Iranians closer to Bulgarians or to Afghans?

[Myanthropologies]

...........

[wvwvw]

Bulgarians

[Myanthropologies]

Bulgarians

Then the Greeks must be really really close to Afghans.

why bulgarians greek turks? well the answer is most of iran share at least more genetic drift with some populous folks in afghanistan compared to bulgarians. but still there is significant difference. and they geographically, linguistically and culturally way more distant to bulgarians i guess though this three aspects does not always overlap with genetics. and there are some confined languages and other families in afg regardless recent language influence from neighbors. as to admixtures, this can give best idea even though no calculator is perfect.

	ANATO NEO	CHGEEF	EHG	IRAN NEO	ANCES IND	SE ASIA	SIB	NATUF	SHGWHG	POLAR	KARIT	PAP	SSA
Pak. Pashtun	0.600%	13.045%	10.508%	39.693%	30.035%	0.112%	0.452%	1.246%	2.088%	0.922%	0.509%	0.655%	0.128%
Afghan Pashtun	1.185%	18.383%	11.147%	36.888%	19.845%	1.682%	2.132%	3.017%	2.975%	0.623%	0.778%	0.842%	0.495%
Afghan Tajik	1.775%	22.170%	14.439%	29.045%	14.251%	3.862%	4.903%	2.737%	3.274%	1.598%	1.406%	0.446%	0.093%
Afghan Hazara	1.469%	11.673%	6.550%	17.389%	10.054%	22.467%	24.409%	1.857%	1.779%	0.549%	1.111%	0.582%	0.109%
Iranian Mazand.	4.319%	23.554%	4.143%	44.874%	7.477%	1.235%	0.839%	11.491%	0.383%	0.381%	0.593%	0.295%	0.414%
Iranian Lori	8.611%	21.633%	4.649%	39.710%	4.170%	1.089%	1.767%	15.799%	0.468%	0.981%	0.498%	0.253%	0.369%
Bulgarian	18.759%	40.240%	11.312%	8.008%	1.300%	0.119%	0.711%	7.842%	9.708%	0.614%	0.367%	0.768%	0.253%
Greek	20.770%	37.360%	6.949%	12.839%	0.197%	0.366%	0.247%	11.821%	7.539%	0.475%	0.766%	0.426%	0.247%
Turkish Bal.	13.953%	30.162%	4.493%	22.272%	0.662%	5.065%	8.305%	9.412%	3.602%	0.498%	0.650%	0.662%	0.263%
Turkish Ayd.	12.716%	28.216%	3.819%	22.866%	0.687%	4.667%	9.143%	11.929%	3.256%	0.690%	1.110%	0.506%	0.400%

a neo: based on neolithic anatolia genomes
chg eef: common spns between paleolithic-mesolithic south caucasus hunter gatherer genomes and early european farmers
ehg: eastern hunter gatherers
iran neo: neolithic iran territory genome
ances ind: ancestral indian (ancient south indian/asi) based on kusunda of nepal
se asian: south east asian
sib: siberian
natuf: natufian (of epipaleolithic levant)
shg/whg: shared snps between scandinavian hunter gatherers (they are like half ehg half whg but this component based on common snps) and paleolithic western hunter gatherers
karit: karitiana
ssa: sub saharan african
pap: papuan
polar: peaks in chukchi and eskimo

SaveSave

[AphroditeWorshiper]

Afghans, duh

Indo Iranian brothers

[Registan]

Afghans

[Danishmend]

why bulgarians greek turks? well the answer is most of iran share at least more genetic drift with some populous folks in afghanistan compared to bulgarians. but still there is significant difference. and they geographically, linguistically and culturally way more distant to bulgarians i guess though this three aspects does not always overlap with genetics. and there are some confined languages and other families in afg regardless recent language influence from neighbors. as to admixtures, this can give best idea even though no calculator is perfect.

	ANATO NEO	CHGEEF	EHG	IRAN NEO	ANCES IND	SE ASIA	SIB	NATUF	SHGWHG	POLAR	KARIT	PAP	SSA
Pak. Pashtun	0.600%	13.045%	10.508%	39.693%	30.035%	0.112%	0.452%	1.246%	2.088%	0.922%	0.509%	0.655%	0.128%
Afghan Pashtun	1.185%	18.383%	11.147%	36.888%	19.845%	1.682%	2.132%	3.017%	2.975%	0.623%	0.778%	0.842%	0.495%
Afghan Tajik	1.775%	22.170%	14.439%	29.045%	14.251%	3.862%	4.903%	2.737%	3.274%	1.598%	1.406%	0.446%	0.093%
Afghan Hazara	1.469%	11.673%	6.550%	17.389%	10.054%	22.467%	24.409%	1.857%	1.779%	0.549%	1.111%	0.582%	0.109%
Iranian Mazand.	4.319%	23.554%	4.143%	44.874%	7.477%	1.235%	0.839%	11.491%	0.383%	0.381%	0.593%	0.295%	0.414%
Iranian Lori	8.611%	21.633%	4.649%	39.710%	4.170%	1.089%	1.767%	15.799%	0.468%	0.981%	0.498%	0.253%	0.369%
Bulgarian	18.759%	40.240%	11.312%	8.008%	1.300%	0.119%	0.711%	7.842%	9.708%	0.614%	0.367%	0.768%	0.253%
Greek	20.770%	37.360%	6.949%	12.839%	0.197%	0.366%	0.247%	11.821%	7.539%	0.475%	0.766%	0.426%	0.247%
Turkish Bal.	13.953%	30.162%	4.493%	22.272%	0.662%	5.065%	8.305%	9.412%	3.602%	0.498%	0.650%	0.662%	0.263%
Turkish Ayd.	12.716%	28.216%	3.819%	22.866%	0.687%	4.667%	9.143%	11.929%	3.256%	0.690%	1.110%	0.506%	0.400%

a neo: based on neolithic anatolia genomes
chg eef: common spns between paleolithic-mesolithic south caucasus hunter gatherer genomes and early european farmers
ehg: eastern hunter gatherers
iran neo: neolithic iran territory genome
ances ind: ancestral indian (ancient south indian/asi) based on kusunda of nepal
se asian: south east asian
sib: siberian
natuf: natufian (of epipaleolithic levant)
shg/whg: shared snps between scandinavian hunter gatherers (they are like half ehg half whg but this component based on common snps) and paleolithic western hunter gatherers
karit: karitiana
ssa: sub saharan african
pap: papuan
polar: peaks in chukchi and eskimo

SaveSave

MyAnthrotardism's nightmare.

[Pahli]

These useless stupid threads need to stop now, Iranians are obviously closer to Afghans because of shared CHG / Iran_Neo ancestry.

[Myanthropologies]

These useless stupid threads need to stop now, Iranians are obviously closer to Afghans because of shared CHG / Iran_Neo ancestry.

So then how are Turks suddenly closer to Bulgarians than to Afghans on average if Turks cluster so close to Iranians?

[Myanthropologies]

MyAnthrotardism's nightmare.

Ancestral Indian is 50% CHG and 50% ASI, nice try. Your worst nightmare is that I'm closer to real Turkics than you are.