0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,840 Given: 1,720 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
Russia for new NATO member! 80% of NATO money comes from american taxpayers! Is beautiful do wonderful things with money of others! American money will help in russian crisis!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,686 Given: 9,316 |
gypsy Shkembe mode on: russian and turkish totalitarian dictators is bombing peaceful ISIS.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 899 Given: 622 |
no just you know painfully little of military operations. Isis has teritories that have a lot of civilian populations. Did you see what russia did in aleppo? What would you say if US did that? Russia is not out to defeat ISIS, but rather anyone who dislikes assad.
and why is that my friend? Does eu have anti missile defense system installed all around US? there is a reason why US pays so much money.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,435 Given: 793 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 998 Given: 821 |
First i heard it from Turkish officials. Then, i asked "Official Twitter account of the International Coalition for Operation" https://twitter.com/CJTFOIR which is an official account of The US Defence Department (or central command) about why they did not target ISIS positions in Al Bab.
The answer they gave to me confirmed claim of Turkish officials, saying the western planes did not target ISIS was true.
I can post the conversation between but i dont want to reveal my Twitter account.
Got it?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,716 Given: 5,586 |
Once again the katsap unibrow is involving me in something for no reason.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 89 Given: 156 |
When Putin and Erdogan were at odds, all Russian media and, therefore, Putin apologists word wide were distributing articles "Erdogan sponsors ISIS", "Erdogan's family members get profit from ISIS", "Erdogan founded ISIS" and such like. Now when two buddies got closer, putinists are happy to tell us how their aircrafts bomb ISIS terrorists together. The direction of propaganda in third world countries changes like in Orwell's dystopia "1984":
But to trace out the history of the whole period, to say who was fighting whom at any given moment, would have been utterly impossible, since no written record, and no spoken word, ever made mention of any other alignment than the existing one. At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,991 Given: 21,752 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,154 Given: 1,061 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks