4
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,481 Given: 2,716 |
Thanks. I find it odd how people have to blame certain differences between native americans (north and south) and northeast asians on them being actually white or something (as in pre-columbian white admixture) when there is no genetic evidence for such a thing. They likely have some unique ancestry, something, idk, similar to Ainu? And don't get me started bout that guys. They are not some lost Aryans or some whacked out thing like that. I bet similarities to caucasians seen in natives can be blamed on some ancient race that is SIMILAR to white europeans. Not the same though. That is just nuts. We would know from genetic testing that this is true IF it was. The only european blood we find in natives is blood that CAN be linked to specific places, or, in other words, POST columbian.
I am not saying they are all out mongols though. They LIKELY (though it is not like I can prove this or anything, it is just likely) have some ancient white-looking asian blood. The Ainu had this look and some north asian groups still have this look a little bit. Don't believe me? Do a lil search on the internet.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 28,799 Given: 25,904 |
Right. Also, Native Americans did not evolve from East Asians. They both evolved from an early proto-Mongoloid group, that may also have been a Proto-Caucasoid group or share some similar origin. We do not know for certain. There are plenty of East Asian features that are recurring which are native to East Asians that may share similarities to European features, but they are not the same such as the high bridged nose, many NE Asians have that feature, but it doesnt mean they are part Euro nor is it the same phenotype.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,035 Given: 1,735 |
alberto-pizango-300x350.jpgximena5.jpg
As you can see, some Amerindians retain Asiatic features especially in the eyes.
But would I wouldn't necessarily mistake them for Asians. But I do find some East Siberians look similar, but not the same.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 341 Given: 485 |
asians and europeoans are parallel equivalents of amerindias. they are the northern proto race
Thumbs Up |
Received: 283 Given: 663 |
If Native Americans are Asians then so are Europeans.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,721 Given: 6,335 |
I agree with you there. There are actually two if not three waves of migration to the Americas before the columbian era. The first wave was from Siberians who migrated southwards from Alaska, the second wave were some Malays who migrated via boat to South America and the third wave were some Vikings who settled from Greenland to the Americas.
I'm tired of all these Latinos are part Mongoloid crap because you're stock is isn't primarily mongoloid, more like proto-mongoloid.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 28,799 Given: 25,904 |
First off, most Amerindians can be classified as Mongoloid, they just aren't the same as Asians.
Secondly, very few Latinos in real life even think about this stuff nor claim they are Mongoloid or even native American. It seems like many Latinos primarily just identify with Spanish/Iberian culture, period.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,721 Given: 6,335 |
Central America hosts the Panama canal connecting the Atlantic and Pacific of course some of them looked East Asian. Likewise the West Coast of Mexico especially Acapulco was the Eastern end of the Manila Galleons between Mexico and the Philippines. that's why there shall always be Filo looking Mexicans and Mexican looking filos.
The 2nd, 4rth and 5th people in the pictures would not be out of place in Manila.
You can find all those in a Manila crowd.
(I even spoted a couple of Castizos in
that crowd)
Last edited by Selurong; 03-18-2014 at 05:58 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks