Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Hello

09-20-2016, 07:22 AM #11
~~Bezprym~~

View Profile

View Forum Posts

View Blog Entries

View Articles
Banned

Join Date

Aug 2012

Last Online
02-19-2017 @ 11:29 PM

Ethnicity

Mr. Cogito

Country

Region

Gender

Posts

4,350

Thumbs Up

Received: 4,617
Given: 2,771
0

Greetings.

I'd simply say there are people who either are imbeciles or simply act like that. Not all of them of course, only those the loudest.
Reply With Quote
09-20-2016, 07:24 AM #12
Anglojew

View Profile

View Forum Posts

View Blog Entries

Visit Homepage

View Articles
Communism Is So Bourgeois
Apricity Funding Member
"Friend of Apricity"

Join Date

Oct 2012

Last Online
05-20-2019 @ 07:10 AM

Location

The division of Goldstein

Meta-Ethnicity

Germano-Celto-Judean

Ethnicity

Scythian-Jewish, Anglo-Celtic

Ancestry

Ashkenazi + Anglo-Celtic

Country

Region

Y-DNA

Q1b Scythian/Khazar (Indigenous Central-Asian)

mtDNA

U5b2a3 Mesolithic European (Indigenous European)

Taxonomy

Atlanto-Med

Politics

كافر

Hero

Charles Martel, Winston Churchill, Fjordman, Allen West & Robert Spencer

Religion

Jewishish

Age

29

Gender

Posts

23,432

Thumbs Up

Received: 14,012
Given: 11,416
0

Welcome to the forum.

Spoiler!

When debating Muslims, I've noticed they employ the following tactics, in full or in part; 1. Distraction: The Muslim will try to divert attention from the argument at hand and avoid debating the issue directly 2. Ad hominem logical fallacy: The Muslim will try blaming the messenger and not debating the message 3. Fallacy of relevance eg a "red herring": The Submitter will attempt the "two wrongs make a right" tactic (or the Tu Quoque logical fallacy).- In employing evasive tactics the Muslim unwittingly admits the correctness of their opponent's original argument by implication. A typical Islam-apologist tactic is to try to prove Islam is the second worst case; as if this were a good thing
Reply With Quote