Hillary speech, takes on Farage, Trump and Alt-Right, destroys Racists

[Slud]

Trump all the way. He's not racist lol, the thing he said about Mexicans has nothing to do with their race, he wants to prevent them from coming because there's a ton of mexicans from Mexico who come here ILEGALLY to commit crimes and leech off the welfare. In short, he wants to prevent illegal immigrants from all countries to come to the US. The reason he only talks about Mexicans is because they're by far the biggest group of illegals coming to the US.

[BeerBaron]

*shrug*
IDK if that's even a bad thing at this point. I have been wracking my brains for months as to who is more suitable and still do not have an answer.

I can solve that for you, you want to vote for the "lesser of 2 evils" right? Right. So, you vote for the one the establishment, the ones that have brought you economic ruin and endless wars, goes against. Makes sense? Yes, good, so vote for Trump then, even doing nothing is better than a murderer which is what Clinton is.

[Sebastianus Rex]

That has nothing to do with Trump, dummy! Read the quotes or listen to that part of the vid! Did the Italians who immigrated to the US and were discriminated by WASPs, Irish, etc., whined all day long about racism?! Nope. They adapted themselves to that reality and moved on! And so should you!

You seriously think they will ever give up the race card ? NOT.

[Enflamme]

Trump will build a stupid wall that will wreck our economy (will cost billions and billions of dollars and will be completely ineffective). So that is what's wrong with him.

Hillary on the other hand, could potentially start WW3 with her strong Russophobia and hawkish attitude (plus she is quite obviously controlled by the banks who, anticipate WW3 so they can make a ton of profit through selling weapons). Economically she will be a continuation of Obama so get ready for more welfare-leeching. I want a social safety net but not as generous as what we have now - it's a disaster. So neither are too good for the economy, actually.

Also, Trump will appoint very conservative judges to appease his base which will probably lead to less civil rights.

Trump - bad for economy and civil rights.
Hillary - bad for economy and foreign affairs.

Make your choice.

I'm not sure who is actually worse for the economy but they are both bad for it.

I'd personally say Trump is very slightly better. Civil rights is a big issue for me but ultimately, WW3 is my biggest issue and Hillary is just too hawkish (Russia is actually preparing for it right now if she becomes Pres).

Etain is "conservative" (like me) at level the "civic rights" (she is opposed to abortion, LGBT and other things). So it's not a problem...

+ your text sound SOOOO liberal. Yuck

In Europe, we called this : leftist or "un gauchiste".

In USA, you should choice between a less leftist (Trump) and a leftist (Hillary and Sanders)

But, personally, i'm not democrat. I am not in favor of modern democracy.

[Smitty]

Etain is "conservative" (like me) at level the "civic rights" (she is opposed to abortion, LGBT and other things). So it's not a problem...

+ your text sound SOOOO liberal. Yuck

In Europe, we called this : leftist or "un gauchiste".

In USA, you should choice between a less leftist (Trump) and a leftist (Hillary and Sanders)

But, personally, i'm not democrat. I am not in favor of modern democracy.

I think European terminology is preferable. We call Democrats "liberal" (and democrat, for that matter) because they started calling themselves that, and at this point no one knows the difference. Of course, their ideology is diametrically opposed to classical liberalism. I'm trying to start calling them leftists instead. It's more accurate and neutralizes their deception.