Feminism & the illusion of parity

[Hierarchalist]

[Hierarchalist]

Isn't that sweet? a parody of a conversation where the males are made to sound like buffoons and the woman, the one woman, is made to sound as an above average female amongst below average males.
Then we all laugh at how absurd these generalizations all are and we leave, returning to the truths of our own cultural dogmas, knowing that there is no real difference between men and women.

It's all made up, and how foolish we look when we see ourselves in the caricatures the parody forces upon us.

[Neanderthal]

Isn't that sweet? a parody of a conversation where the males are made to sound like buffoons and the woman, the one woman, is made to sound as an above average female amongst below average males.
Then we all laugh at how absurd these generalizations all are and we leave, returning to the truths of our own cultural dogmas, knowing that there is no real difference between men and women.

It's all made up, and how foolish we look when we see ourselves in the caricatures the parody forces upon us.

To be honest I haven't meet many women that can discuss a subject like that. Women are very prone to fall to pseudo-scientific speech, and often they are biased by their own decision. Of course this is not the norm. I know many very bright girls, my girlfriend for example, but for average female college student it's almost impossible to discuss new ideas with them.

For example, there's this girl on my girlfriend class, friend of my girlfriend, that would sometimes chat with me on Facebook. She often post all this pseudo-intellectual propaganda, like; 'save the animals! let's all turn vegetarian!' and similar themes. I'm not quite sure how does the cognitive and deductive process function on people like this, but if you try another approach with them, they get affected by cognitive dissonance, and they get mad because they cannot understand different points of view.

She once told me: 'I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over race!', and I told her, 'well, I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over wallet and abs either.' That got her thinking quite some time.

[Hierarchalist]

To be honest I haven't meet many women that can discuss a subject like that. Women are very prone to fall to pseudo-scientific speech, and often they are biased by their own decision. Of course this is not the norm. I know many very bright girls, my girlfriend for example, but for average female college student it's almost impossible to discuss new ideas with them.

For example, there's this girl on my girlfriend class, friend of my girlfriend, that would sometimes chat with me on Facebook. She often post all this pseudo-intellectual propaganda, like; 'save the animals! let's all turn vegetarian!' and similar themes. I'm not quite sure how does the cognitive and deductive process function on people like this, but if you try another approach with them, they get affected by cognitive dissonance, and they get mad because they cannot understand different points of view.

She once told me: 'I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over race!', and I told her, 'well, I cannot understand how someone can chose partner over wallet and abs either.' That got her thinking quite some time.

Women are the simplest creatures out there. Simple is feminine.

Look at philosophy and science. What thinking dominates?

Women adapt to whatever is given. They are pragmatic in the sense that they restrict their perspective to a very small temporal space and a very linear perspective. It is why men dominate, because they have a wider event horizon. Women make do. All they see are immediate relationships as they pertain to them. This is why women don't excel in anything beyond sex and relationships. They are frivolous. That is why their passions and loyalties and loves are unpredictable and shallow.

[rob211080]

The end of western civilization was sealed as soon as women got the vote,they have simply been voting themselves a pay rise ever since.Emotions before logic.

[Hierarchalist]

The end of western civilization was sealed as soon as women got the vote,they have simply been voting themselves a pay rise ever since.Emotions before logic.

The reason feminism has become such a viable ideal is not because of its logic or transcending virtuousness but because human meddling has made it possible to control female conception and it has found alternative, more subtle methods to integrate males into the system.

[Hierarchalist]

Bump

[Hierarchalist]

Francis Parker Yockey wrote

Liberalism is an escape from hardness into softness, from masculinity into femininity, from History to herd-grazing, from reality into herbivorous dreams, from Destiny into Happiness. Nietzsche, in his last and greatest work, designated the 18th century as the century of feminism, and immediately mentioned Rousseau, the leader of the mass-escape from Reality. Feminism itself — what is it but a means of feminizing man? If it makes women man-like, it does so only by transforming man first into a creature whose only concern is with his personal economics and his relation to “society,” i.e., a woman. “Society” is the element of woman, it is static and formal, its contests are purely personal, and are free from the possibility of heroism and violence. Conversation, not action; formality, not deeds. How different is the idea of rank used in connection with a social affair, from when it is applied on a battlefield! In the field, it is fate-laden; in the salon it is vain and pompous. A war is fought for control, social contests are inspired by feminine vanity and jealousy to show that one is “better” than someone else.