Page 1 of 14 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 138

Thread: WTF???? 'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

  1. #1
    Fantasy Peddler
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kazimiera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic / Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Caucasian
    Country
    South Africa
    mtDNA
    I1b
    Taxonomy
    West Baltid
    Religion
    Roman Catholic
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Age
    99
    Gender
    Posts
    26,401
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 35,591
    Given: 16,990

    11 Not allowed!

    Thumbs down WTF???? 'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

    'Paedophilia is natural and normal for males'

    Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/1...for-males.html

    How some university academics make the case for paedophiles at summer conferences


    After the report into Jimmy Savile and the conviction of Rolf Harris, Britain has gone into a convulsion of anxiety about child abuse in the Eighties

    "Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

    Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

    The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

    Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

    Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.

    Another attendee, and enthusiastic participant from the floor, was one Tom O’Carroll, a multiple child sex offender, long-time campaigner for the legalisation of sex with children and former head of the Paedophile Information Exchange. “Wonderful!” he wrote on his blog afterwards. “It was a rare few days when I could feel relatively popular!”

    Last week, after the conviction of Rolf Harris, the report into Jimmy Savile and claims of an establishment cover-up to protect a sex-offending minister in Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet, Britain went into a convulsion of anxiety about child abuse in the Eighties. But unnoticed amid the furore is a much more current threat: attempts, right now, in parts of the academic establishment to push the boundaries on the acceptability of child sex.


    Jimmy Savile exploited the trust of a nation for his own vile purposes

    A key factor in what happened all those decades ago in the dressing rooms of the BBC, the wards of the NHS and, allegedly, the corridors of power was not just institutional failings or establishment “conspiracies”, but a climate of far greater intellectual tolerance of practices that horrify today.

    With the Pill, the legalisation of homosexuality and shrinking taboos against premarital sex, the Seventies was an era of quite sudden sexual emancipation. Many liberals, of course, saw through PIE’s cynical rhetoric of “child lib”. But to others on the Left, sex by or with children was just another repressive boundary to be swept away – and some of the most important backing came from academia.

    In 1981, a respectable publisher, Batsford, published Perspectives on Paedophilia, edited by Brian Taylor, a sociology lecturer at Sussex University, to challenge what Dr Taylor’s introduction called the “prejudice” against child sex. Disturbingly, the book was aimed at “social workers, community workers, probation officers and child care workers”.

    The public, wrote Dr Taylor, “generally thinks of paedophiles as sick or evil men who lurk around school playgrounds in the hope of attempting unspecified beastliness with unsuspecting innocent children”. That, he reassured readers, was merely a “stereotype”, both “inaccurate and unhelpful”, which flew in the face of the “empirical realities of paedophile behaviour”. Why, most adult-child sexual relationships occurred in the family!

    The perspectives of most, though not all, the contributors, appeared strongly pro-paedophile. At least two were members of PIE and at least one, Peter Righton, (who was, incredibly, director of education at the National Institute for Social Work) was later convicted of child sex crimes. But from the viewpoint of today, the fascinating thing about Perspectives on Paedophilia is that at least two of its contributors are still academically active and influential.


    Prof Ken Plummer, left, and former PIE head Tom O'Carroll

    Ken Plummer is emeritus professor of sociology at Essex University, where he has an office and teaches courses, the most recent scheduled for last month. “The isolation, secrecy, guilt and anguish of many paedophiles,” he wrote in Perspectives on Paedophilia, “are not intrinsic to the phenomen[on] but are derived from the extreme social repression placed on minorities …

    “Paedophiles are told they are the seducers and rapists of children; they know their experiences are often loving and tender ones. They are told that children are pure and innocent, devoid of sexuality; they know both from their own experiences of childhood and from the children they meet that this is not the case.”

    As recently as 2012, Prof Plummer published on his personal blog a chapter he wrote in another book, Male Intergenerational Intimacy, in 1991. “As homosexuality has become slightly less open to sustained moral panic, the new pariah of 'child molester’ has become the latest folk devil,” he wrote. “Many adult paedophiles say that boys actively seek out sex partners … 'childhood’ itself is not a biological given but an historically produced social object.”

    Prof Plummer confirmed to The Sunday Telegraph that he had been a member of PIE in order to “facilitate” his research. He said: “I would never want any of my work to be used as a rationale for doing 'bad things’ – and I regard all coercive, abusive, exploitative sexuality as a 'bad thing’. I am sorry if it has impacted anyone negatively this way, or if it has encouraged this.” However, he did not answer when asked if he still held the views he expressed in the Eighties and Nineties. A spokesman for Essex University claimed Prof Plummer’s work “did not express support for paedophilia” and cited the university’s charter which gave academic staff “freedom within the law to put forward controversial and unpopular opinions without placing themselves in jeopardy”.

    Graham Powell is one of the country’s most distinguished psychologists, a past president of the British Psychological Society and a current provider of psychology support services to the Serious Organised Crime Agency, the National Crime Squad, the Metropolitan Police, Kent Police, Essex Police and the Internet Watch Foundation.

    In Perspectives on Paedophilia, however, he co-authored a chapter which stated: “In the public mind, paedophile attention is generally assumed to be traumatic and to have lasting and wholly deleterious consequences for the victim. The evidence that we have considered here does not support this view … we need to ask not why are the effects of paedophile action so large, but why so small.”

    The chapter does admit that there were “methodological problems” with the studies the authors relied on which “leave our conclusions somewhat muted”. Dr Powell told The Sunday Telegraph last week that “what I wrote was completely wrong and it is a matter of deep regret that it could in any way have made things more difficult [for victims]”. He said: “The literature [scientific evidence] was so poor in 1981, people just didn’t realise what was going on. There was a lack of understanding at the academic level.” Dr Powell said he had never been a member of PIE.

    In other academic quarters, with rather fewer excuses, that lack of understanding appears to be reasserting itself. The Cambridge University conference, on July 4-5 last year, was about the classification of sexuality in the DSM, a standard international psychiatric manual used by the police and courts.

    After a fierce battle in the American Psychiatric Association (APA), which produces it, a proposal to include hebephilia as a disorder in the new edition of the manual has been defeated. The proposal arose because puberty in children has started ever earlier in recent decades and as a result, it was argued, the current definition of paedophilia – pre-pubertal sexual attraction – missed out too many young people.

    Ray Blanchard, professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, who led the APA’s working group on the subject, said that unless some other way was found of encompassing hebephilia in the new manual, that was “tantamount to stating that the APA’s official position is that the sexual preference for early pubertal children is normal”.

    Prof Blanchard was in turn criticised by a speaker at the Cambridge conference, Patrick Singy, of Union College, New York, who said hebephilia would be abused as a diagnosis to detain sex offenders as “mentally ill” under US “sexually violent predator” laws even after they had completed their sentences.

    But perhaps the most controversial presentation of all was by Philip Tromovitch, a professor at Doshisha University in Japan, who stated in a presentation on the “prevalence of paedophilia” that the “majority of men are probably paedophiles and hebephiles” and that “paedophilic interest is normal and natural in human males”.

    O’Carroll, the former PIE leader, was thrilled, and described on his blog how he joined Prof Tromovitch and a colleague for drinks after the conference. “The conversation flowed most agreeably, along with the drinks and the beautiful River Cam,” he said.

    It’s fair to say the Tromovitch view does not represent majority academic opinion. It’s likely, too, that some of the academic protests against the “stigmatisation” of paedophiles are as much a backlash against the harshness of sex offender laws as anything else. Finally, of course, academic inquiry is supposed to question conventional wisdom and to deal rigorously with the evidence, whether or not the conclusions it leads you to are popular.

    Even so, there really is now no shortage of evidence about the harm done by child abuse. In the latest frenzy about the crimes of the past, it’s worth watching whether we could, in the future, go back to the intellectual climate which allowed them.
    Last edited by Kazimiera; 07-10-2017 at 12:14 AM.

  2. #2
    Fantasy Peddler
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kazimiera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic / Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Caucasian
    Country
    South Africa
    mtDNA
    I1b
    Taxonomy
    West Baltid
    Religion
    Roman Catholic
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Age
    99
    Gender
    Posts
    26,401
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 35,591
    Given: 16,990

    21 Not allowed!

    Default

    Send the whole fucking lot of them to the chair!


  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:10 PM
    Location
    In a bar wearing flannel
    Ethnicity
    Midwestern Trash
    Ancestry
    Across Northern Europe with a sprinkle of Med
    Country
    United States
    Y-DNA
    R1a-L365
    mtDNA
    N1b1b, H3(P)
    Hero
    The Christ
    Religion
    Christian
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Gender
    Posts
    7,057
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,434
    Given: 5,952

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Goodness...fucking...gracious...

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Online
    11-16-2014 @ 06:59 PM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Vatican-City
    Gender
    Posts
    3,105
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,846
    Given: 4,747

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Ugh.

    All I will say is: next time around they won't need a hoax.

  5. #5
    Fuhrer
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Online
    03-22-2024 @ 05:31 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    ( ͡°╭͜ʖ╮͡° )
    Ethnicity
    ( ş ͜ʖ ͡ş)
    Country
    Adyghea
    Region
    Lord Howe Island
    Gender
    Posts
    8,475
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,336
    Given: 685

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Pedophilia can't absolutely be natural, it goes against the imperative of humans that we should reproduce and as we know that's not the case when we're talking about children.

  6. #6
    Senior Member KeinMitleid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Last Online
    12-27-2014 @ 03:18 AM
    Location
    Under the lie and failure known as democracy
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Homo Deus
    Ethnicity
    Teutonic/Slavic/Celtic
    Ancestry
    Balkans, Central Europe, Scandinavia, British Isles
    Country
    United States
    Politics
    Natural Order and Hierarchy
    Religion
    Proud Heathen, Gentile, and Infidel
    Gender
    Posts
    330
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 195
    Given: 88

    5 Not allowed!

    Default

    This is no surprise to me. Scum like this infest the so-called intelligentsia all the time. Degenerate scum.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Styrian Mujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Last Online
    12-18-2022 @ 11:53 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanophile
    Ethnicity
    Nordophile
    Ancestry
    Austrian Empire and the Ottoman Empire
    Country
    Slovenia
    Region
    Tirol
    Taxonomy
    Gracilized,Reduced Neotenic Eastern Mediterranid+Alpine-CM
    Age
    19
    Gender
    Posts
    4,482
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,526
    Given: 257

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Even if it's natural that some men are attracted by children does not mean it's ok mainly because the sexual act will probably have adverse psychological affects on the children.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member wvwvw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Online
    03-02-2024 @ 11:38 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Homo neogrecous
    Ethnicity
    Yes
    Country
    Japan
    Region
    Acadia
    mtDNA
    H
    Politics
    oh look. the curve is flattening.
    Age
    36
    Gender
    Posts
    31,839
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,431
    Given: 241

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    I have noticed many cases of paedophilia reported in the Greek press lately. What is frightening is that many of these subhumans are teachers, doctors and people that you trust.

  9. #9
    Fascist Army Pontios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    09-11-2015 @ 12:07 AM
    Location
    Trapezounta, Republic of Pontus
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Roman
    Ethnicity
    Roman
    Ancestry
    Pontos
    Country
    United States
    Taxonomy
    Pontid
    Politics
    Fascist/Pan-European
    Hero
    Ioannis Metaxas & Georgios Papadopoulos
    Religion
    Eastern Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    4,137
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 922
    Given: 562

    8 Not allowed!

    Default

    And JUST LAST WEEK, I was comparing how gays used to be seen as something unnatural, and then all of a sudden, it's "something in nature" apparently! And JUST LAST WEEK I was saying how the same crap would happen with pedophiles one day with the way things are going! All of a sudden they are found in nature!!

    Disgusting filth...
    Fascist Army
    "Fascism means first of all defending your nation against the dangers that threaten it. It means the destruction of these dangers and the opening of a free way to life and glory for your nation." -Corneliu Codreanu

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Online
    11-24-2016 @ 02:18 AM
    Location
    Santa Catarina
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Romance
    Ethnicity
    Azorean-Catarinense (Homo sapiens nobilis)
    Country
    Portugal
    Region
    Santa Catarina
    Taxonomy
    [Updating... 10%]
    Politics
    Separatist.
    Hero
    Ana Maria de Jesus Ribeiro Garibaldi (Anita Garibaldi)
    Religion
    Roman Catholic
    Gender
    Posts
    6,053
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,787
    Given: 3,908

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    sick sick sick sick....
    Spoiler!

Page 1 of 14 1234511 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Black males in the minds of white males
    By Bozkurt_Karabash in forum Race and Society
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-18-2019, 05:10 AM
  2. Why are so many atheists obsessed with paedophilia?
    By meAyin-sixteen in forum Christianity
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-18-2014, 03:57 AM
  3. Germany's Green Party leader regrets campaign to 'legalise paedophilia'
    By Baluarte in forum Deutschland - English Entries
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-17-2013, 01:05 AM
  4. Supporter of Paedophilia mocks "far right" leader.
    By Beorn in forum United Kingdom
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-09-2011, 07:07 AM
  5. Germany and EU to Legalise Paedophilia
    By Sol Invictus in forum Deutschland - English Entries
    Replies: 106
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 04:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •