The people loyal to the Syrian government are happy with Donald Trump winning the U.S. election

[crazyladybutterfly]

At the passport counter, a Syrian officer’s face lit up when he saw an American traveler.“Congratulations on your new president!” he exclaimed, giving an energetic thumbs up. Mr. Trump, he said, would be “good for Syria.”

Asked about Aleppo in an October debate with Clinton, Trump said it was a humanitarian disaster .
Clinton, he said, was talking in favor of rebels without knowing who they were.The rebels fighting Assad in western Syria include nationalists fighting under the Free Syrian Army banner, some of them trained in a CIA-backed program, and jihadists such as the group formerly known as the al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front.

The Obama administration, through the CIA led by Saudi asset John Brennan, fed weapons, training and billions of dollars to “moderate rebels”
These then turned around (vid) and either gave the CIA gifts to al-Qaeda in Syria (aka Jabhat al Nusra) or joined it themselves. The scheme was no secret at all and Russia as well as Syria pointed this out several times.


The Russian foreign Minister Lavrov negotiated with the U.S. Secretary of State Kerry who promised to separate the “moderate rebels” from al-Qaeda. But Kerry never delivered.

While Obama met Trump in the oval office, new policies, prepared beforehand, were launched. The policies were held back until after the election and would likely not have been revealed or implemented if Clinton had won.

The U.S. declared that from now on it will fight against al-Qaeda in Syria:
President Obama has ordered the Pentagon to find and kill the leaders of an al-Qaeda-linked group in Syria.
That shift is likely to accelerate once President-elect Donald Trump takes office. … possibly in direct cooperation with Moscow.


U.S. officials who opposed the decision to go after al-Nusra’s wider leadership warned that the United States would effectively be doing the Assad government’s bidding by weakening a group on the front line of the counter-Assad fight. Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and other Pentagon leaders initially resisted the idea of devoting more Pentagon surveillance aircraft and armed drones against al-Nusra.

Ash Carter is a U.S. weapon industry promoter, He saw al-Qaeda in Syria as a welcome proxy force against Russia.

(OFAC) took action today to disrupt al-Nusrah Front’s military, recruitment, and financing operations. Specifically, OFAC designated four key al-Nusrah Front leaders – Abdallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini, Jamal Husayn Zayniyah, Abdul Jashari, and Ashraf Ahmad Fari al-Allak – pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism.
These designations were taken in coordination with the U.S. Department of State, which today named Jabhat Fath al Sham as an alias of al-Nusrah Front – al-Qa’ida’s affiliate in Syria.
dallah Muhammad Bin-Sulayman al-Muhaysini was designated for acting for or on behalf of, and providing support and services to or in support of, al-Nusrah Front.

Nusra will from now on be on the run not only from Russian and Syrian attacks but also from the intelligence and military capabilities of the United States.

Hadi Abdullah, friend of the designated al-Qaeda terrorist Muhaysini, just received the 2016 Press Freedom Price from the CIA/Soros financed “regime change” influence operation Reporters Without Borders.

https://southfront.org/nusra-on-the-...ange-on-syria/

[crazyladybutterfly]

edit

[crazyladybutterfly]

bump

[crazyladybutterfly]

,.,.,.

[Nikomahos]

λαξ

[War Chef]

This is definitely good news for Syria as Trump is gonna take the same stance Russia has.

Trump is no weasel like Hillary and her close circle. Like John Kerry when he's friends with Assad one minute, then Assad has some rough times and Kerry is suddenly wishing death on him! What a scum-bag:



I can't stand most of these scum-bags in Washington with no integrity or honor, I see Trump is different

[Profileid]

This is definitely good news for Syria as Trump is gonna take the same stance Russia has.

Trump is no weasel like Hillary and her close circle. Like John Kerry when he's friends with Assad one minute, then Assad has some rough times and Kerry is suddenly wishing death on him! What a scum-bag:



I can't stand most of these scum-bags in Washington with no integrity or honor, I see Trump is different

The US has a long history of doing this sort of thing.
Donald Rumsfeld was very chummy with Saddam but in the 80s. Then was one of the main architects of the war against him.

[War Chef]

The US has a long history of doing this sort of thing.
Donald Rumsfeld was very chummy with Saddam but in the 80s. Then was one of the main architects of the war against him.

Hmmmm I see.... I can't stand that horse face John Kerry. His dumbass almost won president election in 2004..... that would be a nightmare

[Böri]

The spectre of Raine is haunting TA. Lol We dont care Assad but the Niggah always playin with golf stick boost help to PKK in Syria, YPG before leaving. It's annoying. Support Turks I will pay myself nose job for you.

[Fantomas]

Well i think Assad regime has a big problem from now

Michael T. Flynn:
When it is said that Russia would make an ideal partner for fighting Radical Islam, it behooves us to remember that the Russians haven't been very effective at fighting jihadis on their own territory, and are in cahoots with the Iranians. In Syria, the two allies have loudly proclaimed they are waging war against ISIS, but in reality the great bulk of their efforts are aimed at the opponents of the Assad regime


Mike Pompeo:
One of these places is Syria — an ungoverned territory where terrorist groups control swathes of land, Russian troops roam freely, and the Islamic Republic of Iran has found an ally in the fanatical butcher Bashar al-Assad. Because of these circumstances, the United States does have a side in the fight — the American side. It is in our interest to crush ISIS, terrorist groups like the al-Nusra front and Ahrar ash-Sham, and Iran’s puppet Assad. Any candidate who thinks that we only need to attack ISIS from the sky, without regard to where they flourish and why, shares President Obama’s view that Iran is our partner in peace. Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei and Assad are two sides of the same terror coin. Letting Assad continue to wield lethal power means that Tehran’s terror network — from Hezbollah to the Houthis — will persist in threatening the West.



Jeff Sessions:
Thus, this threat must be successfully resisted. To do so obviously means that we, and our allies, have to agree on an effective strategy—not just the tactics of Iran today, ISIS tomorrow, Egypt the next day, Yemen the next day. Seven years into his presidency, President Obama has failed in this regard. We must accept that fact. The result is instability, violence, and displaced persons. Indeed, one wise European leader told me that the immigration crisis, as a result of refugees from the Middle East, is the greatest European challenge since World War II. What a dramatic statement.
The question of Iran and its sponsorship of terrorism and its acquisition of nuclear weapons is a dramatic and extremely important development. That’s why it has engaged our attention so significantly.


Mike Pence:
Provocations by Russia need to be met with American strength.” If Russia “continues to be involved” in airstrikes along with the Syrian government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, he said, “the United States of America should be prepared to use military force to strike the military forces of the Assad regime” and “prevent this crisis in Aleppo.


Mitt Romney:
“Syria,is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world,” stressing the role the regime of Bashar al-Assad plays as Iran’s base for extending its influence in the eastern Mediterranean. Toppling Mr. Assad, Mr. Romney correctly explained, would deal a blow to Hezbollah and roll back Iranian influence throughout the region.


Rudy Giuliani:
This is what happens when you leave a vacuum — and you have an America that doesn’t want to be aggressive, an America that doesn’t want to act. Somebody else fills the vacuum

It seemed to me then we had a chance — the rebel groups that were more legitimate rebel groups, groups that were really just reacting to the oppression and corruption of the Assad regime, we had a good chance of forming them, we had a good chance of controlling them.

Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran that will eventually let them become a nuclear power and is putting billions of dollars back into a country that’s the world’s biggest state supporter of terrorism, “We are actually giving them the money to fund the terrorists that are killing us and our allies. We are giving them the money! Are we crazy?”
“You pour them back into Syria, and you put them in a no-fly zone in Syria … Send them back to Syria, that’s where they belong.”

It was Obama’s inattentive foreign policy that has allowed Russia to expand its military presence significantly, elevating Syria to the same frontline status we increasingly see once again in Europe.


Add to this European leaders

Manuel Valls:
Defeating ISIS can be accomplished by working with Turkey, the Kurds and numerous Sunni Arab states, starting with the Saudis and other Gulf Arabs. We must not accept Assad’s regime, much less be complicit with it.
"The urgency, on the contrary, is to reach an agreement that definitively turns the pages of Assad's crimes ... with a man responsible for so many dead and crimes against humanity, no compromise or deal is possible."

Boris Johnson:
Boris Johnson has given his first hint that the West may be willing to step up military activity against the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, saying a meeting of foreign ministers on Sunday will look at new options.
He stressed he did not want to give false hope to the Syrian opposition, and said it might be a long day’s march, but “more kinetic options, the military options” were being considered.


Federica Mogherini:
"Acceptance of the dictator's role, who wages a civil war against his own people, is not considered," Mogherini told the France Inter radio station, when asked about the prospects for Assad's political future.


https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...-war-on-terror
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...ional-security
http://www.sessions.senate.gov/publi...3-A2E2F9B36843
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...rump-on-syria/
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/r...egy-for-syria/
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...a-syria-092792
http://nypost.com/2016/02/01/get-rea...-syria-fiasco/
http://fortune.com/2016/11/15/rudy-g...al-statements/
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mi...0RF1UK20150915
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ing-considered
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201...-syria-future/