Iceland permits homosexual marriage

[RoyBatty]

Whitney Houston off her tree on crack again

[Turkophagos]

Congrats to them. No reason two consenting adults who love each other shouldn't be able to get married.

Marriage= Reproducing. Fags=/=Reproducing. Fags shouldn't get married.


It's simple maths.

[jerney]

Marriage= Reproducing. Fags=/=Reproducing. Fags shouldn't get married.


It's simple maths.

Plenty of people who get married don't reproduce, it's simple logic.

[Turkophagos]

[Eldritch]

It was also decided to end the country’s system of registered partnerships for same-sex couples, meaning marriage will become their only option – as was always the case for opposite-sex couples

I think this is absurd. What kind of reasoning was behind this particular decision?

[Monolith]

Civil marriage became so degenerated in the last several decades that it lost much, if not most, of its former value. I wouldn't be surprised if some day it became legally possible to marry an animal or something. It's quite irrelevant what they call it, it's not real marriage and the fact that is't called that way doesn't make it one. I say let it rot until it finally dies a slow and painful death.

[Great Dane]

We have gay marriage in Iowa. It came about because the Iowa Supreme Court decided there was a constitutional right to gay marriage. Most people oppose gay marriage but the the opposition to it is disorganized. Most of the gay marriages have taken place in Des Moines and in Iowa City, location of the state university.

[RoyBatty]

I've seen enough "tolerance" to last me a couple of lifetimes. "Tolerance" just doesn't work. It simply encourages more deviants to crawl out of the woodwork whilst demanding (and receiving) more rights whilst the rights of the majority are stripped away.

The sooner intolerance and discrimination (against fags, vocal and radical minorities, radicals, liberals etc) is brought back the better.

The best solution of all would be to create "degenerate" zones where all the junkies, homos, radical ethnics, liberals etc who "want to be free" can live together in their Rainbow Paradise.


PS
Not all gay people or "non-whites" are necessarily a burden or negative influence on society. I'm referring to the radical agitators and the degenerates amongst them.

[The Lawspeaker]

^ Ship the whole lot to San Fransisco.

[Hedgerider]

I've seen enough "tolerance" to last me a couple of lifetimes. "Tolerance" just doesn't work. It simply encourages more deviants to crawl out of the woodwork whilst demanding (and receiving) more rights whilst the rights of the majority are stripped away.

The sooner intolerance and discrimination (against fags, vocal and radical minorities, radicals, liberals etc) is brought back the better.

Oh yes all those deviants. If you look at natural selection and the idea of the ancient "ideal human society", it is obvious that this majority you mention can be seen as Sudras. Tolerance might "just not work". But why should a healthy society tolerate you, above all those you call "deviants"? Because you are blessed with above average intelligence, superior strength, beauty, moral character and merit? Or are you just another average, beer gulping, pissed off, internet guy?

The best solution of all would be to create "degenerate" zones where all the junkies, homos, radical ethnics, liberals etc who "want to be free" can live together in their Rainbow Paradise.

Assuming you are one of the elites that do not belong to a "degenerate zone", but what if alcoholism and homosexuality are inborn genetic deviations that can appear within every class and environment?