How do you think the world would've been if Hitler had won WW2?

[HawkR]

How do you think the world and your country specific would've been if Hitler had won WW2?

[Arrow Cross]

My country would have remained in the German sphere of influence, and as part of the "Western world", regardless of a succesful Barbarossa happening or not. That is the inevitable fate of (now-)small nations, although we'd be way larger of a country, thanks to the First and Second Vienna Awards.

Our Jewish and Gypsy population would be expulsed to Palestine and Madagascar, respectively. There were bad tongues in wartime, especially after the front neared the borders that upon a German victory, we'd be "sent back to Asia" too, but it's most likely nothing more than the mind-creation of Bolshevik propagandists - and radical SS members.

After Hitler's death, I think a more moderate National Socialist leader would have followed(much like in the S.U.), but the Slavs of Europe would have had a rought time for sure, nevertheless. The ultimate failure of Hitlerism was its lack of Pan-European thought, they were defeated, among others, because they refused to extend their hand to their Slavic brothers.

That is a lesson we must never forget.

[HawkR]

I didn't realice how hard the question would be for me


The world itself, well, it's hard to imagine anything actually as I don't know as much about Hitler as I would like to. But Norway would've been a better place since we then would have no immigrants and such. No jews, yeah, I think it would have been better.

[Oisín]

I imagine a victory for Germany in WWII would have meant a much weaker Britain so they would no longer be occupying the north east of Ireland, other than that I don't think Ireland would have been affected too much. Apart from some nice pro-Irish propaganda films I don't think Hitler had too much of an interest in Ireland. Throughout WWII we remained on good diplomatic terms with the Third Reich and De Valera refused to join the Allies despite enormous pressure from the UK so perhaps he would have rewarded us some land in England, that would have been nice.

[TheGreatest]

There would had been no ''Hitler was wrong" rhetoric that led to the revolutions of the 1970's that brought an end to the United States, as being an European-White institution.


That means the Jim Crow Laws remain in effect, John F. Kennedy does not become President (or adjusts himself to become a Nationalists; how typical of politicians) and there is no immigration and civil rights reform in 1965.

And of course this means no War on Terror (and no being sodomized by black security guards at the Detroit Airport) and no Barack Hussein Obama.



So what would life be like? It's debatable as to how far consumer goods will advance. Would we have personal computers? Let alone Video Games? Would the Nazi have tolerated millions of youth spending a dozen hours+ doing ''Idle's Work" on the Xbox?

Much like in the People's Republic of China, there are actual Government mandates dictating the maximum hours a child/adult can spend online.


But I will talk about myself. I was forced to go to an educational institution (elementary/secondary) were almost everyone was non-white. That was because I was born in a city, particularly in a community, in which everyone was an immigrant except for the oldest families.

Very few kids spoke English and it was difficult for me to make friends.
Had Hitler won, I doubt this would have occurred, a large number of East Indians and Chinese being tolerated and allowed to settle in North America.



And regarding German racial policy? I don't know if I would had been ''grabbed and sent" to a farm in Manitoba or Siberia, massaging Heinz the German Landlord and harvesting his wheat. Although I had the impression that the Germans had only reserved such a fate to the Asiatic-looking populations in Eastern Europe.


As a young adult I am terrified about my immediate future. Will I be able to afford a home? Thanks to an An immigration boom from Hong Kong and the richest parts of India, has resulted in a cadre of foreign-businessmen playing ''real estate" and subsequently flipping and bursting properties into the unaffordable range for the majority of people in the city, subsequently forcing most of us to live in small apartments.



Thanks Hitler. Had you fought a little harder, maybe I would had have the pleasure of being born in a 100% ethnic community, afford my own house at 20 and have a lovely looking pair of sons. Instead few people I know have children before 30, no one can afford their own house and most people are miserable, centering their lives around work...

[Absinthe]

I don't see how the world could ever have been worse than it is right now

[TheGreatest]

I imagine a victory for Germany in WWII would have meant a much weaker Britain so they would no longer be occupying the north east of Ireland, other than that I don't think Ireland would have been affected too much. Apart from some nice pro-Irish propaganda films I don't think Hitler had too much of an interest in Ireland. Throughout WWII we remained on good diplomatic terms with the Third Reich and De Valera refused to join the Allies despite enormous pressure from the UK so perhaps he would have rewarded us some land in England, that would have been nice.

Hitler's defeat did leave ripples in the English speaking world; particularly in the academia, who certainty left their impression on the post-war baby boomers, who are the current political leaders of our nations.

My Father is sadly a Neo-Conservative because of them. Loves Israel and thinks it's purpose is to ''spread democracy'' in the Middle East. Of course he could always be pulling the wool over our eyes. Because other than his pro-Israeli stance, he is a Nationalist and an Anglo-Saxon one at that.

[Vulpix]

That is my point of view as well.

I don't see how the world could ever have been worse than it is right now

[TheGreatest]

Despite all the misery things wouldn't be so bad if we just had options. We don't. We no longer have the living space that our ancestors had.



And creating it isn't much of an option. Rhodesia being a good example of a nation in Africa that encouraged White immigration and was subsequently destroyed by both the Capitalists and Bolsheviks (Zionists for a lack of a better word)

[Loyalist]

It depends on how and when Germany prevailed. If, for example, peace was negotiated with the British after the fall of France, the United Kingdom, by necessity, would be much stronger than it is at present. With the proper leadership, the British Empire would still exist in some form, unless Colonial leaders took a sharp anti-Axis turn (which is more than likely). If defeat of the United Kingdom came about through German invasion (eg: Operation Sea Lion), the country would be in ruins for decades to come, and relegated to being a puppet state with the Nazi-installed BUF in power.

In Eastern European, Generalplan Ost would have done its job and wiped out the Slavs. The vast majority would have been subject to enslavement (particularly the Czechs and Poles), expulsion beyond the Urals, extermination, and the assimilation of a small number of Nordic specimens. Today, there would be no Slavic remnants anywhere in the region, which would now be populated by millions of German colonists.

Italy would certainly remain indepenent, so long as Mussolini remained in power. It may be part of a small Mediterranean empire (encompassing Albania, Greece, North Africa, etc.), but would be wholly subservient to Germany.

Japan would doubtless rule over Asia, the Pacific Islands, and most likely Australia and New Zealand. I would like to see how Germany and Japan would go about carving up Asia, and if there were any conflicting interests.

As far as the United States is concerned, I cannot see how they could co-exist peacefully with the Axis powers for any extended period of time. The threat of nuclear M.A.D. might be enough to maintain a status quo, but tensions would always be ready to boil over at any minute, and I do not believe the Americans could prevail over a combined German and Japanese assault. The best option for the US would be to elect a president likely to have a friendly approach to the Axis, such as Charles Lindbergh or Joseph Kennedy Sr. The obstacle to that would be bitter Jews waging their biggest financial and propaganda war yet to elect an anti-Axis leader, even if it meant destruction for the nation.

As for the political situation in Germany, Hitler would have held power at least into the 1960s (I do not believe he was heading towards senility, dementia, or any of those other insulting theories). Either way, the chances of a moderate coming to power are remote. Hard-liners such as Heinrich Himmler, Josef Goebbels, and even Reinhard Heydrich (whom Hitler had long been grooming as a successor) would be lined up to seize power in the event of Hitler's death or incapacitation. Bormann and Göring are the best candidates for a less-extreme interpretation of National Socialism, but the two are political enigmas. I would agree that, once the World War II generation died out, it is almost certain that a moderate or reformer would be installed.

The political landscape aside, it would seem that, technologically, we would be far ahead of our own world. Aircraft, space exploration, and even home technologies would be given a massive boost. Healthcare would be far superior, aided by everything from improved equipment, research, eugenics, and so on. Industrial entities, being more environmentally-compatible, would cut down on pollution, eliminating all this ridiculous worrying about "global warming". Youth groups (eg: Hitler Youth) would likely be more commonplace across the globe, instilling discipline and responsibility, while eliminating problems such as gangs and teen pregnancy. Criminals would simply be liquidated, as opposed to ridiculous concepts, like rehabilitation, that have taken hold now. I could go on and on, but regardless, an alternate outcome to World War II would leave this world a utopia compared to our situation in reality.