Q&A: Ask a Nationalist!

[Longbowman]

If I gave you the necessary powers to fulfil your heart's desires, what would you do with non-Anglo Saxons in America? If your answer varies depending by group, please take the time to specify, if possible, and only include 'deportation' when it is pragmatic to do so (ie, first generation immigrants).

[Beit El]

Good question! A Nationalist first and foremost is a person who opposes Globalism and Internationalism, Nationalists can see Globalism and Internationalism as having positive qualities, but overall being destructive. A true Nationalist does not want to meddle in the affairs of other countries, nor to have other countries meddling in the affairs of one's own nation.

Now, on to race. A Nationalist will be in favor of protecting the race and culture of their own Nation. If this means closing borders, ceasing immigration, so be it.

There are variations to this, but that is the gist.



No, I'm only a member of the KEBAB REMOVAL SQUAD!



A grand total of zero, quite a few less than you.

If you stopped taking dicks up your arse you wouldn't be so butthurt.

[RandomlyRenounced]

If I gave you the necessary powers to fulfil your heart's desires, what would you do with non-Anglo Saxons in America? If your answer varies depending by group, please take the time to specify, if possible, and only include 'deportation' when it is pragmatic to do so (ie, first generation immigrants).

Of course it would depend on what nationalist you ask, as there is no set in stone position on this in Nationalism, but here's my take.

Firstly, all Illegal Immigrants would be deported back to their country of origin.

Next, all recent immigrants (think: two or three generations or less) would be given financial assistance to voluntarily immigrate back to their country of origin. All immigration would then cease.

With the remainder of the population I would start the slow process of peacefully splitting the country into various Nations based on where the bulk of each race's population is. ie; Blacks would get most of the deep Southeast, Mestizos get parts of the Southwest near the old US-Mexico border. Asians would probably get parts of the West Coast. Native Americans get the current reservations, but expanded greatly. Whites would get most of the North and Midwest region. All of this is just an example, but the borders would be worked out as fairly as possible.

If you stopped taking dicks up your arse you wouldn't be so butthurt.

I don't understand what your problem is.

[Longbowman]

Of course it would depend on what nationalist you ask, as there is no set in stone position on this in Nationalism, but here's my take.

Firstly, all Illegal Immigrants would be deported back to their country of origin.

Next, all recent immigrants (think: two or three generations or less) would be given financial assistance to voluntarily immigrate back to their country of origin. All immigration would then cease.

With the remainder of the population I would start the slow process of peacefully splitting the country into various Nations based on where the bulk of each race's population is. ie; Blacks would get most of the deep Southeast, Mestizos get parts of the Southwest near the old US-Mexico border. Asians would probably get parts of the West Coast. Native Americans get the current reservations, but expanded greatly. Whites would get most of the North and Midwest region. All of this is just an example, but the borders would be worked out as fairly as possible.

Sounds neat. Let's assume it isn't. What about tiny groups like mixed-race blacks and natives, and what about European sub-groups, and what about MENA Americans, and what about Jews?

[XenophobicPrussian]

Would you agree nationalism is going the entirely wrong way? We have to start campaigning for break away states and actually fighting migration with migration ourselves, not trying to take back entire countries, especially not the US.

Also, what is your opinion on giving up on the USA entirely so the liberals do actually have a place to go if they wanna be around other races? I'm Canadian but I really don't give the slightest shit about this country, I care about mother Europe.

One more thing. Outing the Jew, good or bad? I think there's no denying the role Jews are playing but I just don't see the point of pointing that out. It doesn't do anything. Oh and, who is a bigger threat to white nationalism, Jews or low IQ lower class nationalists/neo-Nazis who give us a bad image?

Okay, one more.. Why don't liberals and Longbowmanoids voluntarily move to say, East St. Louis, MO, if that's what they want for the future? Confusing.

[Longbowman]

Okay, one more.. Why don't liberals and Longbowmanoids voluntarily move to say, East St. Louis, MO, if that's what they want for the future? Confusing.

Well, Missouri is my ideological homeland, but there is still Jewing to be done in ultra-conservative Britain.

[Sockorer]

Do you think the words "Nationalism" and "Nationalist" are too vague to adequately describe any sort of political position?

Do you agree any identity is going to necessarily be a sort of Nationalism, even if they pertain to things not essentially related to a specific race or culture, like economic ideology or even Humanist ideology?

[Dr. Robotnik the Subbotnik]

If you stopped taking dicks up your arse you wouldn't be so butthurt.

Real classy.

[RandomlyRenounced]

Sounds neat. Let's assume it isn't. What about tiny groups like mixed-race blacks and natives, and what about European sub-groups, and what about MENA Americans, and what about Jews?

I forgot to mention, but there would be an area of the former United States to be designated as a Multicultural zone. This area would be the destination for those who identify as Mixed and decide to remain in the US. This area would be open to all, and its size would be determined by the amount of people who decide to live in this multicultural area.

The European designated area would for the most part be pan-European, possibly with small areas for people of different European subraces if they wish to remain separate.

Jews and MENA are tricky. Jews, not quite as much.

The areas where Jews are the most concentrated parts of the population is currently in some areas surrounding Los Angelos and in the city itself. The other, and larger concentration is in New York City. The Los Angelos area would already be dedicated for Asians, so the Jewish designated area would probably be centered around New York City and the surrounding area.

The MENA population is much more scattered, so it'd be harder to pinpoint an area. It could probably be centered around a metropolitan area that has a significant MENA minority as well as the surrounding area. Perhaps somewhere around Michigan, for example.

[Beit El]

Real classy.

I'm just joking around and giving free bumps while doing it. Calm down.