No, you look more like an Arab than an actual East African there.
Printable View
Ethnicity includes common ancestors, which is genetically verifiable like in ashkenazi jews, so it isnt bogus. I agree about culture though, but culture is only one part of ethnicity. I dont think that "cultural appropriation" is a thing or offensive or wrong.
Race and ethnicity are both constructed.
Inviato dal mio SM-A405FN utilizzando Tapatalk
Race is 100% biological, it's a matter of fact - Europe has done well so far holding strong despite some actors wish for its destruction.
Ethnicity is partially genetic and partially cultural and race is such a diffuse concept as to be meaningless. Rishi Sunak is technically caucasoid but so are berbers but minorities, such as Indians, can be integrated into British culture as long as they genetically don't replace the natives.
Race is not real. Ancestry is.
Irrelevant, outdated Anglo colonial classifications that have been phased out in science through decades of study on population genetics. Adamanese people look indistinguishable from Central Africans, but they're genetically much closer to Chinese and even Welsh. A hirsute , tan, double eyelid , Roman-nosed Portuguese fisherman and a Summo fighter from Honshu are much more closely related than two tribes living a few hours by car from each other in Congo with nearly identical physical Characteristics. What's your point.
To put it another way perhaps: "Caucasoid is real and it is race. European is unreal and it is ethnicity".