Turanid-Mongoloid ruling Europeans white and South Asians for 700 years and influencing them (

[ButlerKing]

DON'T BE INDENIAL LIKE THE INDIANS


IT IS SENSITIVE EDUCATION BUT IT'S FACTS

This is not a troll topic, I understand is a sensitive topic but I'm also a realist. Besides you can't escape these facts since it's mentioned in Wikipedia anyway. How the Mongoloid/Caucasoid hybrid races such as Huns, Avars, Kipchaks, Bulgars ect had ruled Europe 700 years and India being under 1000 years of foreign rule, most of if were under the Turkic people of Central Asia.

History of Europe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Europe


History of India

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_India


I don't know if they teach these type of history in European schools but in India they teach about the Mughals and Dehli sultanate.


SENSITIVE EDUCATION IN INDIA


In Indian schools, teachers tells their student that some of the most important dynasties that had influenced modern South Asia and ruled for the longest times were of foreign origin. They never talk about the races of these people and what their facial characteristics although the teachers ( even admitted it on youtube ) think they were most similar to Mongols due to the fact

1) they were described as being " small eye people" similar to the description made on turks only Arabs included " flat nose " aswell

2) Indian scholars clearly distinguished their appearance differently to all the Caucasoids Arabs, Kashmiris, Persians, Afghans who historically invaded India.


The Mughals 1526–1857 ruling India and South Asia for a total of 331 years were responsible for many thing, is a important history that cannot be rid of.




* Urdu which is influenced by Turkic, is the national language and lingua franca of Pakistan, and an official language of six Indian states. Much of the architecture, arts, cuisine, imperialistic government was greatly influenced by Mughals. They build Taj Mahal and today had attracted millions of tourism, it is one of the pride of India today. Muslims became the most dominant in India and they had united the subcontinent.



HOWEVER WHEN TALKING ABOUT RACES OF MUGHALS THEY RATHER NOT TALK ABOUT HOW THEY LOOKED LIKE.


In the media and movies... they try to make them as North Indian looking as possible







Even in the portrait, Babur was drawn like a typical North Indian looking person but with darker skin, this portrait was said to be drawn in the 18th century about 300 years later after Babur died


Mughals were described as being lighter than Indians and had small eyes. They were described as being yellow or tan in color


Drawn in the 18th century





English: Babur and Humayun Persian style painting, c. 1650

Date 1650

[ButlerKing]

Date: pre 1530 ( <--- dating of painting before 1530 )

Source: Painting from the Babur Nama reproduced with the kind permission of the National Museum, New Delhi in pg 127 of Treasures of Natural History (2005) eds A. S. Kothari & B. F. Chhapgar, Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press, Mumbai.

The original painting is here, this pictures date before 1530.






Yet on Indian movies they use typical north Indian and south Indian actors

[FeederOfRavens]

Turk dumb asses are getting annoying.

[ButlerKing]

Yes Turkish people are morons. So far no Turkish member in this forum have insulted Indians, where as the Turkish youtubers brags about ruling India like they were the Mughals themselves.

Reality is Mughals were nothing like Turkish people.


And these Uzbek afghans who claim to be descendants of Mughals are still in Afghanistan and Pakistan today





Pakis have even described the Mughals as looking like Hazara.


Another Uzbek boy



I believe the Central Asians who ruled South Asia ( even before Mughals ) WERE just like the Mughals who who ruled India for many centuries


Europeans were also ruled by Asians for 700 years, this is a fact.

[templumForasticus]

[ButlerKing]

This is what happened when you're fed by all the bullshit movies and new drawings of historical people.


Just like Hollywood uses a Scottish highlander to play the role of Attila even though he was described as extremely typical of Mongoloid.




" Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his origin.[4] "

The description suggests a person typical of Asian or Mongoloid features.[3]



Anthropology

" Hungarian archaeologist István Bóna argues that most of Europeans Huns were of Caucasoid and that less than 20-25% were of Mongoloid stock.[47] Turanid was most common among the Hun, According to the Hungarian anhtropologist Pál Lipták (1955) the Turanid type is a Caucasoid type with significant Mongoloid admixture, arising from the mixture of the Andronovo type of Europoid features and the Oriental (Mongoloid).[48] Eickstedt's concept on this race as a variety of the Turanid type, transitional between the Europeoid and Mongoloid.[49] "

And none of their soldiers looked Mongoloid even though 20-25% of them were Mongoloid and even the Caucasoid Hun have significant Mongoloid admixture

[ButlerKing]

Think about it though, isn't it dumb and stupid to keep using Indian actors for this role when Indian had described them being a totally alien race.

In all the Mughal movies of Indian I saw, there was only some soldiers who look mongoloid and 1 ruler who look like half Mongoloid ( back in 1960's ), they used Tibetan and Northeast Indians since they look mongoloid where as the rest of the men look like typical Punjabi looking actors even a couple of South Indian. but after that movie, every actor of Mughal was either Punjabi or North Indian, wether they were soldiers and royalty.

When are they going to stop keep lying to the people of India.

[templumForasticus]

Wrong.
Khazar people was described blond and blue eyes: they´re Ukranian people ancestors.




Magyars are/were caucasoid: Bashkirs are their grandparents:

[ButlerKing]

Wrong.
Khazar people was described blond and blue eyes: they´re Ukranian people ancestors.

Magyars are/were caucasoid.

Khazars

" Studies of the physical remains, such as skulls at Sarkel, have revealed a mixture of Slavic, European, and a few Mongolian types.[77] "


Magyars

And according to Hungarian anthropologist 5% of Magyars were Mongoloid, another small percentages are semi-mongoloid

[ButlerKing]

Wrong.
Khazar people was described blond and blue eyes: they´re Ukranian people ancestors.




Magyars are/were caucasoid: Bashkirs are their grandparents:

Baskhirs are 30 - 58% Mongoloid, did you know that?



I think you be surprised to learn what Russian and Ukranian anthropologist said about Khazars.


The Khazars had 26 distinct ethnic group, most who were not Turkic. ( well duh, Caucasus population were never Turkic )


Facial reconstruction of Khazars elite





"
Exceptional value for understanding the process of ethnogenesis among the peoples of the Khazar kingdom is extensive osteological material generated during excavation, MI Artamonov on Don. All the skeletons date back to the X-XI centuries. But come from the tombs of various types. Most of the extracted from the huge mound that contains about 200 tombs, which belong to the population of the city Sarkel. Mogilny inventory contains a large number of things Slavic, which corresponds to, and historical data. Much smaller number of skeletons derived from small mounds, located near the city, and contain the usual burial nomadic type. This anthropological material was studied by VV Ginsburg ...

" Small mounds of nomadic burials for the most part contained the skeletons of the Mongoloid Turanian type, but with unmistakable Caucasoid admixture, expressed as a mean figure for the entire series, and in the morphological features of individual skulls. This anthropological characterization is applicable to most of the nomadic burial grounds in southern Russia and Ukraine.

Skeletons of a large mound are characterized by much more pronounced Caucasoid features. Yet in some large turtle mound Ginsburg noted undoubtedly Mongoloid features. Consequently, it can be pronounced a small admixture of Asian element and the urban population Sarkel. The predominant Caucasoid component is also not uniform primarily on cranial index. Ancipitate variation curve and the resulting fact a negative correlation between longitudinal and transverse diameters of the entire series as a whole and have a positive dolicho and brahikranov taken separately - all this led Ginsburg concluded, moreover, mixing and blending the recent, most likely at the same time era graves . Hence, Ginsburg makes a logical conclusion that dolihokranny Caucasoid element associated with the Slavic colonization and brahikranny belongs to an ancient people, probably close to the Sarmatians by the type of burial mounds of the Volga delta and p. Urals. (Pp. 251-259) "