6
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,888 Given: 2,144 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 208 Given: 139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,448 Given: 5,717 |
Not all, and E.African is only half SSA. It was giving the right amount to people with documented African, even 2-3%, so it was accurate, just what you usually don't see at higher K. Some can probably be mistaken for archaic admixture, as E_Asian score a little too. Again no need to obsess over it but if you really want to go deep, low K will usually show more of everything non "Caucasoid".
Thumbs Up |
Received: 208 Given: 139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,888 Given: 2,144 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 208 Given: 139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,448 Given: 5,717 |
You cannot get the same values at different K, with different ancient/pop references, that's a given. It's like describing a particular reddish tone with 3 colors, 6 or 18, that are not even the same red, green, blue,... You ll never get the same results, even though you are always describing the same color/genome.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,888 Given: 2,144 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 208 Given: 139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 338 Given: 1,206 |
What is your known ancestry?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks