Afrocentrists vs. Aryocentrists: Who is dumber?

[Teyrn]

Agreed the Greeks were cool up until the Roman Empire period. The Romans steam rolled them.

The Romans didn't have a high opinion of Greeks initially. Old Cato the Censor, out of patriotic zeal, spent a considerable amount of time haranguing about Greeks in the Senate as sneaky, untrustworthy, etc. at a time when Greek philosophy and medicine was penetrating into Roman society. They got a taste of fighting Greeks against the Epriotes led by Pyrrhus and were able to adapt the manipular legion to outfight the Macedonian-styled phalanxes and whatnot. The biggest weakness of the Greeks was that they didn't have the ruthless efficiency of the Romans in forcing conformity on subjugated territories but in Byzantine times the Greeks in the East were able to keep the efficiency and organization of the old Roman military for some time when the West had degenerated into semi-barbaric kingdoms with little military organization outside of the warbands of whichever leader was then in power.

[Hellenas]

It's laughter you hear, and I am no nordic.

...you will not gain my attention by doing or saying anything as well.

[LucvHvce]

Ac that's quite a loss!

Yes it's quite frustrating. It's why I'm looking into selling overseas now. In areas where privacy is a bit more respected.

[Teyrn]

Yes it's quite frustrating. It's why I'm looking into selling overseas now. In areas where privacy is a bit more respected.

Are you using some internet-based retailer as the medium for selling your goods? I can think of eBay for a start.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

...you will not gain my attention by doing or saying anything as well.

By "gain your attention" you mean "defend your lunacy with logic". Yes, I know it's impossible to get you to do that.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

The Romans didn't have a high opinion of Greeks initially. Old Cato the Censor, out of patriotic zeal, spent a considerable amount of time haranguing about Greeks in the Senate as sneaky, untrustworthy, etc. at a time when Greek philosophy and medicine was penetrating into Roman society. They got a taste of fighting Greeks against the Epriotes led by Pyrrhus and were able to adapt the manipular legion to outfight the Macedonian-styled phalanxes and whatnot. The biggest weakness of the Greeks was that they didn't have the ruthless efficiency of the Romans in forcing conformity on subjugated territories but in Byzantine times the Greeks in the East were able to keep the efficiency and organization of the old Roman military for some time when the West had degenerated into semi-barbaric kingdoms with little military organization outside of the warbands of whichever leader was then in power.

Romans didn't invent manipul formations either, but took it from indigenous tribes.

[Hellenas]

By "gain your attention" you mean "defend your lunacy with logic". Yes, I know it's impossible to get you to do that.

Sorry, you are the paranoic madman here, you have no logic at all as well, unless if you can find any serious Scientists who support your crazy claims: That Greeks didn't invent the first European civilization, which gave birth to the western european civilization, that Greeks are not Greeks and have no racial and genetic continuity, that ancient Greeks were Scandinavians and northerners, that Nordics were literate and civilized just like Greeks and Romans and all other lunatic claims of yours.

[Teyrn]

Romans didn't invent manipul formations either, but took it from indigenous tribes.

As a rule the Romans invented very little- they took the gladius from the Iberians, the large shield from the Samnites (I believe), ship-building from the Carthaginians, the toga from the Etruscans, etc. It's what they did with the maniple that counts- not where it came from or who invented it.

[Teyrn]

Sorry, you are the paranoic madman here, you have no logic at all as well, unless if you can find any serious Scientists who support your crazy claims: That Greeks didn't invent the first European civilization, which gave birth to the western european civilization, that Greeks are not Greeks and have no racial and genetic continuity, that ancient Greeks were Scandinavians and northerners, that Nordics were literate and civilized just like Greeks and Romans and all other lunatic claims of yours.

Greeks, Nordics, blah blah blah. It's one extreme vs. the other; as usual the middleman gets the shaft.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

More swarty fantasies. Whatever you say about southern europe, the truth is it's nothing to do with what we call mediterranean people today, especially not east meds as you seem to think. Semitic people have never been a part of real civilization before except in delusional swarty fantasies. I see now your stake in this, but even if any part of the southern european case were true, it's nothing to do with you.


Here is one of the earliest etruscan murals, surprisingly white, more so than I expected.



Here's a mural that swrties LOVE to post pieces of. Look at the so blond and pale they disappear people, those are the etruscans, the rest are servants and musicians who are probably slaves. Whoops.

I have pointed this out in the past to board members here. Solution? Don't post the blonde people at all, just the dark ones who are obviously not etruscan at all.

And here's why it all falls apart...it's obvious the bias and lies that swarty folk will partake of without any hint of shame. Once someone posts bullshit like this how can you take anything they say seriously?

You clowns even claim that ancient sources were biased towards nordicism. Muslim darkoids covering middle east is new. Dark southern europeans came in about 1000 BC, and have slowly spread over time. They didn't invent jack shit either, not a single thing.

This post in another thread is a good example of the general deceptiveness of middle eastern and supposed 'greek' people who try to paint ancient europe as dark. Many afrocentrists are as bad.

I mean, they just outright lie (as KidMulat did ALL THE TIME). So how can you possibly take anything they say seriously? And if there were some 'upsetting' discoveries I would actually be interested to know about them, not try to conceal them. Like if it was found the Irish came from japan or some weird crap, how is that supposed to make me upset?

If you notice, they don't even acknowledge the right of modern europeans to exist. They claim they came only recently to europe, but not from any place that's currently swarty. Then they expanded very rapidly and lightened up europe by magic somehow (we know in reality mixing dark and white always just leads to dark). They are just baldfaced liars with a political agenda to push, nothing else.