4
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,666 Given: 5,623 |
[QUOTE]Incorrect, get the facts straight.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle...e#Epidemiology
As of 2013 about 3.2 million people have sickle-cell disease while an additional 43 million have sickle-cell trait.[7] About 80% of sickle-cell disease cases are believed to occur in sub-Saharan Africa.[8] It also occurs relatively frequently in parts of India, the Arabian peninsula, and among people of African origin living in other parts of the world.[9] In 2013, it resulted in 176,000 deaths, up from 113,000 deaths in 1990.[10] The condition was first described in the medical literature by the American physician James B. Herrick in 1910.[11][12] In 1949 the genetic transmission was determined by E. A. Beet and J. V. Neel. In 1954 the protective effect against malaria of sickle-cell trait was described.[12]
Distribution of the sickle-cell trait shown in pink and purple
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...are-non-white/
Fdesouche gets around the lack of ethnic data by using medical data on the screening of sickle-cell disease among newborns from the French High Authority for Health (HAS). Because of the cost of screening, only newborns from (overwhelmingly non-White) regions and ethnic backgrounds at risk of sickle-cell are screened. Fdesouche points to the fact that the number of screened newborns has increased from 27% in 2006 to 34.44% in 2012.
The HAS indicates that newborns are only screened for sickle-cell disease based on geographic origin, including all individuals originally from (I quote):
- The overseas French departments of the Antilles, Guyana, Reunion or Mayotte.
- All sub-Saharan African countries and Cape Verde
- South America (Brazil), Blacks from North America India, Indian Ocean, Madagascar, Mauritius, Comoros North Africa: Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco
- Southern Italy, Sicily, Greece, Turkey
- Middle East: Lebanon, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman
Needless to say, the babies that are screened are then overwhelmingly non-White and almost certainly made up largely of Blacks and Arabs.
There are a number of caveats however for a newborn to be screened: Both parents must be from an at-risk region or only one parent if the other is not known; if there is a history of sickle-cell in the family; or if there are any doubts on these criteria. The non-White population is underestimated by the data insofar as half-White newborns are not counted, on the other hand, non-Whites would be overestimated to the extent the figure includes Italians, Greeks and “uncertain” White newborns. Regardless of the exact non-White percentage among the screened newborns, the fact that the proportion screened has increased a whopping 7 points – an over 25% increase in just 6 years – suggests an exponential increase in the non-White share of births.
As you can see Portuguese are not included and it's obvious for someone who knows modern France ethnic make up that the overwhelming majority of the babies screened are of african and islamic origin.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,814 Given: 6,097 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,814 Given: 6,097 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,070 Given: 2,329 |
It is that as the elders of the Portuguese community behaved impeccably in France, as the new generations behave as Arabs.
Nothing to do with the cliché of the Portuguese building workers, even though many of them are.
But new generations behave thugs, and spend their time spitting and insulting France.
Nothing is done to appreciate, say it, I do not generalize to the Portuguese, those living in Portugal have nothing to do with the behavior of the Portuguese community in France.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,814 Given: 6,097 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks