Varg Vikernes finally says something not atrociously retarded

[XenophobicPrussian]

Of all the stupid shit that comes out of Varg's mouth, namely his anti-urbanism, anti-OoA "we're 100% Neanderthal" non-sense and his Balto-Slavic equality cucking, he finally says something not completely false.



Starting at around 5:40.

He's 100% correct. This of course doesn't discredit racism as an ideology(especially since the low IQ poor are the most likely to actually live around diversity), but it's 100% true.



People love to whine and moan about Jews. The greatest threat to the white man is incompetent resistance, whether that be Hitler loving Nazi LARPers or just any idiot who cannot come up with a coherent argument, not the Jews or leftists. I'm absolutely convinced a large segment of the white liberal/leftist population is actually more elitist than egalitarian and are more anti-racist because they think right-wingers are retarded, not that they legitimately care about all of humanity or whatever. Not all leftists, but a significant portion of them, and a majority of moderates/apolitical people.

The same goes for the far-left and goyim commies, too, though. All people on the fringes are the dumbest, the apolitical and people on the center, whether it be center-left or center-right are the smartest but are ultimately cowards and will achieve nothing other than the status quo.

Really, this battle should've been already won by the 90s, when we already had enough information on immigrants and race, and because of this incompetent nationalism I can't see whites being massively woken up until we're like 30% of the population and all the faggot lily white suburbs are diversified.

Time to pack your bags and move to Latvia or some other shithole, goys.

[Lightshade25]

Varg has aged really bad.

[Sockorer]

Preface: I didn't watch the Varg video, since I can't stand that retard. edit: or the EDL one, since I don't like to cringe at Nationalists.

But anyway the style of Nationalists you're talking about, I call the blood in the face types. After a documentary about them, that clearly shows them to be incompetent buffoons only interested in LARPing as Nazis, totally unconcerned with being presentable or otherwise appealing to normal people who can actually make a positive contribution to the cause.

All though, to be fair, I doubt we would have won this battle by the 90s if they were more competent, our enemies have a total monopoly on the news and entertainment media, as well as the education system. It's only been since the death of traditional media that we've exploded in numbers.

[Wanderer]

I agree with you that using that Jews as a scapegoat is bad. While the Jews have exerted a disproportionately negative impact in many ways, Western liberals are much to blame as well.

But Varg has some strange ideas about what ethno-nationalism is. What he says does not seem pertinent to my personal ideology, such as conflating ethno-nationalism and "racism." Ethno-nationalism does not concern itself with whiteness but NATION. Naturally, some more meritorious individuals will rise to the top. Ideally, those people should emerge as leaders, in some capacity, of a folk.

He's right about complete idiots in white nationalism, but that has nothing to do with ETHNO-nationalism.

I haven't read Evola, though. Maybe I will, but just from my preconceptions, I'm not sure if I'll gain anything from him.

[Styrian Mujo]

I agree with you that using that Jews as a scapegoat is bad. While the Jews have exerted a disproportionately negative impact in many ways, Western liberals are much to blame as well.

But Varg has some strange ideas about what ethno-nationalism is. What he says does not seem pertinent to my personal ideology, such as conflating ethno-nationalism and "racism." Ethno-nationalism does not concern itself with whiteness but NATION. Naturally, some more meritorious individuals will rise to the top. Ideally, those people should emerge as leaders, in some capacity, of a folk.

He's right about complete idiots in white nationalism, but that has nothing to do with ETHNO-nationalism.

I haven't read Evola, though. Maybe I will, but just from my preconceptions, I'm not sure if I'll gain anything from him.

Technically ethnos is just a Greek equivalent of English word race so...

[Sockorer]

I agree with you that using that Jews as a scapegoat is bad. While the Jews have exerted a disproportionately negative impact in many ways, Western liberals are much to blame as well.

But Varg has some strange ideas about what ethno-nationalism is. What he says does not seem pertinent to my personal ideology, such as conflating ethno-nationalism and "racism." Ethno-nationalism does not concern itself with whiteness but NATION. Naturally, some more meritorious individuals will rise to the top. Ideally, those people should emerge as leaders, in some capacity, of a folk.

He's right about complete idiots in white nationalism, but that has nothing to do with ETHNO-nationalism.

I haven't read Evola, though. Maybe I will, but just from my preconceptions, I'm not sure if I'll gain anything from him.

White nationalism is just American and other colonial countries' Ethno-Nationalism, the ethnic group just being "White"

[Wanderer]

Technically ethnos is just a Greek equivalent of English word race so...

In some contexts, "race" is used to signify ethnicity, folk, or tribe (e.g., "the German race"). But that definition does not correspond to what most people use the word "race" to mean - i.e., biological race. Such a concept is a more recent one.

[Sockorer]

The same goes for the far-left and goyim commies, too, though. All people on the fringes are the dumbest, the apolitical and people on the center, whether it be center-left or center-right are the smartest but are ultimately cowards and will achieve nothing other than the status quo.

I disagree with your observation that apolitical or moderate people are the smartest.

I wouldn't expect a big difference either way between the average IQ of moderates and radicals. But would expect a big difference in the distributions of IQ in moderates and radicals. Radicals being either really smart or really dumb, and the moderates being, relative to the radicals, uniformly average. The reason I think this, is because people who are predisposed to be "radicals" are definitely not neurotypical and so are probably deviant from the norm in other respects, like in IQ for example.

[Sockorer]

In some contexts, "race" is used to signify ethnicity, folk, or tribe (e.g., "the German race"). But that definition does not correspond to what most people use the word "race" to mean - i.e., biological race. Such a concept is a more recent one.

Which is why "White" nationalism is preferable to "insert ethnicity here" nationalism, the term White Nationalism makes it clear we're concerned about race where as American Nationalist or even British Nationalist wouldn't.

[Wanderer]

Which is why "White" nationalism is preferable to "insert ethnicity here" nationalism, the term White Nationalism makes it clear we're concerned about race where as American Nationalist or even British Nationalist wouldn't.

But white nationalism is a lot weaker than ethno-nationalism. "Whites" are not a nation.