How many aborted babies does it take to heat a hospital?

[Hong Key]

...

[Highlands]

That's an argumentative flaw called guilt by association. Here's another example: "Hitler favoured the construction of interstate highways and the persecution of Jews. Interesting..."

I was addressing his comment on morality. He stated anyone who is pro-choice has no morality or something along those lines.

[Anthropos]

I was addressing his comment on morality. He stated anyone who is pro-choice has no morality or something along those lines.

And you are saying that pro-lifers have no morality because some of them are the most racist people you've seen?

[Highlands]

And you are saying that pro-lifers have no morality because some of them are the most racist people you've seen?

I meant specifically on this forum. I find it strange how the right wing extremists spout hate towards certain races and even promote genocide but are pro-life on every occasion. It doesn't make sense from a humanistic standpoint. Just a trend I've observed on here.

[Cleitus]

I meant specifically on this forum. I find it strange how the right wing extremists spout hate towards certain races and even promote genocide but are pro-life on every occasion. It doesn't make sense from a humanistic standpoint. Just a trend I've observed on here.

Nothing in a Humanist standpoint makes sense.

[Anthropos]

I meant specifically on this forum. I find it strange how the right wing extremists spout hate towards certain races and even promote genocide but are pro-life on every occasion. It doesn't make sense from a humanistic standpoint. Just a trend I've observed on here.

I don't like the hate myself but it surely doesn't come from pro-lifers specifically, not to mention of course that association is not enough to prove that the two things have anything to do with each other. I personally shouldn't feel targeted with the charge that I'm hateful against certain people, so as a pro-lifer I object to what you're saying because it's not true.

[Harley]

Well, pro-lifers have the staunch idea that their ideas and individual beliefs are right and just and anyone else is a stupid, amoral, aborted fetuses burning slutwhore.

I don't try to understand it anymore, because you will find that people often think they can live over tens of thousands of lives better than the individual themselves, opting to chew their food and spit it in their mouths instead of letting them learn to masticate and swallow for their own.

[Anthropos]

Seeing as some pro-choicers base their stance on the assumption that a fetus is a part of the body of the person who has the right to abort it, it would be interesting to know from those prochoicers why they would be against using that part of a woman's body as fuel once they have aborted it?

Prochoicers who base their stance on the assumption that a fetus isn't a person should be asked the same question: Why if at all would you oppose using aborted fetuses as fuel?

And why should hospitals and abortion clinics (which have to assume responsibility for the handling of aborted fetuses) care what prochoicers may have to object to their practices? If they have chosen to abort the fetus they really cannot claim that the fetus is too good for any kind of treatment. Concerns about hygiene for the general good is one thing, but no argument coming from any kind of respect can be accepted.

[Harley]

Are there pro-choicers who have chosen to abort using the stance you cited as a means to protest against using it to fuel hospitals?

Or are you seeking ways to further invalidate the power of having choices?

[Anthropos]

I was talking about the reality of choices. I don't have to seek anything in this matter.