0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,569 Given: 2,482 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,569 Given: 2,482 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,596 Given: 409 |
What is not true. These are the Hungarian historian's claim, based on the few written sources and the archaeological materials:
- presumably a principality (and not state) existed on the western Highland.
- the seat of the entity is unknown, Nyitra's exploration is fruitless from this viewpoint untill today.
- the ethnical history of this principality is unknown, we do not know the proportions of the Avar and Slavonic elements and the significance of these peoples in the principalty's life.
- we cannot place the principalty in the history of the 9th century based on the few written sources and not only the Nyitra principalty, but we do not know the "Greater Moravian" entity's place yet (Northern Serbia or the present Moravia)!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 812 Given: 1,341 |
Just to add here, that when the english bishop Willibald visited south Greece in 723, south of what was called "Morias" and today "Peloponisos" , he wrote that "“reached the city of Monemvasia,Morea (Peloponesse) in the land of Sclavinia (et inde navigantes, venerunt ultra mare Adria ad urbem Manafasiamin Slawinia terrae)”"
This Sclavinia was here :
It is safe to guess that at the time whole europe was a huge Slavinia.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks