Homosexual Marriage Debate Thread

[Vukodav]

someone posted this on another forum, it is quote of some feminist bloger,
good for laugh

Gay men are not actually “gay” in the sense that they are attracted to men. They choose to be with men because they view men as better and women as lesser and thus don’t see women as worthy of their time. They stay with other men in order to take use of the power men have in this society. The reason they are looked down on by “homophobic” men is that they are seen as greedy as they want more power than their male person can achieve on their own.

Women who choose to be with other women do it as they see men as what they are. Dangerous, thirsty beasts. They engage romantically and sexually with women in order to prevent themselves from getting harmed by men. This is a natural choice when living in a patriarchal world, and should not be criticized!

This does obviously not mean that men who choose to be with women are good people! They simply want to use women as objects. Women who choose to be with men simply have internalized misogyny and are tricked into thinking they need men to have an enjoyable sex life.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

I think it should be termed a civil union, not a marriage. Beyond that I really don't care, it's not an issue worth fighting over.

[ChocolateFace]

I'll take it a step further. Let's say Gay people have children by donating their sperm or eggs or some other way. Marriage was still made for Male and Female to raise a family. And the original Male and Female system to support children was the best which warranted marriage. So the root of marriage lies in the fact that Males and Females can have kids naturally. So assuming "love" is actually real and Gay people actually "love" each other that still doesn't mean they should get married.

[King Claus]

why would you want to debate this? everybody has his own opinion about this so i geuss you just wanted to make a controversial thread?

[Stimpy]

Yes, they should be able to get married as a union or legal contract between spouses. However, I don't see why they should have to get married in church, it feels hypocritical since homosexuality isn't allowed in any of the abrahamic religions. I don't see why they would want to neither though.

[Mortimer]

no but they can live as registered partners together

[KidMulat]

Ugh. I don't believe that governments have any right in validating/invalidating or giving benefits to marriage or married couples/trios/groups; hetero or homosexual or queer.

Although until we get out of this paradigm I can understand why people want gay marriage; I still eye roll at the heteronormative and assimilationist politics or the rhetoric that its the last frontier when really its not for most LGBTTQ people.

[YeshAtid]

no but they can live as registered partners together

[KidMulat]

someone posted this on another forum, it is quote of some feminist bloger,
good for laugh

What the fuck? I guess its a parody commentary on all the hyperbole around the origin and meaning of homosexuality and sexism in society.

[Mortimer]

Ugh. I don't believe that governments have any right in validating/invalidating or giving benefits to marriage or married couples/trios/groups; hetero or homosexual or queer.

Although until we get out of this paradigm I can understand why people want gay marriage; I still eye roll at the heteronormative and assimilationist politics or the rhetoric that its the last frontier when really its not for most LGBTTQ people.

heteronormative is normal. because hetero is the norm and normal gay is just deviant form of sexuality