0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,436 Given: 1,629 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,289 Given: 6,248 |
R1b U106 is to old to be called Anglo-Saxon/Frankish etc. The subclades of R1b u106 could be attributed to these groups but it's uncertain which subclades are typical for Franks and Saxons.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,436 Given: 1,629 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 160 Given: 296 |
That depends on how we define Norse people. The I1 branch associated with Scandinavians is L22, but L22 isn't homogenous, Swedes and Norwegians belong to a northern cluster, then there's a southern cluster found mostly among Danes. Other I1 branches are mostly non-Scandinavian, found extensively in Germany, Netherlands, the British Isles but also southernmost Scandinavia.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,813 Given: 872 |
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>Y35>CTS3402>Y33>CTS8816>Y2902>Y3226>YP5224>BY27800
N1c-L1026>CTS10760>VL29>Z4908>L550>L1025>M2783>Y5580>L591>BY158>Y5576
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>YP1019>YP1020>YP1033*
R1b-U152>L2>DF103>S14469
It's still not an end.
R1a and R1b unite - Join!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,724 Given: 2,012 |
I think trying to link Y-DNA with languages is just waste of time.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25 Given: 6 |
And everyone always forgets about the G-men.
I'm a G. My male line comes out of SW Germany along the Swiss border. I found someone else who is also a G in that area, with my uncorrupted surname, but they haven't written back
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,813 Given: 872 |
G have this "flaw" of ambiguity, since they were present all across Europe, maybe without northernmost and northeastern fringes. To isolate any branches that can at least partly coorelate with certain ethnicity, you would have to test it deep enough or , even better, sequence it. And moreover, it wouldn't have guaranteed much without proper database, like y-dna project numerous in members who also tested relatively deep.
My own branch (R1a-Z280), though younger than presence of G2a in Europe, also starts to surprise me and I quickly learned that it doesn't wholly fit a Balto-Slavic pattern. Because there are early-diverged branches, like S24902, CTS1055(which look both Celto-Germanic), YP343(which looks ambiguous as hell, possibly spread with various ethnicities) and other subbranches that are also a breach from Balto-Slavic formula. It's not so easy as it seems by reading Eupedia, though it slowly improves.
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>Y35>CTS3402>Y33>CTS8816>Y2902>Y3226>YP5224>BY27800
N1c-L1026>CTS10760>VL29>Z4908>L550>L1025>M2783>Y5580>L591>BY158>Y5576
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>YP1019>YP1020>YP1033*
R1b-U152>L2>DF103>S14469
It's still not an end.
R1a and R1b unite - Join!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 183 Given: 209 |
Isn't R-U198 Germanic? If so tell me more about it!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks