Why are we so obsessed with films about the Second World War?

[pinguino]

This time it is fight to the death or just allow everything to be taken from us. I will fight to the death. You are a moron to think people just sit back and tolerate shit from neo-Marxists....You will see another conflict soon. It is irrelevant whether one wins or loses....if an idea is still alive for us we are invincible. Still think giving us martyrdom is unwise? We don't give breaks this isn't Chile we don't take siestas.

Don't you realize you are in the CIA file, already? I bet you share the gen "gearlose" with Muslims extremists and other idiots of different ideologies. You won't succeed, and if you try you'll be crushed like a cockroach. You don't realize the U.S. is a fascist country already that won't tolerate insurrections.
And indeed, your country isn't Chile. Americans following army orders and using advanced technology can fight anywhere in the world, but back home you don't have the guts and you lack the power to attempt a coup. Back home, you are just domestic lambs.

[Geminus]

Democracy is just controlled decadence, and what do you mean with repressiv ? if i say or do something politically incorrect i can get 5 - 10 years jail, isnt that repressiv ? is it ?

I didn't claim the current system is perfect, but I can just repeat that in totalitarian regimes you could just "vanish" for being against the ruling party.

In the game of Democracy, the electorate looks forwards to the next elections, not to the greater good of the Nation, and it is more susceptible to corruption in the process. In a Democracy, power falls upon the economy, the currency, the corporations and all the branches they have. So yes, I'd prefer Monarchy any day.

Democracies aren't more corrupt than other government forms. If you look at indexes for corruption the Western democratic countries score the lowest values.
Anyway, who decides what the greater good of the nation is? A single person or a single party? Who should this be? And what if he isn't right?
The wealthy people always had great influence on the politics, in former times just as they do right now. I also don't like this, but I don't think that's a specific problem of democracy.

[Dál Riata]

Oh yes you can! Do you even understand the core principles of Democracy? read this: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...ibertarianism/

Great article! We have a world full of selfish materialistic hedonists who think of nothing but their own physical pleasure. Some want the government to facilitate their pleasure and soften the negative consequences of their poor life choices, these are called liberals, Marxists, leftists, etc. Others are self sufficient and rich enough to want a libertine free for all without any attachments to culture or community. These dominate the right. Neither side has any regard for morals or tradition.

[Heart of Oak]

I say let it die, put it to bed, enoughs enough, make more movies about the future, more talking animals type films, as they bring my world closer to the rest of society....

[StormBringer]

I thought it's just the Russians who are truly obsessed with (making) WWII films nowadays.

[Vlach]

Because newspapers like the guardian use the Nazis as a boogey man to browbeat western/white nations into accepting every aspect of the liberal/Marxist agenda.

What do you mean you don't want open borders mass immigration?
You're not a Nazi are you?

What do you mean you're not sure about gay marriage?
You're not a Nazi are you?

What do you mean you're not sure that Islam is a religion of peace?
You're not a Nazi are you?

If the holocaust didn't exist, liberals would have to invent it!

The post of the year !

[alb0zfinest]

Because they show the best and worst of humanity.