1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,784 Given: 2,068 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,282 Given: 43,807 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,282 Given: 43,807 |
Anyway, as I have already said, I want to discuss the differences that occur around the Alps and the Danube as well as the Pyrenees please.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,071 Given: 10,740 |
Danube.
Iberians and French do not change immediately, though there is contrast between northern France and southern Iberia. But people on both sides of the Pyrenees immediately before and after look more or less Ibero-Baskid.
Alps is a gradual change.. on the Italian side you begin seeing more AtlantoMed and Dinarid, but the change is gradual and not abrupt.
With the Danube, the change is pretty drastic, with the rapid increase of Pontids south of it and Baltids and East Nordids north of it.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,099 Given: 5,253 |
Danube my ass. Alps, then Pyrenees.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,071 Given: 10,740 |
The Alps is not as great of a change as one thinks. I'd say that at least individually, most native north Italians (i.e. not including those of recent southern descent) can pass in Switzerland and Austria, and most Swiss and Austrians can pass in northern Italy.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,282 Given: 43,807 |
But as you usually love to point out yourself, even Northern Italians have considerably higher amounts of Mediterranean and West Asian admixture than their Northern neighbours, and surely this is partly reflected in phenotype. (Again, I am only playing devil's advocate here).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,071 Given: 10,740 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 29,829 Given: 24,541 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,071 Given: 10,740 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks