1
Even though I completely disagree, as far as I know, I don't approve of any law the violates the right to speak your mind. Regardless of subject. I'm supposedly a free man in my own homeland, who could possibly have the right to decide over me? However, it always get complicated. What if someone sends you a anonymous message, saying "I will kill and torture you, just wait", and you later find out who it is. Should the police be able to arrest him for threats? We're getting close to anarchy if the answer is no. So we could limit it to only having threats of violence banned. But then leftist could distort the meaning of it and say that nationalist are threatening refugees with violence if they are sent back to their home countries. The solution could be to ban direct threats of assaults, not as a cause by something else, but directly threatening someone with violence. Threatening people with violence who brakes the law obviously doesn't count (at riots etc).
Bookmarks