1
You didn't understand what I say or you lied. I bet first option is true
Cranial / Cephalic index is alwyas measured from glabella (no matter how browridges are devloped).
Head length from ophryon is only used to compare with head lenght from glabella to estimate browridges development.
You simply substract head lenght from ophryon from head lenght from glabella and you have browridges lenght.
But for you it is used to calculate Cranial or Cephalic index
This is bullshit because on every skull those points are in different position. Even on skull without browridges we have shorter distance from ophryon to opistocranion because of usual forehead sloping of most people.
If you think the oppsotite find me definition of cephalic or cranial index with ophryon-opistocranion length instead of glabella lenght
slightly developed browridges - ophryon is few mm above glabella (besides being in shorter distance to occiput).
no bulging at browridges but sloped forehead - ophryon is few mm above glabella. Distance to opistocranion is even shorter than from glabella point beacuse of forehead slope...
This is nonsense. Nobody measure As I said before Cranial /Cephalic Index from ophryon as you try to insist.Aboriginal Australians are indeed tending towards brachycephaly if you eliminate the brow ridges from the length measuremen
Bookmarks