Totally wrong... The semitic race is typical to all ancient and modern Semites, from Akkadians to Israelites and Arabs. It is the dominant phenotype in Arabian peninsula and it is in majority among the Israelis (but not among Samaritans) along with East Med.Quote:
Originally Posted by Septentrion
Halt there! Slow down your role Roman! The Arabid phenotype was at one time was restricted to Arabia (Place of origin). It spread out throughout the Middle East, Northern Africa, Eastern Africa, Southern Asia by ancient migrations and most of all the Islamic Conquest. Yes, it was the Jewish Diaspora who brought this phenotype to Europe. I know that it’s associated with the Semites, however it wasn’t the only race among them.Quote:
Originally Posted by aherne
It's like the so-called Nordics... They stem from so-called Indo-Europeans, but that doesn't mean all (or even the majority) of Aryans belonged to their typical phenotype.Quote:
Originally Posted by Septentrion
Stop that old school nonsensical theory. Aryans were not even Europeans to begin with. True Aryans were Indo-Iranians from Asia and they never came to Europe. The Nazis got it wrong from Gobineau theories which were used to promote Nordid and Germanic supremacy over all the other Europeans in the 19th century. You are a Romanian, how do you stand for that nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by aherne
I didn't expect you to bring the "six million" argument here but:Quote:
Originally Posted by Septentrion
1. there is no such thing as Indo-Europeans... That's a politically-correct term for the Aryans...
2. Aryans use the word arya or aryos to describe themselves, at least in the later phase (hence relics of that name among proto-Kelts even)
3. The so-called "Nordic" phenotype was propagaded through Aryan invasions and only exists in Europe due to Aryan invasions
4. Indo-Iranians originated from Sintashta culture, itself originating from Corded Ware, itself originating from Yamnaya cultures, all of them European