PDA

View Full Version : Interracial relationships



Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Tyrrhenoi
09-27-2010, 01:21 PM
Judging from the photo, she could pass for Southern Italian. :coffee:

Or the balkans, look at her nose, man!

Arne
09-27-2010, 01:57 PM
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Fm8jYsLBcgg/RcwMMf3tubI/AAAAAAAAAAM/LSyANl-8pdw/s320/Anna+Nicole+Smith+and+Howard+Marshall.jpeg

I can almost see the thought bubble with :Cash: :Cash: floating above her head.

But she.. did all of this nasty stuff for almost nothing.. :D

Guapo
09-28-2010, 12:16 AM
http://www.etftrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/currency.jpg

I'm sure they're both rich before they even met each other.

Guapo
09-28-2010, 12:18 AM
Or the balkans, look at her nose, man!

Just Greece, El Gwopo :D

Aramis
09-28-2010, 10:47 PM
Just Greece, El Gwopo :D

Greece, our swarthy frontier.

Beorn
09-28-2010, 10:50 PM
I'm sure they're both rich before they even met each other.

She was bankrupt.

Austrvegr
09-30-2010, 09:42 PM
Ed Miliband & Justine Thornton

http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/m4/sep2010/4/1/ed-miliband-and-his-partner-justine-thornton-pic-andy-stenning-dm-116223238.jpg

:eek:

Korbis
09-30-2010, 09:48 PM
What´s wrong with her?

Foxy
09-30-2010, 09:49 PM
What´s wrong with her?

I suppose the right question is what's wrong with him... He looks Northern African, in particular Algerian, at least from that pic.

Korbis
09-30-2010, 09:54 PM
Just trying to be funny.

Foxy
09-30-2010, 09:56 PM
Just trying to be funny.

Ah.

Tyrrhenoi
09-30-2010, 10:00 PM
Just trying to be funny.

It was funny - :thumb001::D

Korbis
09-30-2010, 10:07 PM
Thanks bro, made my day.


Whats the racial background of that guy by the way?

http://rockylorusso.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ed-miliband.jpg

Osweo
09-30-2010, 11:31 PM
Thanks bro, made my day.


Whats the racial background of that guy by the way?

http://rockylorusso.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ed-miliband.jpg

Can't you tell?
http://web.mit.edu/fjk/Public/gifs/Trotsky-1920.gif
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_hTllmCBb5E8/R3JuuM3Gn4I/AAAAAAAAAfw/FoKDzYLuYRA/s400/YakovSverdlov.jpg
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/1788/edmiliband.jpg

Beorn
09-30-2010, 11:36 PM
He is the spawn of this heap of Marxist shit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Miliband

Korbis
10-01-2010, 12:23 AM
He looks like a jewish-paki offspring. Something really ungodly and wicked. His ideology really fits him well.

Debaser11
10-01-2010, 01:15 AM
http://l1.yimg.com/a/i/ww/news/2010/09/29/lovefirstsight.jpg

Thanks, Yahoo. Marxist whore company.

Megrez
10-01-2010, 02:00 AM
Found it too lol

http://interracialmatcher.com/Images/Cached/SiteImages/5J796F734E23494B.jpg (http://interracialmatcher.com/?CID=CONintX022407x348)

Debaser11
10-01-2010, 02:08 AM
What's going on there? I'm not even buying that they're a real couple. Where are all the Asian men/black women photos?

Svanhild
10-01-2010, 12:26 PM
Heidi Klum en nature

http://germanysnext.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/heidi-klum-nomakeup.jpg

Heidi Klum's die-ugly interracial offsprings

http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2008/04/heidi-klum-children-grove.jpg
http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2008/04/heidi-klum-farm-frolic.jpg
Don't mind her. She has abandoned being German a long time ago when she moved to the USA.

Aww, I wanted to post that there: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19509

Curtis24
10-01-2010, 12:46 PM
didn't Heidi Klum at one point say she couldn't emotionally connect to her children, because they looked so different from her?

Cato
10-01-2010, 01:16 PM
Heidi Klum's kids both look like Buckwheat.

Wyn
10-01-2010, 01:18 PM
Her kids aren't at fault.

Cato
10-01-2010, 01:19 PM
Her kids aren't at fault.

They still look like Buckwheat.

http://open.salon.com/files/buckwheat1245108680.jpeg

O-tay!

Megrez
10-02-2010, 08:40 PM
http://static.technorati.com/glosslip/2007/09/ice-t-coco.jpg
http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/6886-pimp_amp_ho.jpg
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/ice-t-and-wife-coco-jermaine-dupris-36th-birthday-party-arrivals-gMijja.jpg
http://www.showbiz.ie/images/stars2/ice-t-coco3.jpg

Hard to say this is a loss though. If anything, this is a loss for the black side - Ice-T does a damn great job in Law & Order: SVU.

Cato
10-03-2010, 02:23 AM
http://static.technorati.com/glosslip/2007/09/ice-t-coco.jpg
http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/6886-pimp_amp_ho.jpg
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/ice-t-and-wife-coco-jermaine-dupris-36th-birthday-party-arrivals-gMijja.jpg
http://www.showbiz.ie/images/stars2/ice-t-coco3.jpg

Hard to say this is a loss though. If anything, this is a loss for the black side - Ice-T does a damn great job in Law & Order: SVU.

He was a good rapper way back too.

Debaser11
10-03-2010, 02:32 AM
He was a good rapper way back too.

It's ironic that the man who penned "Copkiller" is a cop on Law & Order now. Are you using the term "good" in a relative sense?

jerney
10-03-2010, 03:26 AM
It's ironic that the man who penned "Copkiller" is a cop on Law & Order now.

I've been saying that for years. I don't really care, but I always found the irony of it amusing

Cato
10-03-2010, 04:03 AM
It's ironic that the man who penned "Copkiller" is a cop on Law & Order now. Are you using the term "good" in a relative sense?

No, I still like his old raps (80s era, the only sort of rap I listen to, back when it was still something of an artform (and not a niggerized commercial enterprise), from his pre-Body Count days when he was one of the pioneers of the genre ("gangsta rap) that Dr. Dre and Poop Druggy Dogg later took advantage of. I've never denied that negros have music that I like to listen to, namely jazz, blues, and old-school rap.

Ice-T did an awesome duet with Slayer on the Judgement Night soundtrack in the early 90s, part of the rap/rock fusion that's been lost to the history books.

As to killing cops, the man sung that song about 20 years ago, do you think an entertainer like Ice-T really believes what he sings about?

Pallantides
10-03-2010, 04:11 AM
Best black music is from 1920 to the 1970's imo.

Debaser11
10-03-2010, 04:13 AM
No, I still like his old raps (80s era, the only sort of rap I listen to, back when it was still something of an artform (and not a niggerized commercial enterprise), from his pre-Body Count days when he was one of the pioneers of the genre ("gangsta rap) that Dr. Dre and Poop Druggy Dogg later took advantage of.

Ice-T did an awesome duet with Slayer on the Judgement Night soundtrack in the early 90s, part of the rap/rock fusion that's been lost to the history books.

As to killing cops, the man sung that song about 20 years ago, do you think an entertainer like Ice-T really believes what he sings about?

My point was not whether he believed in what he raps about or not. Obviously, enough people took his song to heart which would give me pause as an entertainer. I feel like liberals often make these same arguments to excuse "entertainers" as if they exist in a void and have no effect on society. Clearly, they do.

I enjoy Slayer. But metal hardly promotes the pathological behaviors that rap music does. It's not the music of choice for gangs. (And before anyone mentions a biker gang, I'm not afraid to go to certain parts of downtown Houston because of white biker gangs.)

Anyways, I'm not trying to bust your chops. I understand your point about earlier rap music. But it sure didn't take long for it to become one of the most disgusting "artistic" expressions I have ever heard.

Psychonaut
10-03-2010, 12:47 PM
But metal hardly promotes the pathological behaviors that rap music does.

It doesn't (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_metal#The_Second_Wave)? ;)

Murphy
10-03-2010, 12:51 PM
It's ironic that the man who penned "Copkiller" is a cop on Law & Order now.

Elliot Stabler being my favourite det' on L&O SVU, and Finn not liking Stabler, makes me dislike Finn :p.

Cato
10-03-2010, 01:10 PM
My point was not whether he believed in what he raps about or not. Obviously, enough people took his song to heart which would give me pause as an entertainer. I feel like liberals often make these same arguments to excuse "entertainers" as if they exist in a void and have no effect on society. Clearly, they do.

Liberals are out of touch with reality, and any attempts to convince them otherwise will make you a crazy, angry racist.

Debaser11
10-03-2010, 02:18 PM
It doesn't (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_metal#The_Second_Wave)? ;)

I see the wink so I guess you were being tongue-in-cheek(?), but generally speaking, no it doesn't. (Just to be clear.)

Eldritch
10-04-2010, 10:55 PM
:dance:

http://i51.tinypic.com/qs5d12.jpg

Cato
10-04-2010, 10:59 PM
:dance:

http://i51.tinypic.com/qs5d12.jpg

:puke: Who's on the down-low here?

Gamera
10-05-2010, 06:57 AM
http://i51.tinypic.com/qs5d12.jpg

http://www.kfc.com.au/about-us/images/newsBucketImg.jpg

Megrez
10-20-2010, 04:57 PM
http://ego.globo.com/Gente/foto/0,,14366349-GDV,00.jpg
http://ego.globo.com/Entretenimento/Ego/foto/0,,11733290-EX,00.jpg

Two Brazilian actors.

Pallantides
10-23-2010, 07:13 AM
http://ego.globo.com/Gente/foto/0,,14366349-GDV,00.jpg
http://ego.globo.com/Entretenimento/Ego/foto/0,,11733290-EX,00.jpg

Two Brazilian actors.

She is Sexy, he is a lucky guy.

Cato
10-23-2010, 11:52 AM
President Obama's parents.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/Dunham.jpg

la bombe
10-24-2010, 04:08 AM
She is Sexy, he is a lucky guy.

lawl

Austin
10-24-2010, 04:22 AM
President Obama's parents.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/Dunham.jpg

So gross.......... dear lord.

la bombe
10-24-2010, 04:36 AM
She is Sexy, he is a lucky guy.

So gross.......... dear lord.

Just wanted to point out the difference in reactions. It makes me laff! :p

Austin
10-24-2010, 05:39 AM
That is a truly messed up woman....the level of social engineering is truly stunning even back then.

One can only imagine what occurs today....complete degeneracy.

Lithium
10-24-2010, 06:34 AM
http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/107379/32_2008/jonkate.jpg

The poor Kate, I'm so sorry for her :/

Austin
10-24-2010, 07:12 AM
http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/107379/32_2008/jonkate.jpg

The poor Kate, I'm so sorry for her :/

I almost think, save for some grand exceptions, that on average what you have now is not so much the cream of the crop being diluted yet so much as the degenerates whom before never had an option save for other degenerates, are now openly mixing with alphas of non-European races.

I would say Kate is a good example of such a degenerate. If you look at her early photos one can not avoid recoiling. It is only now that she has money that she has botoxed herself to death and attained some level of decency. (not that the Asian guy is an alpha, what a putz)

Moonbird
10-29-2010, 05:17 PM
http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/107379/32_2008/jonkate.jpg

The poor Kate, I'm so sorry for her :/

All of their kids seem to look much more Asian than White. The Asian genes seem to be stronger when it comes to determine the phenotypes of children in common.

Cato
10-29-2010, 10:45 PM
That is a truly messed up woman....the level of social engineering is truly stunning even back then.

One can only imagine what occurs today....complete degeneracy.

Would you call the case of Will Adams a case of social engineering, an English sailor who, in the 1600s, "went native" in Japan, married a Japanese lady, and has progeny (and a gravesite visited by his progeny) there even today?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Adams_(sailor)

Agrippa
10-29-2010, 11:52 PM
http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/060914/154616__grease_l.jpg

Well, those two look racially ok, after all she's just a half-J anyway:

Olivia Newton-John was born in Cambridge, England, to a Welsh father, Brinley ("Bryn") Newton-John, and a Jewish German mother, Irene Born (the eldest child of the Nobel prize-winning atomic physicist Max Born).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_Newton-John

Probably there is a difference between ethnoculturally and ethnoreligiously or racially correct at times...


Not only men get yellow fever, apparently :p

http://vnexpress.net/Files/Subject/3B/9F/C4/E4/nat-4.jpg
http://nimg.sulekha.com/others/original700/paradorn-srichaphan-natalie-glebova-2009-8-26-4-10-22.jpg
http://www.thailandtip.de/uploads/pics/paradorn-viagra.jpg
http://www.thaiphotoblogs.com/media/blogs/new/thaiweddingpic_2.jpg
http://livinggallery.oneindia.in/d/3966-2/natalie-glebova-paradorn.jpg

That's one of the cases which are really hard to take, because after all, she is a highest level European, at least physically, he is not even close to a higher level individual of his own race neither, but I guess it was all about "personality" - or does he have a lot of money?


a Peruvian case:

http://www.barcelonareview.com/12/jam_int.jpg

+

http://www.terra.com.pe/addon/img/8a1f6aesposap.jpg


=

http://www.faranduleaperu.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/las-hijas-de-jaime-bayly-camila-y-paola.jpg

Who are those people?

The children look very progressive-harmonious and seem to be good results at least.

Gamera
10-30-2010, 12:52 AM
Who are those people?

The children look very progressive-harmonious and seem to be good results at least.

First one is journalist Jaime Bayly Letts (http://www.google.com.pe/images?q=jaime%20bayly&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=es&tab=wi&biw=1440&bih=775), and the second one is his former wife, Sandra Masías (http://www.google.com.pe/images?q=sandra%20masias&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=es&tab=wi&biw=1440&bih=775). The two girls are their children and there are not many pics of them available.

Here they are, Jaime Bayly and his children, more grown up this time but also keep in mind the lightning in the pic makes them all look darker:

http://www.esmusica.pe/_userfiles/noticias/jaime_bayly_hijas_02_12072010.jpg

Don Brick
10-30-2010, 10:13 AM
http://static.technorati.com/glosslip/2007/09/ice-t-coco.jpg
http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/6886-pimp_amp_ho.jpg
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/ice-t-and-wife-coco-jermaine-dupris-36th-birthday-party-arrivals-gMijja.jpg
http://www.showbiz.ie/images/stars2/ice-t-coco3.jpg

Hard to say this is a loss though. If anything, this is a loss for the black side - Ice-T does a damn great job in Law & Order: SVU.

Yup, Ice-T could surely do better than this. Dis woman looks nasty!

Saruman
10-30-2010, 10:28 AM
but I guess it was all about "personality" - or does he have a lot of money?




He is a solid tennis player(from Thailand I think).

Moonbird
10-30-2010, 12:32 PM
Not only men get yellow fever, apparently :p

http://vnexpress.net/Files/Subject/3B/9F/C4/E4/nat-4.jpg
http://nimg.sulekha.com/others/original700/paradorn-srichaphan-natalie-glebova-2009-8-26-4-10-22.jpg
http://www.thailandtip.de/uploads/pics/paradorn-viagra.jpg
http://www.thaiphotoblogs.com/media/blogs/new/thaiweddingpic_2.jpg
http://livinggallery.oneindia.in/d/3966-2/natalie-glebova-paradorn.jpg

I'm sorry but that is one of the ugliest men I've ever seen:eek:

Aramis
10-30-2010, 12:53 PM
I'm sorry but that is one of the ugliest men I've ever seen:eek:

"A man is not a man unless he is ugly, and a women is not a women unless she is pretty” - Captain Kunuckles




http://www.flapjack.tv/assets/images/flapjack-captain-knuckles.gif

Debaser11
10-30-2010, 01:30 PM
http://static.technorati.com/glosslip/2007/09/ice-t-coco.jpg
http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/6886-pimp_amp_ho.jpg
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/ice-t-and-wife-coco-jermaine-dupris-36th-birthday-party-arrivals-gMijja.jpg
http://www.showbiz.ie/images/stars2/ice-t-coco3.jpg

Hard to say this is a loss though. If anything, this is a loss for the black side - Ice-T does a damn great job in Law & Order: SVU.

Wait, this is racially incorrect? Had me fooled. :)

Debaser11
10-30-2010, 01:34 PM
He is a solid tennis player(from Thailand I think).

Yeah, he had Southeast Asian written all over his nose.

Austin
10-30-2010, 01:49 PM
Wait, this is racially incorrect? Had me fooled. :)

Anyone who does that to their breasts to that degree is far lost anyways. Still sick to see though =/

Eldritch
11-04-2010, 02:22 AM
http://www.thelocal.se/articleImages/30000.jpg


[Den motvillige monarken (‘The reluctant monarch’)] also tells of alleged year-long love affair the King had with a Swedish singer and model.

According to the Expressen newspaper, the object of the King’s affection was Camilla Henemark, who was born to a Nigerian father and Swedish mother and who was once a founding member of the band Army of Lovers.

In 1994 she also hosted an erotic-themed programme on Sweden’s TV3 called Seventh Heaven.

The relationship reportedly lasted about a year in the late 1990s and with the knowledge of Queen Silvia.

According to the book, the King was quite smitten by Henemark, who goes by the stage name La Camilla.

“The King sometimes looked like a love-crazed school boy and on one occasion they talked about running away together to an isolated exotic island,” reads the book.

Link. (http://www.thelocal.se/30000/20101103/)

Alvarado
11-04-2010, 06:49 PM
(MODE NAZI ON)

Spanish singer Soraya Arnelas and her swedish boyfriend:

http://www.hola.com/musica/2009/02/25/soraya-cibeles/imgs/soraya1a.jpg

http://sp0.fotolog.com/photo/32/56/4/always__soraya/1251799832791_f.jpg

http://www.todocotilleo.com/wp-content/uploads/soraya.jpg

http://canales.hoy.es/datos/soraya/img/sorayabio.jpg


We must protect our women from these greasy monkeys.
(MODE NAZI OFF)

Agrippa
11-04-2010, 08:34 PM
What does that have to do with "Nazi", if "the Nazis" would have rarely if ever, criticised such relationships?

Megrez
11-04-2010, 09:47 PM
http://htmlimg3.scribdassets.com/8tobl85ksqfyksg/images/83-b0c3d912a8/000.jpg

There's another photo of this couple, I have to find it. The guy is of a swarthy type... and? He's wearing a nazi uniform and nobody is shooting him for dating the fair woman.

Vasconcelos
11-04-2010, 10:06 PM
He's still white, regardless of being tanned, swarthy or whatever.

Megrez
11-04-2010, 11:37 PM
I found the other photo:

http://comunidadeativa.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/nazi-german-colored-photo-471.jpg?w=640 (http://comunidadeativa.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/nazi-german-colored-photo-471.jpg)

And the same photo afore posted in better resolution:

http://comunidadeativa.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/nazi-german-colored-photo-681.jpg?w=640 (http://comunidadeativa.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/nazi-german-colored-photo-681.jpg)

Does the myth that such a swarthy/fair couple was incorrect for the Nazis still stand? That's BS and the photos above prove it.


Thanks to: 82 fotos coloridas raras da Alemanha Nazista -- COMUNIDADE ATIVA (http://comunidadeativa.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/82-fotos-coloridas-raras-da-alemanha-nazista/)

Debaser11
11-04-2010, 11:41 PM
Not to derail the thread, but there are a lot of myths about how the Nazis (especially Hitler himself) viewed race. Sometimes they were over the top, but they weren't the morons you're led to believe they are in primary and secondary school about this stuff. Personally, that couple gets an A+ from me on the "Racial Compatibility Correctness Report Card."

Megrez
11-05-2010, 12:24 AM
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/5673/rafaniver2hs4.png

Look at the little boy: :eek:


http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/8306/rafaniver5dp0.png

The little boy again: :bullet puke :runs:

The little boy has wisdom.

Austin
11-05-2010, 01:12 AM
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/5673/rafaniver2hs4.png

Look at the little boy: :eek:


http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/8306/rafaniver5dp0.png

The little boy again: :bullet puke :runs:

The little boy has wisdom.

oh my god


and I think probably that little kid is not from the guy he doesn't look it really

The Lawspeaker
11-05-2010, 01:17 AM
I think that the young boy is her younger brother or the like ? Gods.. how old is this girl: 15? 16?

Debaser11
11-05-2010, 01:25 AM
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/5673/rafaniver2hs4.png


http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/8306/rafaniver5dp0.png


The little boy has wisdom.

F-!

I don't know if he has wisdom, but I can hope he hasn't degraded his race the way this broad shown above has.

Megrez
11-05-2010, 01:26 AM
No way the kid was born to the couple, I believe he is the girl's brother.

Debaser11
11-05-2010, 01:27 AM
I think that the young boy is her younger brother or the like ? Gods.. how old is this girl: 15? 16?

It's likely she's well past marrying age in homeboy's "different but equally valid" culture. :rolleyes2:

The Lawspeaker
11-05-2010, 01:27 AM
She looks like a very hansom young girl that could make a boy of her own sort very happy. And at her age it's probably just a phase but I hope that no children will be born from this temporary union.

The picture was taken in 2001 and it's very likely that this younglady is now married and the proud mother of a couple of children of European descent.

Vasconcelos
11-05-2010, 01:33 AM
photos are from 2001, so hopefully she's grown up a bit (mentally) and dropped that negro.

Megrez
11-05-2010, 02:59 AM
She looks like a very hansom young girl that could make a boy of her own sort very happy. And at her age it's probably just a phase but I hope that no children will be born from this temporary union.

The picture was taken in 2001 and it's very likely that this younglady is now married and the proud mother of a couple of children of European descent.
I make mine those words. All I can tell for sure about the picture is that the people portrayed are Brazilian, the picture's title, "rafaniver" refers to the birthday of someone nicknamed "Rafa" - could be either one in the picture. "Niver" is slang for aniversário, birthday.

The lad clearly belongs to a lower social level, being equivalent to a chav or gangsta. Such types are often attractive to young girls, with their "cool", devious stance, the easygoing conversation characteristic of someone with an empty head and the apparent patience to understand the futilities of a modern girl (again characteristic of vacuum heads). But no way the girl will marry him, for it would mean she would have to live with him in a favella or any kind of poor place where he surely belongs. When responsibilities begin to pop, she will realize there is no prospect of a secure future with the lad, with good income and a dwelling in a decent place, so she would dump him. Even more so, would it be if she is attending a university, with prospects of graduation and a well paid employment: she herself would become increasingly demanding for the lowlife lad and a breaking point for both would come soon.

There are only 3 scenarios in which she might end marrying the guy:


She comes from a poor environment, of the same social level as the lad (which she doesn't seem to be);

Both are members of evangelical churches (and probably so are their parents); however, this is usually true only to people of lower social level, which makes scenario 1 almost a precondition for scenario 2;

Last and less probably, she will demand her (wealthy) parents to sustain herself and and the lowlife. I've heard a few stories of moronic, extremely caring/loving parents that agree to sustain their offspring and the in-law, in some cases they let the couple dwell in the parental home, living almost like screaming teenagers. This is a truly rotten, unhealthy environment, such situation can't sustain itself for long and the parents usually have a breaking-point. This usually ends with the separation of the couple.

Agrippa
11-05-2010, 01:47 PM
It is interesting to classify him, he could be all kind of things, but for sure no typical Negroid of any sort, I suspect he's triracial...

Debaser11
11-05-2010, 11:10 PM
It is interesting to classify him, he could be all kind of things, but for sure no typical Negroid of any sort, I suspect he's triracial...

Trirone!

Alvarado
11-05-2010, 11:58 PM
Not to derail the thread, but there are a lot of myths about how the Nazis (especially Hitler himself) viewed race.

In his own words:

"This conglomerate spectacle of heterogeneous races which the capital of the Dual Monarchy presented, this motley of Czechs, Poles, Hungarians, Ruthenians, Serbs and Croats, etc., and always that bacillus which is the solvent of human society, the Jew, here and there and everywhere--the whole spectacle was repugnant to me. The gigantic city seemed to be the incarnation of mongrel depravity." (Mein Kampf, Chapter 3)

Debaser11
11-06-2010, 01:12 AM
^Yes, I probably agree with that sentiment. I would assume most cultural preservationists would logically have to as well.

Megrez
11-06-2010, 01:27 AM
That says nothing about swarthies dating fair ones, btw.

Alvarado
11-06-2010, 03:13 AM
Hitler's views on mixing between europeans:


"Here again it was believed that the Polish people could be Germanized by being compelled to use the German language. The result would have been fatal. A people of foreign race would have had to use the German language to express modes of thought that were foreign to the German, thus compromising by its own inferiority the dignity and nobility of our nation". (Mein Kampf, Chapter 2, VOL II)


"We must consider it as fortunate that a Germanization of Austria according to the plan of Joseph II did not succeed. Probably the result would have been that the Austrian State would have been able to survive, but at the same time participation in the use of a common language would have debased the racial quality of the German element". (Mein Kampf, Chapter 2, VOL II)


"For the Russian State was not organized by the constructive political talent of the Slav element in Russia, but was much more a marvellous exemplification of the capacity for State-building possessed by the Germanic element in a race of inferior worth". (Mein Kampf, Chapter 14, VOL II)

Debaser11
11-06-2010, 06:50 AM
Hitler's views on mixing between europeans:

Dude, what's your point? I think Hitler has some valid points about race, there (from both a spiritual and perhaps a genetic perspective). Am I supposed to be appalled that he views Poles as inferior? You think Poles didn't view Germans as inferior? We know they're not the same racially from a cultural, spiritual, or even a biological point of view, for the most part. What's wrong with him thinking his countrymen are superior? Your point seems to be that what he is saying is unpalatable, but you're not explaining why he's actually wrong for thinking the way he does. Mixing cultures does degrade or destroy those that existed before. That's just a law of nature. Is that not why globalization disgusts some of us? When Europeans from Eastern Europe immigrated to the U.S., it wore down the traditional Anglo culture some. Sure, it added something new but a person does not necessarily have to see that as a positive. I wouldn't want to see any European culture degraded by massive racial/cultural mixing, either.

Would you like it better if he sprinkled some 21st century relativist crap like "I know we're all equal but I just really like German stuff better because I'm German and so mixing is therefore not desirable"?

Agrippa
11-06-2010, 12:31 PM
In his own words:

You have to read this passage in the correct context, because in this case, he used race like many English speaking people do, making not clear whether he meant biological races or "races of people".

So what he really meant, especially in this passage, is the multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and divided context of the Austrian monarchy.

He said later, that the only plausible solution would have been to radically Germanise the rest of the monarchy, to form a new identity - he's not saying that this would have been no problem at all, as his comment about Poles in Prussia shows, but "races" has to be seen, in this passage, being more than just biological races and means rather "ethnicities", ethnocultural groups.


That says nothing about swarthies dating fair ones, btw.

Actually, if reading the SS-standards, the basic requirements for those units, obviously considered the biological future elite of the state, were that the core should be Nordoid and North Cromagnoid to put it simple.

But
- that was the future elite, it had little to do with any sort of restrictions for common people
- among the requirements further notes explain (simplified): Also acceptable are people of the Dinarid and Mediterranid type, especially the mixtures, as long as they are not too foreign looking. So all progressive variants were accepted largely, as long as they weren't too foreign looking - ok, that's open to debate.

Also, if it was about Czechs, a large portion was considered integrable, so eindeutschungsfähig.

This means, whatever was said before, in the practical policy, a large portion of the other nations was considered assimilable, but to put it simple, elements which were considered less favourable - even in the own people - shouldn't be strengthened.

So f.e. to assimilate all Poles would have meant, to say it blunt, that the Osteuropid element would have increased in this future German people drastically.

Also in the assimilation and SS-policy, you see a lot of political influences of that time - I mean people which were considered friendly allies were always portrayed better than those which were declared enemies, like the Poles f.e.

That's just natural, especially in a war...

Cheesypie
11-06-2010, 10:35 PM
http://www.showbiz.ie/images/stars2/ice-t-coco3.jpg

We could use a few of those zebra poachers they have in Africa.

Joe McCarthy
11-06-2010, 11:03 PM
Hitler's views on mixing between europeans:

The Nazis actually employed the death penalty against Polish slave laborers in Germany who slept with Germans. To them it was racial defilement.

Alvarado
11-06-2010, 11:13 PM
The Nazis actually employed the death penalty against Polish slave laborers in Germany who slept with Germans. To them it was racial defilement.

Nazism isn't pan-europeanism, but germanic supremacism despite revisionist tales. Mein Kampf is a good proof of that.

Cheesypie
11-06-2010, 11:18 PM
The Nazis actually employed the death penalty against Polish slave laborers in Germany who slept with Germans. To them it was racial defilement.

That is horrid... Where did you discover this?

Joe McCarthy
11-06-2010, 11:20 PM
Nazism isn't pan-europanism, but germanic supremacism despite revisionist tales. Mein Kampf is a good proof of that.

Beyond that, it's another indication of just how much Nazi era racialism differs from racialism today, and adds another reason for today's racialists not to slobber over the Nazis. They can be seen as an influence, yes, but there is way too much fanboy worship going on.

Megrez
11-07-2010, 12:45 AM
Actually, if reading the SS-standards, the basic requirements for those units, obviously considered the biological future elite of the state, were that the core should be Nordoid and North Cromagnoid to put it simple.

But
- that was the future elite, it had little to do with any sort of restrictions for common people
- among the requirements further notes explain (simplified): Also acceptable are people of the Dinarid and Mediterranid type, especially the mixtures, as long as they are not too foreign looking. So all progressive variants were accepted largely, as long as they weren't too foreign looking - ok, that's open to debate.

Also, if it was about Czechs, a large portion was considered integrable, so eindeutschungsfähig.

This means, whatever was said before, in the practical policy, a large portion of the other nations was considered assimilable, but to put it simple, elements which were considered less favourable - even in the own people - shouldn't be strengthened.

So f.e. to assimilate all Poles would have meant, to say it blunt, that the Osteuropid element would have increased in this future German people drastically.

Also in the assimilation and SS-policy, you see a lot of political influences of that time - I mean people which were considered friendly allies were always portrayed better than those which were declared enemies, like the Poles f.e.

That's just natural, especially in a war...

That.

Perhaps the Nazis would have a problem with a German marrying someone of a mediterranean nation, but not exactly for strictly biological reasons, as proposed in this thread with that Swedish/Spanish couple as example. The problem appointed by Hitler in Mein Kampf was more the cultural mongrelization, which was vanishing the German culture in the capital (Vienna) of a German nation (Austria), thus putting aspires of nationalist ideals into oblivion.
The lowest common denominator for cultures will always be sought in a multicultural environment, which goes against the uplift of cultural standards the Nazis sought...

As for the Nordic ideal, as Agrippa said it was a goal to be sought for the future, the foundations for the future society were still being built, even by people who didn't match the euphenic ideal for the future, who however were steadfast to the long term goal.

http://forum.axishistory.com/download/file.php?id=133659

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1890/magda00uw1.jpg

Margarete Siegroth and Magda Goebbels matched the Nordic ideal, but their respective husbands, Heinrich Himmler and Joseph Goebbels, surely didn't match the euphenic standards for the future. But did the Nazis consider them incorrect couples? The memetic genes of those men would be a contribution of the utmost benefit for the future of the Reich...

There's a sociocultural question involved in this issue of sub-racial, or rather meta-ethnical, mixing, under Nazi ideal. As Agrippa said, mixing with a not foreign looking individual (on a phenotypic level) would be more desirable, as I think he/she would carry a more similar memetic memory to that of the German individual, not to mention the fitness for the future Nordic ideal. But in no way it would be desirable the ordinary, low-brow individual of Germany to marry an equally ordinary individual of other nation, no matter the racial type, especially in an urban environment, for they would likely seek the lowest common denominator for cultures and aspires for cultural uplift would be destroyed, as Hitler verified in Vienna.
However, marriages with foreign individuals of a clearly higher sociocultural type, akin to the ideals sought in Nazi Germany wouldn't be opposed, I think, as well as marriage between German individuals of the type aforementioned and foreigners of occupied or satellite countries (there's even an example of the latter case in the history of the family of a member of this very forum). Julius Evola, born in Rome to a Sicilian family of nobles, lived in Germany from 1943 to the end of war. What if he had taken a German woman to marry? I don't think the Nazis would oppose...

Megrez
11-07-2010, 12:48 AM
The Nazis actually employed the death penalty against Polish slave laborers in Germany who slept with Germans. To them it was racial defilement.
What nation would want its women to mate with slave laborers? For me it's common sense lol :roll eyes

Gamera
11-07-2010, 01:03 AM
What nation would want its women to mate with slave laborers? For me it's common sense lol :roll eyes


The Nazis actually employed the death penalty against Polish slave laborers in Germany who slept with Germans. To them it was racial defilement.

Polish man:

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-d/041-NS-rassenschande-terror-pole-gefesselt-m-schild-Eisenach-15-11-1940.jpg

Mordid
11-07-2010, 01:09 AM
Polish man:

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-d/041-NS-rassenschande-terror-pole-gefesselt-m-schild-Eisenach-15-11-1940.jpg

:rolleyes:

Cato
11-07-2010, 01:16 AM
Nazism isn't pan-europeanism, but germanic supremacism despite revisionist tales. Mein Kampf is a good proof of that.

I've read the book.. twice over, going on thrice over, and it's just a long-winded bit of shite from some would-be autocrat's deepest and most insane imaginings. That folks still get off on Hitler these days amazes me. :eek:

Now, the surviving (and collected) writings of Washington inspire and are worth admiration. The writings of Hitler excite only contempt. :grumpy:

Alvarado
11-07-2010, 01:23 AM
Beyond that, it's another indication of just how much Nazi era racialism differs from racialism today, and adds another reason for today's racialists not to slobber over the Nazis. They can be seen as an influence, yes, but there is way too much fanboy worship going on.

In my opinion, they can't be seen as an influence because they are against a considerable part of Europe. Nazi ideology is based on the innate inferiority of non-germanic europeans, which is laughable considering that nazis try to stole the past of other european nations (and even non-europeans) due to the lack of great ancient civilizations in Germanic Europe. Nazi dreams about nordic pharaohs (no Ramses II bullshit please) and blond Persian emperors are ridiculous and bizarre. This way of acting is untypical of proud European people.

Megrez
11-07-2010, 01:25 AM
Punishments for violation of racial NS law, "racial defilement" (http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-ENGL.html)

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-d/041-NS-rassenschande-terror-pole-gefesselt-m-schild-Eisenach-15-11-1940-45pr.jpg
Polish man chained with shield for racial defilement, Eisenach (Thuringia) 15 Nov 1940: "Ich bin ein Rassenschänder" ("I am a racial defiler")

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-d/042-NS-rassenschande-terror-dt-frau-ausgestossen-m-schild-Altenburg-7-2-1942-35pr.jpg
German woman with shield: Expelled from the people's community, Altenburg (Thuringia) 7 Feb 1942, because she was together with a Pole. Text: "Ich bin aus der Volksgemeinschaft ausgestossen!" ("I am expelled from the people's community!")

The punition goes the other way around too... those Nazi folks were unbiased. :cool:

Megrez
11-07-2010, 01:33 AM
In my opinion, they can't be seen as an influence because they are against a considerable part of Europe. Nazi ideology is based on the innate inferiority of non-germanic europeans, which is laughable considering that nazis try to stole the past of other european nations (and even non-europeans) due to the lack of great ancient civilizations in Germanic Europe. Nazi dreams about nordic pharaohs (no Ramses II bullshit please) and blond Persian emperors are ridiculous and bizarre. This way of acting is untypical of proud European people.
Aren't these actually, Nordicist dreams?

Care to provide a source proving these were official historic teachings in the III Reich?

Alvarado
11-07-2010, 01:39 AM
I've read the book.. twice over, going on thrice over, and it's just a long-winded bit of shite from some would-be autocrat's deepest and most insane imaginings. That folks still get off on Hitler these days amazes me. :eek:

Now, the surviving (and collected) writings of Washington inspire and are worth admiration. The writings of Hitler excite only contempt. :grumpy:

I completely agree and I salute these "swarthy" gentlemen.
http://mcgrathstudio.com/portraits/lee02.jpg

Cato
11-07-2010, 01:42 AM
I completely agree and I salute these "swarthy" gentlemen.
http://mcgrathstudio.com/portraits/lee02.jpg

That's a collection of C.S.A. general officers there, sir, from the looks of things. :)

Robert E. Lee married into Washington's family by marrying the daughter or granddaughter of his wife, Martha Custis (Washington). Lee was also from Virginia, where I lived, so you won't find me insulting the Confederate generals like I do with Sheridan and co.

Alvarado
11-07-2010, 01:20 AM
Aren't these actually, Nordicist dreams?

Care to provide a source proving these were official historic teachings in the III Reich?


Some examples:


"Ahura Mazda says to Zoroaster: Only once in the year does one see the rising and setting of stars and sun and moon; and the inhabitants hold to be a day, what is a year. This must be for the Persian god of light a distant memory of the Nordic homeland, for only in the far north do day and night each last six months".


"Together with these primeval Aryan Atlantic memories appear those cult allegories, costumes, carvings which are understandable only in terms of Nordic origin. In predynastic Egypt, we find the Nordic boat with its swan neck and trefoil. But the rowers are the later ruling Amorites, already recognised by Sayce as fair skinned and blue eyed".


"The Amorites founded Jerusalem, and they formed the Nordic weft in later Galilee, that is, in the pagan region whence Jesus is said to have come. The Amorites were then augmented by the Philistines, who also brought to Syria hitherto unknown Nordic ship designs, with axe and trefoil as the stem symbols".


"When the first great Nordic wave rolled over the high mountains into India, it had already passed through many hostile races. Instinctively, as it were, the Indoaryans separated themselves from the dark alien peoples they encountered".


"From the sixth century B.C. on, Iran underwent a vast expansion by the Aryan Persians. Under Arshama, there arose one of the greatest personalities of Indoeuropean history, Spitama (Zoroaster, or Zarathustra). Concerned about the fate of the Aryan minority, he developed an idea which is only now beginning to revive in the Nordic west—protecting the race by endogamy within kin. But since the Aryan ruling aristocracy were sparsely scattered, Zoroaster tried to reinforce this imperative by creating an ideologically bound community of faith".


"Most beautifully of all was the dream of Nordic man made manifest in Hellas. Wave upon wave came from the Danube valley and overlaid the earlier population of mixed Aryan and non Aryan immigrants, bringing fresh creative powers. The ancient Mycenaean culture of the Achaeans was predominantly Nordic in character. Next, Dorian tribes stormed anew the citadels of the racially alien aborigines".

Alfred Rosenberg, The Myth of the Twentieth Century.

Cato
11-07-2010, 01:26 AM
Ahuramazda said a great deal to Zoroaster Spitama, but nothing about the superiority of Nordics over all else. Rather, the doctrines of Ahuramazda are for "the seven regions of the earth" and all of the people therein, civilized and barbarian alike.

Refer to the Gathas, the actual hymns of Zoroaster in Old Avestan (largely extinct even before the Jews were writing their Torah). It's quite easy for Nazi sods to take the words of Zoroaster, an actual Aryan rather than some wannabe, out-of-context for their own useless purposes.

Debaser11
11-07-2010, 01:31 AM
Some proof. :rolleyes2:

Agrippa
11-07-2010, 09:38 AM
The Nazis actually employed the death penalty against Polish slave laborers in Germany who slept with Germans. To them it was racial defilement.

The dominant group always cares about its people, especially the women. You might tolerate mixture, but never of foreign males with your own women, especially not if the husband is probably fighting for Germany at the front, while the POW makes children with his wife!


Nazism isn't pan-europeanism, but germanic supremacism despite revisionist tales. Mein Kampf is a good proof of that.

National Socialism wasn't "Paneuropean" in the sense of Coudenhove-Kalergi, but they had a common European interest, but wanted to form a new order for all European people, with the own Germanic-German enlarged sphere of influence.


Margarete Siegroth and Magda Goebbels matched the Nordic ideal, but their respective husbands, Heinrich Himmler and Joseph Goebbels, surely didn't match the euphenic standards for the future.

There's a name for that too though: "Aufnorden" - make a bloodline more Nordic.

So if you are an elite man, you might care for your future generations in the bloodline becoming more ideal.

Actually that wasn't so much of a goal to them, but that was a possibility.


Margarete Siegroth and Magda Goebbels

One can doubt whether any of the two was so much more Nordoud than their husbands, Magda Goebbels most likely, though Goebbels must have had recessive Nordoid genes, otherwise his children wouldn't have been so light pigmented.

Siegroth is about as Alpinoid as Himmler - both having Atlanto-Nordid influences, so a "perfect match".


What nation would want its women to mate with slave laborers? For me it's common sense

Especially if consideirng the special circumstances - war, many husbands at the front and risking their life etc.

But Cultural Marxism changed our perspective, even here...


Polish man:

The picture tells me nothing about the circumstances, when, why, who that is, what he did etc.


Alfred Rosenberg, The Myth of the Twentieth Century.

He wanted - generally speaking - a better treatment of Eastern Europeans by the way, but actually, Rosenberg was not very influential in any way...

Alvarado
11-07-2010, 02:58 PM
National Socialism wasn't "Paneuropean" in the sense of Coudenhove-Kalergi, but they had a common European interest, but wanted to form a new order for all European people, with the own Germanic-German enlarged sphere of influence.


The problem is that nazi new order was based on something like that:


"For the Russian State was not organized by the constructive political talent of the Slav element in Russia, but was much more a marvellous exemplification of the capacity for State-building possessed by the Germanic element in a race of inferior worth". (Mein Kampf, Chapter 14, VOL II)


"We must consider it as fortunate that a Germanization of Austria according to the plan of Joseph II did not succeed. Probably the result would have been that the Austrian State would have been able to survive, but at the same time participation in the use of a common language would have debased the racial quality of the German element". (Mein Kampf, Chapter 2, VOL II)

Austin
11-07-2010, 03:28 PM
I've read the book.. twice over, going on thrice over, and it's just a long-winded bit of shite from some would-be autocrat's deepest and most insane imaginings. That folks still get off on Hitler these days amazes me. :eek:

Now, the surviving (and collected) writings of Washington inspire and are worth admiration. The writings of Hitler excite only contempt. :grumpy:


I like the writings of Hitler. I'd vote for him today.



I disagree that Hitler was a completely naive domestic racialist, the evidence and his actions don't add up to that at least in respect to Germanic peoples throughout the West.

The Nazi party of America was directly funded and or initially given directives from Hitler himself. It later decided to pass leadership over to American Nazi's instead of German Nazi's in an effort to grow in numbers, which it indeed did because of that move. Hitler was the one who decided on this move.KPGT7EaCiIY

Cato
11-07-2010, 04:21 PM
I
The Nazi party of America was directly funded and or initially given directives from Hitler himself. It later decided to pass leadership over to American Nazi's instead of German Nazi's in an effort to grow in numbers, which it indeed did because of that move. Hitler was the one who decided on this move.KPGT7EaCiIY

And was a front for a hostile, foreign power, just like AIPAC is today.

Tomasz
11-07-2010, 05:39 PM
The dominant group always cares about its people, especially the women. You might tolerate mixture, but never of foreign males with your own women, especially not if the husband is probably fighting for Germany at the front, while the POW makes children with his wife!

That's very true but why did they call him "race defiler"? Doesn't it suggest racial motive behind this punishment?

This one of things about Third Reich I will never understand. I was in (East) Germany and people don't look that much different when you cross the border, not enough to suggest some great racial barrer.

Vasconcelos
11-07-2010, 06:04 PM
I like the writings of Hitler. I'd vote for him today.

Suprise!

Joe McCarthy
11-07-2010, 08:00 PM
In my opinion, they can't be seen as an influence because they are against a considerable part of Europe. Nazi ideology is based on the innate inferiority of non-germanic europeans, which is laughable considering that nazis try to stole the past of other european nations (and even non-europeans) due to the lack of great ancient civilizations in Germanic Europe. Nazi dreams about nordic pharaohs (no Ramses II bullshit please) and blond Persian emperors are ridiculous and bizarre. This way of acting is untypical of proud European people.

By the same token the ancient Greeks considered non-Greeks to be inferior barbarians. That doesn't mean I dismiss Plato and Herodotus.

Joe McCarthy
11-07-2010, 08:04 PM
That is horrid... Where did you discover this?

http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-d/043-NS-rassenschande-terror-4-poln-zwangsarbeiter-aufgehaengt-plakat-1942.jpg


Poster that 4 Poles had been hanged for racial defilement, 1942. Text:


"Polen! In letzter Zeit wurden hingerichtet: Zlosnik Josef, Sikora Stanislaus, Domagala Wladyslaw, Pesko Josef. Ihr sollt daraus erkennen: Wer arbeitet, hat es gut in Deutschland! Wer nicht arbeiten will, wird dazu gezwungen! Wer sich gegen die deutschen Kriegs- und Sittengesetze vergeht, wird aufgehängt!"

(English: "Poles! Recently were executed: Zlosnik Josef, Sikora Stanislaus, Domagala Wladyslaw, Pesko Josef. You shall recognize by this: Who is working will live well in Germany! Who does not want to work will be forced to do so! Who is violating the German war and moral laws will be hanged!")



http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-ENGL.html

Here is more on the subject:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,672803,00.html

Joe McCarthy
11-07-2010, 08:07 PM
And was a front for a hostile, foreign power, just like AIPAC is today.

I wouldn't call Israel a hostile power. I'd call them a dangerous ally. They actually vote with us far more than the UK, Canada, and France at the UN. Greece has a powerful lobby too. That doesn't make them hostile.

That isn't to say I like AIPAC. In fact, I think foreign lobbies should be banned. But Israel isn't North Korea.

Agrippa
11-07-2010, 08:12 PM
That's very true but why did they call him "race defiler"? Doesn't it suggest racial motive behind this punishment?

This one of things about Third Reich I will never understand. I was in (East) Germany and people don't look that much different when you cross the border, not enough to suggest some great racial barrer.

That's a question of propaganda obviously. I mean if the Christian inquisition eliminated a hostile preacher, they didn't spoke about: "We defend the power and dominance of the Catholic church against competitors, because we want to control all of you."

But something different.

In a similar way they used the general idea if racial pride and ideals to keep away the foreign ethnic elements from the German women, plain and simple.

Obviously some really thought about the Poles being racially inferiour, but if it is about these concrete cases and laws, I think the thing can be explained the way I described.

Alvarado
11-07-2010, 08:55 PM
By the same token the ancient Greeks considered non-Greeks to be inferior barbarians. That doesn't mean I dismiss Plato and Herodotus.

Since when ancient Greeks can be considered European preservationists? That comparison is wrong. Ancient Greeks weren't "proeuropean" or "prowhite" and they didn't want some kind of European Union . They were coherent with their ideology. However, revisionists try to make an European Union with an antieuropean ideology, wich is completely incoherent.

Joe McCarthy
11-07-2010, 09:01 PM
Since when ancient Greeks can be considered European preservationists? That comparison is wrong. Ancient Greeks weren't "proeuropean" or "prowhite" and they didn't want some kind of European Union . They were coherent with their ideology. However, revisionists try to make an European Union with an antieuropean ideology, wich is completely incoherent.

Your view would seem to be that since the German Nazis weren't genuine pan-Europeans, they can't be an influence. That is a classic example of the package deal fallacy. As in anything else, we take what is good and leave what is bad. To just take a knee-jerk posture and reject everything about the Nazis, makes us no better than antifas in spirit.

As for the Greeks being pro-white, I'd argue that they were in fact 'racists', but that's another argument, and this thread is already too derailed.

Debaser11
11-07-2010, 10:56 PM
Would other people speaking German not debase the language? Is English not debased now thinks to niggers and other third worlders who bend the common lexicon? I mean, fair enough if you don't like Hitler, but is there something you care to emphasize that is actually not likely to be true? Sometimes the truth is not pleasant to hear. That's hardly the Nazis' fault.


That's very true but why did they call him "race defiler"? Doesn't it suggest racial motive behind this punishment?

This one of things about Third Reich I will never understand. I was in (East) Germany and people don't look that much different when you cross the border, not enough to suggest some great racial barrer.

Many people rightfully view race as a spiritual aspect on top of genetic one. My father meets the genetic standard to be racially Polish, but as an American, I doubt he is very Polish in spirit.

And concerning the choice of the word "defiler," consider that this was the era before the age of massive 20th century relativism. From the perspective of a Pole, of course a Pole was the best. From the perspective of a German, of course a German was superior. From the perspective of a Czech, of course the Czechs were the best. My Czech grandfather remembers how big of a deal it was for him to marry my German grandmother. And this was in the U.S. AFTER WWII and race-guilt propaganda was in full swing.

So from the perspective of the Germans promulgating the law, a Pole very much is defiling them. He's taking away their Germanness to a degree, no? Is that not almost by definition defiling them? I would say that Polish/German union also defiles Polishness to a certain degree. It might seem to petty next to Arabs marrying Europeans, but I think it's still a valid concern.

Troll's Puzzle
11-08-2010, 11:16 AM
here's some to vex you ;)

John Barnes (the first black man to play for England) and current wife Amanda. She's pregnant for the second time by him. It's in the news right now because he's said he'd rather watch football than watch the child be born.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/11/08/article-1327485-0BF66FFF000005DC-966_468x715.jpg

this is his second wife, before that he was married to this woman;
http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/sm3/oct2007/5/3/E5CCF3B3-0409-4731-1764F702A38ED95F.jpg
she had 4 kids by him. I found the pic by googling her name, it's in the first article which is in a tabloid with this headline:
"John barnes cheated on me & left me for another woman.. but now we're best of pals"
:roll eyes:crazy::roll eyes

Here's another in the news recently. Spice Girl Emma Bunton is pregnant for the second time by her lover;
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01157/emma-682_1157514a.jpg

Debaser11
11-08-2010, 06:45 PM
here's some to vex you ;)

John Barnes (the first black man to play for England) and current wife Amanda. She's pregnant for the second time by him. It's in the news right now because he's said he'd rather watch football than watch the child be born.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/11/08/article-1327485-0BF66FFF000005DC-966_468x715.jpg

That woman is beautiful. Those losses are discouraging to see. I've noticed when blacks "steal white women" they overwhelmingly go for blonds. Especially famous blacks.


this is his second wife, before that he was married to this woman;
http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/sm3/oct2007/5/3/E5CCF3B3-0409-4731-1764F702A38ED95F.jpg
she had 4 kids by him.

So he has six children now? Good grief, what is he trying to do? Create an army of mulatto children? So depressing.


I found the pic by googling her name, it's in the first article which is in a tabloid with this headline:
"John barnes cheated on me & left me for another woman.. but now we're best of pals"
:roll eyes:crazy::roll eyes

Well, most black men do hit and run. But at least they aren't "evil" white men. And, he is a minority. We all need black friends...or something.

la bombe
11-08-2010, 07:44 PM
That woman is beautiful. Those losses are discouraging to see. I've noticed when blacks "steal white women" they overwhelmingly go for blonds. Especially famous blacks.


Maybe that's the case for celebrities and their trophy wives, but when I see a black man and a white women IRL, most of the times she isn't blonde. For the most part black men seem to prefer light-skinned black women, mestizas/triracials and other "light" by comparison but still swarthy type girls (Kim Kardashian) before blonde women. At least in the US.

Debaser11
11-08-2010, 07:56 PM
I'm sure it's partly a regional thing. There aren't as many of those women as you describe in my area, perhaps? The Mexicans are pretty ethnically conscious over here too. There aren't going to be too many of them going with blacks.

Cheesypie
11-08-2010, 10:28 PM
http://www.geschichteinchronologie.ch/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_zwangsarbeit-ENGL.html

Here is more on the subject:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,672803,00.html

The first link is a reprint from the Jewish Encyclopedia, which has been known to publish a few flights of fancy, not to say everything in it is. Unfortunately such idiocy has been used selectively by liberals in general (and Jews in particular) to attack any sense of white self-preservation.

Cheesypie
11-08-2010, 10:31 PM
John Barnes (the first black man to play for England) and current wife Amanda. She's pregnant for the second time by him. It's in the news right now because he's said he'd rather watch football than watch the child be born.

this is his second wife, before that he was married to this woman;


I cut off the rest of the post and especially the pictures to spare us of filth. THAT is racial defilement and there should be executions.

I'm sorry, I have no pity for a dumb whore who opens her legs for a nigger and stupidly thinks she's getting a Ward Cleaver.

Austin
11-08-2010, 11:22 PM
Meh I do not worry about such losses racially. If human history is an accurate measuring stick, and I firmly believe it is, then extreme, visibly-interracial people will succumb to the same fate in the future to which visibly mixed race people currently suffer in the U.S. prison system.

Clear mixed individuals are always the first to perish from any purifying force. This is especially true in respect to humans natural racialist sensitivities in times of great conflict for which if human history is any indicator there will be much of in the future.

Nature is not the only force which weeds out the unnatural and impure. Humans have a ripe history and tendency of it as well.


I wouldn't bring visibly mixed race children into this world not only because of my racial views but for the simple fact that I'd worry they were on borrowed time. I do not think they would survive the future and what it, based on human history, likely brings.

Megrez
12-14-2010, 08:48 PM
http://cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/85797877.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=77BFBA49EF8789215ABF3343C02EA5483678ADB21FEA509A F404B956E7BE04BB64349240FBDE0D48E30A760B0D811297
http://www3.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Grand+Opening+Pearl+Concert+Theater+Palms+HZ-v-7flOlYl.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4Y4737MSZxw/Sf3uLpy74YI/AAAAAAAALp0/kD4HZYYjbkI/s400/690390_height370_width560.jpg

Erin is American and Tony is British born to Indian parents. They're expecting a child, who will certainly be very pretty.

Tony used to be boyfriend of Gwen Stefani (they are bandmates in No Doubt). Their breakup 15 years ago inspired Gwen to compose No Doubt's hit "Don't Speak".

(Holy shit how I get to know these things?)

Davy Jones's Locker
12-15-2010, 08:13 PM
Jenson Button and Jessica Michibata

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/25/article-1187288-05135F06000005DC-918_468x350.jpg

Daniel Craig (Half English/Half Welsh) is in a relationship with (Part Japanese) Satsuki Mitchell.

http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2008/11/daniel-craig-satsuki-mitchell-kissing.jpg

Michael Shanks (Scottish-Canadian) has been married to (Half Filipino) Lexa Doig since 2003.

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/000JfKq1Jq4sV/610x.jpg

Don't think those two have been mentioned.

Austin
12-16-2010, 01:59 PM
Daniel Craig (Half English/Half Welsh) is in a relationship with (Part Japanese) Satsuki Mitchell.

http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2008/11/daniel-craig-satsuki-mitchell-kissing.jpg

Michael Shanks (Scottish-Canadian) has been married to (Half Filipino) Lexa Doig since 2003.

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/000JfKq1Jq4sV/610x.jpg

Don't think those two have been mentioned.


Fame corrupts and is not reminiscent of reality and it's norms. All the same it is mind-boggling to see just what absolutely dismal little sexual-fetish fiends fame and money can turn the average person into becoming.

This is why I strongly believe humans are not inherently honorable or loyal but must be instilled or gifted by chance of such values as it is evident most do not subscribe to such values on any level given ample indoctrination that what they are doing is acceptable or good for them.

Austin
12-29-2010, 03:54 AM
Some more:


Tim Duncan.....boy does she look out of place in that pic heh
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/421/timduncanandfamily1.jpg (http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/421/timduncanandfamily1.jpg)
OJ before he *really* nailed her (:
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/930/12084935.jpg
Tiger
http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/877/woodsfamilysmall.jpg
Cuban Gooding Jr.
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/1299/l365285.jpg
Kobe with kids (oh my god look at the little girl.....holy god)
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/260/kobebryantswifevanessaw.jpg
Reality TV whore
http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/3718/khloelamarodonpredivorc.jpg
Tony Parker
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/9812/72232786.jpg
Michael Jordan with whatever number she was to him I never kept up with his saga
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/8272/34249177.jpghttp://img826.imageshack.us/img826/3295/47869hankbaskettandkend.jpg
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/9495/itr1235647290tigerwoods.jpg

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 01:21 AM
Disgusting thread. I would call this thread as "Masochism". One should not be worried. In reality, most white women who go for black men are fat, ugly and over 100 pounds overweight. They're better off removed from the genepool while making negroes whiter.

Beorn
12-30-2010, 01:30 AM
John Barnes (the first black man to play for England)

Viv Anderson was the first. Come on, Trolly, at least give the homegrown monkeys credit before the foreigners :D

Austin
12-30-2010, 01:43 AM
I see them as unique, collector-edition human manifestations.

One day I suspect they'll be the topic of great amusement in history books once true civilization is reached and the depraved, modern-human-societal-ideological-Sodom ended.

Osweo
12-30-2010, 02:17 AM
while making negroes whiter.

I never understood how that is a 'good thing'. Seems far more dangerous than good to me.

Whitish 'Blacks' are only going to be better able to function in white countries, and thus shunt us aside more effectively, slipping more easily into our social structures and daughters' knickers.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 02:20 AM
^I've often thought the same thing, Os. And many of the "great" black leaders (Malcolm X, Harry Belafonte, Louis Farrakhan, and even the great B.O. himself, for example) had or have distinctly whiter complexions. Gee, I wonder why?

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 02:25 AM
I never understood how that is a 'good thing'. Seems far more dangerous than good to me.

Whitish 'Blacks' are only going to be better able to function in white countries, and thus shunt us aside more effectively, slipping more easily into our social structures and daughters' knickers.

It's good because you have less full-blown, crime ridden, dumber negros around.

A mulatto is definately less dumb than a full blown Congoid. They cause less problems. (not to mention the whiter they are, the less of a visual sore they are.)

It's also good because Caucasian genes and phenotypes are further spread.

Osweo
12-30-2010, 02:41 AM
It's good because you have less full-blown, crime ridden, dumber negros around.
You also have less white people than you would if the women in question had bore children to their own kind.

A mulatto is definately less dumb than a full blown Congoid. They cause less problems. (not to mention the whiter they are, the less of a visual sore they are.)
Mulattos (like Obama and Malcolm X and so on) tend to feel an identity problem. They often solve this by overstressing their commitment to Black causes. In doing so, they use European abilities to further anti-European agendas. I'd rather have full Congoids plotting against me than octoroons. :ohwell:

It's also good because Caucasian genes and phenotypes are further spread.
'Caucasian' (have a look on a map and find the Caucasus, and consider dropping that silly term) genes are spread with NO benefit to full Europeans.

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 02:47 AM
You also have less white people than you would if the women in question had bore children to their own kind.

Would you really want whales like this (this is what Black people usually can get) have lots of kids?

http://danieldickey.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/fat_girl.jpg

Removing them from the Gene pool you kill 2 evils.




Mulattos (like Obama and Malcolm X and so on) tend to feel an identity problem. They often solve this by overstressing their commitment to Black causes. In doing so, they use European abilities to further anti-European agendas. I'd rather have full Congoids plotting against me than octoroons. :ohwell:

That's because the one drop rule. In the USA, any mixed person is getting told to be a nigger since the day they're born. Not to mention the popularity of Hip Hop culture.



'Caucasian' (have a look on a map and find the Caucasus, and consider dropping that silly term) genes are spread with NO benefit to full Europeans.

I don't see why is it silly. The Caucasus can be considered as the geographical center of the Caucasoid periphery.

Beorn
12-30-2010, 02:48 AM
The two women on the panel are prime racemixers. One is fat, mentally deficient and prone to bloating herself with food when her latest buck leaves her for a younger, more malleable model, and the other is an attention seeking, musically challenged windbag with a husband who can damn sure play the black music, yeahaw!

I suspect the host is actually inbred too. Just look at his eyes....oh! He's a known Red. Silly me! That isn't being inbred, that is being a cunt.

Zoom to about the 2 min 18 sec mark for acceptable racism.

2moSvsIAbC0

Aren't Jews just the sweetest things?

Osweo
12-30-2010, 03:03 AM
Would you really want whales like this (this is what Black people usually can get) have lots of kids?

http://danieldickey.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/fat_girl.jpg

Removing them from the Gene pool you kill 2 evils.
These sad freaks are the descendants of heroic pioneers and workers. The problem is not in their genes. :tsk:

That's because the one drop rule. In the USA, any mixed person is getting told to be a nigger since the day they're born. Not to mention the popularity of Hip Hop culture.
A mixed person looks 'foreign' to a pure person, always did and always will, never mind passing cultural fads. They will always have doubtful allegiances.

I don't see why is it silly. The Caucasus can be considered as the geographical center of the Caucasoid periphery.
:ohwell:
Europoid makes far more sense.

I've been to the Caucasus. The Balkars and Nogai there can look like Mongols, even. It's a daft term.

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 03:13 AM
These sad freaks are the descendants of heroic pioneers and workers. The problem is not in their genes. :tsk:

They're already in the verge of degeneration.



A mixed person looks 'foreign' to a pure person, always did and always will, never mind passing cultural fads. They will always have doubtful allegiances.

I agree about that, but I think a fullblown negro population, even minoritary is more of a nuissance.



:ohwell:
Europoid makes far more sense.

I've been to the Caucasus. The Balkars and Nogai there can look like Mongols, even. It's a daft term.

Balkars and Nogai's are foreigners in Caucasus (Especially Nogais). These are Turkified groups and not fully native to Caucasus. You should try Chechens or Georgians, you won't see any Genghis amongst them.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 03:16 AM
I understand where you're coming from, Argenraza. But I think you're getting hung up on short term interests for the white races versus a long term interest for them. Miscengenation (and the inevitable acceptance that accomapnies an increasing rate of it) is not good. It degrades all the races of the world and their respective cultures. Such subversion should be fought tooth and nail if we see value in not only our race, but of the various races which make up true diversity in the real sense (and not the liberal sense).

la bombe
12-30-2010, 03:18 AM
Disgusting thread. I would call this thread as "Masochism". One should not be worried. In reality, most white women who go for black men are fat, ugly and over 100 pounds overweight. They're better off removed from the genepool while making negroes whiter.

Would you really want whales like this (this is what Black people usually can get) have lots of kids?

Removing them from the Gene pool you kill 2 evils.

Well, being a disgusting, degenerate fat whale or something similar myself, I guess I should just resign myself to my fate of fucking ghetto black guys and popping out mixed children in the hopes of "bettering the black gene pool" according to your brilliant suggestions.

.... Or not :rolleyes:

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 03:20 AM
Well, being a disgusting, degenerate fat whale or something similar myself, I guess I should just resign myself to my fate of fucking ghetto black guys and popping out mixed children in the hopes of "bettering the black gene pool" according to your brilliant suggestions.

.... Or not :rolleyes:

Reading that while seeing your "mood status" was quite hilarious, I have to give you a cookie for that.

Beorn
12-30-2010, 03:21 AM
http://www.carrieanddavidgrant.co.uk/images/Carrie_and_david_new.jpg

Primetime on CBeebies channel singing their lovely songs about love and friendship (admirable, of course) and mixed relationships...??? Huh??? Wha?

Here's the channels 'Spring song'.

avs0e66RwIk

I suppose the only saving grace is my daughter still calls black people 'brown faced'.

"Ere, Da! That bloke with de brown face say that ee were gonna take me teeth...."

LOL!

Fuck you BBC!!! We got your number yet!

Osweo
12-30-2010, 03:22 AM
They're already in the verge of degeneration.
There, but for the grace of god, go we all.

I agree about that, but I think a fullblown negro population, even minoritary is more of a nuissance.
A short term consideration that would see us end up like Puerto Rico in the longer run.

Balkars and Nogai's are foreigners in Caucasus (Especially Nogais). These are Turkified groups and not fully native to Caucasus. You should try Chechens or Georgians, you won't see any Genghis amongst them.
I know the older populations. But the Turkics have been there for many centuries. 'Foreign' is not an unproblematic term in such contexts.

'Old Caucasians' are not very good types to characterise the entire europid spectrum anyway, though. They are very much a peripheral type of only local importance.

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 03:25 AM
There, but for the grace of god, go we all.

Not if we filter out that specimens.



A short term consideration that would see us end up like Puerto Rico in the longer run.

That would be one dangerous consequence. It depends of the size of the Negro population.



I know the older populations. But the Turkics have been there for many centuries. 'Foreign' is not an unproblematic term in such contexts.

'Old Caucasians' are not very good types to characterise the entire europid spectrum anyway, though. They are very much a peripheral type of only local importance.

I think "Old Caucasians" are somewhere in the middle of the Caucasoid vicinity, just like Balkan peoples. Peripheral types for me would be Uralic, Turanid, Indid, Berberid etc...

Osweo
12-30-2010, 03:27 AM
Fuck you BBC!!! We got your number yet!
Beorny, this is the age of the DVD. You can get a single disc with ALL episodes of Bagpuss on for a few bob. I would NOT allow my kids to watch the filth they broadcast now. :(

I'd be sorely tempted to simply not have a TV aerial, to remove the temptation.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 03:33 AM
Well, being a disgusting, degenerate fat whale or something similar myself, I guess I should just resign myself to my fate of fucking ghetto black guys and popping out mixed children in the hopes of "bettering the black gene pool" according to your brilliant suggestions.

.... Or not :rolleyes:

Well, LB, I mean this with all due respect because I've had long chats with you in the past and grew to like you, there are two ways to react to Argenraza's words here.

One is to try your best to work on your physical shortcomings as best you can while acknowledging them (which you have of course done which is half the battle). Afterall, we all have them. Some people are not as capable of abstract thought. Others are simply ugly. Myself, I'm not the best looking guy and I'm far from the smartest.

But rather than feeling sorry for yourself like niggers do and tending toward the lowest common denominator (and I do realize you were being a bit sarcastic), you can try to fight the hand you've been dealt as best you can. Part of doing so is not being defensive about it.

And c'mon, you're no where near the cow that was posted in that pic. :) And you're thoughtful. The glass is half full here. :)

Beorn
12-30-2010, 03:35 AM
Beorny, this is the age of the DVD. You can get a single disc with ALL episodes of Bagpuss on for a few bob. I would NOT allow my kids to watch the filth they broadcast now. :(

I'd be sorely tempted to simply not have a TV aerial, to remove the temptation.

You forget the hurricane which is my personality :D

In fairness, the programming is good generally, but is spoiled by the propaganda which does rear its head often enough to notice. It is thankful that my children have taken a liking to certain cartoons and serial characters which are easily affordable to cater privately towards the children's requests, or have been graceful enough to leave opportunities to Pirates sailing the terrestrial seven seas to copy and mass produce.

I'd recommend Peppa Pig. Keep it quiet, but I actually look forward to watching it online and on TV with the kids. We all pretend to be one of the characters. :D

4__8rX-eI4s

Who can honestly say this is detrimental? It even stars Brian Blessed in some episodes! BRIAN BLOODY BLESSED!!! :D:p

la bombe
12-30-2010, 03:42 AM
But rather than feeling sorry for yourself like niggers do and tending toward the lowest common denominator (and I do realize you were being a bit sarcastic), you can try to fight the hand you've been dealt as best you can. Part of doing so is not being defensive about it.


I was being more than a tad bit sarcastic and I can be defensive if I want, especially when someone is implying that I am an "evil" that should be removed from the "white genepool" or whatever retarded, imaginary grouping that said someone has designated :thumb001:

Also LOL @ the interracial dating ad right below my post.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 03:45 AM
I was being more than a tad bit sarcastic and I can be defensive if I want, especially when someone is implying that I am an "evil" that should be removed from the "white genepool" or whatever retarded, imaginary grouping that said someone has designated :thumb001:

Also LOL @ the interracial dating ad right below my post.


Well, that's the part of your post I was addressing, I guess. I don't think you should be removed from the gene pool. :) The woman in that pic should be along with many other whites, though.

I think what Argenraza is saying is that the overweight nature of such people is a symptom of their degradation. Not a cause. You don't seem to resemble the people he's referring to and you're not an ugly fat whore, either.

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 03:48 AM
I was being more than a tad bit sarcastic and I can be defensive if I want, especially when someone is implying that I am an "evil" that should be removed from the "white genepool" or whatever retarded, imaginary grouping that said someone has designated :thumb001:

Also LOL @ the interracial dating ad right below my post.

I feel you're offended but in reality I didn't want to offend you and if you analize it, my ideas make sense and can also be applied from a female perspective.

One has to remember white people are the most merciful of the planet and that a huge part of the sentiment of being white is to babysit and help to improve other races while making ourselves even better.

I can easily see how that "degenerate fat whale" comment was agressive to some, but in reality it could have just been "degenerate weak toothless hillbilly".

Individuals like this should be better being bred out of our gene pool. They should be bred out because they're useless and degenerate looking, which reduces race quality. However, if sending them to breed with negros (an inherently inferior race) even the worst of our white individuals can be helpful to the negro gene-pool.

http://www.thewvsr.com/images/redneck.jpg

http://yourdouche.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/wigger.jpg

In this way, you're not only doing a favor to your race but also to other races as well.

I personally would be happier to see the individuals above with a (relatively speaking) attractive black girl than with a ugly whale like these, boosting the quantity of low-quality whites.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Od5Y-KUmNPc/SBfx1_vO2nI/AAAAAAAAAa8/w6zXH8jMiFo/s400/redneck_pics_tattoo2.jpg

la bombe
12-30-2010, 03:48 AM
The woman in that pic should be along with many other whites, though.


I'm not really a eugenicist so I can't stand behind that statement, personally.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 03:52 AM
I'm not really a eugenicist so I can't stand behind that statement, personally.

What's wrong with eugenics? Its application to every other species (plant or animal) is mainstream science. You know those nice strawberries you find in your grocery store? They wouldn't exist to the extent they do without eugenic principles. Scientists actually realize it's completely a fact of life but will not talk about it in relation to humans and especially not in relation to race for the sake of having a career. And I guess death threats for being an out and out eugenicist in the public limelight is also problematic.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 03:52 AM
I was being more than a tad bit sarcastic and I can be defensive if I want, especially when someone is implying that I am an "evil" that should be removed from the "white genepool" or whatever retarded, imaginary grouping that said someone has designated :thumb001:

Also LOL @ the interracial dating ad right below my post.

Pfft. So you're overweight! You're still good looking.

Fat at least can be fixed, while ugly cannot.

And I bet some of the men here bashing women are no lookers (the ones who showed their pictures certainly aren't).

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 03:55 AM
Pfft. So you're overweight! You're still good looking.

Fat at least can be fixed, while ugly cannot.

And I bet some of the men here bashing women are no lookers (the ones who showed their pictures certainly aren't).

You couldn't have laid on eyes on mine, then.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 04:00 AM
You couldn't have laid on eyes on mine, then.

Have you ever called a woman a whore, whale, cunt, damaged goods (or merely just goods), or advocated violence towards them?

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 04:03 AM
Have you ever called a woman a whore, whale, cunt, damaged goods (or merely just goods), or advocated violence towards them?

Yeah. I don't think I have on this site, though.

My statement was made in jest, anyways. The reality of the situation is that I know that there's no way any woman could find me anything but irresistable when looking at my pic. I don't need confirmation. ;)

You think I'm okay looking, right? Right?!! ;)

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 04:11 AM
Yeah. I don't think I have on this site, though.

My statement was made in jest, anyways. The reality of the situation is that I know that there's no way any woman could find me anything but irresistable when looking at my pic. I don't need confirmation. ;)

You think I'm okay looking, right? Right?!! ;)

I've never seen your pic.

But anyways, I hate the amount of woman bashing on this forum and the fact that my defending women gets an immediate accusation of being a Marxist or whatever.

And it's funny, men on race forums bash white women, and white men who race mix also bash white women. We never win.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 04:16 AM
I've never seen your pic.

But anyways, I hate the amount of woman bashing on this forum and the fact that my defending women gets an immediate accusation of being a Marxist or whatever.

And it's funny, men on race forums bash white women, and white men who race mix also bash white women. We never win.

Oh. You really think that women get a raw deal. I'm sorry. But I completely disagree. Feminism basically rules the day. Maybe I should move to your neck of the woods?


If I said "women are smarter than men" on a day time talk show (as I've seen some men do), I'd be cheered. If I said the reverse, I'd be booed off the stage. All I see in the media is a condescending attitude toward men and masculinity in general.

"Women are the stronger gender. They can have kids."

"Dumb macho male attitude."

Such statements and sentiments represent the status quo.

la bombe
12-30-2010, 04:24 AM
What's wrong with eugenics? Its application to every other species (plant or animal) is mainstream science. You know those nice strawberries you find in your grocery store? They wouldn't exist to the extent they do without eugenic principles. Scientists actually realize it's completely a fact of life but will not talk about it in relation to humans and especially not in relation to race for the sake of having a career. And I guess death threats for being an out and out eugenicist in the public limelight is also problematic.

I never offered any critique of eugenics, I said that I myself am not one. At least not to the extent that I think women should be "removed from the white gene pool" based on how they look.



But anyways, I hate the amount of woman bashing on this forum and the fact that my defending women gets an immediate accusation of being a Marxist or whatever.

And it's funny, men on race forums bash white women, and white men who race mix also bash white women. We never win.

Ding ding.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 04:31 AM
I never offered any critique of eugenics, I said that I myself am not one. At least not to the extent that I think women should be "removed from the white gene pool" based on how they look.



Again, no such implication was made that they should be removed based solely on how they look. But how they look is often a symptom of how they think.

I believe this was actually clarified by Argenraza.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 04:51 AM
Oh. You really think that women get a raw deal. I'm sorry. But I completely disagree. Feminism basically rules the day. Maybe I should move to your neck of the woods?


If I said "women are smarter than men" on a day time talk show (as I've seen some men do), I'd be cheered. If I said the reverse, I'd be booed off the stage. All I see in the media is a condescending attitude toward men and masculinity in general.

"Women are the stronger gender. They can have kids."

"Dumb macho male attitude."

Such statements and sentiments represent the status quo.

But women are still expected to be perfect. Please count me how many anorexic men there are... other than the lead singer of Silverchair who is most likely a flaming homosexual, I can't think of any. When a man puts on a few pounds it's fine, meanwhile female celebrities who gain weight are publically embarrassed by ending up on some stupid Worst Beach Body of the Year list or just bashed on TV. What kind of message does that send to normal women? People called Britney Spears fat when she performed at the Grammies... I'm about the same size. I didn't feel too good then. And then normal men, brainwashed by the media, call women "whales".

Sorry, petty insults made by dumb feminists don't even come close. We're bombarded by unrealistic expectations of beauty since we come out of the womb.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 04:58 AM
To add to that point (can't edit posts with Tapatalk), I had half my thyroid removed. Almost turned down the surgery because I was afraid of getting fat. I gained weight, and I'll be honest, since it's been coming off so slowly and its frustrating, the suicide word has been thought of. Sorry, this is a reality of being a woman and again, insults against men from feminists (who dont represent all women) don't compare since women often kill themselves (either by suicide, anorexia, or bulimia) because of society pressures put on them.

Beorn
12-30-2010, 05:06 AM
But women are still expected to be perfect.

And Men aren't?

I can still recall the programme my other half watched which had videos of Leonardo DiCaprio with his fat belly hanging out and the Hoff puking everywhere whilst eating a burger and mouthing off, amongst other examples of "male perfection."

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 05:09 AM
But women are still expected to be perfect.

How so? Most men I know simply want women to start acting like ladies again instead of trying to imitate and one up men in masculine roles in order to demean men. Seems reasonable enough to me.


Please count me how many anorexic men there are... other than the lead singer of Silverchair who is most likely a flaming homosexual, I can't think of any.

This is a total non sequitur. The fact that more women worry about their appearances for the purposes of sexual selection than men does not mean that women are expected to be perfect.


When a man puts on a few pounds it's fine,

Take it up with the women who go out with those men, then. There is no law saying they have to date these men or even find them attractive. The fact is that women place less of an emphasis on appearance for the most part. I didn't write nature's rules. And guess what? Biology isn't fair. Get over it.


female celebrities who gain weight are publically embarrassed by ending up on some stupid Worst Beach Body of the Year list or just bashed on TV.

Uh, so? I don't feel sorry for some woman whose sole marketablity came from her good looks and willingness to whore herself out to the public. You reap what you sow.


What kind of message does that send to normal women?

Like I've already said, the men I know and hang with (who are not womanizers) would simply like it if women learned how to be ladies again. You know, the same way women like it if men hold the door for them and compliment them as a gentlemen should and protect them and defend them the way a gentlemen should and pay for dinner without being petty and so on. The media demeans men who don't live up to this (unless they are black) while praising women who act like whores (Sex In The City, Desperate Housewives).


People called Britney Spears fat when she performed at the Grammies... I'm about the same size. I didn't feel too good then.

Uh, so? She was fat. Or are you under the illusion that her marketability was based solely on her singing ability? And I'll bet you half the writers who called her "unattractive" and "fat" were themselves women.

For the record, she didn't look bad there. But I'd prefer it if women didn't sell their bodies (literally or figuratively) in the first place. But of course, I'd be called a "sexist prude" by most "sexually liberated" women this day and age anyways. So what do I know?


And then normal men, brainwashed by the media, call women "whales".

Right. And women have no choice animal names for men. I believe the list for men is quite a long one, actually. Snake, rat, pig, weasel, toad, reptile, worm, and jackass (just to get started) all have male connotations. And guess what? I'm not crying about it because often the men in question match those descriptions just like many of women are more often than not, accurately matched up with their respective animal metaphors.


Sorry, petty insults made by dumb feminists don't even come close. We're bombarded by unrealistic expectations of beauty since we come out of the womb.

You women judge each other more harshly than men judge you. Just as men judge each other more harshly than women tend to judge them.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 05:14 AM
And Men aren't?

I can still recall the programme my other half watched which had videos of Leonardo DiCaprio with his fat belly hanging out and the Hoff puking everywhere whilst eating a burger and mouthing off, amongst other examples of "male perfection."

Not near as pervasive.

I'm sorry, but after reading posts saying fat women should be removed from the white genepool, and also women are fat because of what they think, I can't help but be a little pissed.

You don't know. They could have health problems, or be on s medication that causes weight gain. They could have been injured so couldn't be as active... Or just naturally big.

And women won't bash Leonardo di caprio if he puts on a few, the Hoff did, and he's a man. Meanwhile men have no problem razzing women over weight.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 05:21 AM
Feminist premises are so much a part of the status quo that people are often not even aware of just how pro-woman they are at the expense of male masculinity. They aren't even aware of how disprivileged masculine gender roles are for men. To feminists, it's about showing everyone that women are "just as good as men." They can't see that this only demeans what makes men unique from women the same way women are uniquely special in their own right. It took me until my mid twenties to even realize it.

The ideal yin/yang relationship of man and woman which has sustained a healthy West for so long has been thrown frightfully off track since the 20th century.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 05:28 AM
Sorry, I don't feel sorry for men one bit. Men don't have near the pressures that women do. I've even brought up my own experiences with putting my own health at risk (a growth on my thyroid doctors thought was cancer but confirmed it wasn't after it was removed, actually) to stay slim. I've also turned down other medical treatments in the past because weight gain wad listed as a side effect. Doubt many men would do that.

Not to mention, I thought I was fat since I was 8 years old. Most females think they're fat.

Beorn
12-30-2010, 05:41 AM
Meanwhile men have no problem razzing women over weight.

And that's it right there.

I've had to say it a few times to women on these forums, but these forums are male dominated. Keep kicking and screaming, and get your own to kick and scream louder than they do and the voice will be heard.

Till then, the voice is male I'm afraid. :)

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 05:45 AM
Sorry, I don't feel sorry for men one bit.

Of course not. But unlike you, I wasn't implying that you should feel sorry for my gender. I was simply explaining where I think feminist thinking is wrong. I actually think the people most harmed (not to be confused with victimized) by feminism are women themselves. Sex is much more costly for women than it is for men. Treating the genders as if they were the same gives men an excuse to behave less like men. They can freely pursue women with minimal cultural scrutiny and are sometimes even lauded for their promiscuity. Last I checked, women don't like this type of thinking among men. Last I checked, men have to be pushed harder into monogamy than women do. But without feminism, such thought would be much less pervasive among men. With masculinity there comes not only a sense of healthy pride and fulfillment, but a sense of responsibility and commitment to one woman and a healthy family (honor) that most men don't have to the extent they should as a direct result of women thinking they can do it all while demeaning men who insist that women "need a man." Of course, these knee-jerk feminist reactionaries never say that these same men are also saying that men "need a woman."


Men don't have near the pressures that women do.

Oh, spare me. Last I checked, women wanted "the pressures."


I've even brought up my own experiences with putting my own health at risk (a growth on my thyroid doctors thought was cancer but confirmed it wasn't after it was removed, actually) to stay slim.

That was your choice. If a man spends a lot of money while "under pressure" to impress a woman he will not garner any sympathy from me, either. Are you aware of alimony/palimony laws in the U.S. and who benefits from them? It's not men.


I've also turned down other medical treatments in the past because weight gain wad listed as a side effect. Doubt many men would do that.


Yeah, I suppose they'd have enough sense not to. Again, you have an issue with biology. There is no law of nature saying fat ugly men must get laid.

And I could just as easily turn the tables and say that all women have to do is be pretty to get laid. Afterall, pretty women basically control the reproductive game, not handsome men. Men are the ones who have to be "motivated" and "successful" and "funny." I don't see men making demands that women be any of these things. Men largely like attractive women. Women's attraction to men seems to be more cerebral. You're being childish, if I may be so blunt. There are pressures on both sides. They're just of a different nature because men and women are not the same.


Not to mention, I thought I was fat since I was 8 years old. Most females think they're fat.

That's because women are merciless when evaluating each other. Just as men call each other "pussies" for not living up to the male standard.

Grumpy Cat
12-30-2010, 06:03 AM
I never said feminism was right and I do agree it hurts women. However, the pressure is on women from a young age to meet a specific standard of attractiveness that is unattainable. Ever take a look a a Barbie doll and her proportions? Ridiculously small waist, big boobs, big hips, and long legs. If a real woman had Barbie's proportions, she'd be unable to walk, which just shows the expectations on women are unrealistic. And children play with these things!

Sorry, you need to either walk in the shoes of a woman, or have daughters.

It's not the same for men:

Donald Trump is fat, he's still a successful businessman.

Stephen Harper is fat, he was re-elected as Prime Minister of Canada twice.

Meanwhile Britney Spears goes from underweight to healthy weight, or maybe •slightly• overweight but not obese, and she's ridiculed.

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 06:26 AM
I never said feminism was right and I do agree it hurts women.

Well, naturally I would expect you to agree with that part. Your talking points are directly from the feminist bible so you must think it's right.


However, the pressure is on women from a young age to meet a specific standard of attractiveness that is unattainable.

Just as the pressure for many men to obtain a certain level of affluence, charm, and handsomeness is unattainable. You just ignore that.


Ever take a look a a Barbie doll and her proportions? Ridiculously small waist, big boobs, big hips, and long legs.

So? Barbie is attractive. Get over it. You don't see me crying about a Ken doll or a He-Man action figure.


If a real woman had Barbie's proportions, she'd be unable to walk, which just shows the expectations on women are unrealistic. And children play with these things!

Oh my God. How terrible. I played with WWF action figures and was never able to obtain the Ultimate Warrior's body because I didn't take steroids. I'm so messed up. I blame society.


Sorry, you need to either walk in the shoes of a woman, or have daughters.

No I don't. Women don't have a monopoly on raw deals. You say you don't agree with feminism, but all you do is spew their rhetoric. The whole "you need walk in their shoes" is the classic line. It's designed to subvert argument. Since I can never "walk" in women's shoes, I can't criticize their grievances even if I try to support my argument intelligently. Yet, women can criticize men and do all the time. Minorities pull this double standard parlor trick on whites all the time. You don't like being labeled a Marxist. Well, maybe you should read up on the subject of Marxism and how it works so you'll understand why people like myself are likely to label you exactly that!


It's not the same for men:

Donald Trump is fat, he's still a successful businessman.

Yeah. Because he's smart. He gets demeaned for his appearance all the time. How often are his hairplugs ridiculed? Guess what? Hot women still want him. So what? If he had the same appearance issues as you did would that make you less of a feminist?


Stephen Harper is fat, he was re-elected as Prime Minister of Canada twice.

Dear God. You do realize people have free will, don't you? Men aren't going around saying that women have to look like Spears and men can be fat like Harper.


Meanwhile Britney Spears goes from underweight to healthy weight, or maybe •slightly• overweight but not obese, and she's ridiculed.

She's mainly ridiculed for her behavior. Her appearance is more than likely a symptom of her drinking and other drug choices. But your criticism once again ignores that women and men alike ridiculed her. You act like everything is a conspiracy against women.

And you didn't address most of my points from the previous post even though I make an attempt to address everything you have written on the subject.

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 06:34 AM
Don't worry girls. Black people like it phat :D

Debaser11
12-30-2010, 06:55 AM
Better to be a nun than to miscegenate.

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:11 AM
Better to be a nun than to miscegenate.

You should have told that to Argenraza mother. :D

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 07:15 AM
You should have told that to Argenraza mother. :D

What are you implying cholo?

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:26 AM
What are you implying cholo?

I'm not implying anything, i'm just an observer of the obviousness; Gaucho, you look Mestizo to my eyes. Shit, I have some weird traits, let's say im "Hungarian" and wipe the evidence of my Fuegid slave forebears. It's always better to take the easy way out huh?

Si t'es Hongrois et je suis Japonais mon ami. :p

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 07:28 AM
I'm not implying anything, i'm just an observer of the obviousness; Gaucho, you look Mestizo to my eyes. Shit, I have some weird traits, let's say im "Hungarian" and wipe the evidence of my Fuegid slave forebears. It's always better to take the easy way out huh?

Si t'es Hongrois et je suis Japonais mon ami. :p

Maybe you're jealous I'm actually full European and can get a good European girl for myself but don't worry, I will ship you one of these degenerate whales so your children can be white(r).

It's always a white virtue to help other races, even if they are envious of you

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:34 AM
Maybe you're jealous I'm actually full European and can get a good European girl for myself but don't worry, I will ship you one of these degenerate whales so your children can be white(r).

It's always a white virtue to help other races, even if they are envious of you

Haha, no way in hell; Besides, even if you can get a mixed swarth rat like yourself, I wouldn't be jealous, i'd had commiseration for you two. Tell me, what kind of offspring would came out from two mixed swarth rats? A lycanthropus? :(

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 07:36 AM
Haha, no way in hell; Besides, even if you can get a mixed swarth rat like yourself, I wouldn't be jealous, i'd had commiseration for you two. Tell me, what kind of offspring would came out from two mixed swarth rats? A lycanthropus? :(

Surely better than someone who looks like a white skinned clone of this:

http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/clifton-collins-jr-wonderland-movie-premiere-1AU0EL.jpg

You're a depigmented mestizo rat

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:40 AM
Surely better than someone who looks like a white skinned clone of this:

http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/clifton-collins-jr-wonderland-movie-premiere-1AU0EL.jpg

You're a depigmented mestizo rat

Sure, say the guy who can't grown a beard :rolleyes: that's an Europid trait for sure.

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 07:43 AM
Sure, say the guy who can grown a beard :rolleyes: that's an Europid trait for sure.
Excuse me?

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:43 AM
You look just like this guy:

http://bligoo.com/media/users/4/208634/images/public/22415/chicharito.jpg?v=1261577518712

You all mestizos look the same.

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:49 AM
Excuse me?

Cool looking beard mate.

http://www.derok.net/derok/images/classics/planet%20simpsons%20monkeys.jpg
:tongue

Dario Argento
12-30-2010, 07:49 AM
You look just like this guy:

http://bligoo.com/media/users/4/208634/images/public/22415/chicharito.jpg?v=1261577518712

All you mestizos look the same.

That dude doesn't look Mestizo, however you do. It's obvious you're envious, you're from Mexico (a rathole country) and you're a slave of the USA as your profile indicates.

Neanderthal
12-30-2010, 07:59 AM
That dude doesn't look Mestizo, however you do. It's obvious you're envious, you're from Mexico (a rathole country) and you're a slave of the USA as your profile indicates.

Oh come on, quit your whinin, are you gonna start a Med-Centrist rant now? You are the one rotting of envy, wearing a Burzum shirt not even being partially Nordid, Mr Vikernes wouldn't be please I assure you. :rolleyes:
Talking about ratholes, Mexico GDP is like 3 times higher than your shithole, so shut up already mate, you're just digging your own grave of stupidity.

Gamera
12-30-2010, 04:12 PM
Guys.............. stop fighting about this.

Wyn
12-30-2010, 05:06 PM
Sorry, petty insults made by dumb feminists don't even come close.

I wouldn't normally post in this horrible thread, but I have to chime in here and say that in my part of the world, the kind of statements/attitudes Debaser gave examples of aren't restricted to being the "petty insults" of "dumb feminists" - they're very common and widespread.

Austin
12-30-2010, 11:01 PM
That dude doesn't look Mestizo, however you do. It's obvious you're envious, you're from Mexico (a rathole country) and you're a slave of the USA as your profile indicates.


That guy does look Mestizo (http://www.google.com/images?q=Mestizo&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=SIT&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbs=isch:1&ei=XR4dTevABMGclgeH-LSyDA&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&ved=0CAsQ_AU&biw=1024&bih=575). You seem to be upset by the word Mestizo friend.

Megrez
12-31-2010, 12:45 AM
On the whitening of colored populations:

Deny the partly black full and unrestricted access to the white man's homes and daughters and you transform him into the bitterest enemy of the white man. Were it not for the super-sensitive mongrels of North America, there would be no clamor for "equality" of races; nor would there be any eminent "Negroes." Booker Washington was a mulatto, Frederick Douglas was a mulatto. Bruce, Turner, DuBois, Miller; these are not Negroes! Were they white men they would be obscure, but by social custom and by law they are recognized to be Negroes, and as such they stand at the head of their race.

Imagine the mulattoes and the nearer whites of the United States to be greatly augmented in numbers. Suppose they constitute two-thirds of the population. They possess the ballot. The white one-third of the population is the cultural aristocracy, but is divided into factions. Let us say that the Democratic Party, in order to make its ascendency sure, lays special claim to the Negro and mixbreed vote, promising full social and political equality. The Democrats would secure the support of the Negroids and control the nation. Caucasian ideals would assert a dwindling influence in politics, economics, and social aims. No white could hold high office without mongrel support, and the prospective officer holder could not obtain such support without special concessions to the mixbreed element. White politicians would vie with each other in making promises which sooner or later would have to be fulfilled. Eventually the nation would cease to reflect Caucasian ideals and cease to represent Caucasian culture. The pall of Africanism would settle upon the land. Mulatto senators! Revolutions! Creative ingenuity gone, the arts and industries would decay, sky-scrapers would crumble, plantations would be weedgrown, as they are in Haiti. The halls of the national capitol, once familiar to the noblest of the Saxons, would echo to the tread of mulattoes, and a mixbreed would sit as President. This picture is repugnant and we refuse to visualize it, but Egypt knew it in all its essentials; and India, and what is more Germanic at this point Latin America.

The history of Latin America countries shows a steady rise of the mixbreed to power. Ofttimes the residue of whites in the various Latin American governments was divided into factions. The whites in their bitter enmity would seek aid from the mixbreeds. White or near-white leaders led the mixbreed to ascendency. The white influence became less and less and Latin America fell lower and lower in the cultural scale in keeping with concomitant loss in the racial scale.
Whitening colored populations isn't the way to go really. However, today it isn't like they are white men's enemies: in these times when any racial oath is broken, the mestizo is seen just as someone else in the crowd; give him education and a job and he becomes readily acceptable; put the colored together with whites in a hedonic environment and everything turns into a glaring carnival, basic carnal (material) instincts arise and everyone acts as if there was no tomorrow.

There was an implicit policy of whitening the colored in Imperial Brazil during the 19th century. The result wasn't really that great, but I can say the task was successfully accomplished to some extent. It's actually hard to find a pure negroid in most Brazilian downtowns, let alone pure amerinds. The pure negroids are more easily found only in poorer suburbia or in favelas, or also in poorer rural areas where negroes established communities after they were freed from slavery. The only major city where negroes (in more or less pure forms) are the overwhelming majority is Salvador, capital of the state of Bahia.

Austin
12-31-2010, 03:35 AM
I do admire that in South America thanks to no real racial civil rights movement comparable to the U.S. that there still exists a clear racial element in the actual discourse of the nations societies and how they operate.

This is not the case in America. The U.S. cannot even talk about race in realist terms without madness reigning from all ends in the most misunderstanding of forms. Race is completely glossed over as a supposed 'non-issue' when in reality it is the basis for everything in America. Americans delude themselves, as if in a preferred, commercial-induced delusion over racial cause and effect realities. I attribute this primarily to sports and what they have done to America and arguably much of the world.

Sports have masked racial realities to public's with images of harmonious racial teamwork and commercially-hyped 'successes' on staged courts/fields/arenas all for commercial gain with the secondhand effect probably accomplishing more for social-race-progressives than anything else has in the world ten fold. Commercially motivated sports have stupefied the public and have been an absolute-disaster of epic proportions for nationalist/conservative/traditionalist/preservationist movements. In America the commercial sports world is completely foreign from how American society operates yet it broadcasts it's deceiving social/racial image all across the world and propagates notions of race mixing and supposed achieved racial harmony when the actual societies which field such players are nothing of the sort nor are the beliefs of most of said societies behind closed doors in respect to race. It is mass delusion and deceit on a global level which hurts both European populations and black populations.

You never hear about the major university that 'donated' it's Federally allocated, impoverished-student grant money to said black fathers church fund in some ghetto black neighborhood so his high school running-back son would choose their university football team. It has nothing to do with racial harmony it is about money and the idiotic public's have ate it up at the expense of ironically (and typically) their own expense and said exotically glorified minority players overall populations expense. We reside in a world of morons whom every time turn on the TV to perform their ritualistic sports viewing further enslave themselves on all levels.

Dario Argento
12-31-2010, 05:45 AM
That guy does look Mestizo (http://www.google.com/images?q=Mestizo&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=SIT&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbs=isch:1&ei=XR4dTevABMGclgeH-LSyDA&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&ved=0CAsQ_AU&biw=1024&bih=575). You seem to be upset by the word Mestizo friend.

http://www.puroschismes.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/1552013925.jpg

This man appeared in your mestizo link. Do you agree?

Austin
12-31-2010, 07:56 PM
http://www.puroschismes.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/1552013925.jpg

This man appeared in your mestizo link. Do you agree?

Yes.

Basically that guy wouldn't qualify as white from where I'm from. That would be a Mexican or a Mestizo far removed.

Great Dane
12-31-2010, 08:24 PM
http://www.puroschismes.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/1552013925.jpg

This man appeared in your mestizo link. Do you agree?

He looks European but of the southern Europe variety. I've seen plenty of Mexicans and other Hispanics and you would find someone like him only among the upperclasses. He would look out of place in most of the Midwest, bit we are postly northwestern european and Slavic in some larger cities.

Pallantides
01-01-2011, 01:13 AM
Yes.

Basically that guy wouldn't qualify as white from where I'm from. That would be a Mexican or a Mestizo far removed.

He just looks Southern European.:confused:

Dario Argento
01-01-2011, 01:16 AM
Yes.

Basically that guy wouldn't qualify as white from where I'm from. That would be a Mexican or a Mestizo far removed.

Who cares about who qualifies as white where you from? Texas was part of Mexico anyway

He looks no different than Southern Europeans, thus, not Mestizo unless you consider Southern Europe a Mestizo region as well.

Austin
01-01-2011, 01:54 AM
I just wouldn't consider him white based on how I was raised and what I was taught was white. I don't so much argue that the guy in the picture isn't southern European, he might be, but from my and many others perspective walking down the street and seeing that guy wouldn't bring the idea of a traditional 'white person' to mind..... more the idea of Mexican in my area which doesn't equal white.

In Texas if you say Mexican in the white community that instantly means non-white unless there is a visible exception based on looks such as the occasional rare blond Mexican with more Spanish European blood in them. Let me tell you though I live in a 75% Mexican city and the fabled 'blond' Mexican is an extreme rarity and I live in the nice parts where they'd be.

Lurker
01-13-2011, 08:00 PM
http://www.portalibahia.com.br/nemteconto/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/toshi.jpg

Debaser11
01-13-2011, 10:00 PM
Who cares about who qualifies as white where you from? Texas was part of Mexico anyway

He looks no different than Southern Europeans, thus, not Mestizo unless you consider Southern Europe a Mestizo region as well.

What are you implying here?

Austin
01-13-2011, 10:18 PM
Mexicans are not white. This is bullshit and I won't sit and listen to it. I live in Texas in a 75% Mexican populated city and most all of them have darker skin and are not considered white, even according to them in their own words they are not white.




If you really consider someone two or three shades darker than the average white person to truly be white then all I can say is you are lucky to have a passive fantasy world aside from the world we all reside in. I've always thought the ability of personal delusion was always the one thing I would wish for if I could have anything.

Cheesypie
01-14-2011, 01:28 AM
I find this thread a little mind-boggling since there are other threads on this forum of members posting photos of non-whites and drooling over them.

Austin
01-14-2011, 03:03 AM
I find this thread a little mind-boggling since there are other threads on this forum of members posting photos of non-whites and drooling over them.


I've never posted in such threads ever. But it jibes with the nature of the internet. The internet serves as a bastion of safety and comfort for the masses of remaining non-pussified males to express themselves without being professionally raped by some PC-feminist and her minority cabal in some office meeting setting.

I have seen feminist absolutely desecrate their own races males in conference calls and meetings resulting in said males being fired and or humiliated. Months later said white feminists are just shocked when their minority clique they utilized to oust their own males ends up mercilessly axing them in the next round. Sick-scum feminists. I have found if you want to truly protect your own you must utilize the enemies stratagems ideology wise and in practice. You must not fight liberalism. You must inject yourself into it's inner ranks. Learn how to talk like a liberal social progressive. Work your way in. Get the proverbial access codes.

Yes feminists use minorities to destroy our fathers world and hurt you and in toe themselves, yet the silver-lining irony being that those very same minorities actually loathe feminists more than anything in this world. The cursed ones despise openly nothing more than opposing cursed ones. Use this. Use the minorities to destroy the feminist before she gets you. Then destroy said minorities once she is dispatched. It works well.

Grumpy Cat
01-14-2011, 03:09 AM
There are about 9 million white people in Mexico.

Austin
01-14-2011, 03:15 AM
There are about 9 million white people in Mexico.


This was in 1921. One can guess that now it is even less white than then. So yeah, most Mexicans are not white they are mixed or as I like to call it to make people happy I'm being accurate, dark skinned or black.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Mexican

1921 Census

The Mexican Government (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Government) asked Mexicans about their perception of their own racial heritage. In the 1921 census, residents of the Mexican Republic were asked if they fell into one of the following categories:<sup id="cite_ref-7" class="reference">[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Mexican#cite_note-7)</sup>


"Indígena pura" (of pure indigenous (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Mexican) heritage)
"Indígena mezclada con blanca" (of mixed indigenous and white (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mestizo) heritage)
"Blanca" (of White or Spanish heritage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Mexican))
"Extranjeros sin distinción de razas" (Foreigners without racial distinction)
"Cualquiera otra o que se ignora la raza" (Either other or chose to ignore the race)



Pure indigenous (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Mexican) heritage: 4,179,449 {29%}
Mixed indigenous and white (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mestizo): 8,504,561 {59%}
White or Spanish heritage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Mexican): 1,404,718 (10%)
Total population: 14,334,780

Grumpy Cat
01-14-2011, 03:23 AM
A 1921 census is out of date plus Wikipedia isn't very reliable:

mestizo (Amerindian-Spanish) 60%, Amerindian or predominantly Amerindian 30%, white 9%, other 1%

Population: 112,468,855,000

9% of that is about 10 million.

(This is using 2010 data)

Anyways, point being, there are white people in Mexico.


https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mx.html

Austin
01-14-2011, 03:30 AM
A 1921 census is out of date plus Wikipedia isn't very reliable:

mestizo (Amerindian-Spanish) 60%, Amerindian or predominantly Amerindian 30%, white 9%, other 1%

Population: 112,468,855,000

9% of that is about 10 million.

(This is using 2010 data)

Anyways, point being, there are white people in Mexico.


https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mx.html


So basically it's the exact same almost stat-wise. Mexico is not even close to a white nation.

But yeah there are whites in Mexico, it's just that many want to be labeled as white when they are clearly not. Mexico is huge on racism though. The whites in Mexico hate the other Mexican's. Where I live the rich Mexican nationals won't even speak to the regular Mexicans. They treat them like second class people who they have to deal with.

Also Wikipedia is very accurate. Many university professors hate it because it gives easily accessible information and stats on things that they'd rather it not, such as race. Wikipedia is a flawless example of freedom destroying the PC intelligentsia's bullshit.

purebread
01-19-2011, 03:58 PM
George Bush and Condi Rice were rumored to be pretty close. Way to go George!

Ibericus
01-20-2011, 04:09 PM
http://www.puroschismes.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/1552013925.jpg
He looks European but of the southern Europe variety. I've seen plenty of Mexicans and other Hispanics and you would find someone like him only among the upperclasses. He would look out of place in most of the Midwest, bit we are postly northwestern european and Slavic in some larger cities.
He doesn't look full european to me. Maybe in latinamerica he is considered White.

antonio
01-20-2011, 05:42 PM
He doesn't look full european to me. Maybe in latinamerica he is considered White.

I see that case before: many of them have a hardly-explainable look that severe them from Spanish into Mestizos. I bet majority dont ever know that we know. :D

Foxy
01-20-2011, 08:24 PM
Anyway some Mexicans are so mixed that they can pass for very pigmented Europeans in my opinion. Especially in their features some of them have lost their "indio features" to look more Western. But yet in Mexico there are also many descendents of Arabs and other non-white ethnicities. Surely Mexico as a whole is not a white country.
According to wiki: 60% of Mexicans are a mix of indios and Europeans, especially Spaniards, but of course are not fully Saniards. Only 20% are pure Indios. 19% are "Creoli" (a mix of more European ethnicities) mostly of Spanish, Italian, French, German and Polish heritage.

Dario Argento
01-21-2011, 01:58 AM
He doesn't look full european to me. Maybe in latinamerica he is considered White.

Could you point out what is non-Caucasoid about him? I honestly can't see anything

Alvarado
01-21-2011, 02:14 AM
Could you point out what is non-Caucasoid about him? I honestly can't see anything

It's pretty obvious he is mixed.

http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/gael-garcia-bernal/gael-garcia-bernal-20050117-20964.jpg

Dario Argento
01-21-2011, 02:16 AM
It's pretty obvious he is mixed.

http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/gael-garcia-bernal/gael-garcia-bernal-20050117-20964.jpg

Booohoohooo is mixed is mixed booohohooo!!


If it's pretty obvious he's mixed you won't have troubles pointing out what's mixed about it, would you?

Don
01-21-2011, 02:40 AM
Booohoohooo is mixed is mixed booohohooo!!


If it's pretty obvious he's mixed you won't have troubles pointing out what's mixed about it, would you?
http://www.palmyto.com.ar/ckfinder/userfiles/images/ciego.jpg
Congenital blindness in sudacas.

Alvarado
01-21-2011, 02:45 AM
Booohoohooo is mixed is mixed booohohooo!!


If it's pretty obvious he's mixed you won't have troubles pointing out what's mixed about it, would you?

I don't give a fuck about what's "non-caucasoid" in him and I don't have to prove anything.

He is a mestizo like his mother.

http://i2.esmas.com/2009/02/25/35569/patricia-bernal-hablo-de-si-su-hijo-gael-le-pide-consejo-para-criar-a-su-pequeno-300x350.jpg

Ibericus
01-21-2011, 02:53 AM
Booohoohooo is mixed is mixed booohohooo!!

If it's pretty obvious he's mixed you won't have troubles pointing out what's mixed about it, would you?
http://imstars.aufeminin.com/stars/fan/gael-garcia-bernal/gael-garcia-bernal-20050117-20964.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_pSMUcHl9wOY/R-LYziT2QRI/AAAAAAAAD8s/cNw9HRqGw7g/s400/Yanomami+del+shapono+Witokayateri+(Lechosa).jpg

Gamera
01-21-2011, 03:17 AM
IRk6dvRLngA

My god....

Debaser11
01-21-2011, 03:54 AM
^Whore.

Don
01-21-2011, 12:43 PM
IRk6dvRLngA

My god....

Pensé que eran "Bicheros" definidos por los bichos que atrapan.

Translation explanation:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_kzE0gSJoTvQ/TBfLO-DMRgI/AAAAAAAABZ4/eQRwtZiXElw/s1600/BichoPNG.png
BichERO is the one dedicated to capure or deal with Bichos (creepy animals, bugs).

Debaser11
01-25-2011, 06:38 AM
^ Very sad to European genes lost like that. No disrespect to her, either, but she's definitely not as pretty as your average German girl. Not by a long shot. Hopefully your friend will see the light.

antonio
02-04-2011, 11:13 PM
^ Very sad to European genes lost like that. No disrespect to her, either, but she's definitely not as pretty as your average German girl. Not by a long shot. Hopefully your friend will see the light.

Unfortunatelly (from our point of view) she looks quite well at second pic (at first one she looks pathetic, more Amerindian whorish than Indian), to be more precise, although, as you well noted, she would be substandard in some European areas, she looks great for a non-Europid with the plus of her exotism, what would be, probably, the critical factor for your friend selection. I have no problem on admitting racial exotism is a plus (forgetting for a moment our serious racial concerns) although it's usually added to very low standards of beautiness. That concrete case is a frontier one although I would probably try to find inside my race.

Don
02-05-2011, 12:50 AM
(please don't quote the photos)

Great Dane
02-05-2011, 01:16 AM
Unfortunatelly (from our point of view) she looks quite well at second pic (at first one she looks pathetic, more Amerindian whorish than Indian), to be more precise,She doesn't look American Indian in either pic. Asian Indian, yes.:coffee:

Debaser11
02-05-2011, 02:38 AM
Tell me all of you guys here:thumb001:, what means that " average german" beside " that one indian",do you make qualifications only when it is regularand correct by your own opinion ?

I just find German women more attractive. For one, I think lighter features with a symmetrically beautiful face looks better than a symmetrically beautiful face with darker features.


I wanted to say both those women are beautifull,but one of them is " racialy incorrect"''- related to your topic theme .....so don t be shuffles my male friends

decide....:thumb001:

Well, that couple is racially incorrect. They are not compatible from a racial standpoint. I'm sure they're both fine individuals but as a couple, they are not ideal.

demiirel
02-05-2011, 02:50 AM
^ Very sad to European genes lost like that. No disrespect to her, either, but she's definitely not as pretty as your average German girl. Not by a long shot. Hopefully your friend will see the light.

It's a rare exceptional case. Maybe not as rare as White with Black woman. But no threat to European genes.

abcd
02-11-2011, 06:56 PM
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/7855/picef.jpg

Meine Fresse, was für ein kranker Thread :puke:

Arne
02-11-2011, 07:16 PM
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/7855/picef.jpg

Meine Fresse, was für ein kranker Thread :puke:

Es sollte wohl eher heißen "Meine Fresse, was für ein kranker Mensch" :wink

Himera
02-23-2011, 02:32 PM
I just find German women more attractive. For one, I think lighter features with a symmetrically beautiful face looks better than a symmetrically beautiful face with darker features.



Well, that couple is racially incorrect. They are not compatible from a racial standpoint. I'm sure they're both fine individuals but as a couple, they are not ideal.

Good..you understood me well ,but some guys wereand they are leadedby their own genitalias ..and that was aproblem even during the II WW....

It is not problem with social and political views ,it is only problem whit what people really feel..to distungish it...and to admit to themselves...

Raikaswinþs
02-23-2011, 02:39 PM
marry who you love. most scenarios , most people will marry someone of their own ethnicity anyway

I preferably would marry a European woman, because it would be so much easier to congeniate, since we share already many civilisational traits.

but if I fall in love with a Japanese girl or an Argentinian..their phenotype wouldn´t make me discard her (but maybe our cultural differences might prove to be an insurmountable obstacle)

Debaser11
02-24-2011, 07:25 AM
marry who you love. most scenarios , most people will marry someone of their own ethnicity anyway

I preferably would marry a European woman, because it would be so much easier to congeniate, since we share already many civilisational traits.

but if I fall in love with a Japanese girl or an Argentinian..their phenotype wouldn´t make me discard her (but maybe our cultural differences might prove to be an insurmountable obstacle)

I guess you choose to ignore the premise (hint: "r" word) of the thread.

Dario Argento
02-25-2011, 04:21 AM
I dislike all race mixing, but to be honest none is as upsetting as coal burner. If I see an Asian or Arab with an European woman, it just fails to disgust me as seeing one with a coon.

Pallantides
02-28-2011, 04:04 AM
http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00205/Morten_Gamst_Peders_205408m.jpg

Beorn
03-04-2011, 11:49 AM
The accepted racism of the media keeps marching on.

http://i.imgur.com/FO1TT.jpg

Agrippa
03-08-2011, 12:27 PM
http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00205/Morten_Gamst_Peders_205408m.jpg

What is the background of these two?

Ushtari
03-08-2011, 12:30 PM
http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Eliza+Dushku+Rick+Fox+Dancing+Stars+200th+rTw5xpVt zG9l.jpg

Diaspora bitches are real hoes

Don Brick
03-08-2011, 12:38 PM
http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/na/archive/00205/Morten_Gamst_Peders_205408m.jpg

lol :D

Korbis
03-08-2011, 12:41 PM
http://www2.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Eliza+Dushku+Rick+Fox+Dancing+Stars+200th+rTw5xpVt zG9l.jpg

Diaspora bitches are real hoes

Is that Eliza Dushku? she´s not white - half lebanese or something.

Ushtari
03-08-2011, 12:43 PM
Is that Eliza Dushku? she´s not white - half lebanese or something.
She is half Danish half Albanian

Korbis
03-08-2011, 01:09 PM
She is half Danish half Albanian

Oh well. I guess I mashed up her backgrond with another celebrity.
She looks sort of Lebanese anyway, and quite dark for a danish-albanian offspring.

Ushtari
03-08-2011, 01:17 PM
Oh well. I guess I mashed up her backgrond with another celebrity.
She looks sort of Lebanese anyway, and quite dark for a danish-albanian offspring.
Actually i know some skandinavian/albanian offsprings my self and non of them stand out in northern europe, but in the same time i dont find eliza to exotic either, she just look typical southern(imo).

la bombe
03-08-2011, 03:35 PM
Oh well. I guess I mashed up her backgrond with another celebrity.
She looks sort of Lebanese anyway, and quite dark for a danish-albanian offspring.

Dark?

http://celebritysurgery.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/eliza.jpg

Danes can have brown hair and brown eyes too, you know. But anyway, her mother is a white Amurikan of "Danish and English descent".

mymy
03-08-2011, 03:52 PM
Pretty, only her eye shape is little strange to me, her eyes going somehow down.

Saruman
03-08-2011, 06:11 PM
Pretty, only her eye shape is little strange to me, her eyes going somehow down.

Slanted outwardly("sleepy")? Well I think some European forms have such eye shape often (Nordoids etc.), it's totally opposite from Mongoloid inwardly slanted eyes and in Europe East-Baltids probably have a tendency for such eye shape.

mymy
03-08-2011, 07:25 PM
Slanted outwardly("sleepy")? Well I think some European forms have such eye shape often (Nordoids etc.), it's totally opposite from Mongoloid inwardly slanted eyes and in Europe East-Baltids probably have a tendency for such eye shape.

East-Baltids have tendency for slanted outwardly or inwardly slanted?
Didn't understand good. I guess inwardly slanted as opposite of Nordoids or not?

Saruman
03-08-2011, 07:29 PM
I guess inwardly slanted as opposite of Nordoids

Yes.
Of all Mongolid subtypes Tungids have the most extreme inwardly slanted eyes, they are also probably the most cold-adapted human type.

http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/bilder/gl-tungid.jpg

Himera
03-08-2011, 07:52 PM
She is half Danish half Albanian

So what is wrong with this couple ?
That her "danish" part is the only ruined vistim here...according to the topic...

:D:D:D

Don
03-08-2011, 08:09 PM
http://sp0.fotolog.com/photo/32/56/4/always__soraya/1251799832791_f.jpg
http://img.poprosa.com/2009/02/soraya-novio.jpg
http://sp4.fotolog.com/photo/36/24/66/sooraya_arnelass/1277781415195_f.jpg

Swedish whatever and famous Spaniard Singer.

Pallantides
03-08-2011, 08:30 PM
Slanted outwardly("sleepy")? Well I think some European forms have such eye shape often (Nordoids etc.), it's totally opposite from Mongoloid inwardly slanted eyes and in Europe East-Baltids probably have a tendency for such eye shape.

Such eyeshape is rather rare in Scandinavia, I have never met anyone with eyes like that woman.

most have totally straight eyes or slightly slanted.



What is the background of these two?

The guy have Saami ancestry, the woman is just Norwegian I believe.

Saruman
03-08-2011, 08:41 PM
Such eyeshape is rather rare in Scandinavia, I have never met anyone with eyes like that woman.


But that woman's eyes have other traits that aren't so "Scandinavian", but in particular I spoke of outwardly slanted eyes, I would be very surprised if there are no such people there. Inwardly slanted eyes might be occasional due to Lappoid admixture probably.

Pallantides
03-09-2011, 09:22 AM
But that woman's eyes have other traits that aren't so "Scandinavian", but in particular I spoke of outwardly slanted eyes, I would be very surprised if there are no such people there. Inwardly slanted eyes might be occasional due to Lappoid admixture probably.

It doesn't take Lappoid or other admixture for a Scandinavian to have inwardly slanted eyes, of course there are some people with outwardly slanted eyes... but it's not as common as straight eyes, neither is inwardly slanted ones for that matter.

Wanderlust
05-04-2011, 05:52 PM
I've checked pages 1-26 but I don't have enough patience for the rest. :p
I suppose that someone has already mentioned Khloe Kardashian and her husband
http://www.mauritiushot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/khloe-and-lamar-season-1-episode-3.jpg

Another couple:
Prince Maximilian of Liechtenstein and his wife Princess Angela of Liechtenstein originally from Panama.

http://www.thumperscorner.com/discus/messages/2152/6637.jpg

their son, Prince Alfons
http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii8/pisces33_photos/07090842.jpg


*source google images

The Journeyman
05-04-2011, 06:46 PM
I've checked pages 1-26 but I don't have enough patience for the rest. :p
I suppose that someone has already mentioned Khloe Kardashian and her husband
http://www.mauritiushot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/khloe-and-lamar-season-1-episode-3.jpg


Chloe Kardashian is a friggin monster, I don't consider her European in any sense. He only improved our gene pool by marrying her.

Efim45
05-04-2011, 06:56 PM
A black princess? WTF!

Sikeliot
05-04-2011, 06:59 PM
Here's another one. She might be on the tan side but she's still white.. he's not.

http://blog.zap2it.com/thedishrag/mario-lopez-Courtney-Mazza.jpg