Search:

That's correct. The Scottish sample in that study is Aberdeen; Eastern Scots are genetically closer to the English, while Western Scots are closer to the Irish.

I'm not going to argue about arbitrary terms like Alpine, Med and Brunn, that are open to interpretation. I'd prefer to discuss verifiable things. In genetics and pigmentation the British Isles and...

Is it? Generalising the British Isles and the Netherlands as homogenous units is mistaken.

They came from the Netherlands, yes. What percentage of Bell Beaker/Bronze Age Netherlands ancestry the modern Dutch have is unclear, but the North Dutch/Frisians evidently have the most of it....

They are fairly distinct from the English like all Dutch, but you can certainly see the relatedness in many of them, and in those common looks you can see exactly what the early Anglo-Saxons looked...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3UpRnkSkQ4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKX0ItADkTQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWG-BoHX47M

Drop bears.

It's just a bit pointless as a question, since White Americans aren't an ethnicity, but an aggregate of every racially 'White' person in the US, which officially includes Jews, Middle Easterners,...

By the same rationale, Scandinavians are 'genetically closer' to Poles than to other NW Europeans.

Target: Swedish
Distance: 4.6513% / 0.04651320
50.8 Yamnaya_Samara
32.6 Barcin_N
16.6 WHG
...

My quick attempt at an objective playlist of the 100 greatest popular songs by British bands/artists (post-war), in terms of impact + quality, not necessarily my favourites.
...

I mean ffs, Friesland was literally repopulated by the same wave of migrating Anglo-Saxons at the same time England was. That's why the English and Frisians spoke mutually intelligible language until...

Scandinavians are also mixed with 'Celtic' as well as other things since the Viking era, part of Norway apparently has as much as 25% Insular Celtic, plus more Southern ancestry. Nobody is exactly...

They are. Thus useless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Yl2PXAdGQ8&list=LL&index=7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JzhP8qfbqE&list=LL&index=2

Gold Coast in the late 80s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbGkfOm5_i8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SK7qeaucF1U

Sydney in the early 90s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvYqvYlD9a4

Which raises the question again why people keep using G25 averages as a reference when they're clearly inaccurate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7P7BFBWQ1E

The modern population the Anglo-Saxon invaders resembled are Frisians, that is who English Germanic types most resemble, and also the closest linguistic cousin to English on the continent.

Meaney is a stereotype. This forum is obsessed with stereotypes and extremes, average people of each nation are marginalised on this supposed anthropology forum.

It's nearly always Ashleigh for girls not Ashley, at least in Australia.

No big loss anyway. Not like it's a traditional given name.

lol

Welcome back JamesBond007

Same here. I wouldn't be able to hum one of her songs even. She'll be easily forgotten in 10 years.

This thread was about Irish vs English closeness to Anglo-Saxons, that's what I responded to. No idea why you're bringing Scandinavians into it.

And btw, Saxon and Kentish English were already...

Are you really confused why? Feminists. Mainstream media is infested with them.

What exactly do you think the first PCA shows? There's never been a more extensive study. The Anglo-Saxon samples in all the studies are overwhelmingly from the 400s-700s.