The pro-muslim european races

[SteelRose]

It is said that europe is racially degrading, due to the influx of middle-eastern muslims. The truth is that only a people who are racially degraded in the first place would allow the muslim scum in (with the exception of importing them as livestock to feed europeans). Some fanatics prefer to blame everything, including the muslim invasion of europe, on the jews, but that is just a way of projecting the flaws of europeans onto others. It is the egalitarian collectivist temperament among so many europeans that allows the muslims, with their theocratic temperament, to invade europe. The only way to get rid of the vulgar theocratic middle-easterners of europe is to first get rid of the vulgar egalitarian-collectivist european race(s).

So, the question becomes: What are the european racial elements that allow this decay to occur? -racial elements which, evidently, are the product of the evolutionary psychological effect of a particular sort of environment. Whoever they are, they must be extremely numerous, probably constituting over half of the population of modern northwestern europe.

Over the centuries, the various races within europe have mixed, such that egalitarian-collectivist genes have been mixed with physical traits of races other than those in which the genes have originated in, but nonetheless there should still be correlations which indicate the race(s) in which the egalitarian-collectivist genes originated. All one need do is look at the politicians and activists who support the muslim invasion, to get some sense of what these original racial elements are.

In the United States, two of the most extreme egalitarian-collectivist politicians- Harry Reid and Jimmy Carter, are of the same racial type: the northern coastal european race. This is the same race that Carleton Coon identified as occurring in the norwegian coastal town of Bergen:

I'm sure though that there are also other racial elements that are responsible, since that one racial element can not be very numerous.

[The Ripper]

You're a fool if you think phenotypes are responsible for the spiritual decay of Europe.

[Don]

Please, stop applying the North-South axis proper of America to European analysis. That it's as simplistic as totally inadequate.
And by the way, stop insulting the whole american fame by that senseless statement that implies that the people from the mediterranean coasts (west or east) of europe are inferior than scandis.

At least hide your flag before defending such a stupid statements, to respect the name of your country.

[Wotan88]

No offence but it's a bit ridiculous. It's paranoic view, you'd kill most of the Europe. It would only weaken us, not make stronger.

Certain racial type is not responsible for "multi-kulti" mentality. Harry Reid and Jimmy Carter are of same race because of accident.

I know Nordics and Alpines alike who support ideas of multiculturalism just as I know Nodics and Alpines proud of their European ancestry. It's stupid to generalize in this situation. Level of being egalitarian-collectivist bastard is based on level of brainwash and stupidity one has. Not on some genetical/phenotypical differences...

[Kadu]

Man! you're a genious! But unfortunately you're almost one hundred years late.

Lombroso’s theories have been severely criticized by modern criminologists. It has been pointed out that he used the term atavism loosely since physical traits of the criminals as well as social customs were regarded by him as of atavistic significance. His assumption regarding some sort of nexus between atavism and criminal behaviour has no scientific base. He also failed to appreciate that both criminal as well as non-criminal behaviours were the result of the same process operating on the basis of various social and physical factors.
According to Gabriel Tarde, one of the many critics of Lombroso, crime being of social origin is of changing nature i.e. it depends upon social definitions and cannot be explained with reference to atavism. Moreover, according to Tarde, Lombroso’s theory did not explain the lower rate of criminality among women having the same stigmata. Lombroso has also been criticized for his anthropometric measurements on which he formulated his theories of criminal behaviour.

Some of the more important criticisms are:

i)His approach assumed individual physique as something fixed and not prone to changes. He did not take into consideration the morbid process affecting the human physique.

ii)For actual measurement of his subjects, he depended on others and thus created doubt regarding the reliability of the data employed by him.

iii)Sophisticated statistical techniques, developed subsequently were not available to Lombroso, which proved his analysis to be highly deficient.

iv)Lombroso had no control groups and was, therefore, unable to compare the so-called characteristics of criminals with those of non-criminals.

v)The data did not cover sufficient numbers and it could not, therefore, be regarded as truly representative of the relevant groups.

vi)He did not take into account the racial and ethnical differences among the members of his samples and treated them as homogenous which was not always the case.


Because of his pioneering work dealing with the personality of criminals, Lombroso has been designated as putative father of modern criminology and it is not surprising that Lombroso has been praised as well as criticized extensively for his theories to explain criminal behaviour. Critics like Lindesmith and Levin believe, however, that he, because of his faulty assumptions, hindered the progress of scientific criminology.


Lombroso’s theories received a severe jolt as a result of the studies made by Charles Goring, which revealed that there was no significant difference between the physical characteristics of criminals and non-criminals and also among criminals of different kinds. This was stated by Goring in The English Convict (1913) a statistical study in which he compared measurements of 37 specific physical characteristics of some 3,000 English recidivist prisoners with similar measurements of university students, hospital patients and members of the British Army.

Source

[The Ripper]

And by the way, stop insulting the whole american fame by that senseless statement that implies that the people from the mediterranean coasts (west or east) of europe are inferior than scandis.

Where does he say that?

[Don]

Where does he say that?

In the whole statement.

[The Ripper]

In the whole statement.

No he doesn't.

[Don]

No he doesn't.

Implicit message. Too predictable traits in his statement.

[The Ripper]

Implicit message. Too predictable traits in his statement.

You are imagining things. To the contrary, he said that there is a significant "racial element" in NW Europeans that causes this "racial decay". And with someone so confused, it seems strange to take him seriously in the first place.