Why didn't Scythians conquer land like Turks and Mongols

[Sky earth]

I think almost all of the Eurasian steppe today are partly descendants of the Scythians be it Slavs or Turkics

Turkic peoples are the cultural descendants of Scythians and also genetically to a certain degree

[War Chef]

Because Turkic culture was direct spawn from Siberian taiga wilderness, lifestyle of hunter-gatherers, they view humans as commodities like the sheep they butcher, which is why they had no moral dilemma doing genocide. You can kill 100 cows you can kill 100 humans.

[Äijä]

There are historical mentions of them reaching the Baltic, Gulf of Finland has been called the Scythian Gulf is some sources.

[Sky earth]

Because Turkic culture was direct spawn from Siberian taiga wilderness, lifestyle of hunter-gatherers, they view humans as commodities like the sheep they butcher, which is why they had no moral dilemma doing genocide. You can kill 100 cows you can kill 100 humans.

Wrong in many levels. Turks were equestrian pastoralists from the steppes of Eurasia

[Anglojew]

Khazars were Oghur Turks and the ruling elite were descendants of Ashina Türks. They were of course mixed with Scythians but they were ethnically still Turkic.

The Ashina clan actually were Scythians originally. There's is some confusion about this today. This is why I'm sure the Khazars were a Sarmatian group.

[Proto-Shaman]

Linguistically the Ossetians. Genetically probably much of Eurasia.

Amazingly, it is universally accepted in the Indo-European scientific world that the Ossetian language, with 80% non Indo-European lexicon, 100% non Indo-European grammar and 100% non Indo-European morphology, is unquestionably an Indo-European language.

And so the Scythians, and later their linguistic kins Sarmatians, and specifically one of the Sarmatian tribes, the Alans, spoke an Iranian language akin to the uniquely opposed to the all Indo-European languages Ossetian language, which itself consists of 80% of non Indo-European lexicon. A lovely deduction, isn't it? Go figure that mechanics.

[Proto-Shaman]

Scythians=Proto-Turks/Mongols

(lol...just trying to stir the pot, is all...)

U're welcome: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turanid_race

[Proto-Shaman]

Because Turkic culture was direct spawn from Siberian taiga wilderness, lifestyle of hunter-gatherers, they view humans as commodities like the sheep they butcher, which is why they had no moral dilemma doing genocide. You can kill 100 cows you can kill 100 humans.

A former, legendary, king of the Turks is supposed to have said: 'The Turk is like a pearl (dur) in its shell at the bottom of the sea, when it is worth nothing; but when it comes out of its shell, and out of the sea, it becomes valuable and adorns the crown of kings and the neck and ears of brides'. [Ibid., p. 37.]

[Anglojew]

Another territory the Scythians ruled;

[Anglojew]

Amazingly, it is universally accepted in the Indo-European scientific world that the Ossetian language, with 80% non Indo-European lexicon, 100% non Indo-European grammar and 100% non Indo-European morphology, is unquestionably an Indo-European language.

And so the Scythians, and later their linguistic kins Sarmatians, and specifically one of the Sarmatian tribes, the Alans, spoke an Iranian language akin to the uniquely opposed to the all Indo-European languages Ossetian language, which itself consists of 80% of non Indo-European lexicon. A lovely deduction, isn't it? Go figure that mechanics.

The Scythians and Turks intermingled creating the Sarmatians, Khazars etc.