Marriage between different Europids?

[SuuT]

I'm not trying to be an asshole E.S., I'm just genuinely curious at these things. People should be with whomever they wish; and the law of attraction usually places 'like' with 'like' so, ultimately, the question you pose seems moot (to me): It's just a very slippery slope.

[Östsvensk]

Err... you do realize that typology is pseudo-science BS right?

Phenotypes are not races, of course I know that, but they still show diversity and often symbolizes a persons ancestry (not always though).

Would you understand a European or even another Swede that finds that a bit whacky?

Also, are you anti-Dinarid, or something? I mean, if there was a mass influx of Dinarids to Sweden, would it all fall apart?

You mean if my friends would find it whacky that I was against a Swede marrying a Dinarid Albanian? I don't think so, since they often agrees on me with sticking to each etnicity.

About the last question, that has already happened. Why don't you ask Brännvin if the "Dinarids" in Landskrona have made the country flourish or not.

More seriously, no I am not anti-Dinarid.

so, we're talking against marriages between people of different nationalities, not only subraces

Thanks for the rep. Yes, at least I do. Though I decided to use other terms since some people are against different phenotypes intermarrying too (look at the voting on Skadi for instance).

Closer? In what sense? Because a Nordid is closer metrically to a Mediterranid than to an Alpine.

And 'indigenous'? You can find any Europid subtype indigenously all over Europe.

Is there any population/country in Europe where there is one single discrete subtype?

Read my posts again please. "Indigenous" types in each country, which means that I am talking about ethnicity.

[Stefan]

I think it depends on the country these Europeans(or descendants) are from, and how mixed their ancestry is. If they are descendants it shouldn't matter at all.In the U.S it is tough enough trying to stay pure Europid. If you are going to get picky with sub-race you aren't going to end up anywhere. Most Americans, like myself, are heavily mixed europeans anyway. Now if you are a full Nordid(phenotypically), and you want to retain your features, and you wouldn't want to mix with say an Alpinid, then it is fine. The same thing could be said in vice-versa. That is your choice.
It shouldn't be a problem that is pushed though.I think more people care about National Preservation when they don't have to worry about European preservation. They want their children to marry the same Nationality as them.

I for one will not stay exclusive to my sub-race though.That is because my children could already come out looking a totally different sub-race due to my varied ancestry. Actually, I could be considered a combination of sub-races that have the same phenotypical effect of a Dinarid opposed to having a long line of Dinarid ancestry. So it depends on the person, and it really isn't important from the start. I think people have the right to choose whether or not they want to stay pure to that level.

[Anthropos]

I am sure you can find Swedish 'dinarics' if you try harder. Lundman, old nutty professor, recorded occurences of hook-nosed individuals, in his opinion resembling Turks, in remote places in Dalarna where no foreign influx was known.

[SuuT]

You mean if my friends would find it whacky that I was against a Swede marrying a Dinarid Albanian? I don't think so, since they often agrees on me with sticking to each etnicity.

AHHT! You went and did it! You started this whole question with whether or not Europid subraces should 'mingle' with one another; then you added a nationality; and then called the whole thing an ethnicity.

*Europeans take note: You do this at least as much as Americans.

About the last question, that has already happened. Why don't you ask Brännvin if the "Dinarids" in Landskrona have made the country flourish or not.

Because I already know what he'll say. Anyway, you did it again: the problems of Landskrona have to do with Dinarids?. And besides, there are Dinariform individuals indigenous to Sweden and greater Scandinavia: Dinarisation is a process.

[Östsvensk]

I am sure you can find Swedish 'dinarics' if you try harder. Lundman, old nutty professor, recorded occurences of hook-nosed individuals, in his opinion resembling Turks, in remote places in Dalarna where no foreign influx was known.

They do exist, but I would say they are few. A larger amount can probably be dinaricized though, I guess.

Anyway, in that case I wouldn't be against. But that is my opinion and no ones else. Some people might have different views.

[Kadu]

I am sure you can find Swedish 'dinarics' if you try harder. Lundman, old nutty professor, recorded occurences of hook-nosed individuals, in his opinion resembling Turks, in remote places in Dalarna where no foreign influx was known.

I would have guessed the existence of such types in the regions bordering the sea, it would definitely be easier to explain such occurence due the Megalithic raiders during the Chalcolithic/Bronze age. But Dalarna is a inland region bordering Norway, it's definitely way more puzzling.

[Östsvensk]

AHHT! You went and did it! You started this whole question with whether or not Europid subraces should 'mingle' with one another; then you added a nationality; and then called the whole thing an ethnicity.

*Europeans take note: You do this at least as much as Americans.

Anyway, in that case I wouldn't be against. But that is my opinion and no ones else. Some people might have different views.

Because I already know what he'll say. Anyway, you did it again: the problems of Landskrona have to do with Dinarids?. And besides, there are Dinariform individuals indigenous to Sweden and greater Scandinavia: Dinarisation is a process.

Considering that I put smileys and wrote "more seriously" afterwards, I thought my sarcasm was obvious. It seems that I was wrong though...

[SuuT]

I would have guessed the existence of such types in the regions bordering the sea, it would definitely be easier to explain such occurence due the Megalithic raiders during the Chalcolithic/Bronze age. But Dalarna is a inland region bordering Norway, it's definitely way more puzzling.

Actually insofar as Dinarisation is a process, it should be expected in mountainous and pre-mountainous regions which boded nicely for the animal stock of ancient populations, the decendants of these ancient herding populations surviving in Dalarna.

[Brännvin]

Because I already know what he'll say.

Ding dong, american , you've none idea of my opinions, so do not try anything there out of your ass, american ..