Same-Sex Marriage - For Or Against

[Yaroslav]

You're moving too fast for me. I'd rather you explain your stance on OP without condemning me to your hell first.

My stances are unequivocal, I suggest you repent instead of engaging in your farcical commentaries. Life is short.

[Amud]

I'm ambivalent, as it has no effect on my life. Nothing against gays, but I really couldn't care less whether or not they are allowed to marry. However, I'll go with being opposed to it, just because I'm sick of everybody acting like it's some major issue and I enjoy pissing off those types of people. The government loves to harp about non-issues like gay marriage and marijuana, letting the people vote on it and so on, letting us pretend we're sitting at the grown-up table. The purpose is twofold: It lets the people feel like they have some say in what's going on, and it distracts them from the important issues that they want to keep hushed up, like the NSA and foreign policy.

Also, I'm absolutely disgusted by some practices of the LGBT community, such as public demonstrations where they walk around naked on the street, or wearing suits made of dildos, or the whole bugcatching thing. Not all gays are guilty of this, but I shouldn't have to accept those who are. Anyone who engages in this behavior should absolutely not be given any kind of government benefits, including those afforded by marriage.

[Harley]

Every person in society must be responsible for the future of society. If a guy robs a bank, it is the business of good citizens to punish this guy so the future can be peaceful. It should also be everyone business to disapprove of homosexuality for the sake of the future.

Can you explain what you mean by sake of the future?

[Yaroslav]

Yes I do, and it's not heretic lol.

You accept Vatican II then? What a clown. Repent, I say this with greatest concern and love for you.

[Hayalet]

And you support fag "unions"?

Are you talking about so-called civil unions? If so, no, I don't support any government recognition or subsidization of homosexual couples.

[Óttar]

42 AD Christian emperors Constantius II and Constans issued a law in the Theodosian Code (C. Th. 9.7.3) prohibiting same-sex marriage in Rome and ordering execution for those so married

Theodosius can suck my nut-sack. The passage above proves that such a thing as same-sex marriage existed despite their lack of recognition.

[Harley]

My stances are unequivocal, I suggest you repent instead of engaging in your farcical commentaries. Life is short.

You're right; life is short. Why would you spend what life you have investing fear and anxiety in your responses?

[Yaroslav]

Can you explain what you mean by sake of the future?

The Last Judgement.

[Dictator]

You accept Vatican II then? What a clown. Repent, I say this with greatest concern and love for you.

Ok, I was wrong. I repent. We should ostracize homosexuals.

[Yaroslav]

Theodosius can suck my nut-sack. The passage above proves that such a thing as same-sex marriage existed despite their lack of recognition.

St. Theodosius would cut your nut-sack off and your tongue for your vile railing.