another 'conspiracy theory' to some, but what is the evidence/argument for and against the moon landing ?
is it a political hoax ?
or what is a genuine mission ?
Printable View
another 'conspiracy theory' to some, but what is the evidence/argument for and against the moon landing ?
is it a political hoax ?
or what is a genuine mission ?
The moon landing a hoax? Lord, people will believe just about anything these days.
Astronomer Dr. Phil Plait (a major player in the Voyager missions to Jupiter and Saturn, plus a blogger at The Discovery Channel) answers this one adequately here and here. Plus answers a whole lot of misconceptions about astronomy at his web site.
If this doesn't convince you, then you're free to email Dr Plait about this. Anybody who believes it's a hoax is likely to have paranoid attitudes about even the most ordinary acts of government.
First man on the moon… 1969
Wheels on luggage weren’t invented until 1972.
Something’s very wrong with that timeline…
[YOUTUBE]ZOo6aHSY8hU[/YOUTUBE]
This ought to be moved to the Conspiracies subforum. :coffee:
Considering the recent Japanese moon probe (JAXA) was able to take HD film footage of a couple landing sites- even the astronaut foot paths were visible- the evidence is overwhelming. Not a hoax.
no they didn't. In fact if you use a telescope you can't see human steps on its surface and in the fake videos there are not stars, the shadows are wrong and the flag waves.
Give me a break. They have cameras orbiting earth that can tell what type of cigarettes are sitting on the dash of your car, so you are saying a moon orbiter from Japan, noted for their optics construction, can't authenticate lunar garbage left over from the moon walks?
The moon has no atmosphere to distort optics either.
I am highly disturbed that such ignorance exists within the European populace.