1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,927 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 111 Given: 132 |
Bird bones have been found in a number of
Mesolithic and Neolithic burials in northern Europe,
but they are seldom studied in a wider perspective
(Gurina 1956; Jaanits 1957; Guminski
2005; Mannermaa 2006; 2008). A famous and
often cited archaeological find is the grave from
the Late Mesolithic Vedbćk Břgebakken site in
Denmark (Fig. 1) that contained the remains of
a young woman and a newborn baby who was
buried on a whooper swan wing (Albrethsen &
Brinch Petersen 1976).another R1b-p297 shaman in Bolshemys cultureCertain birds are perceived as helping or
guardian spirits in Saami religion (Karsten 1955;
Hultkrantz 1987; Schanche 2000). Animal bones
in Saami graves and offering places may represent
the dead animal’s spirit (Schanche 2000:
299). Bones hold a metaphorical relation to
power and the spirit of the animal. By putting
the bones of a spirit animal in a grave, its power
accompanied the dead person (Schanche 2000:
296). Wing bones have perhaps symbolized
complete wings or a living bird. This might indicate
that animal body parts used in burial rituals
referred to those elements that were important in
the animal’s relation with humans (see Schanche
2000: 295; Fowler 2004: 136–7).
It is also possible that parts of important animals
were fastened to the death costumes as decorations
and symbols. The use of parts of totem
animals or implements depicting them in dress
decoration is a common practice among recent
hunter-gatherer societies in Siberia. For example,
a Yakut shaman (Altai) wore a costume which
resembles a golden eagle, a leader (Lönnquist
1986: 84; Siikala 2002: 44). The Nganasan shaman’s
costume had motifs of the most powerful
birds (Taksami 1998: 21).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,500 Given: 5,742 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,500 Given: 5,742 |
8000 years ago in the mesolithic, yes a bit more.
Still not as much as you think since all these R1 predate your "muh IE" by thousands of years.
Btw these HG samples aren't likely blue eyes, they have lower prediction values of blue eyes than the other mesolithic of the same period. Eye colour prediction at 0.7 or 0.5 is in best case scenario green eyes but most likely hazel for the 0.5, people who take this test nowadays with more than 0.9 are truely blue eyes usually. Besides, all dark hair but this is the usual thing. On the other hand they indeed might have developped fair skin earlier, around the same time than the farmers, also the usual pattern of the meso more related to EHG. Nothing really new here, except the Ukrainian that has nothing, and well.. more mesolithic R1b.
The only sample that is convincingly light eyes/light hair is the middle neolithic Latvia MN1, about a thousand years later, which is still way before any steppe influences.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
Why 8001 doesn;t count?
It is of course not true, but you are free to belive what you want to.Still not as much as you think since all these R1 predate your "muh IE" by thousands of years.
They could be even negros - it doesn;t matter in this part.Btw these HG samples aren't likely blue eyes, they have lower prediction values of blue eyes than the other mesolithic of the same period. Eye colour prediction at 0.7 or 0.5 is in best case scenario green eyes but most likely hazel for the 0.5, people who take this test nowadays with more than 0.9 are truely blue eyes usually. Besides, all dark hair but this is the usual thing. On the other hand they indeed might have developped fair skin earlier, around the same time than the farmers, also the usual pattern of the meso more related to EHG. Nothing really new here, except the Ukrainian that has nothing, and well.. more mesolithic R1b.
There was no thousands fictional years, but even if would be, it doesThe only sample that is convincingly light eyes/light hair is the middle neolithic Latvia MN1, about a thousand years later, which is still way before any steppe influences.
not matter. Steppeites didn;t grew from earth accidently 3000 BC.
They had to live somewhere 3001 years ago.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,455 Given: 813 |
The envied and maligned Basques(true royal celts=tudors/stuarts)are the origin of R1b.Any educated person should know this in 2017.Quit glory hunting and granting the glory to people who arent the origin of the true royal haplogroup.
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...hidden-history
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,165 Given: 10,233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,490 Given: 10,741 |
Any educated person in 2017 knows, that Basques are I2, (at least NOT R1) and
R1b people are foreigners. But any thinking person knew this allready in 2007.
I can assure you, that there was much more serves and slaves with that hg, than KingsQuit glory hunting and granting the glory to people who arent the origin of the true royal haplogroup.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Reactions of non-R1 IE's when "IE R1 identity" is under threat:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks