Putin's next target: Latvia ?

[Hweinlant]

it's not just asking, but a totalitarian requirement, which basically limits rights. Just try to look on a world's example of freedom - USA. They haven't oficial language, defined by the law, till this time.

So all Latvians must speak Russian so that Russians can have their human rights ?

in my opinion, no. why you ask it?

Why do they then need another country with constitution giving them right to speak exclusively in Russian language ?

of cause not. if you are a free people and your country have not any totalitarian requirements, defined by the law, you may speak in any language, what you want.

So everyone in Latvia should speak (also) in Russian ?

You are a proper Russian nazi old boy.

[ЛыSSый]

Hweinlant , now you think like totalitarian sectant. It's not your fault, but your fate. This point of view was imposed to you from fasist goverment of Latvia.

В тоталитарных сектах идеология выдается за "истину" и "единственную
карту" реальности. Доктрина служит не только фильтром для поступающей
информации, но и руководством по осмыслению и обработке отфильтрованной
информации. Обычно доктрина носит абсолютистский характер и разделяет мир на
"черное -- белое", "добро -- зло", "мы -- они".

Т.Лири, М.Стюарт и др. "Технологии изменения сознания в деструктивных культах"

ЛыSSый:
it's not just asking, but a totalitarian requirement, which basically limits rights. Just try to look on a world's example of freedom - USA. They haven't oficial language, defined by the law, till this time.
Hweinlant:
So all Latvians must speak Russian so that Russians can have their human rights ?

all of latvians not must speak on russian, and all of latvians not must speak with anyone.
Exist another exit: let they try to use english, for example. It's an international speaking one and all inhabbits will hame a profit it they use it day by day.
But fasist goverment of Latvia using totalitarian requirement, which basically limits human rights.

ЛыSSый:
of cause not. if you are a free people and your country have not any totalitarian requirements, defined by the law, you may speak in any language, what you want.
Hweinlant:
So everyone in Latvia should speak (also) in Russian ?

no, if they are a free smart people, they can choose any language for conversatoin between ones.
But not like now, when fasist goverment of Latvia using totalitarian language requirement, which basically limits human rights.

You are a proper Russian nazi old boy.

thank for example of totalitarian fasist thinking. If i not agree with fasist point of view, i must be enemy.
"Russian nazi old boy" in this case.


In a fact i'm ukrainian liberal 2x- years old. And my example of freedom - USA's "bill of rights".

[LightHouse89]

democracy=suicide....its as bad as bolshevikism.....I plan on making fascism the new style....everyone will want to be apart of it. You see! democracy is so 1995.

[LightHouse89]

I can't help you with getting hot wimmenz but the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution (very MASONIC) are quite enough for you guys to get to keep your guns.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...Bill_of_Rights



Who were those anti-federalists ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sons_of_liberty



Yeah, Freemasons.

Anti Federalist were against establishing a giant government that governed each state. Later on this would spark the civil war here. Southern Democrats vs Northern Unions [unionists are or were republicans...very religious, pro capitalism, pro industry, pro immigration, pro cheap labor, pro freeing blacks and other slaves, pro interventionalism]. Southern Democrats were pro isolationism, pro racial hierarchy, religious but in the southern way which is different where I live, anti federal government [means more state rights/power of courts etc...], anti immigration [well regulated immigration is what they practiced], anti race mixing [basically between blacks and whites], pro slavery, and also believe America should export their resources which many countries refused to have anything to do with the south....their money was also worthless internationally which helped them lose. All of Europe refused to support them.....and most other countries. Mexico may have helped had the war dragged on.

Anti-federalism today would be Libertarianism, Neo-Confederatism, White Seperatism....it could mean many things. Republicans and modern Democrats are pro Federalism...infact democrats are the opposite of what they use to be. They are more left wing today than right wing if you know what I mean.

[LightHouse89]

it's not just asking, but a totalitarian requirement, which basically limits rights. Just try to look on a world's example of freedom - USA. They haven't oficial language, defined by the law, till this time.
in my opinion, no. why you ask it?

of cause not. if you are a free people and your country have not any totalitarian requirements, defined by the law, you may speak in any language, what you want.

soon the language wil be Spanish.....the government does not plan on doing anything about the border issue we have....drugs are increasing here...heroin is popular where I live now. The gift of living in a Godless secular society.

[Virtuous]

Russia can claim its perennial Russian territory in Ukraine but the Baltics should be left alone.

[Rugevit]

East Baltic-type (per C.S Coon) is about faraway from Putin as possible (tall, robust, massive,mesocephalic blonde), as is the Lappoid-type (dark, short and brachyhephalic). Putin is more like Neo-Danubian per C.S Coon's typology. That's not very common at Finland (where 80% of Finnics live). Finnics are mainly Nordic or East Baltic per C.S Coon.

You already wrote nonsense suggesting Ingrians were Finns , who migrated from Finland to Leningrad region. Those migrants were Ingrian Finns rather than autochthonous Ingrians (nkeroin, ižora, ižoralain), who are related to Vots (vaďďalaizõd). As for anthrotypes you are writing nonsense again. Mika Häkkinen showing similar features will not be mistaken for anyone but a Finn. Once Mika reaches Putin's age similar features will ever be so apparent. However one classified the types, Putin does look like autochthonous Finnic speakers from eastern Finland and north-western Russia agreed by many people.

[Ctwentysevenj]

If he goes for Latvia, then he might think I might as well go for the other 2 Baltic states Lithuania and Estonia. Bring them back to his new Soviet Union. Then it be Moldavia's turn. I don't why he wants more territory. Russia is already a huge country stretching from the borders from Norway to north Korea. Getting a bit greedy guts.

[glass]

living standarts in Latvia are higher,

They have similar capital/non capital disparity like Russia, also Latvia like other baltic states is plain banana republic where good jobs limited to state owned companies and government/administration. Minorities do not really have any chance to get such jobs. Because officials, policemen and so on are balts only. Such discrimination in Latvia is not as strong as in Estonia but still exists. Living standards in eastern mostly russian Latvia are very low. Averagy latvian salary $754 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Latvia), or 26k rubles. Lless than in Russia for example.

[Raven_]

'do not have a chance' sounds a bit dramatic.

Upon reviewing all of the aforementioned company’s one must conclude that the
situation concerning minority employment is not clear across the board. In companies
like the Latvian Railway and Latvian Shipping minority employees dominate, while
Lattelekom and Latvian Post employ somewhat more ethnic Latvians. Other types of
statistical data also indicate that at state enterprises and former state enterprises that have
been recently privatised, minorities are a larger part of the work force than ethnic
Latvians (31% and 26%, respectively). Minorities are more often employed in
manufacturing, transportation and communications, trade, the army and the police (Rose
2000: 6).

All in all, one can say that minorities are well represented in state enterprises. This
relatively large representation partly has to do with the fact that minorities were
traditionally employed in these sectors even before the reestablishment of independence.
The situation has not changed radically in the last 10 years

Read more here.