda. In fact this what was shown in some of those studies. I just don't believe that some puzzles and questions will measure intellignece especially when you had lack of education or poor environment. It's the abstract element that makes it to be nothing but b.s. Educated people no matter who behave in the same way most often.

But scientific studies don't show that environment has a "great deal" of effect. It shows that most IQ is directly genetic.

Scientists of all political stripes recognize the validity of twin studies and other data in which intelligence has been gathered, and this data has been gathered going back decades.

As I have said before also, there is a correlation between national IQ averages and levels of national wealth.

I just don't see how all those things can be brushed off so easily.

Contra Mundum
03-10-2012, 11:31 PM
Yap. It's the European way: that is true conservatism.

Western culture will not dominate forever. When your country is majority non-white, it's cultural and politics will change as well. Genetics will win out in the long run.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 11:32 PM
Western culture will not dominate forever. When your country is majority non-white, it's cultural and politics will change as well. Genetics will win out in the long run.
Bla bla. Scaremongering.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 11:33 PM
Irony.

I've seen it on occasion. One disheveled white guy who looked like he just woke up from a bad hangover with a mestiza who was very clean, and another white guy whose hair was so screwed up he looked like he had a grand mal seizure overnight and forgot to comb out with a panface.

I think it speaks volumes, though. As I said before, non-whites who date whites have lower standards of the kinds of people they're willing to date. You wouldn't see a clean-cut white woman with either of those men. You'd either see an equally trashy white woman or a clean non-white. They're about on par, apparently.

Jon Snow
03-10-2012, 11:34 PM
...

I have revised my position.

You clearly possess the borderline retarded IQ of an average Negro, so go forth and mix with my blessings. Just try not to reproduce with anyone of any race, okay? :thumb001:

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 11:38 PM
I've seen it on occasion. One disheveled white guy who looked like he just woke up from a bad hangover with a mestiza who was very clean, and another white guy whose hair was so screwed up he looked like he had a grand mal seizure overnight and forgot to comb out with a panface.



Or maybe white women are sometimes so demanding that men just stop bothering and go for other races and see that they sometimes have lower standards. Let me give you a small insight in Asian cultures. What is the role of the man there ?

That's right: he is the breadwinner. So a nerd has a perfect chance of getting a girl there. Why ? Because he has brains in his head and can hold a job. When it comes to low-end white men: some may still have a job and be providers and women that belong to non-feminist cultures will quickly find them as potential mates.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 11:48 PM
Western culture will not dominate forever. When your country is majority non-white, it's cultural and politics will change as well. Genetics will win out in the long run.

It's already going. The more non-whites that move here, the more they reject and want to marginalize our culture. Our old ways are already being pushed out of the way in favor of multiCult feel-good garbage.

Do they even read Jack London in schools, anymore? I bet they don't.

Supreme American
03-10-2012, 11:51 PM
So, you're admitting that

1) Interracial marriage laws do not solve our root problem, which is the fact that we have a divided multiracial, multicultural nation.

You're the one that has been asserting that is a problem that needs solving, I have not. There in fact is no "solution" to this other than expelling migrants. As I said, outlawing interracial marriage is another topic.



2) Interracial marriage laws would be effected to protect the "purity" of White Americans, and mixed race people would be relegated to a "Black" category.

Would be, have been. This seems to only be an issue for you.


3) In the long era in which interracial marriage laws were in place, a much more effective deterrent of interracial marriage and sex was social and cultural norms. The laws were mostly for show, and to punish those that went against the normal convention.

No, they were to help enforce the cultural norms. Something wrong with that?

I'm not sure I'm even seeing the point in our dialogue.

The Lawspeaker
03-10-2012, 11:52 PM
Do they even read Jack London in schools, anymore? I bet they don't.
Maybe in England but here Dutch literature is still sometimes referred to in school. It was in my days.