Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Most Desirable Mates May Not Sire Prolific Offspring

  1. #1
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    06-06-2013 @ 07:33 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    .
    Ethnicity
    .
    Gender
    Posts
    1,536
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 92
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Most Desirable Mates May Not Sire Prolific Offspring

    Sometimes hunting down the best mate can backfire. The theory of sexual selection posits that choosy females seek out mates with elaborate antlers or splashy plumage, for example, because these traits might signify good genes that will lead to hearty offspring. But researchers report that top-breeding fruit flies of both sexes produced worse-breeding descendents, primarily because the mating prowess of each parent did not translate to offspring of the opposite sex. The result supports the idea that some genes can be good for one gender but bad for the other, which may limit the power of sexual selection.

    In theory, sexual selection should weed out the less useful genes over time, but animals are nonetheless extremely variable in their genes, notes evolutionary geneticist Adam Chippindale of Queens University in Kingston, Ontario. One reason could be that the same genes are beneficial to one sex but harmful to the other, resulting in a genetic tug-of-war. If true, males or females that have high "fitness" (generate lots of offspring) compared with their counterparts would produce relatively unfit offspring of the other sex. "There could be kind of a dark side to 'good' genes," Chippindale says. Despite some experimental signs of such fitness reversals, researchers had not tested the effect thoroughly in the lab.

    To identify a reversal, Chippindale and his colleague Alison Pischedda raised multiple lines of male and female Drosophila melanogaster, some of high fitness and others of low fitness. The researchers then mated the flies in all possible combinations and measured their progeny's reproductive success. As predicted, flies that found fit mates got a bum deal: Sons of fit mothers were 11 percent less fit than those of unfit moms, and daughters of fit dads were 7 percent less fit than their counterparts. Fit moms at least made up for some of the deficit with their daughters, which were 7 percent more fit than the rest. Not so for fit dads; the fitness of fathers had no effect on that of sons, presumably because the genes that made the dads fit were on their X chromosomes, which were not passed down to sons, the researchers report in the November issue of PLoS Biology.

    "It's an extremely counterintuitive result," says evolutionary biologist Scott Pitnick of Syracuse University. "I actually think this has huge potential for a lot of evolutionary questions, like the maintaining of homosexuality, which really plague evolutionary biology. It's a mechanism for maintaining a tremendous amount of variation." Given that Drosophila is raised in the lab, it's unclear how pervasive the effect might be across species, Chippindale says. "These genes are out there and could be taking the edge off selection," he notes. "It's just a matter of how important they will be in the wild."

    Source

  2. #2
    gone Monolith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    12-03-2011 @ 11:29 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    human
    Ethnicity
    .
    Religion
    .
    Gender
    Posts
    1,457
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    You know what they say about exceptions..

  3. #3
    The Offspring of Neo-Cons Nordish Persephone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    07-18-2012 @ 11:43 PM
    Location
    among ye olde pharts
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Northern European
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Anglo + European-American
    Taxonomy
    Nordish
    Politics
    Pure Capitalism
    Religion
    Spirituality, Reincarnation
    Age
    19
    Gender
    Posts
    405
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Interesting , there is some truth to this in people actually. I have always wondered about what kind of couple makes for the production of offspring with ideal traits in both sexes. You notice the female ideal of what is attractive is thin and non muscular with small delicate facial features, but the male ideal of what is attractive is slim muscular with more robust facial features. Therefore if they produced children they may not be ideal ie. some of the women could be muscular and robust and some of the men could have feminine features and be skinny and non muscular.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    05-01-2010 @ 08:35 PM
    Location
    Nigeria
    Meta-Ethnicity
    African
    Ethnicity
    Yoruba
    Ancestry
    Savannah
    Taxonomy
    Congoid
    Politics
    Yoruban supremacy
    Religion
    trolltheist
    Gender
    Posts
    1,408
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monolith View Post
    You know what they say about exceptions..
    ...that they demolish a theory, especially if there are too many of them.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European-American
    Ethnicity
    British-American
    Gender
    Posts
    8,861
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 31
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quality over quantity, who would've thought. This is an example of the strength and weakness of white people imo. Compare the fewer numbers of whites with the teeming horde of coloreds in the world...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •