Violence Is Golden

[Hierarchalist]

Violence is neither good or bad. It is a useful survival strategy. In our modern times where violence is denied expression, unless it is promoted by the state, male effectiveness is diminished and females gain the upper hand.



You eliminate the option of violence and you diminish fear and even a child becomes equal to an adult male. Only the systems reserves the right to use threats and violence, including murder. All others are equalized as subordinates to it. Valued by how well they adhere to its authority.

Animals are killed daily for your sustenance and your culture, your standard of life, is built on exploiting and dominating other lands, which involves all forms of violence. The fact that you're kept at a distance from it does not absolve you of responsibility. The myth of innocence is attached to the myth concerning the sanctity of life.

Life is expendable. Life feeds on life.



The demand for respectful, polite, humble, selfless behavior and the demonizing of violence, selfishness, egotism, arrogance, pride and hatred from a species evolved to be all of these things and more, leads to the necessity of providing surrogate avenues to defuse many socially unwanted human tendencies and makes it imperative to attempt to control them through moral and religious systems based, again, on a system of promises and threats and to promote socially acceptable human tendencies through ideals, values, coercion and rewards.

Violence is necessary...Violence is useful...Violence is Golden



Or do you dream of a world with no wars, no hunger, no violence, no toil, no suffering, no pain, no injustice?



"A natural world is a world of war
A natural man is a warrior"

Ragner Redbeard - Might is Right

[Unome]

"Might makes Right."

Imagine what would happen to the world if/when nuclear weapons fall into the wrong hands, into the hands of men more than willing to use them.

[Hierarchalist]

"Might makes Right."

Imagine what would happen to the world if/when nuclear weapons fall into the wrong hands, into the hands of men more than willing to use them.

Might does not make it right. However, might always wins, at-least most of the time.....

[StonyArabia]

Violence is a necessary evil, for self defence but it's preferable to solve problems peacefully and to forgive even if it's hard to do that's what makes a person a man.

[Unome]

Might does not make it right. However, might always wins, at-least most of the time.....

The mightiest people make and force the rules onto everybody-else, natural law.

You cannot argue against a nuke. The control of military power leads to all subsequent power. Peace is an illusion outside the safety of social walls & indoctrination, "culture". Not every human population knows the meaning of "peace". Many organisms fight to the death over scraps and crumbs of food. How is this anything but right?

The Western idea of "rights" is a safety net of privileges, entitlements, and securities, inherited by some rare types of people and not others. Not everybody is privileged. Not everybody has "human rights". Human rights represent a liberal-christian ideology that all humans, or living organisms, "deserve" security just for being born. This presupposes a sanctity of life that may not exist at all.

There are no Rights.

[Hierarchalist]

A good read :- Barbarous Philosophers: Reflections on the Nature of War From Heraclitus to Heisenberg - Christopher Coker
http://www.amazon.com/Barbarous-Phil.../dp/0231701985

[Hierarchalist]

[Hierarchalist]

“The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual crime.” - Max Stirner

We live in an age where masculinity has been abstracted to the state, the institution. Only the state is permitted to use violence. The soldiers only represent its will (its arms and legs).

Anti-violence is anti-nature. It is a form of self hatred. When you denounce war and violence, you are in-fact denouncing all the elements that made humans dominant in the animal kingdom.

Due to increasing uniformity, expressions of resistance are dealt with through redirection and imaginative mollification, much in the same way as repressed sexuality is offered a release through porn and repressed aggression is released through action films, video games and sports, allowing controlled violence.


Bertrand Russell :

“In these days under the influence of democracy, the virtue of co-operation has taken the place formerly held by obedience. The old-fashioned schoolmaster would say of a boy that he was disobedient; the modern schoolmistress says of an infant that he is non-co-operative. It means the same thing: the child, in either case, fails to do what the teacher wishes, but in the first case the teacher acts as the government and in the second as the representative of the People, i.e. of the other children. The result of the new language, as of the old, is to encourage docility, suggestibility, herd-instinct and conventionality, thereby necessarily discouraging originality, initiative and unusual intelligence. Adults who achieve anything of value have seldom been “co-operative” children. As a rule, they have liked solitude: they have tried to slink into a corner with a book and been happiest when they could escape the notice of their barbarian contemporaries. Almost all men who have been distinguished as artists, writers or men of science have in boyhood been objects of derision and contempt to their schoolfellows; and only too often the teachers have sided with the herd, because it annoyed them that the boy should be odd.”

[Hierarchalist]