Civilizations of the world tarnished by White supremacist, Afro-supremacy, Turkic supremacist

[ButlerKing]

Most of the world civilization have been heavily tarnished with racial claims



All this all first started with Europeans claiming " Aryan invasion " , " Harrapan civilization was white ". An than the egyptians were white, and ancient Olmecs were europeans, Caucasian influence China. The only civilization that European didn't claim was the Khmer civilization.


Than came Blacks claiming egypts, olmecs, China, mesopotamia, original celtic, or greeks were black civilization and romans emperors were black.


Than Turkic started claiming Italic civilization, and much of the culture of Europe are Turkic civilizations.

[Annihilus]

Than Turkic started claiming Italic civilization, and much of the culture of Europe are Turkic civilizations.

Did I miss something?:confused:

[ButlerKing]

Did I miss something?:confused:

Yes you did, many of your Turkic madmen make outrageous claims. Like for example

Latin Alphabet and Etruscans of Turkic Origin !!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfyNShX-8vI

[Ivan Kramskoï]

Afro supremacist of what ??
Why would they be superior to anybody??
Have they seen their history ??:picard2:

[Annihilus]

comon man, you find the most ridiculous claims on youtube, any 9 year old kid can make them.

[Lusos]

"All this all first started with Europeans claiming " Aryan invasion "

Nah.Just the blond ones,or "wanabe" ones.

[ButlerKing]

Afro supremacist of what ??
Why would they be superior to anybody??
Have they seen their history ??:picard2:

I wouldn't take this lightly if I were you.

Claims like original vikings and celtic were from Africa and Black.
Europe ruled by Blacks for 1000 years.
European kings were of Black descents.

[mr. logan]

Afro supremacism? 100 mts race and basket, maybe..
Turk supremacism? That is harder to come with something. Actually they just entered the Balkans cause there was not primarily an organized defense. My knowledge of Balkanic history is void, but that is my perception with the turks entering Europe there. Nevertheless, didn´t get too far north, so someone stopped them besides Dracula.

[ButlerKing]

comon man, you find the most ridiculous claims on youtube, any 9 year old kid can make them.

I don't care if it's ridicolous, the problem simplys lies there are many crazyass Turks.

Sumerians were Turkic

Hidden Turkic History: Sumerian Latin Greek Cyrillic Alphabets based on Turkic


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrvGjzcvIcI

[Szegedist]

Yes you did, many of your Turkic madmen make outrageous claims. Like for example

Latin Alphabet and Etruscans of Turkic Origin !!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfyNShX-8vI


Lol, there are ITALIAN scholars who suggested a link between Etruscan and Ural-Altaic, or Etruscan and Hungarian...

[Szegedist]

I don't care if it's ridicolous, the problem simplys lies there are many crazyass Turks.

Sumerians were Turkic

Hidden Turkic History: Sumerian Latin Greek Cyrillic Alphabets based on Turkic


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrvGjzcvIcI

Again, the 'Sumerian Turanian" theory was suggested by WESTERN EUROPEAN scholars.

[ButlerKing]

Lol, there are ITALIAN scholars who suggested a link between Etruscan and Ural-Altaic, or Etruscan and Hungarian...

Originally Turkics and Uralic were Mongoloid people. I don't need to explain myself, I have already posted tons of facial reconstruction of ancient Turkic and Uralic people and they always turn out being either Mongoloid or Mongoloid/Caucasoid.

Some Italian scholars are mad men themselves.

[ButlerKing]

Again, the 'Sumerian Turanian" theory was suggested by WESTERN EUROPEAN scholars.

It doesn't matter if they were suggested. Even Egyptians were suggested to Mongoloid by a scholar because of yellow skin.

What matters is so many Turkic people believe in it including your Hungarian people.

[Annihilus]

Originally Turkics and Uralic were Mongoloid people. I don't need to explain myself, I have already posted tons of facial reconstruction of ancient Turkic and Uralic people and they always turn out being either Mongoloid or Mongoloid/Caucasoid.

Some Italian scholars are mad men themselves.

So what man if first were mongoloid, which I highly doubt. You make it sound as if they were living on a different planet. All were living on the same eurasian continent.

Since you act as such a wise guy explain to me why the proto-Indo-European religion is most similar to the turkic one.

[ButlerKing]

So what man if first were mongoloid, which I highly doubt. You make it sound as if they were living on a different planet. All were living on the same eurasian continent.

Since you act as such a wise guy explain to me why the proto-Indo-European religion is most similar to the turkic one.

Doubt all you want but genetics and anthropology do not lie. The ancient Xiongnu and Gokturks were predominately Mongoloid with some Indo-European admixture, however the Turkic tribes in Siberian look full mongoloid while every caucasoid Turk have from 5 - 25 Mongoloid admixtures. Also Turkic have invaded areas that were originally speaking Indo-European, did they just happen dissapear? the only logical explanation was that they were assimilated, turkified, and with intermixture.

Proto-Indo-European religion has nothing to do with your mongoloid ancestors.