2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,939 Given: 916 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 84 Given: 277 |
Armenians' skin color is darker than Tatars. Armenians are mostly brunette people. But racially, Armenians are pure caucasoid. They are Indo-European people. Tatars are caucasoid with mongoloid admixture. They are Turkic people.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 84 Given: 277 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 84 Given: 277 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 639 Given: 1,142 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 639 Given: 1,142 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,939 Given: 916 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,378 Given: 3,032 |
''White'' is not only skin color. Armenians are full caucasoid like most European groups. Tatars are mixed race. Even if Armenians were Middle Easterners they would still be full caucasoid. A lot of MENA groups are full caucasoid.
Honestly, I don't know why Turks hate Armenians, Greeks and Iranians. The caucasoid influence you have come from them, starting when Iranic males procreated with Mongolic women to create Turks around 1000 AD. After Turks settled in Anatolia they procreated with locals and created more mixed people, this time even more caucasoid influenced than before.
Making a parallel with Latin America it's like the local Greeks, Anatolians and Armenians (full caucasoids) were the Spaniards, Turkmen the mestizos and modern Anatolian Turks the castizos.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks