Israel exists only for 64 years when Iran has more than 3000 years of continuous History. And I believe that Iran's ennemies are Arab countries and not Israel.
Printable View
Israel exists only for 64 years when Iran has more than 3000 years of continuous History. And I believe that Iran's ennemies are Arab countries and not Israel.
I strongly disagree. Israel is by far the biggest threat to Iran because of their control over Washington. If it wasn't for Israel, the US government would have little interest in what Iran is doing.Quote:
On July 4, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said that he will not allow Iraqi land, sea, or airspace to be used for an attack on Iran. On July 5, Iraqi representative Mahmoud Othman warned that military action against Iran would destabilize Iraq.
On July 10, OPEC Secretary General Abdalla Salem El-Badri warned that if Iran is attacked, oil prices "would go unlimited."
In November 2011, Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly tried to persuade his cabinet ministers to authorize an attack on Iran. Israeli air force also conducted drills at Sardinia, and it successfully tested a long-range missile capable of striking Iran.
I support Israël , I don't like islam .
Neither. The selfish attitudes of both nations already increase the tension in the area a lot. And it doesn't seem to end pretty for anyone. So these two angry "guys" should be made peace with each other, if possible though
[YOUTUBE]nxeY6bq7lY0[/YOUTUBE]
No, I don't support Iran or Israel.
Iran wasn't always Islamist and this nation has a rich Aryan history. The conflicts and problems between the USA and Iran that have sprung up in the past are terrible and unfortunate and I want nothing but peace between our two countries.
I have read that article one year ago.
Listen, science history is my hobi and I am very well informed about most of it and the most recent one. I am unbiased regarding this issue because I do not care will they won it or will somebody else, but some fact are facts and I do not like when somebody is trying to disprove something which can not be disproved. Its better for anyone to accept some facts and move on without whining about it.
First of all have in mind that there are numerous other Jewish scientists which did not won the prize but nobody will speak anything about that.
Second of all none of you here nor any other Jew haters are informed about science nor its history and the only thing they do is posting articles and what somebodies else said.
Thirdly, from my reading experience non-Jewish scientists in areas which made famous Jewish scientists see no conflicts.
Forth, you should also see critics of Jan Biro who wrote that paper.
The following quote-example is the core of his paper and which I personally find the most flawed
Well the fact is that Sulston's most famous work is the one for which he received the prize while Venter and Francis Collins will get theirs prize in future.Quote:
An example might look like this, without implying that anything of the kind really happened. Real names are used only to make the example more plausible.
The Human Genome Project was largely completed in 2000 [21, 22]. The names of Francis Collins and Craig Venter became very familiar to the entire world during the most competitive final three years of sequencing [23]. Sequencing of the human genome was a huge investment by the scientific community and the grant-giving nations behind it. It was clear that it had significant benefits for humankind and would fundamentally change ways of thinking and working in biology. It was generally expected that the project would somehow be honored by a Nobel Prize.
However, the key person who catalyzed the project, and saved it from bankruptcy, was Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur. He was working for himself and his company, Celera, meanwhile serving humankind (there are many similarities between him and A. Nobel). Celera was selling the sequences to other scientists and patenting them for future biotechnological applications. This made Venter unpopular in the economically rather naïve scientific community.
The second best candidate was Francis Collins, the head of the Human Genome Project, HGP, at the NIH. He is a talented, highly social person with good organizing skills. However, his academic organization became famous for its slowness and expensiveness. Many academic scientists used the project for comfortable living for decades with no end in the sight. Additionally, Collins is an openly and deeply religious scientist, a Christian one, which irritates many others.
Number three in the sequencing arena was John E. Sulston, the director of the newly established Sanger Centre, located in Cambridgeshire, England. He and his Centre significantly contributed to the success of the HGP but were still far behind Collins and Venter.
The Collins-Venter-Sulston trio could have been the ideal laureates for the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 2002. This did not happen. The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute made the policy decision to choose another research area to honor, which kept Sulston (and the HGP) on the nominee list but rejected Collins and Venter. Honoring Sulston for research on C. elegans (a worm) instead of sequencing the human genome (a human) gave a “free ride” to the Nobel Prize for Sydney Brenner and H. Robert Horvitz, who both happened to be Jews. A J-bias was born, though the benefits of C. elegans for humankind remain to be seen.
If Collins, Venter and Sulston get their prize for which author says then Brenner and Horvitz would get it later. The same shit.
Actually what would not be right is that Sulston gets Nobel prize for working on human genome because it should rightfully go to Venter and Collins alone.
Iran obviously. ;)