If we exclude recent European immigration what are the Latin Americans with more European admixture

[Mobby]

The question is simple and obvious.


Therefore i vote in Brazilians.

[KonanxB]

Chileans and Uruguayans.

[Marco94]

Chileans and Uruguayans.

Agreed, but I would add Argentines too. Central and Eastern Argentina was just like Uruguay in colonial times, and Chile was just like Southern and Western Argentina. So if both countries are included, I don't see why Argentina without recent European admixture would be different.

[KonanxB]

Agreed, but I would add Argentines too. Central and Eastern Argentina was just like Uruguay in colonial times, and Chile was just like Southern and Western Argentina. So if both countries are included, I don't see why Argentina without recent European admixture would be different.

Argentina at the beginning of the 19th century was less populated, has more Afro population and more Amerindians census compared to Chile.

[Erronkari]

Uruguayans.

Chilean northern side didn't belong to that country at that time, so in my opinion Uruguay was whiter by far.

[Marco94]

Argentina at the beginning of the 19th century was less populated, has more Afro population and more Amerindians census compared to Chile.

More afros than Uruguay proportionally to its population? More Amerindians than Chile? I really doubt it. For Chile it took longer for Argentina to fully control its indian territories.

What's your source?

[Erronkari]

Indeed Chile has 11% of pure amerindians right now....

[KonanxB]

More afros than Uruguay proportionally to its population? More Amerindians than Chile? I really doubt it. For Chile it took longer for Argentina to fully control its indian territories.

What's your source?

More afros than Chile, I said.
It's what I remember reading, another day with time I review the PDFs.

[JMack]

Brazil and maybe Uruguay.

Actually contrary to what most people think a good portion of European admixture in Brazil is colonial. In the beggining of 19th century there were more Whites living in Brazil than in all Hispanic American countries at the same time.

Brazil had basically the same population of Portugal with at least 30-40% being White, the rest formed by mixed people and African slaves (who tended to die quickly). Good chunks of the Portuguese population transferred to Brazil. There was even a plan to make Brazil the center of the Portuguese Empire (what was effectivelly done after Napeoleon invaded Portugal). I've seen many colonial Brazilians scoring over 90% European.

The problem with these threads is that Hispanic Americans know basically 0 of Brazilian history and demography. That's why I think we should be separated from them.

[KonanxB]

Indeed Chile has 11% of pure amerindians right now....

Correct, but in Argentina there were more extermination policies than in Chile, remember that in two centuries everything changes a lot.