Next Evidence For Young Humankind and Yet Another Example, How Evolutionists are Stupid or Lying.

:picard2:

The same was with many other hugly old things, which served as a proof of something, and basing
on which, people (also on this forum) were trying to proof their idiotic atheistic statement... If such
examples, do not force you to rethink your usuall worldview, then nothing will help you, becasue you
deliberetly are choosing this, what you want to be true, no matter how ridiculous or stupid it is.


Darra-i-Kur specimen about 25,000 years younger than previously thought

Very disappointing, because of the dearth of pre-Neolithic samples from Central Asia, but interesting nonetheless. The sample belongs to mtDNA haplogroup H2a, which has also been found in remains from the Eneolithic and Bronze Age Pontic-Caspian Steppe (see here). So there's a chance that it harbors Khvalynsk-like or Yamnaya-like ancestry from ancient Eastern Europe. Hopefully the genome-wide data is coming soon.

Abstract: The temporal bone discovered in the 1960s from the Darra-i-Kur cave in Afghanistan is often cited as one of the very few Pleistocene human fossils from Central Asia. Here we report the first direct radiocarbon date for the specimen and the genetic analyses of DNA extracted and sequenced from two areas of the bone. The new radiocarbon determination places the find to ∼4500 cal BP (∼2500 BCE) contradicting an assumed Palaeolithic age of ∼30,000 years, as originally suggested. The DNA retrieved from the specimen originates from a male individual who carried mitochondrial DNA of the modern human type. The petrous part yielded more endogenous ancient DNA molecules than the squamous part of the same bone. Molecular dating of the Darra-i-Kur mitochondrial DNA sequence corroborates the radiocarbon date and suggests that the specimen is younger than previously thought. Taken together, the results consolidate the fact that the human bone is not associated with the Pleistocene-age deposits of Darra-i-Kur; instead it is intrusive, possibly re-deposited from upper levels dating to much later periods (Neolithic). Despite its Holocene age, the Darra-i-Kur specimen is, so far, the first and only ancient human from Afghanistan whose DNA has been sequenced.


Douka et al., Direct radiocarbon dating and DNA analysis of the Darra-i-Kur (Afghanistan) human temporal bone, Journal of Human Evolution, Volume 107, June 2017, Pages 86–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.03.003

I didn;t know were to put it :)

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...9812fbb878.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Europa Nazione

New big study!

The Genomic History Of Southeastern Europe
Y and MtDNA samples list and results

---

Here, according to this data, Ust-Ishtim-man lived 45,000 years ago and was R1a1a1b.
According too YFull it is 5500/5000 old - so it was living 40,000 years earlier than itself...
It is even 23,000 earlier than Mal'ta-boy, R*...

But what it is only 40,000 years, if one cannot even imagine, how
long it is... but on the paper it looks nice - the bigger, the better! :picard2:

Another example: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...hed-in-Siberia

376,000 years of fiction... they really can't even imagine
how long it is... just chandged the numer and all is fine! :picard2:
Don't even bother, that something s wrong with them
and their methods... never, even if organism is still alive... :picard1:

Rethel you are joking or what?

I'm under the impression he's a believer in Adam and Eve along with a 6000 yo planet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mlukas

Rethel you are joking or what?

---

What am I joking? About fails presented here?
(Maybe Ust Ishtim was a wrongly putted data
in the table, but rest are real. You want more?)

The Bible never claims the Earth is six thousand years old. In fact in Genesis it says the sun to dictate the days, times, and the years was created on the fourth day. So obviously the first three weren't 24 hour days. They could have been millions of years. The Bible was never meant to be a science book it's meant to reveal the reality of Christ. Evolution doesn't contradict God in fact it supports it in my mind. Theres No reason to be against evolution

Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by karol.klacansky

The Bible never claims the Earth is six thousand years old.

---

Even if, then say, that humankind is.

Quote:

---

In fact in Genesis it says the sun to dictate the days, times, and the years was created on the fourth day.

---

It is argument exactly from the same poket as
your frist, so you should follow it, and know,
that on the fourth day, the sources of the
light were visible on the sky.

Quote:

---

So obviously the first three weren't 24 hour days.

---

Why not? Time can be measure wihout sun, becasue earth can
rouding without him. And even without rounding, God can measure
the time, the same as you could with the watch or clock.

Quote:

---

They could have been millions of years.

---

If they were millions of years old, how did plants live without light and bees?

Quote:

---

The Bible was never meant to be a science book it's meant to reveal the reality of Christ.

---

And the reality of Christ is, that he is reedemer, a second Adam - so obviously had to be frst.

Quote:

---

Evolution doesn't contradict God in fact it supports it in my mind. Theres No reason to be against evolution

---

There is every reason, becasue Bible clearly says, that evrything was created by it's kind.

Jesus was a second Adam, and for his existence was necessary the first one.

The enmity between seed of the Stan and seed of the woman begans in literal Eden.

Bible says about perfect begining and fall - evolution not.

And extrabiblical argument is this, that almost everything contradicts evolution.

There is neverending list of things which are impossible to happend if Universe
is billions of years old, and much more, which cannot happened by accident.

For example, about the moon... https://youtu.be/_TRmr2jMpcw?t=6m26s

Since 6:25

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TRm...utu.be&t=6m26s