http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/...ly-acceptable/
Printable View
Just wait, soon one will be allowed to terminate their ten year old.
Obama supported that when he was a Senator from Illinois.
Well, as the debate has already pointed out - what's the difference? If we are stopping children developing inside the mother, then why not outside? Both are putting an end to an unwanted life.
It takes a special kind of depraved individual to let a newborn just lay there and die.
Newborn versus unborn. The problem becomes complicated as people like Obama are advocating for children, already born, to be denied medical care and be left to die if they are considered to be at risk of genetic defects. No different from Hitler then, is he?
Infanticide is the word. :mad:
It is different from Hitler,since nazists were never so unhuman.
Those two "scientists" who proposed such a thing are just some idiots.
I could not read from original link,but read before about those two "scientists" which came with this theory.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...iOsR_blog.html
I think those who promote it should be considered for a late-late-late-late-late term abortion themselves.