Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: A genomic history of Aboriginal Australia

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Seville
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtiberian
    Ethnicity
    Andalusian from Seville
    Country
    Spain
    Taxonomy
    Grazilmediterranid
    Politics
    Autocratic
    Hero
    René Descartes
    Religion
    Cartesian
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Age
    38
    Gender
    Posts
    8,844
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,241
    Given: 7,078

    6 Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Last Online
    01-19-2024 @ 01:06 PM
    Location
    Manila - Philippines
    Ethnicity
    Visayan (Filipino)
    Country
    Philippines
    Y-DNA
    The largest BBC in the TA but you can't suck it because I made a vow of celibacy. Chastity is sexy!
    Politics
    Righteous
    Hero
    DN8, Carlito's Way, The Lawspeaker, Toppo900, Teutone and KuriousKatKommittee!
    Religion
    Roman Catholic
    Relationship Status
    Repentant of my former man-whoreness. But you like it if naughty?! Ooh let me spank you my sinner!
    Gender
    Posts
    5,612
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,721
    Given: 6,335

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Interesting. I hear that Aboriginal Australians also have a high amount of Denisovan admix.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last Online
    06-27-2021 @ 10:40 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Latin American
    Ethnicity
    Dominican
    Ancestry
    Western Europe, West Africa, The Caribbean
    Country
    Dominican-Republic
    Y-DNA
    R-L51
    mtDNA
    L1c2b1
    Taxonomy
    Atlantid + Minor Negroid
    Hero
    Ken O'Keefe, Booker T Coleman, Bob Marley, Elliott Hulse, Felix Antonion Cruz Jiminian
    Gender
    Posts
    3,723
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,414
    Given: 1,414

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    nice find, very interesting

    when it comes to genetics, anthropology, paleontology, and archeology, (especially genetics and archeology) i get confused

    some archeological evidence supports that humans have been in Australia for a much longer time (150k + years ago or more)

    i would say both have some sort of limitations but def very accurate, however i think that (imo) Homo Sapiens left Africa about 50,000 to 250,000 years ago in different waves not just two like the current mainstream belief in science, but a whole bunch of em, as well as many attempts and groups who have died out and or another one replaces them (also nature), just like today.

    But i def agree that Australian Aborigines are among the first to survive and left Africa or maybe is the oldest surviving relic of one of the groups that sccessfully made it out of Africa leaving descendants along the way

    Anthropologically - I would say Africa was already somewhat diverse when Humans started leaving already at that different periods of time (but they were very very similar), brown to black skin with very kinky hair and some with wavy-curly hair, with facial characteristics being somewhat diverse but of Negroid appearance.

    Aborigines look very primitive compared to other sub races of the human family

    This is an Australoid skull


    This is an Australoid man

  4. #4
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:36 AM
    Location
    Pole position
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    21,462
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20,923
    Given: 18,997

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Australian Aboriginal sample on GEDmatch:

    http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...=1#post4090658

  5. #5
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:31 PM
    Location
    Côte d'Azur
    Ethnicity
    Solutrean
    Country
    Monaco
    Region
    Lyon
    Y-DNA
    R1b-Z367
    mtDNA
    H1c1
    Gender
    Posts
    7,381
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9,474
    Given: 5,729

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dominicanese View Post
    nice find, very interesting

    when it comes to genetics, anthropology, paleontology, and archeology, (especially genetics and archeology) i get confused

    some archeological evidence supports that humans have been in Australia for a much longer time (150k + years ago or more)
    You had some ancient hominins&archaics everywhere in Eurasia before, sums it up well:


  6. #6
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    me
    Country
    European Union
    Y-DNA
    R1a > YP1337 > R-BY160486*
    mtDNA
    H3*
    Gender
    Posts
    6,066
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7,243
    Given: 2,623

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    So basically model of mixed OoA + polygenic (different archaic admixes) human evolution is confirmed.
    Where are those who laugh at Coon's model.
    It was extreme (separate branches) but Abos paelo features are probably simply derived from Ngadong / Solo man line (this is supposed mistery SE-Asian hominid related to Denisovan, I'm sure), as Coon stated.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. America's Stonehenge: New Hampshire rocks history or hoax?
    By European Knight in forum Megaliths & Prehistory
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-28-2016, 08:11 AM
  2. The Genetic History of Ice Age Europe
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum DNA Scientific Papers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-23-2016, 07:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •