3
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,927 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,875 Given: 2,197 |
Maybe these "L" Huns were some Parthians. Possible or impossible? Because I browsed this forum last year (before crash) and there was a member who claimed L is related to Dahae/Parthian.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 4 |
I cannot seem to find data on the Argyn L haplogroups, can someone share it if they have the data?
Kazakh L is almost exclusive to Tatars.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,888 Given: 2,144 |
Prior to the rise of the international Anglo-American hegemony, Europe was nothing but a seminal spittoon for Mongoloid males. Guys, please just accept this reality for what it was and stop pretending it was Arabs or Slavs. It was this guy:
You weak, weak fucking beta males. How could you not have the vitality to defend your homelands?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,165 Given: 10,233 |
Huge kek, Hunnic cheiftain aka. Gedrosian nigga
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,875 Given: 2,197 |
I think it just confirms that Huns were a union of different Eurasian tribes and Huns were not a specific people. As I said, the only strange thing about this chieftain is his background. Which ancient tribe/region and the closest modern ethnic groups to him.
Just google Red Huns, White Huns, Black Huns, and other X Huns... Seems "Hun" was a cool name in that era.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,165 Given: 10,233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,875 Given: 2,197 |
Yeah, Cimmerians, Huns and Scythians were not specific people. For example, there are many different tribes labeled as Scythian and Sarmatian. Antes labeled as "Sarmatian", but it seems they were early Slavs. So I prefer to avoid using terms like Indo-European, Iranic, Uralic, Finno-Ugric, Turkic, Slavic and etc for them.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
So, I am a Hun or what? which subclade is this Hunnic guy? L317, L357, or M27 ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks