Anders Behring Breivik; Evil Terrorist or European Patriot?

**Anglojew** · 11-06-2013, 10:10 PM

Anders Behring Breivik (Norwegian pronunciation: [born 13 February 1979) is the perpetrator of the 2011 Norway attacks. In a sequential bombing and mass shooting on 22 July 2011, he bombed government buildings in Oslo, resulting in eight deaths, then carried out a mass shooting at a camp of the Workers' Youth League (AUF) of the Labour Party on the island of Utøya, where he killed 69 people, mostly teenagers. He was convicted of mass murder, causing a fatal explosion, and terrorism in August 2012.

Breivik described his far-right militant ideology in a compendium of texts entitled 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, which he distributed electronically on the day of the attacks. In it he lays out his worldview, which includes Islamophobia, support of "far-right Zionismand opposition to feminism. It regards Islam and Cultural Marxism as "the enemy", and argues for the violent annihilation of "Eurabia" and multiculturalism, and the deportation of all Muslims from Europe based on the model of the Beneš decrees. Breivik wrote that his main motive for the atrocities was to market his manifesto.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik

His main ideological focus can be seen as opposition to what he felt was the Islamisation of Europe.

He believed;

“As a Justiciar Knight you are operating as a jury, judge and executioner on behalf of all free Europeans. It is better to kill too many than not enough ... the time for dialogue is over ... the time for armed resistance has come”. Anders Behring Breivik, "2083".

He targeted the the Norwegian Labour Party because of their pro-immigration and pro-Jihadist (especially Hamas) and anti-Israel ideology which he thought was anti-European;

Photo: Norway’s Foreign Minister Gahre-Store, who went on to praise Palestinian terrorists and condemn Israel.

He claims that the European Union is a project to create "Eurabia" and describes the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia as being authorised by "criminal western European and American leaders".[183] The Jerusalem Post describes him as pro-Israel and strongly opposed to Islam, and asserts that his manifesto includes "extreme screed of Islamophobia" and "far-right Zionism". In his writings Breivik states that "the Battle of Vienna in 1683 should be celebrated as the Independence Day for all Western Europeans as it was the beginning of the end for the second Islamic wave of Jihads."

He cannot simply be dismissed as racist or a neo-Nazi as he was not only pro-Israeli but pro-Indian (Hindu);

The manifesto urges the Hindu nationalists to drive Muslims out of India. He demands the forced deportation of all Muslims from Europe, based on the model of the Beneš decrees.

2083 contains two ultimatums. Before 2020, Muslims should convert to Christianity, adopt Christian names, abandon non-European languages, and get rid of foreign customs, or prepare for expulsion and death. The Armed Forces in every European country need to seize political control by coup d’états, declare martial law, suspend the constitution, execute all traitors, expel all Muslims and permanently ban Islam. Otherwise, the Knights Templar “will have no choice but to take matters into our own hands”. Spectacular attacks against traitors and Muslims – such as the ones Breivik carried out in downtown Oslo and the youth camp at Utøya Island – will lead to a civil war. “Innocent people will die, in the thousands”, but “the needs of the many will always surpass the needs of the few”.

http://www.opendemocracy.net/mattias...ome-from-today

His relationship with Christianity was complicated due to what he saw as the Church leaders duplicity in an anti-Christian and anti-European agenda;

In 2009, he wrote "Today's Protestant church is a joke. Priests in jeans who march for Palestine and churches that look like minimalist shopping centres. I am a supporter of an indirect collective conversion of the Protestant church back to the Catholic." On his Facebook profile, Breivik described himself as a Christian, though he is critical of the Catholic and Protestant churches, objecting to their "current suicidal path".

Despite this he was described, from day 1, as a "Christian terrorist" by a Western media who seemed glad to finally have a Christian terrorist to balance the thousands of Islamic ones.

Do you regard Breivik as a terrorist or a patriotic freedom fighter?

Is he actually wrong about the Islamisation of Europe?

Are his anti-Immigration and pro-assimilation of immigrants beliefs, opposed to multi-culturalism and cultural marxism, actually wrong?

Is it ironic that the “political youth camp” he targeted with politically inspired violence he did so partly because of their support of Islamist political violence i.e. their support for Hamas and Hezballah?

His fascinating manifesto can be found here; http://publicintelligence.net/anders...-independence/