And science is not the only source of truth.
Printable View
And science is not the only source of truth.
I ate a sandwich today.
^^^ Was that science?
BTW, I explained why science is a tool and not a source (in material sense) in post #38:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...=1#post4178054
So because science aids in creating technology, which existed long before science, science proves itself in its fundamental assumptions of the world to be true? Quite a silly argument, but not unexpected. Somehow equating truth with technology, and science with technology, when technology is only a practical application of knowledge in many ways, while a lot of science isn't applied. Neither does it explain how mathematics, most of which is completely theoretical with application in the material world, and which science relies on, can be true. It doesn't answer the question, but only begs it and tries to avoid it. What you are saying is simply that science is practical, but even then a lot of things can be practical and still not true.
Prove science using science. You don't actually have to do it in practice, I just want you to tell me that it can be done in principle and how it would be done.