Gay marriage approved in Portugal

[December]

You do know that socialist governmenst usually cater to the demands of such "minorities" ?

At this moment the biggest party is the Partido Socialista. The Prime Minister is José Sócrates (PS)

Coincedence ?

Nope. You are right. And the next step will be adoption. Sócrates already assumed that it could not be passed only because it was not in the electoral manifest.

Eventhough this was a fraud. The proposal was written in small letters on the manifest. People were much more worried with the financial crisis. Nevertheless he lost half-million votes.

And you know why gay adoption was not in the manifest? In one thing the far-left was right: he didn't have the guts because he knew all too well he would lose elections.

[December]

How is this a tragedy? If two gay people decide to marry, I don't see how it will impact me personally, or any other person who is not involved. If marriage is not allowed, the couple will probably just live together anyway. Sealing their relationship in marriage is a formality that has meaning for them only. It is personal.

The motto of this site ("Cultural & Ethnic European Preservation") is marred if we shrug our shoulders at perversion of basic laws of nature and society that our forefathers have built and preserved both through our genes and culture.

[Cato]

LMAO @ Jose Socrates.

With a name like that is it any wonder why he supports Greek love?

[December]

Related: A gay working man is worth more than a praying man.
Unrelated: Do you guys think priests are trying to pray the gay away?
Related: I agree with Loki and anonymaus on this one.
Unrelated: Have any of you worked on the sabbath? Have you touched or eaten a pig?
Related: Gay marriage should of course not be performed in a church but in the town hall.
Homosexuality isn't about perverted sex but to find a partner for life like anybody else. If you pick and choose in the bible from what to follow and not, then even a 6-year-old wouldn't pay any attention to you.
Garbage thoughts like that is obsolete...it's time to move on and better ourselves.

Here, two respectable working men:



If this is what the genes of Europeans serve for, I'd rather prefer the extinction of humanity.

And this is why the muslims will win this war. They laugh at our decadence.

[Loki]

The motto of this site ("Cultural & Ethnic European Preservation") is marred if we shrug our shoulders at perversion of basic laws of nature and society that our forefathers have built and preserved both through our genes and culture.

In your mind only. What people do in their private lives we cannot change. It is not unlawful have a same-sex partner. And, marriage does not add much to that, it is merely a formality. This new allowance will not all of a sudden persuade heterosexual men to become gays. But gays have always been a minority in society, and that they will remain. Regardless of the strictness of government. In my mind it is better to be open about some things, than doing it in secret.

[Cato]

The fudgepackers need a date with the nidstang, but their desire to force their deviant behavior on society would see the niding pole decorated with rainbow ribbons.

I don't support this sort of abberant lifestyle; it's simply not a part of what I consider to be traditional behavior for a man of any sort, especially the heroic-minded man.

[Tony]

Nope. You are right. And the next step will be adoption.

Indeed , it first starts with the "civil union" , then as a regular marriage and at last with the adoption.
I don't care what 2 gays do in their private and think the whole issue is way overestimated by the politicians and the media to obscure way more serious problems like immigration , poverty and unemployment but I would never force a gay to pretend to be a hetero and play the day the role of the perfect hubby with a fake wive plus sons/daughters and in the night going in search of males , as in once was.
But at the same time I'd NEVER equate a gay couple with a hetero one , the hetero is much more important for the survival of a society , to start with the offspring issue.

[poiuytrewq0987]

Indeed , it first starts with the "civil union" , then as a regular marriage and at last with the adoption.
I don't care what 2 gays do in their private and think the whole issue is way overestimated by the politicians and the media to obscure way more serious problems like immigration , poverty and unemployment but I would never force a gay to pretend to be a hetero and take a fake wives plus sons/daughters , as in once was.
But at the same time I'd NEVER equate a gay couple with a hetero one , the hetero is much more important for the survival of a society , to start with the offspring issue.

I wouldn't want a gay man to be straight and have children because it's mostly likely he'll be a bad influence to the kid. And kids are what keeps us going as a race.

[December]

In your mind only.

Not sure.

LMAO @ Jose Socrates.

With a name like that is it any wonder why he supports Greek love?

LOL, I doubt Greeks will like the comparison... But yes, he had an affair with a known public male figure, which led to the end of his marriage. Of course that by mentioning this, I risk to be sued by defamation like many were.

[Loddfafner]

I don't support this sort of abberant lifestyle; it's simply not a part of what I consider to be traditional behavior for a man of any sort, especially the heroic-minded man.