0
I always wonder why immigrants who may have been "off the boat" for a few years and attain citizenship should have exactly the same rights as people who belong to the indigenous ethnicity of a country, and who's ancestors built the country that into the successful state, that attracted the formerly mentioned immigrant in the first place?
It amazes me that someone can come to a Western country, participate in its legal and political system, and actually lobby to change laws and traditions by allying with other immigrants or Cultural Marxists eg to ban Christmas in the workplace or other traditions practiced for centuries.
These themes have huge implications as "minorities" become the majority in many European cities -and even some Countries- over the next century.
So do you feel a citizen of foreign descent should have identical rights to indigenous ethnic members of your nation?
My own belief is it should take 3 generations to aquire citizenship.
Bookmarks